Skip to content

Neuroplasticity in Parkinson´s Disease After Training

Effects of the HiBalance-program: Linking Clinical Signs and Symptoms to Changes in the Brain in People With Parkinson´s Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03213873
Acronym
BETA-PD
Enrollment
95
Registered
2017-07-11
Start date
2017-08-15
Completion date
2019-12-23
Last updated
2025-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Neural Degeneration, Parkinson Disease, Physical Activity

Keywords

Balance control, Exercise, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Brief summary

This project aims to determine the effects of the HiBalance program on neuroplastic changes in people with mild to moderate Parkinson´s disease. The main hypothesis is that highly challenging exercise will lead to greater gait and balance ability, increased levels of physical activity and an improved health related quality of life. The investigators further hypothesize that neuroplasticity changes will be seen in corresponding areas of the brain, neuropsychological changes on cognitive test measures, and that exercise will inhibit the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the brain through the mediation of neurotrophic factors.

Detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease affecting many physiological systems essential for balance control. New findings suggest that intensive, challenging and cognitively demanding exercises could induce neuroplasticity in PD. A new balance training (the HiBalance program) have therefore been developed; emphasizing critical aspects of balance control through highly challenging and progressive exercises incorporating dual/multi-tasking (Conradsson et al, 2012). In an RCT, the HiBalance-program was shown to improve balance, gait and physical activity level in favor for the training group (Conradsson et al, 2015). In this proposal the investigators will combine physiotherapy, neurology and neuroimaging to characterise and determine the effects on physical and cognitive symptoms as well as structural and functional changes and wet biomarkers in the brain after the training. Participants will be recruited through Karolinska University Hospital and via announcements in relevant forums like for instance the Swedish Parkinson Association. According to earlier power calculations for detecting effects in balance and gait measures after this particular intervention, the investigators anticipate 40 to 50 participants in each group to detect significant changes. The investigators will perform both per protocol analysis and intention to treat analysis using mixed model or repeated measurement ANOVAs if the data is normally distributed.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHiBalance

Intervention of highly challenging balance training for 10 weeks.

BEHAVIORALSpeech and communication therapy

Intervention conducted by speech and language therapist for 10 weeks.

Sponsors

Karolinska University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Investigator and outcome assessors are masked to group allocation at baseline assessment. Care providers are masked to results of the assessments. Participants are masked to the studied intervention/treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson´s disease * Hoehn & Yahr 2-3 * ≥ 60 years of age * Be able to ambulate indoors without mobility aid * Balance impairment

Exclusion criteria

* =\< 21 points on MoCA * Other medical conditions that could substantially influence balance performance, voice or speech performance or participation in the interventions * Participating in an intensive exercise program for balance or speech during the last six months. Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mini-BESTestPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksMini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test a rating scale for dynamic balance incorporating 14 different balance and gait items that were assessed by a physical therapist on a scale from 0-2. Maximum points 28. 0-28 points with higher scores indicating better balance control

