Skip to content

A New APPROACH to HIV Testing: Adaptation of POCT for Pharmacies to Reduce Risk and Optimize Access to Care in HIV

A New APPROACH to HIV Testing: Adaptation of POCT for Pharmacies to Reduce Risk and Optimize Access to Care in HIV - A Type II Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03210701
Acronym
APPROACH
Enrollment
123
Registered
2017-07-07
Start date
2017-02-14
Completion date
2017-09-01
Last updated
2020-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

pharmacy, pharmacist, POCT, Implementation science

Brief summary

An estimated 21% of Canadians with HIV are unaware of their infection. There is a need to improve access to HIV testing to detect infections earlier so individuals can access care early and take steps to prevent transmission to others. Barriers to HIV testing include limited access or reluctance to go to traditional testing sites (doctor's offices and sexually transmitted infection clinics), and the lengthy wait time to receive test results from standard laboratory-based HIV testing (usually 1-2 weeks). These deterrents are particularly significant for those at highest risk of infection, who may be socially marginalized or stigmatized. In rural areas, HIV testing may only be available through doctor's offices and hospitals, yet many Canadians do not have access to a family physician. Pharmacists are among the most trusted and accessible healthcare providers, and are well positioned to improve access to HIV testing. Point of care tests for HIV are easy to administer and results are available within minutes, making them ideal for use in the community pharmacy setting. Point of care testing (POCT) by pharmacists can ensure individuals receive their test results, and facilitate timely linkages to care and treatment. This adaptation grant will look at factors influencing the acceptability and feasibility of pharmacist-provided rapid POCT for HIV in two Canadian provinces, including pharmacies in both urban and rural areas. The effectiveness of pharmacist-delivered POCT will be considered from a variety of perspectives including people living with or at risk of HIV, as well as pharmacists as the service providers.

Detailed description

Background: There is a need to improve access to HIV testing to detect infections earlier so individuals can access care and prevent transmission. Barriers to testing include limited access or reluctance to go to traditional testing sites, and the lengthy wait time to receive results. Pharmacists are trusted, accessible health providers and are well positioned to offer HIV testing. Point of care tests (POCT) for HIV are easy to administer and results available within minutes, making them ideal for use in the pharmacy setting. HIV POCT may overcome barriers to standard testing for those at high risk and in healthcare resource-limited settings. Preliminary data suggest pharmacist-administered POCT can reach those who have never had an HIV test. Implementation and effectiveness of pharmacist-delivered POCT is the focus of this study. Study goals: To determine whether a multi-faceted HIV POCT program adapted for community pharmacies in two Canadian provinces is acceptable, feasible and effective in reaching those at high risk and those who have never been tested. Implementation and effectiveness of an integrated, contextualized model of HIV POCT in urban and rural pharmacies in Newfoundland (NL) and Alberta (AB) will be assessed. Participant characteristics, responses to satisfaction measures on the participant questionnaire, and pharmacist time to offer HIV POCT were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Pre-testing questionnaire data was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. ANOVA was used to assess differences in participants' Denver HIV Risk Scores between provinces, and urban versus rural testing sites, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess differences in participant satisfaction with the testing experience based on province, urban/rural testing site, sex, and history of prior HIV testing. Fisher's Exact tests were used to assess whether history of prior HIV testing depended on province or urban/rural centre for testing. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Interview transcripts and extensive field notes were included for analysis from the participant interviews and pharmacist focus groups. Transcripts from participant interviews were coded using an open or emergent scheme where codes were developed and modified throughout the coding process. Descriptive codes were assigned to identify recurring concepts, and sub-themes were then identified and. Themes from the pharmacist focus groups were considered according to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model to understand behaviour change, which considers opportunities and challenges in the context of professional capability, opportunity, and motivation to offer the HIV POCT program. Impact: This study will inform further modifications to the pharmacy HIV POCT model to optimize effectiveness and increase scalability prior to full adoption and implementation. This will form the basis for a subsequent grant application. Knowledge gained can be used to scale up effective testing programs to increase the number of high risk individuals getting tested. The pharmacy is a novel venue to offer HIV testing, and if successful could be a widely accessible option applicable to other provinces and other countries. This study will provide proof of concept for pharmacy based POCT for other sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) (once tests become available) and successful implementation may also lead to pharmacist-delivered pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs, to further reduce HIV infection rates.

