Skip to content

Efficacy of CES in New Mothers During the Post Partum Period

Effects of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation on Psychological Distress and Maternal Functioning in New Mothers During the Postpartum Period

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03210155
Enrollment
1
Registered
2017-07-06
Start date
2017-07-24
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2020-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depression, Insomnia, Sleep Quality

Keywords

Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES), Efficacy, Post Partum, Anxiety, Depression, Insomnia, Sleep Quality, Maternal Functioning

Brief summary

The birth of a child is a major life event that can be filled with excitement, anticipation and joy. However, the transition and adaptation to new demands, roles, responsibilities, and changes in relationships can be stressful, especially for new mothers. In addition, new mothers typically encounter physiological changes and struggle with concerns about weight gain, body image, sexuality, and other physical difficulties such as fatigue. These problems may generate or exacerbate stress, lead to an actual or perceived crisis and psychological distress. Psychological distress, defined as anxiety, depression, and insomnia, in this study, often increases during the postpartum period and can negatively affect maternal mental health status, maternal and family relationships, and infant-child health. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) on anxiety, insomnia, depression, and maternal functioning in first time new mothers following childbirth.

Detailed description

The birth of a child is a major life event that can be filled with excitement, anticipation and joy. However, the transition and adaptation to new demands, roles, responsibilities, and changes in relationships can be stressful, especially for first-time mothers. In addition, new mothers typically encounter physiological changes and struggle with concerns about weight gain, body image, sexuality, and other physical difficulties such as fatigue. These problems may generate or exacerbate stress, lead to an actual or perceived crisis and psychological distress. Psychological distress, defined as depression, anxiety and insomnia, in this study, often increases during the postpartum period and can negatively affect maternal mental health status, maternal and family functioning, and infant-child outcomes. These conditions commonly present as co-morbidities, but are often unrecognized in clinical practice or under-treated as co-morbidities in new mothers. This unrecognized cluster of co-morbidities may lead to psychological distress and subsequently poor outcomes for mothers, their infants and children. Current treatment recommendations for depression, anxiety and insomnia are primarily pharmaceutical or psychotherapy, both of which have limitations related to cost, time involved and ineffectiveness for some women. Consequently, there is a need to examine other treatment approaches including complementary modalities, such as cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES), particularly in light of current evidence that shows the efficacy of early detection, intervention and treatment for pregnant and postpartum women. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of CES on anxiety in new mothers following childbirth. The secondary objectives are to: (1) determine the effects of CES on depression and insomnia; (2) explore the effect of CES on maternal functioning in new mothers following childbirth, and (3) to examine if items 1 & 2 on the 14 item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A14) perform well as a screening test for anxiety. Please see the enclosed Instrument Description document for detailed information related to this scale.

Interventions

The Alpha-Stim® AID CES device delivers a mild electrical current (100-500 µA) to the brain via ear clips electrodes. The treatment regimen is one daily 60 minutes Alpha-Stim® CES treatment using ear clip electrodes for 6 weeks at 0.5 Hz. 50% duty cycle with a fixed current of 100 µA (subsensory level).

The Alpha-Stim® AID CES sham device is inactive and does not emit electrical current to the brain via ear clip electrodes. The sham treatment regimen is one daily 60 minutes Alpha-Stim® CES treatment using ear clip electrodes for 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Christina Murphey, RN, PhD
Lead SponsorINDIV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The blocked randomization method will be used to assign participants to active and sham groups. Participants will be assigned to CES treatment or sham CES using a 1:1 ratio. Electromedical Products International, Inc. (EPI) will randomize the assignment of appropriate devices to active or sham groups by using a random list of computer generated numbers (1 for active and 2 for sham) in randomly selected block sizes. The PI and participants are blinded to which participants have Alpha-Stim® CES active or sham devices until data analysis is complete. After the completion of data analysis, blinding will be broken.