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait ParametersPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksGait speed in m/sec
Neuropsychological TestsPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksComposite measure of executive functions of four tests: 1. letter fluency 2. the verbal fluency test: category switching 3. the colour-word interference test: switch condition (Test 1, 2 and 3 from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) 4. the digit span total score (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) First, the scores of each of the four tests were standardised into z-scores using pre-scores. Models using different test were compared. The model including all four tests and using the robust diagonally weighted least square estimation was chosen based on fit values. Factor loadings of the model: verbal fluency = 1.000, the verbal fluency test: category switching= 0.887, the colour-word interference test: switch condition= -0.855, the digit span total score= 0.813. Last, the z-scores of each test and person were multiplied with the factor loadings and added together to create a sum score for each person and time point. A higher value = greater executive functions
Quality of Life QuestionnairesPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksThe Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) assesses how often people with Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living (mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communications and bodily discomfort). The sum score is as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. Higher is better
Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksDisease severity/symtoms in Parkinson's disease, Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS) Total score. Higher score is worse, ranging from 0-272
Task-induced Brain Activity as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagingPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksIntervention dependent changes in task-induced brain activity, voxel-wise analyses of whole brain. (Name of the task performed during fMRI; the serial reaction time task.) Analyses defined as: were there any significant clusters of voxels explained by the interaction of group and time. In other words, were there significant changes in voxel activity that depended on the interventions when using a cluster-based threshold. The measure type number was chosen because we estimated the number of significant clusters of voxels. Group statistics were perfromed Note that for task fMRI interaction analyses, there are no meaningful values to report for the groups respectively.
Wet BiomarkersPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksMature Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (mBDNF) in serum
Physical Activity Measured With AccelerometersPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksNumber of Steps per day.
Structural Magnetic Resonance ImagingPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksIntervention dependent changes in brain structure i.e. gray matter volume measured as voxels Analyses defined as: were there any significant clusters of voxels explained by the interaction of group and time. In other words, were there significant changes in voxel activity that depended on the interventions when using a cluster-based threshold using group statistics.. Note that it is not possible to report this outcome per group. Additionally, MR statistics are not reported as measures of central tendency such as the mean or any alternatives provided.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
DysarthriaPre intervention baselineThe Dysarthria Assessment also includes the Questionnaire on Acquired Speech Disorders (QASD, Swedish: Självsvarsformulär om Förvärvade Talstörningar) which is a self-report instrument that captures the subjective symptoms and experiences of individuals living with acquired speech disorders. Three subscales are included: My Speech and Language, Speech and Language in Social Interaction, and Personal and Environmental Factors. Each item is rated on a four-point scale from 0 (definitely false) to 3 (definitely true), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The overall QASD score was determined by calculating the average score of all sub-scales.
Voice StrengthPre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeksThe recordings were performed according to standardised routines for high-quality recordings in a sound-proof recording studio with the equipment Sony Digital Audio Tape Deck DTC-ZE700 and the software Sopran (version 1.0.22 © Tolvan Data). Measures were performed by a speech and language pathologist. The outcome measure from the studio recordings used in the present study was mean voice sound level (dB SPL) in reading a Swedish standardised text.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HiBalance
The HiBalance program is based on scientifically well-established principles of exercise training and postural control as well as current research on training in PD. The training will be conducted as a progressive individually adjusted group program in order to challenge the specific balance disorder of every participant and endorse progression. The intervention will be performed for an hour, 2 times/week in groups of six to eight participants for a total of 10 weeks and one home training session on their own. HiBalance: Intervention of highly challenging balance training for 10 weeks.
48
Speech Therapy
The control group will receive a group treatment (2 times/w for 10 w + 1 home training session) consisting of speech and communication therapy performed by a speech therapist. This intervention will be performed in a sitting position. The speech and communication treatment will aim at increasing vocal loudness and improving articulatory precision. Level of difficulty is gradually increased by progressing from using loud voice and clear speech in short and automatized utterances, to using the same technique in more complex sentences and situations. The group format is used to practice techniques in communicative situations and also to introduce increasing level of multitasking by combining speech training with cognitively more challenging tasks in the group training. Speech and communication therapy: Intervention conducted by speech and language therapist for 10 weeks.
47
Total95

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDiagnosed w atypical PD after randomization01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject89

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSpeech TherapyTotalHiBalance
Age, Continuous71.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
71.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
Disease stage Hoehn & Yahr
Hoehn Yahr Stage 2
34 Participants73 Participants39 Participants
Disease stage Hoehn & Yahr
Hoehn Yahr Stage 3
13 Participants22 Participants9 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
47 participants95 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants35 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants60 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 480 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 480 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Mini-BESTest

Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test a rating scale for dynamic balance incorporating 14 different balance and gait items that were assessed by a physical therapist on a scale from 0-2. Maximum points 28. 0-28 points with higher scores indicating better balance control

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Population: All participants randomised included using intention-to-treat-analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HiBalanceMini-BESTestPre, observed values20.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
HiBalanceMini-BESTestPost, observed values22.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Speech TherapyMini-BESTestPre, observed values21.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Speech TherapyMini-BESTestPost, observed values21.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
p-value: 0.5795% CI: [-1, 1.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Gait Parameters

Gait speed in m/sec

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Population: All participants randomised were included using intention-to-treat analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HiBalanceGait ParametersPost, observed values1.3 m/secStandard Deviation 0.2
HiBalanceGait ParametersPre, observed values1.2 m/secStandard Deviation 0.2
Speech TherapyGait ParametersPre, observed values1.2 m/secStandard Deviation 0.2
Speech TherapyGait ParametersPost, observed values1.2 m/secStandard Deviation 0.2
p-value: 0.2595% CI: [-0.03, 0.12]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)

Disease severity/symtoms in Parkinson's disease, Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS) Total score. Higher score is worse, ranging from 0-272

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HiBalanceMovement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)Pre, observed values51.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
HiBalanceMovement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)Post, observed values48.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Speech TherapyMovement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)Pre, observed values50.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Speech TherapyMovement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)Post, observed values45.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Secondary

Neuropsychological Tests

Composite measure of executive functions of four tests: 1. letter fluency 2. the verbal fluency test: category switching 3. the colour-word interference test: switch condition (Test 1, 2 and 3 from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) 4. the digit span total score (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) First, the scores of each of the four tests were standardised into z-scores using pre-scores. Models using different test were compared. The model including all four tests and using the robust diagonally weighted least square estimation was chosen based on fit values. Factor loadings of the model: verbal fluency = 1.000, the verbal fluency test: category switching= 0.887, the colour-word interference test: switch condition= -0.855, the digit span total score= 0.813. Last, the z-scores of each test and person were multiplied with the factor loadings and added together to create a sum score for each person and time point. A higher value = greater executive functions

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HiBalanceNeuropsychological TestsPre, observed values0.6 z-scoresStandard Deviation 2.6
HiBalanceNeuropsychological TestsPost, observed values1.5 z-scoresStandard Deviation 2.6
Speech TherapyNeuropsychological TestsPre, observed values-0.7 z-scoresStandard Deviation 2.4
Speech TherapyNeuropsychological TestsPost, observed values0.1 z-scoresStandard Deviation 3
p-value: 0.7595% CI: [-0.8, 1.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Physical Activity Measured With Accelerometers

Number of Steps per day.

