Skip to content

A Phase 2 Study of NIR178 in Combination With PDR001 in Patients With Solid Tumors and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

A Phase 2, Multi-center, Open Label Study of NIR178 in Combination With PDR001 in Patients With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03207867
Enrollment
315
Registered
2017-07-05
Start date
2017-08-28
Completion date
2023-02-14
Last updated
2024-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NSCLC, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, RCC, Renal Cell Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Urothelial Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, DLBCL, Diffused Large B Cell Lymphoma, MSS, Microsatellite Stable Colon Cancer, TNBC, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Melanoma, mCRPC, Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Immunotherapy, A2aR, PDR001, NIR178, NSCLC, solid tumors

Brief summary

The purpose of this phase 2 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NIR178 in combination with PDR001 in multiple solid tumors and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and further explore schedule variations of NIR178 to optimize immune activation through inhibition of A2aR.

Detailed description

This is an open-label multi-part, phase II study evaluating the combination of NIR178 and PDR001 in patients with advanced solid tumors and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The study has three parts: * Part 1: Multi-arm Bayesian adaptive signal finding design in solid tumors and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with continuous dosing of NIR178 in combination with PDR001. * Part 2: Exploration of continuous and intermittent NIR178 schedules in combination with PDR001 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). * Part 3: Further evaluation of optimal intermittent or continuous schedule of NIR178 in combination with PDR001 (if selected based on results of Part 2). As of protocol amendment 6, Part 3 explored the safety and pharmacokinetics of the film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation of NIR178 continuous dosing in combination with PDR001 in tiple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. In addition, a separate safety run-in part was conducted in Japan in order to adequately characterize the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of NIR178 as a single-agent and in combination with PDR001. Patients enrolled in this study received NIR178 either twice daily (BID) continuously or based on the assigned intermittent schedule within 60 minutes prior to PDR001 infusion. PDR001 400 mg was administered via IV infusion over 30 minutes once every 4 weeks. Each treatment cycle was 28 days. Patients enrolled in the Japanese safety run-in part received NIR178 as single agent for the first cycle (28 days). If the patients completed Cycle 1 without experiencing dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), they initiated combination therapy with PDR001 starting Cycle 2 onwards, and continued at the same dose of NIR178. An additional cohort in the Japanese safety run-in part of the study received NIR178 in combination with PDR001 starting with Cycle 1. If the patients complete Cycle 1 without experiencing DLTs, they continued to receive combination treatment. Patients received treatment with the combination until disease progression (assessed by investigator per immune-related response criteria (iRECIST) or Cheson 2014), unacceptable toxicity, death or discontinuation from study treatment for any other reason (e.g., withdrawal of consent, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy or at the discretion of the investigator), otherwise known as End of Treatment.

Interventions

DRUGNIR178

NIR178, a new, non-xanthine based compound, is a potent oral adenosine A2a receptor against antagonist being developed by Novartis. NIR178 was administered orally twice daily (BID) as a capsule (Part 1, Part 2 and Japanese safety run-in) and as a film-coated table (Part 3). There were up to 3 dose levels assessed: 80, 160 and 240 mg. Three alternative dosing schedules were evaluated: continuous (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Japanese safety run-in), 2 weeks on/2 weeks off (Part 2) and 1 week on/1 week off (Part 2). Each cycle consisted of 28 days.

DRUGPDR001

PDR001 is a human monoclonal antibody (MAb) administered on Day 1 of each cycle. PDR001 400 mg was administered via intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 30 minutes every 4 weeks (Q4W).