Intervention model description

The design for the proposed study is a matched-pair, quasi-experimental, 1:1 randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial with a longitudinal component. The analytic technique employed to answer the research questions will be repeated measures analysis of covariance.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant must have a total score of ≥ 16 on the HAM-A14 and ≥2 on both Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A14) item 1 (anxious mood) and item 2 (tension) at screening and baseline to be considered for inclusion into the study. 2. Participant is a primiparous new mother, 18-45 years inclusive, who had an uncomplicated vaginal or cesarean birth, gave birth to a healthy baby and both mother and baby are healthy at enrollment and randomization in the study. 3. Sexually active female participants of childbearing potential must be self-report practicing, at least, one or more the following methods of contraception during the study: intrauterine device (IUD), barrier method in combination with a spermicide, oral/hormonal contraception or abstinence. Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test before receiving study treatment. 4. Written informed consent must be obtained from the participant before study participation. 5. Participant is in good medical health. 6. No current abuse of alcohol or other substance. 7. Capable of giving informed consent. 8. Capable of doing active or sham CES treatments and completing all study requirements independently 9. For compliance, participants need to have completed 85% (36) of treatments to continue participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Participant had serious complications during or after a vaginal or cesarean delivery. 2. Participant had multiple births. 3. Participant meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-V criteria for a mental disorder diagnosis (i.e., schizophrenia, mood disorder, psychosis, anorexia nervosa) as determined by medical history and/or self-report. 4. Participant is clinically judged by the investigator to be at risk for suicide or is acutely suicidal. Participant has attempted suicide one or more times within the past twelve months. 5. Participant has a Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A14) score above 30 which suggests a very severe clinical level of anxiety symptoms. 6. Participant has a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) score above 30 which suggests a very severe clinical level of depressive symptoms. 7. Participant has a psychiatric condition that would require inpatient or partial psychiatric hospitalization. 8. Participant has a significant history of medical disease (i.e. cardiovascular, hepatic (e.g., cirrhosis, hepatitis B or C) renal, gynecological, musculoskeletal, neurological (seizures), gastrointestinal, metabolic, hematological, endocrine, cancer with a metastatic potential or progressive neurological disorders) which could impair reliable participation in the trial or necessitate the use of medication not allowed by this protocol. 9. Participant is pregnant, planning to become pregnant. If a participant becomes pregnant, she will be dropped from the study immediately and followed appropriately. 10. Participant has had concomitant therapy with another investigational drug, or participation in an investigational drug study within one month before entering this study. 11. Participant has a history of poor compliance or in the investigator's judgment any participant who is not compliant with the requirements of the study. 12. Participant has had previous trial of CES.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT1 (Baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 Weeks)Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A14): The HAM-A probes 14 parameters. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0=not present to 4=severe and combined to compute a total score. Higher total scores suggest worse outcomes Total score: 14-17 = Mild Anxiety Total score: 18-24 = Moderate Anxiety Total score: 25-30 = Severe Anxiety

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT1 (Baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 Weeks)Hamilton Depression Rating Scale17 (HAM-D17) Although the HAM-D form lists 21 items, the scoring is based on the first 17. Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe and combined to compute a total score. Nine items are scored from 0-2. Higher total scores suggest worse outcomes. Total score: 0-7 = Normal Total score: 8-13 = Mild Depression Total score: 14-18 = Moderate Depression Total score: 19-22 = Severe Depression Total score: ≥ 23 = Very Severe Depression 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression ≥ 23 = Very Severe Depression Higher total scores suggests worse outcomes
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale Scores Over TimeT1 (Baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 weeks)Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI19) A 19-item scale that measures sleep quality during the previous month and discriminates between good and poor sleepers The PSQI19 is a 19-item scale that measures sleep quality during the previous month and discriminates between good and poor sleepers 0 = no difficulty 3 = indicates severe difficulty Seven component scores are then added to yield one global score, with a range of 0 = 21 points 0 = indicating no difficulty to 21 = indicating severe difficulties in all areas.
Insomnia Severity Index Scores Over TimeT1 (baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 weeks)The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI7) Items include: the severity of sleep onset and maintenance (middle and early morning awakening) difficulties, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, interference with daily functioning, appearance of impairment attributed to the sleep problem, and the degree of concern caused by insomnia Total score categories: 0 - 7 = No clinically significant insomnia 8 - 14 = Sub threshold insomnia 15 - 21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity) 22 - 28 = Clinical insomnia (severe) Higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning Scores Over TimeT1 (baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 weeks)Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning (BIMF20) The Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning (BIMF) is a 20-item self-report measure that was designed to assess overall functioning in the context of new motherhood. After reverse-coding for items 16 and 18, the BIMF is scored by simply summing all 20 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 120 Higher scores represent better outcomes

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The only subject was recruited from study flyer in May 2018. Subject met inclusion criteria, provided informed consent and was recruited into the study.