Interventions

OTHERA HIV POCT program adapted for & provided by community pharmacists

Using a Type II hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness study design investigators will assess the implementation and effectiveness of a multi-faceted, integrated, contextualized model of HIV POCT in pharmacies in urban and rural settings in NL and AB, Canada. This design will be flexible, responsive and capable of capturing changing elements at multiple points in time. A mixed methods approach will be used to assess Implementation and Effectiveness aims.

Sponsors

Memorial University of Newfoundland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Consistent with current testing guidelines and the National HIV POCT Action Plan HIV testing will be offered to anyone age 18+ who requests a test and is not known to be HIV+.

Exclusion criteria

* Anyone unwilling to sign the consent form will be unable to participate in the study or receive HIV POCT.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study SiteCollected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)Number of patients who presented to a community pharmacy test site and requested a rapid HIV test.
Number of Reactive Test ResultsCollected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)Number of patients who requested a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy and received a reactive test result
Total Time Required for the HIV Testing ProcessFrom time of participant consenting through to providing pre-test counseling, administering the test & explaining the result, post-test counseling, & referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated, 30-40 minutes on averageThis was the time of the total patient pharmacist interaction, which began with the pharmacist explaining the study and ended with referring the patient for additional sexually transmitted blood borne infections (STBBI) counselling. The entire testing process included time spent explaining the study and consenting the participant, providing pre-test counselling, administering the test and explaining the result, post-test counselling, and referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated.
Participant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceCompleted immediately after each individual participants testing process was completed, approximately 10 minutes on averageOnce the testing was completed (see Outcome 3) prior to leaving, participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire which assessed perception of the testing experience including factors that influenced their decision to be tested at the pharmacy & whether they would have sought HIV testing elsewhere if not at the pharmacy. Information was captured using a percentage continuous response scale from 0 to 100%. Participants were instructed to answer the questions by marking an x on the line at the point which represented their experience. For example, in response to the question How likely are you to buy a lottery ticket today?, the participant was instructed that if they were 50% certain, they would mark an x at the 50% notch on the line. Questions were positively worded, with higher scores indicating higher agreement. Not all patients answered all questions; reported data is based on the number of respondents for each question.
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk BehavioursImmediately prior to testing process, participant completed the survey, approximately 5 - 10 minutes on averagePrior to initiating the testing process participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire that included demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, relationship status, highest education attained, and income level) as well as information about HIV risk factors and previous HIV testing history. Pre-testing questionnaire data on HIV risk factors was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score (www.denverptc.org/resource.php?id=33) for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. Patients who score 30 points or greater on the Denver HIV Risk Score are considered at increased risk of undiagnosed HIV infection and should be offered routine screening. Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
123
Total123

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy Participants
Age, Continuous34.8 years
Annual Income
>$100K
15 Participants
Annual Income
$20 - $39,999
25 Participants
Annual Income
<$20K
32 Participants
Annual Income
$40 - $59,999
26 Participants
Annual Income
$60 - $79,999
11 Participants
Annual Income
$80 - $99,999
14 Participants
Employment Status
Full time
76 Participants
Employment Status
Not Employed
12 Participants
Employment Status
Other
1 Participants
Employment Status
Part time
4 Participants
Employment Status
Retired or on Disability
9 Participants
Employment Status
Student
17 Participants
Employment Status
working and student
4 Participants
Highest level of education
High school diploma or equivalent
25 Participants
Highest level of education
Some high school
2 Participants
Highest level of education
Some university or college
21 Participants
Highest level of education
Trade or technical school diploma
30 Participants
Highest level of education
University degree
45 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African, Caribbean or Black
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
98 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indigenous
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
Rural
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
Urban
112 Participants
Relationship status
Casually Dating
39 Participants
Relationship status
Married, Common-Law or Committed
34 Participants
Relationship status
SDW and Casually Dating
2 Participants
Relationship status
Separted, divorced, widowed (SDW)
6 Participants
Relationship status
Single
42 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
28 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
93 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Other
2 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Trans person
0 participants
Tested for HIV previously
Not tested previously
33 Participants
Tested for HIV previously
Other
2 Participants
Tested for HIV previously
Tested previously
86 Participants
Tested for HIV previously
Unsure
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Reactive Test Results