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Part 1, Part 3 and the Japanese safety run-in part were not randomized. In Part 2, patients were randomized to one of the 3 treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1:1.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients ≥18 years of age. For Japan only: written consent is necessary both from the patient and his/her legal representative if he/she is under the age of 20 years. * Histologically documented advanced or metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas Part 1: histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic cancer, urothelial cancer, head and neck cancer, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), microsatellite stable (MSS) colon cancer, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), melanoma, metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) Part 2: histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced/metastatic NSCLC. For those with mixed histology, there must be a predominant histology Part 3: histologically confirmed diagnosis of selected advanced/metastatic malignancies. Part 3 will be opened to further assess TNBC patients with a PD-L1 SP-142 IC score of 0 (\<1%). A second tumor group will be considered for Part 3 after completion of Part 1. * Patient (except for those participating in Japanese safety run-in) must have a site of disease amenable to biopsy, and be a candidate for tumor biopsy according to the treating institution's guidelines. Patient must be willing to undergo a new tumor biopsy at screening, and again during therapy on this study. * Safety run-in part in Japanese patients can enroll any tumor type included in part 1, 2 and 3. The collection of recent sample is permitted under the following conditions (both must be met): Biopsy was collected ≤ 6 months before 1st dose of study treatment and available at the site. No immunotherapy was given to the patient since collection of biopsy. \- Part 1 - 3 only: Patients (other than those with DLBCL) must previously have received at least 1 and no more than 3 prior lines of therapy for their disease (with the exception of IO-pretreated cutaneous melanoma, HNSCC and RCC), unless considered inappropriate for the patient (e.g. safety concern, label contraindication): Patients with NSCLC must have received a prior platinum-based combination. Patients with EGFR positive NSCLC with a T790M mutation must have progressed on osimertinib or discontinued due to toxicity. Patients with head and neck cancer must have received a prior platinum-containing regimen. Patients with bladder cancer must have received a prior platinum-containing regimen or be ineligible for cisplatin. Patients with renal cell carcinoma must have received a prior VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Patients with MSS colorectal cancer must have received (or be intolerant to) prior therapy with fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin- and irinotecan- based regimens. Patients with triple negative breast cancer:. Part 1: must have received a prior taxane-containing regimen Part 3: should have received no more than 2 prior lines of therapy including taxane-based chemotherapy and should have a known PD-L1 status as per local available testing as determined by VENTANA PD-L1 SP142 Assay with IC score of 0 (\<1%) Patients with DLBCL should be limited to those with no available therapies of proven clinical benefit Patients should have had prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) or determined to be ineligible for auto-HSCT. Patients with melanoma: BRAF V600E wild type patients: must have received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 single agent, or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 therapy BRAF V600E mutant patients: must have received prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 single-agent, or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 therapy. In addition, subjects must have received prior BRAF V600E inhibitor therapy, either single-agent or in combination with a MEK inhibitor Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): * Of the 1-3 prior lines of therapy, patients must have received and failed at least one line of treatment after emergence of castration resistant disease * Patients must not have received prior immunotherapy (previous immune checkpoint inhibitors; single agent and/or combination therapy with anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1), except for NSCLC patients enrolled in part 3 and Japanese safety run-in part. * Patients must have measurable disease, defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded for non-nodal lesions and short axis for nodal lesions) as \>20 mm with conventional techniques or as \>10 mm with spiral computer tomography (CT) scan, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), or calipers by clinical exam.

