Skip to content

Comparison in Marginal Adaptation Between Conventional and Gull Wing Preparation in Laminates Veneers

Marginal Adaptation of E.Max Laminate Veneers Prepared With Modified Gull Wing Preparation and Conventional Preparation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03214549
Enrollment
38
Registered
2017-07-11
Start date
2018-07-13
Completion date
2018-10-01
Last updated
2017-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Teeth Sensitivity

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate tooth sensitivity and marginal adaptation of porcelain laminates veneers prepared with modified gull wing preparation and conventional preparation.

Detailed description

Visit 1: Preoperative records, face-to-face adherence reminder session, clinical, radio-graphic examination and primary impression for diagnostic cast construction. Visit 2: Teeth preparation, secondary impression,temporary restoration and teeth sensitivity evaluation using United States Public Health Service criteria. Visit 3: Placement and permanent cementation of the final restoration Visit 4: marginal adaptation measurement by electron microscope using impression replica.

Interventions

PROCEDUREgull wing preparation of laminates veneers

preparation involving mesial and distal extension further lingualy.

PROCEDUREconventional preparation of laminates veneers

preparation not involving mesial and distal extension further lingualy.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* From 18-40 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. * Be physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative Procedures. * Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations. * Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer (e.g:discoloration, fracture not involve more than 50% enamel loss, mild malposition. * Be willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth. * Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss. * Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation. * Pregnant women. * Patient with post and core endodontically treated teeth. * Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. * Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
measuring marginal adaptation of laminates veneers using stero-microscopeimmediately before laminates delivery up to 4 week sfter tooth preparationmarginal adaptation of laminates veneers will be assess as follows, before laminates cementation, an impression material will be placed in the fitting surface of the veneers and placed over the reduced tooth using finger pressure, after material set the impression replica is separated from the laminates and the replica is section and measures under stero-microscope for marginal adaptation, measurement will be performed in eight different points on the buccal and mesio-distal sections, measurement will be in micrometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
measuring tooth sensitivity after tooth preparation for laminates veneersone week after tooth preparationmeasurment will be acording tomodified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria used for the clinical evaluations of the restorations. post-operative sensitivity 0 No symptoms 1. Slight sensitivity 2. Moderate sensitivity 3. Severe pain

Contacts

Primary Contacthousham N Musa, master
dr_hishamnabeel@hotmail.com00201068778033
Backup Contactrayan R dahab, master
rayanrabiedahab@gmail.com00201068775688

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026