Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Adults With Active Noninfectious Uveitis

A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Subjects With Active Noninfectious Uveitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03207815
Acronym
HUMBOLDT
Enrollment
74
Registered
2017-07-05
Start date
2017-07-26
Completion date
2021-04-22
Last updated
2022-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Noninfectious Uveitis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of filgotinib versus placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of noninfectious uveitis as measured by the percentage of participants failing treatment for active noninfectious uveitis by Week 24.

Interventions

DRUGFilgotinib

Tablet(s) administered orally

Tablet(s) administered orally

DRUGPrednisone

Tablet(s) administered orally

Sponsors

Galapagos NV
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Is diagnosed with active noninfectious intermediate-, posterior-, or pan-uveitis * Must have active uveitic disease at the Day 1/Baseline visit as defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following parameters in at least one eye despite 2 weeks of maintenance therapy with oral prednisone (≥ 10 mg/day to ≤ 60 mg/day) or an oral corticosteroid equivalent: * Active, inflammatory, chorioretinal and/or inflammatory retinal vascular lesion * ≥ 2+ anterior chamber cells per the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria * ≥ 2+ vitreous haze per the National Eye Institute/Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (NEI/SUN) criteria * No evidence of active tuberculosis (TB) or untreated latent TB Key

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with elevated intraocular pressures and/or severe glaucoma * Confirmed or suspected infectious uveitis, including but not limited to infectious uveitis due to TB, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1), Whipple's disease, Herpes Zoster virus (HZV), Lyme disease, toxoplasmosis and herpes simplex virus (HSV) Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Failing Treatment for Active NonInfectious Uveitis by Week 24Week 6 through Week 24Treatment failure was a participant meeting at least 1 of these criteria in at least 1 eye: New active, inflammatory lesions relative to Day 1/Baseline (all visits starting Week (Wk) 6); Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (change of Grade 0 to Grade 2+/Grade 0.5+ to Grade 3+) (all visits after Wk 6) relative to best state (RBS) achieved in Anterior Chamber (AC) cell grade (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature \[SUN\] criteria)\[AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells) to 4+ (\>50 cells), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (all visits after Wk 6) RBS achieved in Vitreous Haze (VH) grade (National Eye Institute \[NEI\]/SUN criteria)\[VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Worsening of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by ≥15 letters RBS achieved (all visits starting Wk 6), measured by an eye chart, fewer correct letters=severe uveitis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)Grading of VH was based on the publication from the NEI which has also been adapted by the SUN working group. VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), with higher scores indicating greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.
Change in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETPrior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)The number of AC cells observed within a 1 mm × 1 mm slit beam were recorded for each eye. The reported number was used to determine the grade according to the SUN criteria. AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells in field) to 4+ (\>50 cells in field), with higher scores indicating more cells visible in the AC and greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.
Change in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETPrior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)BCVA is the best possible vision that an eye can achieve with the set of glasses or contact lenses. A refraction test was performed to measure the appropriate lens strength to focus light on the retina. Using the appropriate corrective lenses based on that visit's refraction, participant's BCVA was measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. In the ETDRS system, 15 letters is equal to a change in 3 lines of visual acuity. If the participant is unable to read letters on a testing chart, visual acuity is described as ranging from ability to count fingers, recognize hand movements, or light perception. The smaller BVCA score indicates greater severity of uveitis. A positive change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.
Time to Treatment Failure on or After Week 6Week 6 through Week 52Treatment failure was a participant meeting at least 1 of these criteria in at least 1 eye: New active, inflammatory lesions relative to Day 1/Baseline (all visits starting Wk 6); Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (change of Grade 0 to Grade 2+/Grade 0.5+ to Grade 3+) (all visits after Wk 6) relative to best state (RBS) achieved in AC cell grade (SUN criteria) \[AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells) to 4+ (\>50 cells), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (all visits after Wk 6) RBS achieved in VH grade (NEI/SUN criteria) \[VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Worsening of BCVA by ≥15 letters RBS achieved (all visits starting Wk 6), measured by an eye chart, fewer correct letters=severe uveitis.
Time to Development of Macular Edema in At Least One Eye on or After Week 6Week 6 through Week 52Time in weeks until the development of Macular edema or Week 52 or EOT or ET. Macular edema is determined by OCT and is defined as central retinal thickness ≥ 300 microns if using Cirrus machine, or ≥ 315 microns if using Spectralis machine.
Plasma Concentration of FilgotinibDay 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time
Plasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Day 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time
Log Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETPrior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)Central retinal thickness is measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Central retinal thickness is defined as the thickness of the retina in the center of the foveal pit (1 mm subfield). The larger central retinal thickness value indicates greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Germany, Israel, and New Zealand. The first participant was screened on 26 July 2017. The last study visit occurred on 22 April 2021.