Exclusion criteria

* Ongoing or prior treatment with A2aR inhibitors. Patients previously treated with A2aR inhibitors for non-oncologic indications (e.g. Parkinson's disease) may be considered for enrollment on a case by case basis. * Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 28 days before the first dose of PDR001, with the exception of intranasal/inhaled corticosteroids or systemic corticosteroids at physiological doses (not exceeding equivalent of 10 mg/day of prednisone) * History of another primary malignancy except for: Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease ≥2 years before the first dose of study drug and of low potential risk for recurrence Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna without evidence of disease Adequately treated carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease * Active or prior documented autoimmune disease within the past 2 years. Patients with vitiligo, Grave's disease, or psoriasis not requiring systemic treatment (within the past 2 years) are not excluded. * More than 3 prior lines of therapy except for Japanese safety run-in part. * History of interstitial lung disease or non-infectious pneumonitis * Systemic anti-cancer therapy within 2 weeks of the first dose of study treatment. For cytotoxic agents that have major delayed toxicity, e.g. mitomycin C and nitrosoureas, 6 weeks is indicated as washout period. For patients receiving anticancer immunotherapies, 4 weeks is indicated as the washout period. GnRH therapy to maintain effective testosterone suppression levels is allowed for mCRPC patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCLUp to 2.5 yearsORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). For Cheson 2014 criteria, CR= Target nodes/nodal masses must regress to ≤1.5 cm in longest diameter (LDi), no extralymphatic sites of disease, absent non-measured lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal, no new lesions, and bone marrow normal by morphology (if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative); PR= ≥50% decrease in the sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes, absent or regressed non-measured lesions, spleen must have regressed by \>50% in length beyond normal, and no new lesions.
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Mean Percentage Change in PSA From BaselineBaseline, up to 0.8 yearsProstate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were assessed in serum. Rising PSA is generally a manifestation of progression of prostate cancer.
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsDCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCLUp to 2.5 yearsDCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsDCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsDCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsDCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsDCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsDOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsDOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCLUp to 2.5 yearsDOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for DLBCL. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsDOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsDOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsDOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsDOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCLUp to 2.5 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)2 yearsOS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan (SAP).
Part 2: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)2 yearsOS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 3: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)2 yearsOS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor TissueScreening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor TissueScreening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.
Part 3: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor TissueScreening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodUp to 4 years (Part 1), 4.8 years (Part 2) and 0.6 years (Part 3)Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration.
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of NIR178 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of NIR178. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule.
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of PDR001 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of PDR001. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule. Dose reductions were not permitted for PDR001.
Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)Dose intensity of NIR178 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days.
Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)Dose intensity of PDR001 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days.
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 daysPK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose.
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesUp to approximately 5 yearsPDR001 immunogenicity was evaluated in serum samples. Patient anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status was defined as follows: * ADA-negative at baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline * ADA-positive at baseline: ADA-positive sample at baseline * ADA-negative post-baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-reduced ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-induced ADA-positive: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-induced ADA-positive sample * Treatment-boosted ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample * ADA-inconclusive: patient who does not qualify for any of the above definitions or a patient for which the baseline sample is missing
Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)28 daysA dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness or concomitant medications, which occurs within the first 28 days of treatment with NIR178 as single agent or in combination with PDR001 during the Japan safety run-in part of the study. Other clinically significant toxicities may be considered to be DLTs, even if not CTCAE grade 3 or higher.
Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodUp to 0.7 yearsNumber of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration.
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 daysPharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose.
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 daysPharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 daysPK parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation.
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 daysNJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose.
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 daysNJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsDCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 daysPK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
All Study Parts: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 28 Days Post Dose (AUC0-28day) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 daysPK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-28day calculation.
All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 daysNJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation.
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 3.9 yearsORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 4.7 yearsORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsUp to 0.5 yearsORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in 21 investigative sites in 15 countries.

Pre-assignment details

The screening period began once patients had signed the study informed consent. Screening evaluations had to be completed within 21 days prior to the first dose of treatment except for the radiological tumor assessment which had to be performed within 28 days prior to the first dose. After screening, the treatment period started on Cycle 1 Day 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had not been previously treated with immuno-oncology therapy
11
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mg
NIR178 240 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had not been previously treated with immuno-oncology therapy
12
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mg
NIR178 240 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had been pretreated with immuno-oncology therapy
11
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with pancreatic cancer
14
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with urothelial cancer
14
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) who had not been previously treated with immuno-oncology therapy
15
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) who had been pretreated with immuno-oncology therapy
11
Part 1: H-N Pre 240 mg
NIR178 240 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) who had been pretreated with immuno-oncology therapy
12
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC) with RAS wildtype
27
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC) with RAS mutant
29
Part 1: MSS CRC Unk 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC) with unknown RAS status
2
Part 1: TNBC 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
30
Part 1: Melanoma naïve 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with cutaneous melanoma who had not been previously treated with immuno-oncology therapy
3
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with cutaneous melanoma who had been pretreated with immuno-oncology therapy
13
Part 1: DLBCL 160 mg
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
13
Part 1: DLBCL 240 mg
NIR178 240 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
6
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mg
NIR178 240 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
15
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg Cont
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
22
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-off
NIR178 160 mg twice daily 2 weeks on/2 weeks off in combination with PDR001 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
20
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-off
NIR178 160 mg twice daily 1 week on/1 week off in combination with PDR001 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
20
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg Cont
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
6
JSR: 80 mg Cont
NIR178 80 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 (starting Cycle 2 Day 1) in the Japan safety run-in
3
JSR: 160 mg Cont
NIR178 160 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 (starting Cycle 2 Day 1) in the Japan safety run-in
3
JSR: 240 mg Cont
NIR178 140 mg twice daily continuous in combination with PDR001 (starting Cycle 1 Day 1) in the Japan safety run-in
3
Total315