Number of patients who requested a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy and received a reactive test result

Time frame: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study ParticipantsNumber of Reactive Test Results1 Participants
Primary

Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience

Once the testing was completed (see Outcome 3) prior to leaving, participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire which assessed perception of the testing experience including factors that influenced their decision to be tested at the pharmacy & whether they would have sought HIV testing elsewhere if not at the pharmacy. Information was captured using a percentage continuous response scale from 0 to 100%. Participants were instructed to answer the questions by marking an x on the line at the point which represented their experience. For example, in response to the question How likely are you to buy a lottery ticket today?, the participant was instructed that if they were 50% certain, they would mark an x at the 50% notch on the line. Questions were positively worded, with higher scores indicating higher agreement. Not all patients answered all questions; reported data is based on the number of respondents for each question.

Time frame: Completed immediately after each individual participants testing process was completed, approximately 10 minutes on average

Population: Percentage continuous response scale (0-100)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceComfort with testing at pharmacy88.66 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceConfidence PhC did a good job administering test96.93 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceLikelihood to get tested for other STBBI83.14 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceImportance of privacy at pharmacy site89.42 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceImportance of finger prick blood sample80.35 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceImportance of immediate test results94.87 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceImportance of private room for testing and consult94.87 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceImportance of free testing88.78 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceImporatance of not needing an appointment91.22 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceWillingness to pay for testing78.69 score on a scale
Study ParticipantsParticipant Satisfaction With Testing ExperienceShould HIV testing be offered at pharmacies99.2 score on a scale
Primary

Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours

Prior to initiating the testing process participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire that included demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, relationship status, highest education attained, and income level) as well as information about HIV risk factors and previous HIV testing history. Pre-testing questionnaire data on HIV risk factors was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score (www.denverptc.org/resource.php?id=33) for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. Patients who score 30 points or greater on the Denver HIV Risk Score are considered at increased risk of undiagnosed HIV infection and should be offered routine screening. Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.

Time frame: Immediately prior to testing process, participant completed the survey, approximately 5 - 10 minutes on average

Population: Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study ParticipantsParticipants Self-identified HIV Risk BehavioursMen who have sex with men56 Participants
Study ParticipantsParticipants Self-identified HIV Risk BehavioursHistory of IV drug use6 Participants
Study ParticipantsParticipants Self-identified HIV Risk BehavioursPreviously exchanged sex for money or drugs8 Participants
Study ParticipantsParticipants Self-identified HIV Risk BehavioursPrior blood transfusion2 Participants
Study ParticipantsParticipants Self-identified HIV Risk BehavioursDenver HIV risk score >/= 3089 Participants
Primary

Patients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study Site

Number of patients who presented to a community pharmacy test site and requested a rapid HIV test.

Time frame: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study ParticipantsPatients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study Site123 Participants
Primary

Total Time Required for the HIV Testing Process

This was the time of the total patient pharmacist interaction, which began with the pharmacist explaining the study and ended with referring the patient for additional sexually transmitted blood borne infections (STBBI) counselling. The entire testing process included time spent explaining the study and consenting the participant, providing pre-test counselling, administering the test and explaining the result, post-test counselling, and referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated.

Time frame: From time of participant consenting through to providing pre-test counseling, administering the test & explaining the result, post-test counseling, & referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated, 30-40 minutes on average

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study ParticipantsTotal Time Required for the HIV Testing Process30.4 MinutesStandard Deviation 6.95

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026