Skip to content

Comparison Manufactured Rib Splint With Hand-made Rib Splint

Comparison of the Effectiveness in Pain Reduction Between a Rib Splint Produced in the ER and a Manufactured Rib Splint: Preliminary Clinical Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03210792
Acronym
CMRSHRS
Enrollment
12
Registered
2017-07-07
Start date
2017-07-10
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2017-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Acute

Brief summary

A pilot study for a prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare subjects using the CCO (Group-A) with those using the ER-splint (Group-B) before and after the intervention. The primary outcome was difference in the level of pain based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) between before and after intervention in each group during forceful and resting respiration. VAS : Visual analogue scale CCO : Chrisofix® Chest Orthosis

Detailed description

Investigators performed VAS assessments to determine the level of pain in the subjects with RFs during resting and forceful respiration. Investigators applied either the CCO rib splint or the ER splint to the RF subjects in a randomized order. At 30 minutes after splint application, investigators repeated the VAS assessments during resting and forceful respiration. Subsequently, additional pain control was provided via intravascular drug injection. RF : Rib fractures VAS : Visual analogue scale CCO : Chrisofix® Chest Orthosis

Interventions

DEVICEApplication of Rib Splint

Investigators randomly apply handmade Rib Splint or manufactured Rib Splint to subjects.

Sponsors

Hanyang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who have rib fractures and age was over 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Investigators excluded subjects with cardiopulmonary dysfunction, poly-trauma, flail chest, damage to an internal organ, or alcoholism and subjects who did not consent to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effectiveness of each intervention based on the VAS scores in each group during resting and forceful respirationWe check a pain scale at 30 minutes after splint applicationComparison CCO Rib splint with Handmade Rib splint about pain reduction

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026