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013FG014FG015FG016FG017FG018FG019FG020FG021FG022FG023
Overall StudyAdverse Event101002112200000031210000
Overall StudyDeath000001031201010002010000
Overall StudyPatient/guardian Decision001112101001012013410000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision350320004204002112130000
Overall StudyProgressive Disease77910111098192322431195101413146333

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: H-N Pre 240 mgPart 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: MSS CRC Unk 160 mgPart 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Melanoma naïve 160 mgPart 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: DLBCL 160 mgPart 1: DLBCL 240 mgPart 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 2: NSCLC 160 mg ContPart 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 3: TNBC 160 mg ContJSR: 80 mg ContJSR: 160 mg ContJSR: 240 mg ContTotal
Age, Continuous65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.96
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.98
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.63
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.13
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.05
60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.07
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.04
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.21
46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.56
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81
50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.65
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.87
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.65
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
68.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.14
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.51
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.16
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.69
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.54
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.59
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants8 Participants0 Participants0 Participants8 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants11 Participants13 Participants12 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants78 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants7 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
9 Participants3 Participants10 Participants13 Participants5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants12 Participants20 Participants23 Participants2 Participants21 Participants1 Participants13 Participants7 Participants0 Participants13 Participants10 Participants7 Participants7 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants200 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants6 Participants5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants9 Participants8 Participants1 Participants30 Participants1 Participants3 Participants7 Participants3 Participants0 Participants7 Participants7 Participants8 Participants6 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants119 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants12 Participants9 Participants8 Participants9 Participants13 Participants8 Participants9 Participants18 Participants21 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants10 Participants6 Participants3 Participants15 Participants15 Participants13 Participants12 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants196 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
EG016
affected / at risk
EG017
affected / at risk
EG018
affected / at risk
EG019
affected / at risk
EG020
affected / at risk
EG021
affected / at risk
EG022
affected / at risk
EG023
affected / at risk
EG024
affected / at risk
EG025
affected / at risk
EG026
affected / at risk
EG027
affected / at risk
EG028
affected / at risk
EG029
affected / at risk
EG030
affected / at risk
EG031
affected / at risk
EG032
affected / at risk
EG033
affected / at risk
EG034
affected / at risk
EG035
affected / at risk
EG036
affected / at risk
EG037
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 116 / 2310 / 146 / 148 / 264 / 1222 / 589 / 307 / 169 / 132 / 62 / 156 / 224 / 206 / 204 / 62 / 30 / 31 / 33 / 77 / 173 / 44 / 812 / 184 / 822 / 3612 / 218 / 92 / 43 / 47 / 138 / 169 / 167 / 141 / 20 / 00 / 01 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1122 / 2314 / 1414 / 1425 / 2612 / 1252 / 5829 / 3014 / 1613 / 135 / 614 / 1522 / 2216 / 2017 / 206 / 63 / 32 / 33 / 30 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 117 / 239 / 147 / 1416 / 265 / 1228 / 5814 / 304 / 167 / 130 / 65 / 1511 / 229 / 207 / 203 / 62 / 31 / 31 / 30 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL

ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). For Cheson 2014 criteria, CR= Target nodes/nodal masses must regress to ≤1.5 cm in longest diameter (LDi), no extralymphatic sites of disease, absent non-measured lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal, no new lesions, and bone marrow normal by morphology (if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative); PR= ≥50% decrease in the sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes, absent or regressed non-measured lesions, spleen must have regressed by \>50% in length beyond normal, and no new lesions.

Time frame: Up to 2.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected lymphoma group defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: DLBCL 160 mg

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL15.4 percentage of participants
Primary

Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors27.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors25.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors7.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors13.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors3.4 percentage of participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors10.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Primary

Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 who were randomized to the study treatment dosing schedule.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors9.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors10.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors16.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178

PK parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received NIR178 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated with the same formulation (capsule, tablet) at the same NIR178 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)295 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 198.3
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 7 (1 wk-on/1 wk-off)1260 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63.2
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 14 (2 wk-on/2 wk-off)1680 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 94.4
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)918 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 187.5
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)487 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 126.3
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)1620 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 147.9
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)938 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 412.2
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)232 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 437.4
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)697 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 131.8
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)170 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 124.9
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)63.3 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 88
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)242 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.5
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)12800 hr*ng/mL
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)550 hr*ng/mL
Secondary

All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)

NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received NIR178 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated with the same formulation (capsule, tablet) at the same NIR178 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)98.2 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 87.1
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 7 (1 wk-on/1 wk-off)243 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.5
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 14 (2 wk-on/2 wk-off)288 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.7
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)214 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 76.6
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)382 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.7
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)122 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 75.6
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)226 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 147
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)77.1 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.9
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)117 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.2
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)277 hr*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 69
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)362 hr*ng/mL
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)119 hr*ng/mL
Secondary

All Study Parts: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 28 Days Post Dose (AUC0-28day) of PDR001

PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-28day calculation.

