Skip to content

Perinatal Precision Medicine

Prenatal Precision Medicine (NSIGHT2): A Randomized, Blinded, Prospective Study of the Clinical Utility of Rapid Genomic Sequencing for Infants in the Acute-care Setting

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03211039
Acronym
NSIGHT2
Enrollment
213
Registered
2017-07-07
Start date
2017-06-29
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2024-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genetic Diseases, Genetic Syndrome, Mendelian Disorders

Keywords

Neonate, Genomic Medicine, Rapid Precision Medicine, Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing, Diagnosis, Infant, Intensive care unit, clinical trial, Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing, Single locus disease, Ultra-rapid whole genome sequencing, Clinical Utility

Brief summary

This study will seek to determine if rapid genomic sequencing improves outcomes for acutely ill infants. The investigator will enroll up to 1,000 acutely ill infants in a prospective, randomized, blinded study to either rapid Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) or rapid Whole Exome Sequencing (WES, which is 2% of the genome and \ 4-fold less expensive). 213 infants were actually enrolled. Outcomes will be measured both by objective clinical measures and family perceptions (patient/family centered outcomes). Primary analysis of WGS or WES will be in infants alone. Secondary analysis, in infants who do not receive a diagnosis, will be of families - ideally trios (mother, father, and affected infant), which is \ 2-fold more expensive. Trios will be analyzed within the same randomization arm (WGS or WES). This study is designed to quantify which acutely ill infants benefit from rapid genomic sequencing, by how much they benefit, how they benefit, which rapid genomic sequencing method is superior, and the cost effectiveness of such testing.

Detailed description

Acutely ill infant inpatients who have an undiagnosed illness, and their families, will be eligible to participate in the study. The investigators will enroll up to 1,000 infants. Locally, the study population will be recruited from Rady Children's Hospital (RCH) inpatient population, primarily the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU), with a smaller population presenting to other hospital in-patient services. Recruitment will be targeted at the RCH main campus, but it may include referrals from satellite locations in the RCH network (particularly the RCH NICU network throughout San Diego County). All patients will continue to receive routine care as clinically indicated, including the state newborn screen and other genetic testing as determined by their treating providers. Half of the affected study participants will be randomized to receive rapid whole genome sequencing (WGS) and the other half will receive rapid whole exome sequencing (WES). Each arm will initially be analyzed using the patient's (proband's) sample only. If a proband-only analysis fails to yield a diagnosis, genomic data from the biological family members (typically parents), when available, will be used to supplement analysis (trio analysis). Occasionally, a second affected sibling may be available for family analysis. Not infrequently, the father is not available for study. Similarly, the investigators anticipate the need for targeted genetic analysis of biological parents, and possibly other family members, to confirm diagnostic results and/or provide additional information regarding inheritance. The investigators anticipate that in rare cases a newborn may be so ill that the team lacks equipoise that the child can wait for the estimated ten day turnaround time of our send-out exome testing. In these rare cases, the PI, or his delegate, will decide if the child is not eligible for randomization. These children will remain in the research study throughout the entirety of the study, but will receive in-house ultra-rapid whole genome sequencing by the Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine (RCIGM, also called RadyPGSMI) laboratory in lieu of either a rapid genome or rapid exome (both anticipated to be 10 day turn-arounds). Enrollment will be sought within the first 96 hours following admission to RCH or an RCH network ICU or within 96 hours of meeting criteria for the study if the infant was not previously eligible. Patients and their family members who consent to participate will have their blood drawn and will be randomized to receive either rapid WGS or rapid WES. The initial symptom-driven analysis will be conducted on the patient's sample only (singleton analysis). If a diagnosis is not found promptly (within 24 hours) via a singleton analysis, the family (or any combination of parents and/or other family members) will be analyzed using the same technology that the patient was randomized to receive. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (as determined by American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines) that relate in part or in whole to the patient's current phenotype will be clinically confirmed and reported into the patients' medical record. Although the intention of the study is to return symptom-driven results to the medical record, the clinical report for confirmation of symptom-driven findings may include negative findings of testing. In the event that our analysis incidentally finds a pathogenic variant for which a treatment or intervention exists to improve morbidity and/or mortality, families may choose not to receive this additional information.