Pre-assignment details

116 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Filgotinib
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally, once daily for up to 52 weeks along with a standardized prednisone burst of 60 mg/day at Day 1/Baseline followed by a protocol-defined mandatory taper schedule up to Week 15.
37
Placebo
Participants received placebo to match filgotinib tablet orally, once daily for up to 52 weeks along with a standardized prednisone burst of 60 mg/day at Day 1/Baseline followed by a protocol-defined mandatory taper schedule up to Week 15.
35
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyInvestigator's Discretion11
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyPregnancy/Partner Pregnancy10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation31
Overall StudyWithdrew Consent10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboFilgotinib
Age, Continuous46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
57 Participants25 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Permitted
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
10 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
55 Participants26 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants31 participants29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants20 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants15 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 3719 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 372 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Failing Treatment for Active NonInfectious Uveitis by Week 24

Treatment failure was a participant meeting at least 1 of these criteria in at least 1 eye: New active, inflammatory lesions relative to Day 1/Baseline (all visits starting Week (Wk) 6); Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (change of Grade 0 to Grade 2+/Grade 0.5+ to Grade 3+) (all visits after Wk 6) relative to best state (RBS) achieved in Anterior Chamber (AC) cell grade (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature \[SUN\] criteria)\[AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells) to 4+ (\>50 cells), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (all visits after Wk 6) RBS achieved in Vitreous Haze (VH) grade (National Eye Institute \[NEI\]/SUN criteria)\[VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Worsening of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by ≥15 letters RBS achieved (all visits starting Wk 6), measured by an eye chart, fewer correct letters=severe uveitis.

Time frame: Week 6 through Week 24

Population: Evaluable Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and did not permanently discontinue from the study prior to Week 6.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FilgotinibPercentage of Participants Failing Treatment for Active NonInfectious Uveitis by Week 2437.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Failing Treatment for Active NonInfectious Uveitis by Week 2467.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.006495% CI: [-56.2, -4.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ET

The number of AC cells observed within a 1 mm × 1 mm slit beam were recorded for each eye. The reported number was used to determine the grade according to the SUN criteria. AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells in field) to 4+ (\>50 cells in field), with higher scores indicating more cells visible in the AC and greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.

Time frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)

Population: Participants in the Evaluable Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FilgotinibChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.0 scoreStandard Deviation 0.09
FilgotinibChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.0 scoreStandard Deviation 0.12
FilgotinibChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.2 scoreStandard Deviation 0.59
FilgotinibChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.2 scoreStandard Deviation 0.53
PlaceboChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.7 scoreStandard Deviation 1.05
PlaceboChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.1 scoreStandard Deviation 0.19
PlaceboChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.6 scoreStandard Deviation 0.87
PlaceboChange in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.1 scoreStandard Deviation 0.25
p-value: 0.014595% CI: [-0.8, -0.1]Repeated Measure ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ET

BCVA is the best possible vision that an eye can achieve with the set of glasses or contact lenses. A refraction test was performed to measure the appropriate lens strength to focus light on the retina. Using the appropriate corrective lenses based on that visit's refraction, participant's BCVA was measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. In the ETDRS system, 15 letters is equal to a change in 3 lines of visual acuity. If the participant is unable to read letters on a testing chart, visual acuity is described as ranging from ability to count fingers, recognize hand movements, or light perception. The smaller BVCA score indicates greater severity of uveitis. A positive change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.

Time frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)

Population: Participants in the Evaluable Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FilgotinibChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.09 logMARStandard Deviation 0.195
FilgotinibChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.09 logMARStandard Deviation 0.193
FilgotinibChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.03 logMARStandard Deviation 0.154
FilgotinibChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET-0.01 logMARStandard Deviation 0.116
PlaceboChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.07 logMARStandard Deviation 0.144
PlaceboChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.07 logMARStandard Deviation 0.209
PlaceboChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.05 logMARStandard Deviation 0.112
PlaceboChange in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.12 logMARStandard Deviation 0.28
p-value: 0.038995% CI: [-0.1, 0]Repeated Measure ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)

Grading of VH was based on the publication from the NEI which has also been adapted by the SUN working group. VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), with higher scores indicating greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.