Time frame: First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received PDR001 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated at the same PDR001 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 28 Days Post Dose (AUC0-28day) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1)1140 day*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.2
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 28 Days Post Dose (AUC0-28day) of PDR001Cycle 3 Day 12030 day*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.3
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 28 Days Post Dose (AUC0-28day) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1)1110 day*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.9
Secondary

All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received NIR178 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated with the same formulation (capsule, tablet) at the same NIR178 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)129 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 335
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 14 (2 wk-on/2 wk-off)392 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 212.7
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 7 (1 wk-on/1 wk-off)576 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 83.1
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)297 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 291.4
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)160 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 247.8
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)622 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 154.3
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)723 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 295.5
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)75.1 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 382.3
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)311 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 91.5
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)81.8 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 99.9
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)167 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.9
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)30.1 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.9
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)3760 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.6
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)234 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.9
Secondary

All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)

NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received NIR178 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated with the same formulation (capsule, tablet) at the same NIR178 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)25.5 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 85.2
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 7 (1 wk-on/1 wk-off)62.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.4
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 14 (2 wk-on/2 wk-off)71.3 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.3
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)42.6 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 82.2
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)33.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.2
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)77.3 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.9
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)54.1 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 102.4
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)20.1 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 99.2
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)45.6 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 74
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)25.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 77
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)53.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.2
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)111 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.6
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)28.5 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 99.9
Secondary

All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001

PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose.

Time frame: First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received PDR001 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated at the same PDR001 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001Cycle 3 Day 1126 µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.4
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1)93.2 µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.8
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1)85.0 µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.8
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001Cycle 3 Day 1119 µg/mL
Secondary

All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received NIR178 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated with the same formulation (capsule, tablet) at the same NIR178 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)2.00 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)2.00 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 7 (1 wk-on/1 wk-off)1.45 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 14 (2 wk-on/2 wk-off)1.97 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)2.13 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)2.02 hours
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)1.52 hours
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)1.50 hours
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)1.43 hours
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)1.50 hours
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)1.45 hours
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)1.50 hours
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)3.00 hours
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)2.87 hours
Secondary

All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)

NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received NIR178 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated with the same formulation (capsule, tablet) at the same NIR178 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 7 (1 wk-on/1 wk-off)1.50 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 14 (2 wk-on/2 wk-off)1.98 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)2.00 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)2.00 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)2.08 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)2.10 hours
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)0.750 hours
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)2.10 hours
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)2.23 hours
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)1.95 hours
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)1.45 hours
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 1 (all regimens)3.00 hours
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous)2.87 hours
Secondary

All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001

PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.

Time frame: First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days

Population: Patients in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) who received PDR001 and had an available value for the outcome measure at each timepoint. PAS consists of all patients who received one of the planned treatments, provided at least one PK parameter and did not vomit within 4 hours after dosing with NIR178. Patients from the same ethnicity (Non-Japanese, Japanese) treated at the same PDR001 dose level are pooled together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001Cycle 3 Day 11.50 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1)1.50 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1)1.50 hours
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001Cycle 3 Day 11.65 hours
Secondary

Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period

Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration.

