HIV Infections
Conditions
Keywords
pharmacy, pharmacist, POCT, Implementation science
Brief summary
An estimated 21% of Canadians with HIV are unaware of their infection. There is a need to improve access to HIV testing to detect infections earlier so individuals can access care early and take steps to prevent transmission to others. Barriers to HIV testing include limited access or reluctance to go to traditional testing sites (doctor's offices and sexually transmitted infection clinics), and the lengthy wait time to receive test results from standard laboratory-based HIV testing (usually 1-2 weeks). These deterrents are particularly significant for those at highest risk of infection, who may be socially marginalized or stigmatized. In rural areas, HIV testing may only be available through doctor's offices and hospitals, yet many Canadians do not have access to a family physician. Pharmacists are among the most trusted and accessible healthcare providers, and are well positioned to improve access to HIV testing. Point of care tests for HIV are easy to administer and results are available within minutes, making them ideal for use in the community pharmacy setting. Point of care testing (POCT) by pharmacists can ensure individuals receive their test results, and facilitate timely linkages to care and treatment. This adaptation grant will look at factors influencing the acceptability and feasibility of pharmacist-provided rapid POCT for HIV in two Canadian provinces, including pharmacies in both urban and rural areas. The effectiveness of pharmacist-delivered POCT will be considered from a variety of perspectives including people living with or at risk of HIV, as well as pharmacists as the service providers.
Detailed description
Background: There is a need to improve access to HIV testing to detect infections earlier so individuals can access care and prevent transmission. Barriers to testing include limited access or reluctance to go to traditional testing sites, and the lengthy wait time to receive results. Pharmacists are trusted, accessible health providers and are well positioned to offer HIV testing. Point of care tests (POCT) for HIV are easy to administer and results available within minutes, making them ideal for use in the pharmacy setting. HIV POCT may overcome barriers to standard testing for those at high risk and in healthcare resource-limited settings. Preliminary data suggest pharmacist-administered POCT can reach those who have never had an HIV test. Implementation and effectiveness of pharmacist-delivered POCT is the focus of this study. Study goals: To determine whether a multi-faceted HIV POCT program adapted for community pharmacies in two Canadian provinces is acceptable, feasible and effective in reaching those at high risk and those who have never been tested. Implementation and effectiveness of an integrated, contextualized model of HIV POCT in urban and rural pharmacies in Newfoundland (NL) and Alberta (AB) will be assessed. Participant characteristics, responses to satisfaction measures on the participant questionnaire, and pharmacist time to offer HIV POCT were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Pre-testing questionnaire data was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. ANOVA was used to assess differences in participants' Denver HIV Risk Scores between provinces, and urban versus rural testing sites, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess differences in participant satisfaction with the testing experience based on province, urban/rural testing site, sex, and history of prior HIV testing. Fisher's Exact tests were used to assess whether history of prior HIV testing depended on province or urban/rural centre for testing. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Interview transcripts and extensive field notes were included for analysis from the participant interviews and pharmacist focus groups. Transcripts from participant interviews were coded using an open or emergent scheme where codes were developed and modified throughout the coding process. Descriptive codes were assigned to identify recurring concepts, and sub-themes were then identified and. Themes from the pharmacist focus groups were considered according to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model to understand behaviour change, which considers opportunities and challenges in the context of professional capability, opportunity, and motivation to offer the HIV POCT program. Impact: This study will inform further modifications to the pharmacy HIV POCT model to optimize effectiveness and increase scalability prior to full adoption and implementation. This will form the basis for a subsequent grant application. Knowledge gained can be used to scale up effective testing programs to increase the number of high risk individuals getting tested. The pharmacy is a novel venue to offer HIV testing, and if successful could be a widely accessible option applicable to other provinces and other countries. This study will provide proof of concept for pharmacy based POCT for other sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) (once tests become available) and successful implementation may also lead to pharmacist-delivered pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs, to further reduce HIV infection rates.
Interventions
Using a Type II hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness study design investigators will assess the implementation and effectiveness of a multi-faceted, integrated, contextualized model of HIV POCT in pharmacies in urban and rural settings in NL and AB, Canada. This design will be flexible, responsive and capable of capturing changing elements at multiple points in time. A mixed methods approach will be used to assess Implementation and Effectiveness aims.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Consistent with current testing guidelines and the National HIV POCT Action Plan HIV testing will be offered to anyone age 18+ who requests a test and is not known to be HIV+.
