Genetic Diseases, Genetic Syndrome, Mendelian Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Neonate, Genomic Medicine, Rapid Precision Medicine, Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing, Diagnosis, Infant, Intensive care unit, clinical trial, Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing, Single locus disease, Ultra-rapid whole genome sequencing, Clinical Utility
Brief summary
This study will seek to determine if rapid genomic sequencing improves outcomes for acutely ill infants. The investigator will enroll up to 1,000 acutely ill infants in a prospective, randomized, blinded study to either rapid Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) or rapid Whole Exome Sequencing (WES, which is 2% of the genome and \ 4-fold less expensive). 213 infants were actually enrolled. Outcomes will be measured both by objective clinical measures and family perceptions (patient/family centered outcomes). Primary analysis of WGS or WES will be in infants alone. Secondary analysis, in infants who do not receive a diagnosis, will be of families - ideally trios (mother, father, and affected infant), which is \ 2-fold more expensive. Trios will be analyzed within the same randomization arm (WGS or WES). This study is designed to quantify which acutely ill infants benefit from rapid genomic sequencing, by how much they benefit, how they benefit, which rapid genomic sequencing method is superior, and the cost effectiveness of such testing.
Detailed description
Acutely ill infant inpatients who have an undiagnosed illness, and their families, will be eligible to participate in the study. The investigators will enroll up to 1,000 infants. Locally, the study population will be recruited from Rady Children's Hospital (RCH) inpatient population, primarily the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU), with a smaller population presenting to other hospital in-patient services. Recruitment will be targeted at the RCH main campus, but it may include referrals from satellite locations in the RCH network (particularly the RCH NICU network throughout San Diego County). All patients will continue to receive routine care as clinically indicated, including the state newborn screen and other genetic testing as determined by their treating providers. Half of the affected study participants will be randomized to receive rapid whole genome sequencing (WGS) and the other half will receive rapid whole exome sequencing (WES). Each arm will initially be analyzed using the patient's (proband's) sample only. If a proband-only analysis fails to yield a diagnosis, genomic data from the biological family members (typically parents), when available, will be used to supplement analysis (trio analysis). Occasionally, a second affected sibling may be available for family analysis. Not infrequently, the father is not available for study. Similarly, the investigators anticipate the need for targeted genetic analysis of biological parents, and possibly other family members, to confirm diagnostic results and/or provide additional information regarding inheritance. The investigators anticipate that in rare cases a newborn may be so ill that the team lacks equipoise that the child can wait for the estimated ten day turnaround time of our send-out exome testing. In these rare cases, the PI, or his delegate, will decide if the child is not eligible for randomization. These children will remain in the research study throughout the entirety of the study, but will receive in-house ultra-rapid whole genome sequencing by the Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine (RCIGM, also called RadyPGSMI) laboratory in lieu of either a rapid genome or rapid exome (both anticipated to be 10 day turn-arounds). Enrollment will be sought within the first 96 hours following admission to RCH or an RCH network ICU or within 96 hours of meeting criteria for the study if the infant was not previously eligible. Patients and their family members who consent to participate will have their blood drawn and will be randomized to receive either rapid WGS or rapid WES. The initial symptom-driven analysis will be conducted on the patient's sample only (singleton analysis). If a diagnosis is not found promptly (within 24 hours) via a singleton analysis, the family (or any combination of parents and/or other family members) will be analyzed using the same technology that the patient was randomized to receive. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (as determined by American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines) that relate in part or in whole to the patient's current phenotype will be clinically confirmed and reported into the patients' medical record. Although the intention of the study is to return symptom-driven results to the medical record, the clinical report for confirmation of symptom-driven findings may include negative findings of testing. In the event that our analysis incidentally finds a pathogenic variant for which a treatment or intervention exists to improve morbidity and/or mortality, families may choose not to receive this additional information.