Time frame: Up to 0.7 years

Population: All patients from the Japan safety run-in who received at least 1 dose of NIR178 or PDR001.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs2 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs3 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs2 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs3 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs1 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs1 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs3 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs1 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness or concomitant medications, which occurs within the first 28 days of treatment with NIR178 as single agent or in combination with PDR001 during the Japan safety run-in part of the study. Other clinically significant toxicities may be considered to be DLTs, even if not CTCAE grade 3 or higher.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: All patients in the Japan safety run-in who either met the minimum exposure criterion defined in the protocol and had sufficient safety evaluations, or had experienced a DLT during Cycle 1.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgJapan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Secondary

Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178

Dose intensity of NIR178 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)

Population: All patients from Part 1, 2 and 3 who received at least 1 dose of NIR178 or PDR001. For the safety endpoints, patients at each study part with the same type of cancer who are treated at the same dose level and dosing schedule are pooled together, independently of the immune-oncology (IO) pretreatment status and RAS mutation status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178316.7 mg/day
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178477.3 mg/day
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178320.0 mg/day
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178295.7 mg/day
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178309.8 mg/day
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178480.0 mg/day
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178320.0 mg/day
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178320.0 mg/day
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178320.0 mg/day
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178320.0 mg/day
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178480.0 mg/day
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178480.0 mg/day
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178320.0 mg/day
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178160.0 mg/day
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178160.0 mg/day
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178320.0 mg/day
Secondary

Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001

Dose intensity of PDR001 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)

Population: All patients from Part 1, 2 and 3 who received at least 1 dose of NIR178 or PDR001. For the safety endpoints, patients at each study part with the same type of cancer who are treated at the same dose level and dosing schedule are pooled together, independently of the immune-oncology (IO) pretreatment status and RAS mutation status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001394.2 mg/28 days
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001396.2 mg/28 days
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001393.1 mg/28 days
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001398.2 mg/28 days
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001400.0 mg/28 days
Secondary

Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period

Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration.

Time frame: Up to 4 years (Part 1), 4.8 years (Part 2) and 0.6 years (Part 3)

Population: All patients from Part 1, 2 and 3 who received at least 1 dose of NIR178 or PDR001. For the safety endpoints, patients at each study part with the same type of cancer who are treated at the same dose level and dosing schedule are pooled together, independently of the immune-oncology (IO) pretreatment status and RAS mutation status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs3 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs7 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs10 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs2 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs16 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs22 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs7 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs9 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs14 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs9 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs2 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs14 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs7 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs9 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs15 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs16 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs26 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs2 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs3 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs12 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs5 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs2 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs9 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs3 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs7 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs34 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs57 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs28 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs29 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs23 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs11 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs2 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs6 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs15 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs3 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs2 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs11 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs6 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs13 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs2 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs5 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs14 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs4 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs2 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs12 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs1 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs6 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs11 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs15 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs22 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs7 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs3 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs14 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs2 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs18 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs9 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs7 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs18 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related AEs4 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodSAEs3 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related fatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodFatal SAEs0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodAEs6 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment PeriodTreatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 Antibodies

PDR001 immunogenicity was evaluated in serum samples. Patient anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status was defined as follows: * ADA-negative at baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline * ADA-positive at baseline: ADA-positive sample at baseline * ADA-negative post-baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-reduced ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-induced ADA-positive: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-induced ADA-positive sample * Treatment-boosted ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample * ADA-inconclusive: patient who does not qualify for any of the above definitions or a patient for which the baseline sample is missing

Time frame: Up to approximately 5 years

Population: All patients from Part 1, 2 and 3 who received at least 1 dose of NIR178 or PDR001 and had a determinant baseline immunogenicity (IG) sample and at least 1 determinant post-baseline IG sample for assessing anti-PDR001 antibodies. For the safety endpoints, patients at each study part with the same type of cancer who are treated at the same dose level and dosing schedule are pooled together, independently of the immune-oncology (IO) pretreatment status and RAS mutation status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline10 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline11 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive1 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline23 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline23 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive1 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline12 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline11 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive1 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline13 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline12 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline24 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline22 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive2 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline11 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline11 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline49 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive1 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline3 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline48 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive1 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive2 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline25 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline27 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive2 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline13 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline13 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline10 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline10 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline6 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline6 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline11 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline13 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive2 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline21 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline21 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline19 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline14 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive5 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive3 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline14 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline17 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative at baseline6 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-reduced ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-boosted ADA-positive0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-inconclusive0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-positive at baseline0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesTreatment-induced ADA-positive1 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 AntibodiesADA-negative post-baseline5 Participants
Secondary

Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178

Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of NIR178 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of NIR178. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)