Pre-assignment details

The only subject recruited from study flyer in May 2018. Subject met inclusion criteria, provided informed consent and was recruited into the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Comparator
About the size of a smart phone, the Alpha-Stim® AID CES device delivers a mild electrical current (100-500 µA) to the brain via ear clips electrodes. The active intervention is one daily 60 minutes Alpha-Stim® CES treatment using ear clip electrodes for 6 weeks at 0.5 Hz. 50% duty cycle with a fixed current of 100 µA (subsensory level). Alpha-Stim AID CES (Active Comparator): The Alpha-Stim® AID CES device delivers a mild electrical current (100-500 µA) to the brain via ear clips electrodes. The treatment regimen is one daily 60 minutes Alpha-Stim® CES treatment using ear clip electrodes for 6 weeks at 0.5 Hz. 50% duty cycle with a fixed current of 100 µA (subsensory level).
0
Sham Comparator
The Alpha-Stim® AID CES sham device is identical in appearance to the active device but is inactive and does not emit electrical current to the brain via ear clip electrodes. The sham intervention is one daily 60 minutes Alpha-Stim® CES treatment using ear clip electrodes for 6 weeks. Alpha-Stim AID CES (Sham Comparator): The Alpha-Stim® AID CES sham device is inactive and does not emit electrical current to the brain via ear clip electrodes. The sham treatment regimen is one daily 60 minutes Alpha-Stim® CES treatment using ear clip electrodes for 6 weeks.
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham ComparatorTotal
Ability to completing study requirements1 participants1 participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants1 Participants
Capable of giving informed consent1 participants1 participants
Delivery criteria1 participants1 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Number of participants ≥ 10.5 months postpartum0 participants0 participants
Number of Participants with No Current Abuse of Alchohol or Other Substance1 participants1 participants
Number of subjects who received contraception1 participants1 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants1 participants
Screening instrument criteria1 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Scores Over Time

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A14): The HAM-A probes 14 parameters. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0=not present to 4=severe and combined to compute a total score. Higher total scores suggest worse outcomes Total score: 14-17 = Mild Anxiety Total score: 18-24 = Moderate Anxiety Total score: 25-30 = Severe Anxiety

Time frame: T1 (Baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 Weeks)

Population: No subjects were randomly assigned to an active comparator

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ComparatorHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT115 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT215 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT314 score on a scale
Secondary

Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning Scores Over Time

Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning (BIMF20) The Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning (BIMF) is a 20-item self-report measure that was designed to assess overall functioning in the context of new motherhood. After reverse-coding for items 16 and 18, the BIMF is scored by simply summing all 20 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 120 Higher scores represent better outcomes

Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 weeks)

Population: No subjects were randomly assigned to an active comparator

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ComparatorBarkin Index of Maternal Functioning Scores Over TimeT193 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorBarkin Index of Maternal Functioning Scores Over TimeT297 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorBarkin Index of Maternal Functioning Scores Over TimeT392 score on a scale
Secondary

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores Over Time

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale17 (HAM-D17) Although the HAM-D form lists 21 items, the scoring is based on the first 17. Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe and combined to compute a total score. Nine items are scored from 0-2. Higher total scores suggest worse outcomes. Total score: 0-7 = Normal Total score: 8-13 = Mild Depression Total score: 14-18 = Moderate Depression Total score: 19-22 = Severe Depression Total score: ≥ 23 = Very Severe Depression 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression ≥ 23 = Very Severe Depression Higher total scores suggests worse outcomes

Time frame: T1 (Baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 Weeks)

Population: No subjects were randomly assigned to an active comparator

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ComparatorHamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT17 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorHamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT27 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorHamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores Over TimeT38 score on a scale
Secondary

Insomnia Severity Index Scores Over Time

The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI7) Items include: the severity of sleep onset and maintenance (middle and early morning awakening) difficulties, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, interference with daily functioning, appearance of impairment attributed to the sleep problem, and the degree of concern caused by insomnia Total score categories: 0 - 7 = No clinically significant insomnia 8 - 14 = Sub threshold insomnia 15 - 21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity) 22 - 28 = Clinical insomnia (severe) Higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 weeks)

Population: No subjects were randomly assigned to an active comparator

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ComparatorInsomnia Severity Index Scores Over TimeT11 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorInsomnia Severity Index Scores Over TimeT22 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorInsomnia Severity Index Scores Over TimeT35 score on a scale
Secondary

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale Scores Over Time

Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI19) A 19-item scale that measures sleep quality during the previous month and discriminates between good and poor sleepers The PSQI19 is a 19-item scale that measures sleep quality during the previous month and discriminates between good and poor sleepers 0 = no difficulty 3 = indicates severe difficulty Seven component scores are then added to yield one global score, with a range of 0 = 21 points 0 = indicating no difficulty to 21 = indicating severe difficulties in all areas.

Time frame: T1 (Baseline); T2 (3 weeks); T3 (6 weeks)

Population: No subjects were randomly assigned to an active comparator

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ComparatorPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale Scores Over TimeT18 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale Scores Over TimeT27 score on a scale
Sham ComparatorPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale Scores Over TimeT36 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026