Interventions
Patients and their families will be randomized to either receive whole genome sequencing or whole exome sequencing.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Patients (NICU infants) and their parents, the patient's providers, and the enrollment staff will be blinded to the randomization arm they receive.
Intervention model description
The initial symptom-driven analysis will be conducted on the patient's (NICU infants) sample only (singleton analysis). Patients will be randomized to receive either whole genome sequencing or whole exome sequencing. If a diagnosis is not found promptly (within 24 hours) via singleton analysis, sequential analysis of the family (or any combination of parents and/or other family members) will be analyzed using the same technology that the patient was randomized to receive. The study includes parental and physician questionnaires to understand perceptions regarding testing. There is no randomization of parents or physicians nor a requirement to respond to the questionnaires for the patient (NICU infant) to participate in the study. Enrollment: 213 patients (NICU infants)
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Individual in whom one of the following criteria is met: 1. Acutely ill inpatient of less than 4 months of age and within 96 hours of admission. 2. Acutely ill inpatient of less than 4 months of age and within 96 hours of development of an abnormal response to standard therapy for an underlying condition. 3. Acutely ill inpatient of less than 4 months of age and within 96 hours of development of clinical feature or laboratory test value suggestive of a genetic condition. 4. Biological relative of an infant enrolled in this study.
Exclusion criteria
Inpatients of greater than 4 months of age, or who do not meet any of the inclusion criteria, or with: 1. Neonatal infection or sepsis with normal response to therapy 2. Isolated prematurity 3. Isolated unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia 4. Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy with clear precipitating event 5. Previously confirmed genetic diagnosis that explains their clinical condition (i.e. have a positive genetic test) 6. Isolated Transient Neonatal Tachypnea 7. Permission is unable to be obtained by a legal guardian or court-appointed representative within 96 hours of becoming eligible for enrollment. 8. Non-viable neonates - newborns less than 28 days of life with a modified code status (only full code patients may be enrolled).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing | Within one week of the return of results | Perceived utility/benefit of sequencing based on Clinician Assessment questionnaire completed by patient's providers. Question: Was the test clinically useful? Response was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (very useful=5, useful=4, neutral=3, not very useful=2, not useful at all=1. |
| Test Results Led to Change in Patient Management | Within 1 week of return of results | Test results led to Change in clinical management (select all that apply): * Surgical intervention added * Surgical intervention removed * Surgical intervention changed * Medication added * Medication removed * Medication changed * Diet changed * New specialty service sought * Prior specialty service no longer required * New imaging sought * Prior imaging cancelled * New test ordered * Prior testing cancelled * Screening for additional comorbidities added * Screening for additional comorbidities removed * Palliative care initiated * Palliative care withdrawn * Other: (text box for written description) |
| Test Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome | 1 year | Primary physician perception of change in outcome |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Parental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant | Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment | Parental perception that the test benefitted their infant |
| Diagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) | Within approximately 30 days of enrollment | WGS and WES are two clinical diagnostic test modalities. Results of testing were placed in the electronic medical record. Results either provided a molecular diagnosis that explained the patient's condition or did not. The diagnostic proportion is the number of patients who received a molecular diagnosis by the test modality divided by the total number of patients who were tested by that modality. |
| Parental Decisional Regret With Sequencing | Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment | Markers of harm in genetic diagnosis as evidenced by Brehaut's Decisional Regret scale. Scale 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher regret. |
| Result Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt | Within 7 days of sample receipt | Time to result. |
| Parental Perceived Usefulness of Test | Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment | Parental perception that test was useful |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment of acutely ill infants (age less than 1 year) during admission to the neonatal, pediatric or intensive care unit at Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego
Pre-assignment details
Infants considered to be too severely ill at enrollment to be randomized to rapid diagnostic whole genome sequencing or rapid diagnostic whole exome sequencing were excluded from randomization and received ultra-rapid diagnostic whole genome sequencing with the fastest possible time to diagnosis.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing Genetic test that looks at all coding and non-coding areas of the genome. Genomic sequencing and molecular diagnostic results. | 94 |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing Genetic test that looks at all coding areas of the genome. Genomic sequencing and molecular diagnostic results. | 95 |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing Infants considered to be too severely ill at enrollment to be randomized were excluded from randomization and received urWGS, with the fastest possible time to diagnosis. | 24 |
| Total | 213 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Total | Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at symptom onset | 0.4 Days | 1 Days | 3.1 Days | 0.6 Days |
