Skip to content

Comparison of CPAP Modalities for OSA Treatment

A Crossover Study Comparing Fixed Continuous Airway Positive Pressure, FLEX- PLUS and Sensawake Modalities for OSA Treatment

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03212209
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-07-11
Start date
2017-04-28
Completion date
2018-07-16
Last updated
2017-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

Sleep Apnea, CPAP

Brief summary

This is a crossover study comparing the effect of CPAP Fixed Pressure, CPAP FLEX -PLUS and Sensawake on sleep quality, adherence to treatments, and PSG parameters in patients with moderate to severe OSA.

Detailed description

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with behavioral, cognitive, metabolic and cardiovascular conditions. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment for OSA. Despite being the most effective treatment for OSA, 46 to 83% of patients do not adhere to CPAP. New technologies for CPAP treatment have been developed in order to improve patient's comfort, adherence and effectiveness in reducing apnea, hypopneas and flow limitation events. As an example, the FLEX- PLUS technology which increases inspiratory positive pressure and decreases expiratory positive pressure would soften the rhythm of breathing. Sensawake is another technology which evaluates breathing pattern changes during CPAP therapy. When the breathing pattern suggests that patient is awake, a prompt relief in pressure is activated, like ramp feature. However, it is not clear whether CPAP FLEX- PLUS or Sensawake are superior compared with fixed pressure CPAP, in terms of polysomnographic parameters, especially flow limitation or adherence to treatment. Objective: To compare the effect of fixed pressure CPAP, CPAP FLEX- PLUS and Sensawake on sleep and compliance parameters in patients with moderate to severe OSA. Methods: Fifty male patients with moderate to severe OSA will be included in a crossover design study. All patients will use each CPAP modality for 30 days in a randomized order, namely CPAP with Fixed Pressure, Flex- PLUS and Sensawake. A week of washout period will be applied between treatments. All patients will wear the same nasal mask brand. At the end of each treatment (every 4 weeks), patients will undergo polysomnography and fill out Epworth, FOSQ, Pittsburgh questionnaires and a visual analogue scale assessing CPAP side effects and patient´s comfort. Finally, adherence to CPAP modalities will be systematically checked.

Interventions

DEVICECPAP Fixed Pressure

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment for moderate and severe OSA, and it has been known to apply positive pressure in the upper airways, acting as a pneumatic splint preventing the upper airway collapse during sleep. CPAP C- Flex Plus by Philips - Respironics works just as CPAP Fixed Pressure, but increases the pressure delivered in the begining of inhalation to softens the breathing rhythm of the CPAP user. CPAP with SensAwake by Fisher and Paykel works just as CPAP fixed pressure but when the breathing pattern suggests that patient is awake, a prompt relief in pressure to the lowest most comfortable level is activated, like ramp feature.

Sponsors

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Philips Respironics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Participants have never had contact with CPAP, therefore were not aware of PAP modality prescribed. Investigator were also naive, as well as sleep specialist responsible for Polysomnography reports. Only respiratory therapist who was assigned to CPAP clinic was aware of patient´s treatment condition.

Intervention model description

This is a crossover study comparing different CPAP modalities in a group of patients with moderate to severe OSA.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male gender * apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) score of ≥20 events/hour of sleep * 30-65 years-old * body mass index (BMI) ≤40 Kg/m²

Exclusion criteria

* major neurological, psychiatric, cardiac or respiratory disease * use of psychoactive medication * other sleep disorders * patients referred to PSG for Bilevel, considered the need for PAP ≥ 18 cm H2O * Previous contact with any OSA treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flow limitation4 weeks after each CPAP modality completionFlow limitation in percentage of total sleep time. The flow limitation will be assessed by the flow curve obtained in the polysomnographic recording.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wake time after sleep onset4 weeks after each CPAP modality completionWake time after sleep onset assessed by polysomnographic recording
Adherence to CPAP treatment4 weeks after each CPAP modality completionAdherence to CPAP treatment will be evaluated by CPAP SD card download data
Arousal index4 weeks after each CPAP modality completionNumber of arousals per hour of sleep assessed by polysomnographic recording

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026