Exclusion criteria
* Anyone unwilling to sign the consent form will be unable to participate in the study or receive HIV POCT.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study Site | Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months) | Number of patients who presented to a community pharmacy test site and requested a rapid HIV test. |
| Number of Reactive Test Results | Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months) | Number of patients who requested a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy and received a reactive test result |
| Total Time Required for the HIV Testing Process | From time of participant consenting through to providing pre-test counseling, administering the test & explaining the result, post-test counseling, & referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated, 30-40 minutes on average | This was the time of the total patient pharmacist interaction, which began with the pharmacist explaining the study and ended with referring the patient for additional sexually transmitted blood borne infections (STBBI) counselling. The entire testing process included time spent explaining the study and consenting the participant, providing pre-test counselling, administering the test and explaining the result, post-test counselling, and referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated. |
| Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Completed immediately after each individual participants testing process was completed, approximately 10 minutes on average | Once the testing was completed (see Outcome 3) prior to leaving, participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire which assessed perception of the testing experience including factors that influenced their decision to be tested at the pharmacy & whether they would have sought HIV testing elsewhere if not at the pharmacy. Information was captured using a percentage continuous response scale from 0 to 100%. Participants were instructed to answer the questions by marking an x on the line at the point which represented their experience. For example, in response to the question How likely are you to buy a lottery ticket today?, the participant was instructed that if they were 50% certain, they would mark an x at the 50% notch on the line. Questions were positively worded, with higher scores indicating higher agreement. Not all patients answered all questions; reported data is based on the number of respondents for each question. |
| Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours | Immediately prior to testing process, participant completed the survey, approximately 5 - 10 minutes on average | Prior to initiating the testing process participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire that included demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, relationship status, highest education attained, and income level) as well as information about HIV risk factors and previous HIV testing history. Pre-testing questionnaire data on HIV risk factors was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score (www.denverptc.org/resource.php?id=33) for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. Patients who score 30 points or greater on the Denver HIV Risk Score are considered at increased risk of undiagnosed HIV infection and should be offered routine screening. Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided. |
Countries
Canada
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Study Participants Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site. | 123 |
| Total | 123 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 34.8 years |
| Annual Income >$100K | 15 Participants |
| Annual Income $20 - $39,999 | 25 Participants |
| Annual Income <$20K | 32 Participants |
| Annual Income $40 - $59,999 | 26 Participants |
| Annual Income $60 - $79,999 | 11 Participants |
| Annual Income $80 - $99,999 | 14 Participants |
| Employment Status Full time | 76 Participants |
| Employment Status Not Employed | 12 Participants |
| Employment Status Other | 1 Participants |
| Employment Status Part time | 4 Participants |
| Employment Status Retired or on Disability | 9 Participants |
| Employment Status Student | 17 Participants |
| Employment Status working and student | 4 Participants |
| Highest level of education High school diploma or equivalent | 25 Participants |
| Highest level of education Some high school | 2 Participants |
| Highest level of education Some university or college | 21 Participants |
| Highest level of education Trade or technical school diploma | 30 Participants |
| Highest level of education University degree | 45 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African, Caribbean or Black | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 12 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 98 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Indigenous | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada Rural | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada Urban | 112 Participants |
| Relationship status Casually Dating | 39 Participants |
| Relationship status Married, Common-Law or Committed | 34 Participants |
| Relationship status SDW and Casually Dating | 2 Participants |
| Relationship status Separted, divorced, widowed (SDW) | 6 Participants |
| Relationship status Single | 42 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Female | 28 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Male | 93 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Other | 2 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Trans person | 0 participants |
| Tested for HIV previously Not tested previously | 33 Participants |
| Tested for HIV previously Other | 2 Participants |
| Tested for HIV previously Tested previously | 86 Participants |
| Tested for HIV previously Unsure | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 123 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 123 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 123 |
Outcome results
Number of Reactive Test Results
Number of patients who requested a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy and received a reactive test result
Time frame: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Study Participants | Number of Reactive Test Results | 1 Participants |
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Once the testing was completed (see Outcome 3) prior to leaving, participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire which assessed perception of the testing experience including factors that influenced their decision to be tested at the pharmacy & whether they would have sought HIV testing elsewhere if not at the pharmacy. Information was captured using a percentage continuous response scale from 0 to 100%. Participants were instructed to answer the questions by marking an x on the line at the point which represented their experience. For example, in response to the question How likely are you to buy a lottery ticket today?, the participant was instructed that if they were 50% certain, they would mark an x at the 50% notch on the line. Questions were positively worded, with higher scores indicating higher agreement. Not all patients answered all questions; reported data is based on the number of respondents for each question.
Time frame: Completed immediately after each individual participants testing process was completed, approximately 10 minutes on average
Population: Percentage continuous response scale (0-100)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Comfort with testing at pharmacy | 88.66 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Confidence PhC did a good job administering test | 96.93 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Likelihood to get tested for other STBBI | 83.14 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Importance of privacy at pharmacy site | 89.42 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Importance of finger prick blood sample | 80.35 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Importance of immediate test results | 94.87 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Importance of private room for testing and consult | 94.87 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Importance of free testing | 88.78 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Imporatance of not needing an appointment | 91.22 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Willingness to pay for testing | 78.69 score on a scale |
| Study Participants | Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience | Should HIV testing be offered at pharmacies | 99.2 score on a scale |
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours
Prior to initiating the testing process participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire that included demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, relationship status, highest education attained, and income level) as well as information about HIV risk factors and previous HIV testing history. Pre-testing questionnaire data on HIV risk factors was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score (www.denverptc.org/resource.php?id=33) for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. Patients who score 30 points or greater on the Denver HIV Risk Score are considered at increased risk of undiagnosed HIV infection and should be offered routine screening. Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.
Time frame: Immediately prior to testing process, participant completed the survey, approximately 5 - 10 minutes on average
Population: Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Participants | Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours | Men who have sex with men | 56 Participants |
| Study Participants | Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours | History of IV drug use | 6 Participants |
| Study Participants | Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours | Previously exchanged sex for money or drugs | 8 Participants |
| Study Participants | Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours | Prior blood transfusion | 2 Participants |
| Study Participants | Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours | Denver HIV risk score >/= 30 | 89 Participants |
Patients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study Site
Number of patients who presented to a community pharmacy test site and requested a rapid HIV test.
Time frame: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Study Participants | Patients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study Site | 123 Participants |
Total Time Required for the HIV Testing Process
This was the time of the total patient pharmacist interaction, which began with the pharmacist explaining the study and ended with referring the patient for additional sexually transmitted blood borne infections (STBBI) counselling. The entire testing process included time spent explaining the study and consenting the participant, providing pre-test counselling, administering the test and explaining the result, post-test counselling, and referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated.
Time frame: From time of participant consenting through to providing pre-test counseling, administering the test & explaining the result, post-test counseling, & referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated, 30-40 minutes on average
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Participants | Total Time Required for the HIV Testing Process | 30.4 Minutes | Standard Deviation 6.95 |