Time frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)

Population: Participants in the Evaluable Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FilgotinibChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Left Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.1 scoreStandard Deviation 0.79
FilgotinibChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Left Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.3 scoreStandard Deviation 0.4
FilgotinibChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Right Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.1 scoreStandard Deviation 0.62
FilgotinibChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Right Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.3 scoreStandard Deviation 0.36
PlaceboChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Right Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.2 scoreStandard Deviation 0.66
PlaceboChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Left Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.3 scoreStandard Deviation 0.75
PlaceboChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Right Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.3 scoreStandard Deviation 0.45
PlaceboChange in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)Left Eye: Best State Prior to Week 60.2 scoreStandard Deviation 0.33
p-value: 0.35595% CI: [-0.4, 0.2]Repeated Measure ANCOVA
Secondary

Log Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ET

Central retinal thickness is measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Central retinal thickness is defined as the thickness of the retina in the center of the foveal pit (1 mm subfield). The larger central retinal thickness value indicates greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.

Time frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)

Population: Participants in the Evaluable Analysis Set with the available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FilgotinibLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Best State Prior to Week 62.45 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.059
FilgotinibLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Best State Prior to Week 62.47 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.056
FilgotinibLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.01 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.062
FilgotinibLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.01 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.049
PlaceboLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.03 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.055
PlaceboLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Best State Prior to Week 62.46 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.097
PlaceboLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETLeft Eye: Change From Best State at Week 52/EOT/ET0.04 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.08
PlaceboLog Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ETRight Eye: Best State Prior to Week 62.44 log micronsStandard Deviation 0.104
p-value: 0.03495% CI: [-0.05, 0]Repeated Measure ANCOVA
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib

Time frame: Day 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set who have at least one non-missing concentration data with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibDay 1 Postdose748.5 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 1043.84
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibWeek 4 Predose173.3 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 364.46
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibWeek 6 Predose133.9 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 306.18
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibWeek 12 Postdose1088.7 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 856.57
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibWeek 24 Single Anytime397.5 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 561.57
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibWeek 36 Single Anytime295.7 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 420.25
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibWeek 52 Single Anytime195.2 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 344.54
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of FilgotinibEarly Termination Single Anytime434.8 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 478.72
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845

Time frame: Day 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set who have at least one non-missing concentration data with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Early Termination Single Anytime2171.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1224.77
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Day 1 Postdose230.8 ng/mlStandard Deviation 317.98
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Week 4 Predose2085.6 ng/mlStandard Deviation 924.91
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Week 6 Predose2107.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 749.28
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Week 12 Postdose3237.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1180.74
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Week 24 Single Anytime3478.1 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1137.63
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Week 36 Single Anytime2944.3 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1130.84
FilgotinibPlasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845Week 52 Single Anytime2510.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1732.59
Secondary

Time to Development of Macular Edema in At Least One Eye on or After Week 6

Time in weeks until the development of Macular edema or Week 52 or EOT or ET. Macular edema is determined by OCT and is defined as central retinal thickness ≥ 300 microns if using Cirrus machine, or ≥ 315 microns if using Spectralis machine.

Time frame: Week 6 through Week 52

Population: Participants in the Evaluable Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FilgotinibTime to Development of Macular Edema in At Least One Eye on or After Week 67.8 weeks
PlaceboTime to Development of Macular Edema in At Least One Eye on or After Week 612.3 weeks
p-value: 0.589395% CI: [0.625, 2.277]Stratified Log-Rank Test
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure on or After Week 6

Treatment failure was a participant meeting at least 1 of these criteria in at least 1 eye: New active, inflammatory lesions relative to Day 1/Baseline (all visits starting Wk 6); Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (change of Grade 0 to Grade 2+/Grade 0.5+ to Grade 3+) (all visits after Wk 6) relative to best state (RBS) achieved in AC cell grade (SUN criteria) \[AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells) to 4+ (\>50 cells), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (all visits after Wk 6) RBS achieved in VH grade (NEI/SUN criteria) \[VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), higher scores=severe uveitis\]; Worsening of BCVA by ≥15 letters RBS achieved (all visits starting Wk 6), measured by an eye chart, fewer correct letters=severe uveitis.

Time frame: Week 6 through Week 52

Population: Participants in the Evaluable Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FilgotinibTime to Treatment Failure on or After Week 6NA weeks
PlaceboTime to Treatment Failure on or After Week 622.0 weeks
p-value: 0.001495% CI: [0.144, 0.663]Stratified Log-Rank Test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026