Population: All patients from Part 1, 2 and 3 who received at least 1 dose of NIR178 or PDR001. For the safety endpoints, patients at each study part with the same type of cancer who are treated at the same dose level and dosing schedule are pooled together, independently of the immune-oncology (IO) pretreatment status and RAS mutation status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction2 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption6 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction1 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption9 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption2 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction2 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption8 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption12 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction8 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption3 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction1 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction7 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption20 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction3 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption9 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption3 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction1 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction1 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption3 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption1 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction2 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption5 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction2 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption8 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption5 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction1 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction1 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption4 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178At least one dose interruption0 Participants
Secondary

Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001

Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of PDR001 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of PDR001. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule. Dose reductions were not permitted for PDR001.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)

Population: All patients from Part 1, 2 and 3 who received at least 1 dose of NIR178 or PDR001. For the safety endpoints, patients at each study part with the same type of cancer who are treated at the same dose level and dosing schedule are pooled together, independently of the immune-oncology (IO) pretreatment status and RAS mutation status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption6 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption7 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption1 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption6 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption9 Participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption1 Participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption13 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption8 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption2 Participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption2 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption6 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption4 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption2 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose reduction0 Participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContPart 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001At least one dose interruption0 Participants
Secondary

Part 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)

OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan (SAP).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected cancer groups defined in the protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg, DLBCL 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)63.6 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)42.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)27.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)NA percentage of participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)36.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)33.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)15.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)22.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)14.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)30.8 percentage of participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)NA percentage of participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)23.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)31.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue

The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.

Time frame: Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received any study drug, had paired tumor samples, had a valid assessment for the outcome measure and were included in the selected cancer groups defined in the protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg, DLBCL 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue10.93 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 14.227
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue10.53 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 12.456
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue0.70 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 2.645
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue-0.81 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 0.537
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue0.96 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 1.345
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue1.63 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 2.372
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue-0.42 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 1.477
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue0.70 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 1.141
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue-0.01 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 1.164
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue4.86 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 3.751
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue0.16 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 0.54
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue7.84 CD8 percent marker area
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue2.67 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 4.156
Secondary

Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL

DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Time frame: Up to 2.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected lymphoma group defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: DLBCL 160 mg

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL23.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors63.6 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors66.7 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors18.2 percentage of participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors35.7 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors40.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors54.5 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors25.9 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors13.8 percentage of participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors36.7 percentage of participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors46.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors54.5 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors66.7 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors18.2 percentage of participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors28.6 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors40.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors63.6 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors25.9 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors17.2 percentage of participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors33.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors46.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL

DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for DLBCL. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 2.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 for whom best overall response was CR or PR and were included in the selected lymphoma group defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: DLBCL 160 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCLNA months
Secondary

Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 for whom best overall response was iCR or iPR and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Secondary

Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 for whom best overall response was CR or PR and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Secondary

Part 1: Mean Percentage Change in PSA From Baseline

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were assessed in serum. Rising PSA is generally a manifestation of progression of prostate cancer.

Time frame: Baseline, up to 0.8 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the prostate cancer group defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Mean Percentage Change in PSA From Baseline214.46 percentage change in PSA from baselineStandard Deviation 329.459
Secondary

Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors36.4 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors25.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors7.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors13.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors3.4 percentage of participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors10.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL

PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 2.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected lymphoma group defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: DLBCL 160 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL1.7 months
Secondary

Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors8.7 months
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors7.2 months
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors1.9 months
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors1.7 months
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors2.1 months
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors2.0 months
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors3.5 months
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors1.8 months
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors1.9 months
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors1.8 months
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors1.8 months
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors3.7 months
Secondary

Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 3.9 years

Population: All patients from Part 1 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs and were included in the selected advanced solid tumors groups defined in the study protocol for efficacy assessment: RCC naïve 160 mg, RCC naïve 240 mg, RCC pre 240 mg, pancreatic 160 mg, urothelial 160 mg, H-N naïve 160 mg, H-N pre 160 mg, MSS CRC wt 160 mg, MSS CRC mu 160 mg, TNBC 160 mg, melanoma pre 160 mg and mCRPC 240 mg

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors3.5 months
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors7.2 months
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.9 months
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.7 months
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.9 months
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors2.0 months
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors3.5 months
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.7 months
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.9 months
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.7 months
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.8 months
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgPart 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors3.7 months
Secondary

Part 2: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)

OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 who were randomized to the study treatment dosing schedule.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)33.6 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)22.7 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)39.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue

The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.