Interventions

Patients and their families will be randomized to either receive whole genome sequencing or whole exome sequencing.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
CollaboratorNIH
Rady Pediatric Genomics & Systems Medicine Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients (NICU infants) and their parents, the patient's providers, and the enrollment staff will be blinded to the randomization arm they receive.

Intervention model description

The initial symptom-driven analysis will be conducted on the patient's (NICU infants) sample only (singleton analysis). Patients will be randomized to receive either whole genome sequencing or whole exome sequencing. If a diagnosis is not found promptly (within 24 hours) via singleton analysis, sequential analysis of the family (or any combination of parents and/or other family members) will be analyzed using the same technology that the patient was randomized to receive. The study includes parental and physician questionnaires to understand perceptions regarding testing. There is no randomization of parents or physicians nor a requirement to respond to the questionnaires for the patient (NICU infant) to participate in the study. Enrollment: 213 patients (NICU infants)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 4 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Individual in whom one of the following criteria is met: 1. Acutely ill inpatient of less than 4 months of age and within 96 hours of admission. 2. Acutely ill inpatient of less than 4 months of age and within 96 hours of development of an abnormal response to standard therapy for an underlying condition. 3. Acutely ill inpatient of less than 4 months of age and within 96 hours of development of clinical feature or laboratory test value suggestive of a genetic condition. 4. Biological relative of an infant enrolled in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Inpatients of greater than 4 months of age, or who do not meet any of the inclusion criteria, or with: 1. Neonatal infection or sepsis with normal response to therapy 2. Isolated prematurity 3. Isolated unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia 4. Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy with clear precipitating event 5. Previously confirmed genetic diagnosis that explains their clinical condition (i.e. have a positive genetic test) 6. Isolated Transient Neonatal Tachypnea 7. Permission is unable to be obtained by a legal guardian or court-appointed representative within 96 hours of becoming eligible for enrollment. 8. Non-viable neonates - newborns less than 28 days of life with a modified code status (only full code patients may be enrolled).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic SequencingWithin one week of the return of resultsPerceived utility/benefit of sequencing based on Clinician Assessment questionnaire completed by patient's providers. Question: Was the test clinically useful? Response was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (very useful=5, useful=4, neutral=3, not very useful=2, not useful at all=1.
Test Results Led to Change in Patient ManagementWithin 1 week of return of resultsTest results led to Change in clinical management (select all that apply): * Surgical intervention added * Surgical intervention removed * Surgical intervention changed * Medication added * Medication removed * Medication changed * Diet changed * New specialty service sought * Prior specialty service no longer required * New imaging sought * Prior imaging cancelled * New test ordered * Prior testing cancelled * Screening for additional comorbidities added * Screening for additional comorbidities removed * Palliative care initiated * Palliative care withdrawn * Other: (text box for written description)
Test Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome1 yearPrimary physician perception of change in outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parental Perception of Test Benefit for Their InfantWithin one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollmentParental perception that the test benefitted their infant
Diagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)Within approximately 30 days of enrollmentWGS and WES are two clinical diagnostic test modalities. Results of testing were placed in the electronic medical record. Results either provided a molecular diagnosis that explained the patient's condition or did not. The diagnostic proportion is the number of patients who received a molecular diagnosis by the test modality divided by the total number of patients who were tested by that modality.
Parental Decisional Regret With SequencingWithin one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollmentMarkers of harm in genetic diagnosis as evidenced by Brehaut's Decisional Regret scale. Scale 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher regret.
Result Within 7 Days of Sample ReceiptWithin 7 days of sample receiptTime to result.
Parental Perceived Usefulness of TestWithin one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollmentParental perception that test was useful

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment of acutely ill infants (age less than 1 year) during admission to the neonatal, pediatric or intensive care unit at Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego