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HiBalancePhysical Activity Measured With AccelerometersPre, observed values4936.6 steps per day
HiBalancePhysical Activity Measured With AccelerometersPost, observed values4800.8 steps per day
Speech TherapyPhysical Activity Measured With AccelerometersPre, observed values5462.4 steps per day
Speech TherapyPhysical Activity Measured With AccelerometersPost, observed values5609.5 steps per day
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaires

The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) assesses how often people with Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living (mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communications and bodily discomfort). The sum score is as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. Higher is better

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HiBalanceQuality of Life QuestionnairesPre, observed values19.7 score on a scale
HiBalanceQuality of Life QuestionnairesPost, observed values17.5 score on a scale
Speech TherapyQuality of Life QuestionnairesPre, observed values17.8 score on a scale
Speech TherapyQuality of Life QuestionnairesPost, observed values11.9 score on a scale
Secondary

Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention dependent changes in brain structure i.e. gray matter volume measured as voxels Analyses defined as: were there any significant clusters of voxels explained by the interaction of group and time. In other words, were there significant changes in voxel activity that depended on the interventions when using a cluster-based threshold using group statistics.. Note that it is not possible to report this outcome per group. Additionally, MR statistics are not reported as measures of central tendency such as the mean or any alternatives provided.

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HiBalanceStructural Magnetic Resonance Imaging0 Significant clusters of voxels
Speech TherapyStructural Magnetic Resonance Imaging0 Significant clusters of voxels
Secondary

Task-induced Brain Activity as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention dependent changes in task-induced brain activity, voxel-wise analyses of whole brain. (Name of the task performed during fMRI; the serial reaction time task.) Analyses defined as: were there any significant clusters of voxels explained by the interaction of group and time. In other words, were there significant changes in voxel activity that depended on the interventions when using a cluster-based threshold. The measure type number was chosen because we estimated the number of significant clusters of voxels. Group statistics were perfromed Note that for task fMRI interaction analyses, there are no meaningful values to report for the groups respectively.

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Population: All participants without missing or too low-quality fMRI data were included

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HiBalanceTask-induced Brain Activity as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging0 significant clusters of voxels
Speech TherapyTask-induced Brain Activity as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging0 significant clusters of voxels
Secondary

Wet Biomarkers

Mature Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (mBDNF) in serum

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HiBalanceWet BiomarkersPre, observed values38010.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 7956.7
HiBalanceWet BiomarkersPost, observed values37169.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 8044.6
Speech TherapyWet BiomarkersPre, observed values37805.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5928.3
Speech TherapyWet BiomarkersPost, observed values35945.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6208.5
Other Pre-specified

Dysarthria

The Dysarthria Assessment also includes the Questionnaire on Acquired Speech Disorders (QASD, Swedish: Självsvarsformulär om Förvärvade Talstörningar) which is a self-report instrument that captures the subjective symptoms and experiences of individuals living with acquired speech disorders. Three subscales are included: My Speech and Language, Speech and Language in Social Interaction, and Personal and Environmental Factors. Each item is rated on a four-point scale from 0 (definitely false) to 3 (definitely true), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The overall QASD score was determined by calculating the average score of all sub-scales.

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline

Population: This variable were never analysed pre and post since it is not sensitive in patients with mild dysarthria. The variable was just used for describing the group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HiBalanceDysarthria0.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Speech TherapyDysarthria0.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Other Pre-specified

Voice Strength

The recordings were performed according to standardised routines for high-quality recordings in a sound-proof recording studio with the equipment Sony Digital Audio Tape Deck DTC-ZE700 and the software Sopran (version 1.0.22 © Tolvan Data). Measures were performed by a speech and language pathologist. The outcome measure from the studio recordings used in the present study was mean voice sound level (dB SPL) in reading a Swedish standardised text.

Time frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HiBalanceVoice StrengthPre, observed values70.3 dBStandard Deviation 3.5
HiBalanceVoice StrengthPost, observed values70.6 dBStandard Deviation 3.9
Speech TherapyVoice StrengthPre, observed values70.8 dBStandard Deviation 4
Speech TherapyVoice StrengthPost, observed values73.0 dBStandard Deviation 4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 26, 2026