| Age, Continuous | 4 Days | 5 Days | 7.5 Days | 5 Days |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 36 Participants | 88 Participants | 10 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 57 Participants | 123 Participants | 14 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 6 Participants | 8 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 20 Participants | 50 Participants | 3 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants | 11 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 58 Participants | 130 Participants | 17 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 33 Participants | 84 Participants | 8 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 61 Participants | 129 Participants | 16 Participants | 52 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 94 | 3 / 95 | 5 / 24 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 94 | 3 / 95 | 0 / 24 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 94 | 0 / 95 | 0 / 24 |
Outcome results
Subject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing
Perceived utility/benefit of sequencing based on Clinician Assessment questionnaire completed by patient's providers. Question: Was the test clinically useful? Response was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (very useful=5, useful=4, neutral=3, not very useful=2, not useful at all=1.
Time frame: Within one week of the return of results
Population: Test perceived to be useful or very useful in Clinician Assessment questionnaire completed by patient's providers.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Subject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing | 66 Participants |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Subject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing | 66 Participants |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Subject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing | 24 Participants |
Test Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome
Primary physician perception of change in outcome
Time frame: 1 year
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Test Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome | 9 Participants |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Test Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome | 17 Participants |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Test Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome | 6 Participants |
Test Results Led to Change in Patient Management
Test results led to Change in clinical management (select all that apply): * Surgical intervention added * Surgical intervention removed * Surgical intervention changed * Medication added * Medication removed * Medication changed * Diet changed * New specialty service sought * Prior specialty service no longer required * New imaging sought * Prior imaging cancelled * New test ordered * Prior testing cancelled * Screening for additional comorbidities added * Screening for additional comorbidities removed * Palliative care initiated * Palliative care withdrawn * Other: (text box for written description)
Time frame: Within 1 week of return of results
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Test Results Led to Change in Patient Management | 23 Participants |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Test Results Led to Change in Patient Management | 19 Participants |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Test Results Led to Change in Patient Management | 15 Participants |
Diagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)
WGS and WES are two clinical diagnostic test modalities. Results of testing were placed in the electronic medical record. Results either provided a molecular diagnosis that explained the patient's condition or did not. The diagnostic proportion is the number of patients who received a molecular diagnosis by the test modality divided by the total number of patients who were tested by that modality.
Time frame: Within approximately 30 days of enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Diagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) | 18 Participants |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Diagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) | 19 Participants |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Diagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) | 11 Participants |
Parental Decisional Regret With Sequencing
Markers of harm in genetic diagnosis as evidenced by Brehaut's Decisional Regret scale. Scale 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher regret.
Time frame: Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Parental Decisional Regret With Sequencing | 5 score on a scale |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Parental Decisional Regret With Sequencing | 0 score on a scale |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Parental Decisional Regret With Sequencing | 15 score on a scale |
Parental Perceived Usefulness of Test
Parental perception that test was useful
Time frame: Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Parental Perceived Usefulness of Test | 54 Participants |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Parental Perceived Usefulness of Test | 55 Participants |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Parental Perceived Usefulness of Test | 15 Participants |
Parental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant
Parental perception that the test benefitted their infant
Time frame: Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Parental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant | 58 Participants |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Parental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant | 50 Participants |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Parental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant | 13 Participants |
Result Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt
Time to result.
Time frame: Within 7 days of sample receipt
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing | Result Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt | 10 Participants |
| Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing | Result Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt | 4 Participants |
| Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing | Result Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt | 17 Participants |