Pre-assignment details

Infants considered to be too severely ill at enrollment to be randomized to rapid diagnostic whole genome sequencing or rapid diagnostic whole exome sequencing were excluded from randomization and received ultra-rapid diagnostic whole genome sequencing with the fastest possible time to diagnosis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing
Genetic test that looks at all coding and non-coding areas of the genome. Genomic sequencing and molecular diagnostic results.
94
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing
Genetic test that looks at all coding areas of the genome. Genomic sequencing and molecular diagnostic results.
95
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome Sequencing
Infants considered to be too severely ill at enrollment to be randomized were excluded from randomization and received urWGS, with the fastest possible time to diagnosis.
24
Total213

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDiagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingTotalUltra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingDiagnostic Rapid Whole Exome Sequencing
Age at symptom onset0.4 Days1 Days3.1 Days0.6 Days
Age, Continuous4 Days5 Days7.5 Days5 Days
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants88 Participants10 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
57 Participants123 Participants14 Participants52 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants8 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants6 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
20 Participants50 Participants3 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants7 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants11 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
58 Participants130 Participants17 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants84 Participants8 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants129 Participants16 Participants52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 943 / 955 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 943 / 950 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 940 / 950 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Subject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing

Perceived utility/benefit of sequencing based on Clinician Assessment questionnaire completed by patient's providers. Question: Was the test clinically useful? Response was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (very useful=5, useful=4, neutral=3, not very useful=2, not useful at all=1.

Time frame: Within one week of the return of results

Population: Test perceived to be useful or very useful in Clinician Assessment questionnaire completed by patient's providers.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingSubject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing66 Participants
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingSubject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing66 Participants
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingSubject's Main Provider's Perceived Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing24 Participants
Primary

Test Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome

Primary physician perception of change in outcome

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingTest Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome9 Participants
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingTest Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome17 Participants
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingTest Led to Changes in Management That Altered Patient Outcome6 Participants
Primary

Test Results Led to Change in Patient Management

Test results led to Change in clinical management (select all that apply): * Surgical intervention added * Surgical intervention removed * Surgical intervention changed * Medication added * Medication removed * Medication changed * Diet changed * New specialty service sought * Prior specialty service no longer required * New imaging sought * Prior imaging cancelled * New test ordered * Prior testing cancelled * Screening for additional comorbidities added * Screening for additional comorbidities removed * Palliative care initiated * Palliative care withdrawn * Other: (text box for written description)

Time frame: Within 1 week of return of results

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingTest Results Led to Change in Patient Management23 Participants
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingTest Results Led to Change in Patient Management19 Participants
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingTest Results Led to Change in Patient Management15 Participants
Secondary

Diagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)

WGS and WES are two clinical diagnostic test modalities. Results of testing were placed in the electronic medical record. Results either provided a molecular diagnosis that explained the patient's condition or did not. The diagnostic proportion is the number of patients who received a molecular diagnosis by the test modality divided by the total number of patients who were tested by that modality.

Time frame: Within approximately 30 days of enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingDiagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)18 Participants
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingDiagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)19 Participants
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingDiagnostic Proportion for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)11 Participants
Secondary

Parental Decisional Regret With Sequencing

Markers of harm in genetic diagnosis as evidenced by Brehaut's Decisional Regret scale. Scale 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher regret.

Time frame: Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingParental Decisional Regret With Sequencing5 score on a scale
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingParental Decisional Regret With Sequencing0 score on a scale
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingParental Decisional Regret With Sequencing15 score on a scale
Secondary

Parental Perceived Usefulness of Test

Parental perception that test was useful

Time frame: Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingParental Perceived Usefulness of Test54 Participants
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingParental Perceived Usefulness of Test55 Participants
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingParental Perceived Usefulness of Test15 Participants
Secondary

Parental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant

Parental perception that the test benefitted their infant

Time frame: Within one week of the return of results and approximately one year after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingParental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant58 Participants
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingParental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant50 Participants
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingParental Perception of Test Benefit for Their Infant13 Participants
Secondary

Result Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt

Time to result.

Time frame: Within 7 days of sample receipt

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Genome SequencingResult Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt10 Participants
Diagnostic Rapid Whole Exome SequencingResult Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt4 Participants
Ultra-rapid Diagnostic Whole Genome SequencingResult Within 7 Days of Sample Receipt17 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026