Skip to content

Effectiveness, Safety and Feasibility of HECT-CL, in Quetta, Pakistan

Effectiveness, Safety and Feasibility of Thermotherapy With the Hand-held Exothermic Crystallization Thermotherapy for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (HECT-CL), Device for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Quetta, Pakistan

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03208543
Acronym
HECT-CL
Enrollment
56
Registered
2017-07-05
Start date
2017-10-04
Completion date
2017-12-20
Last updated
2019-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cutaneous Leishmaniases

Keywords

thermotherapy, Pakistan

Brief summary

This research studies the effect thermotherapy as treatment of Old World CL which is not invasive, non-toxic, and the short treatment. While the current standard treatment comprise daily painful injections with antimonials,

Detailed description

The current standard treatment for Old World CL is based on daily painful injections with antimonials, which in Pakistan requires specialised care provided in secondary level care facilities. Apart from potential toxic side effects of these antimonials, the long treatment course, high cost and inconvenience, it may prevent patients from seeking care or completing treatment, especially women and children in the Pakistan context. Untreated cutaneous leishmaniasis may leave disfiguring scars leading to stigmatisation and (psycho) social problems. If the CL lesions/scars are located on joints they can cause problems in motion and lead to disability. At a public health level, patients with untreated CL lesions are a reservoir for further transmission of CL in the family and community. Thermotherapy is topical, not invasive, non-toxic, and the treatment duration is only 7 days, and therefore is expected to have major benefits for patients. Additional advantages are that the HECT-CL can be applied by lower level qualified health workers, and the costs are low (less than 3 USD) per re-usable heat pad), and therefore can be rolled out to peripheral health facilities, potentially having a major impact on access to treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEHECT-CL

To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of thermotherapy with the low cost Hand-held Exothermic Crystallization Thermotherapy pad in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.

Sponsors

Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlands
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be enrolled to receive seven treatment sessions with thermotherapy (HECT-CL device) and will be reassessed during follow up visits at day 15, 30, 60, 90 and 180

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with clinical CL symptoms for less than 6 months with the diagnosis confirmed by microscopic visualisation of Leishmania parasites in skin scrape smear. * Patients who have given written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with CL lesions located on or within two centimetres of eyes and lips. * Patients with more than four lesions. * Lesions, nodules and/or ulcerations with a diameter (ø) of more than 6 cm. * Patients with persistent lesions for more than 6 months. * Patients younger than 10 years. * Patients who are unlikely, unable or unwilling to be available for and comply to regular follow up visits for 6 months. * Pregnant, and lactating women \<6 months after delivery. * Patients with uncontrolled medical illnesses. * Patients with immune disorders, such as HIV/AIDS, or those who are on steroid medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Possible adverse effect of the HECT-CL treatment will studied by180 daysThe proportion of patients experiencing adverse effects (AEs) and serious adverse effects (SAEs) (Safety)
Acceptability of the HECT-CL treatment as assessed by180 daysproportion of patients completing the treatment schedule in time (feasibility)
Inappropriateness of the HECT-CL treatment as assessed by180 daysthe percentage of patients (%) with lesions where HECT-CL cannot be used, (e.g. near eyes and lips, larger than 6 cm, or more than four lesions) (feasibility)
Effectiveness of the HECT-CL treatment as assessed by180 daysThe proportion of patients with complete re-epithelisation at each follow up visit associated with the HECT-CL treatment
Ease of use of the HECT-CL treatment as assessed by180 daysthe observation of, and feedback from health providers on the ease of (re-)use of the HECT-CL (feasibility).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The duration of the healing process as assessed by180 daysThe mean time (days) between time of start of treatment and complete re-epithelisation of the treated lesion the healing of the lesion (time-to-heal).
The scars remaining after the HECT-CL treatment as assessed by180 daysthe proportion of patients with remaining scars

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026