Skip to content

Remote Ischemic Conditioning Paired With Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (REVISE-1)

A Pilot Study Assessing the Safety and Feasibility of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Paired With Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03210051
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-07-06
Start date
2017-07-07
Completion date
2017-12-20
Last updated
2017-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Stroke

Keywords

Acute ischemic stroke, Endovascular treatment, Remote ischemic conditioning, Reperfusion therapy, Neuroprotection

Brief summary

Currently, early reperfusion is considered as the most effective therapy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Over the past 20 years, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) has been demonstrated to be the only effective therapy for AIS. More recently, several large randomized clinical trials have concluded the superiority of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for AIS. Furthermore, with the development of materials and techniques, the occluded artery can be recanalized with high percentage (60%-90%), and the rate of recanalization is still being improved. A great number of AIS patients are now eligible for revascularization therapy and there should be a good prognosis of AIS after recanalizing the occluded artery using mechanical thrombectomy. However, things are never as simple as wished to be. The rate of patients with functional independence is less than 50% and over 15% patients died at 3 months post thrombectomy. The discrepancy between the functional outcome and recanalization rates encourage researchers to explore strategies that further improving the functional outcome of AIS patients. Remote ischemic conditioning has been demonstrated to reduce cerebral infarct size in mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia. And clinical researches demonstrated the protective effects of remote ischemic conditioning in AIS patient treated with IV tPA,. However, whether remote ischemic conditioning is safe and effective in protecting patients with large-vessel ischemic stroke and undergoing endovascular treatment is still unknown.

Detailed description

In the present study, the investigators will assess the safety and feasibility of remote ischemic condition paired with endovascular treatment for AIS. A single arm of AIS patients treated with endovascular therapy will be recruited, and remote ischemic conditioning will be applied prior to reperfusion therapy and in combination with post reperfusion therapy.

Interventions

DEVICERemote ischemic conditioning

RIC is a physical strategy performed by an electric autocontrol device with cuffs placed on bilateral arms and inflated to 200 mmHg for 5-min followed by deflation for 5-min, the procedures is performed repeatedly for 5 times.

PROCEDUREEndovascular treatment

Endovascular treatment include strategies that used to recanalize the occluded artery. Strategies often used include thrombectomy, intra-arterial thrombolysis, stenting and balloon angiography.

Sponsors

Capital Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Acute ischemic stroke where patient is ineligible for intravenous thrombolytic treatment or the treatment is contraindicated, or where patient has received intravenous thrombolytic therapy without recanalization; 2. No remarkable pre-stroke functional disability (mRS ≤ 1); 3. Age ≥18 and ≤ 80; 4. Patient treatable within six hours of symptom onset; 5. Informed consent obtained from patient or acceptable patient's surrogate

Exclusion criteria

1. Identified hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR \> 3.0; 2. Baseline platelet count \< 30\*109/L; 3. Baseline blood glucose of \< 2.7mmol/L or \>22.2mmol/L; 4. Renal insufficiency with creatinine ≥ 265 umol/L; 5. Severe, sustained hypertension (SBP \> 185 mmHg or DBP \> 110 mmHg); 6. Woman of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant or lactating; 7. Subject participating in a study involving other drug or device trial study; 8. Patients with a pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluations; 9. Unlikely to be available for 90-day follow-up; 10. Contraindication for remote ischemic conditioning: severe soft tissue injury, fracture, or peripheral vascular disease in the upper limbs; 11. Hypodensity on CT or restricted diffusion amounting to an ASPECTS score of \<7 on noncontrast CT; 12. CT or MRI evidence of hemorrhage; 13. Significant mass effect with midline shift on CT or MRI scans; 14. Subjects with artery occlusions in multiple vascular territories; 15. Evidence of intracranial tumor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with any RIC-related adverse events.0-90 days after endovascular treatment.For all participants, adverse events will be assessed by as assessed by CTCAE v4.0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in cerebral artery blood flow velocity0-7 days.Cerebral artery blood flow velocity is recorded continuously by Transcranial Doppler (TCD) during remote ischemic conditioning.
Change in vital signs0-7 days.Vital signs are documented continuously during remote ischemic conditioning.
Change in intracranial pressure0-7 days.Intracranial pressure is monitored by noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring equipment during remote ischemic conditioning
Change in plasma biomarkers0-7 days.Plasma biomarkers include biochemical biomarkers (e.g.,creatine kinase), blood routine test and coagulation function (e.g., PT, APTT, TT).
Final cerebral infarct volume.5-9 days after endovascular treatment.The final infarct volume of cerebral infarct is evaluated by cranial noncontrast CT.
Number of subjects completing all the designed RIC procedures.0-7 days.9 times (36 cycles) of RIC interventions are planned to be applied to each subject pre and post-endovascular treatment for 7 consecutive days.
The severity of global disability at 90 days, as assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS).0-90 days.The mRS is an ordinal, graded interval scale that assigns patients among 7 global disability levels, which ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage.0-90 days.Deterioration in NIHSS score of ≥4 points within 24 hours from treatment and evidence of hemorrhage in imaging scans.
Any adverse event.0-90 days.Adverse events related or not related to remote ischemic conditioning will be documented.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026