Time frame: Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

Population: All patients from Part 2 who received any study drug, had paired tumor samples and had a valid assessment for the outcome measure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue3.81 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 4.551
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue-2.35 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 5.586
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue1.23 CD8 percent marker areaStandard Deviation 2.955
Secondary

Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 who were randomized to the study treatment dosing schedule.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors36.4 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors45.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors45.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 who were randomized to the study treatment dosing schedule.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors36.4 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors40.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors35.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 for whom best overall response was iCR or iPR

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Secondary

Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 for whom best overall response was CR or PR

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Secondary

Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 who were randomized to the study treatment dosing schedule.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors9.1 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors5.0 percentage of participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors15.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 who were randomized to the study treatment dosing schedule.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors2.1 months
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors2.2 months
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors2.8 months
Secondary

Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 4.7 years

Population: All patients from Part 2 who were randomized to the study treatment dosing schedule.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors2.0 months
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors2.1 months
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.9 months
Secondary

Part 3: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)

OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)NA percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 3: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue

The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.

Time frame: Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received any study drug, had paired tumor samples and had a valid assessment for the outcome measure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue0.26 CD8 percent marker area
Secondary

Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors16.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors16.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 for whom best overall response was iCR or iPR

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid TumorsNA months
Secondary

Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 for whom best overall response was CR or PR

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid TumorsNA months
Secondary

Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors16.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors

PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors1.6 months
Secondary

Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors

PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Time frame: Up to 0.5 years

Population: All patients from Part 3 who received at least 1 full or partial dose of assigned combination of study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgPart 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors1.6 months
Post Hoc

All-Collected Deaths

On-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths were collected from first dose of study medication to 150 days after last dose of NIR178+PDR001. Survival follow-up deaths were collected from 151 days after last dose of NIR178+PDR001 until end of study. All deaths refer to the sum of on-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths plus survival follow-up deaths.

Time frame: On-treatment and safety follow-up (FU) deaths: up to 4.3 years (Part 1), 5.1 years (Part 2), 0.9 years (Part 3) and 0.9 years (JSR). Survival FU deaths: up to 4.3 years (Part 1), 5.1 years (Part 2) and 0.9 years (Part 3) and 0.9 years (JSR)

Population: All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Patients at each study part with the same type of cancer who are treated at the same dose level and dosing schedule are pooled together, independently of the immune-oncology (IO) pretreatment status and RAS mutation status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths4 participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths7 participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths3 participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths13 participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths7 participants
Part 1: RCC naïve 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths6 participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths13 participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths10 participants
Part 1: RCC Pre 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths3 participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths6 participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths4 participants
Part 1: Pancreatic 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths10 participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths12 participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths20 participants
Part 1: Urothelial 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths8 participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths4 participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths8 participants
Part 1: H-N naïve 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths4 participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths22 participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths22 participants
Part 1: H-N Pre 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths44 participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths21 participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths9 participants
Part 1: MSS CRC wt 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths12 participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths7 participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths8 participants
Part 1: MSS CRC mu 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths15 participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths2 participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths9 participants
Part 1: TNBC 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths11 participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths2 participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths5 participants
Part 1: Melanoma Pre 160 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths3 participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths7 participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths9 participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths2 participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths14 participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths6 participants
Part 1: mCRPC 240 mgAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths8 participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths9 participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths4 participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 2wk-on/2wk-offAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths13 participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths6 participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths7 participants
Part 2: NSCLC 160 mg 1wk-on/1wk-offAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths13 participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths5 participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths4 participants
Part 3: TNBC 160 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths1 participants
JSR: 80 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths2 participants
JSR: 80 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths2 participants
JSR: 160 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths0 participants
JSR: 160 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths0 participants
JSR: 240 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsAll deaths2 participants
JSR: 240 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsOn-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths1 participants
JSR: 240 mg ContAll-Collected DeathsSurvival follow-up deaths1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026