Skip to content

Milrinone Versus Dobutamine in Critically Ill Patients

Comparison of Milrinone Versus Dobutamine in a Heterogeneous Population of Critically Ill Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03207165
Enrollment
192
Registered
2017-07-02
Start date
2017-08-30
Completion date
2020-06-12
Last updated
2020-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiogenic Shock, Low Cardiac Output Syndrome, Pulmonary Edema

Keywords

Cardiogenic shock, Inotropes, Low cardiac output syndrome

Brief summary

The investigators are interested in determining if there is a meaningful difference between two of the most commonly used medications used to improve the pumping function of the heart among critically ill patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI). To do this, the investigators will randomly assign patients who are felt to require use of these medications by their treating physicians to one of the two most commonly used agents in Canada: Milrinone or Dobutamine. Each patient will be closely monitored by their healthcare team, and their medication will be adjusted based on each patient's clinical status. Information from blood work (e.g. kidney and liver function, complete blood counts, and other markers of how effectively blood is circulating in the body), assessment of end-organ function (e.g. urine output, mentation), abnormal heart rhythms noted on monitoring and results of imaging studies (e.g. angiogram, echocardiograms.) will be collected for analysis. All patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay at UOHI.

Detailed description

The use of various inotropes in the care of critically ill cardiac patients has become increasingly widespread: while predominantly used in decompensated heart failure, they have also been used in cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and septic shock. Purported mechanisms of efficacy include improved cardiac output, improved end-organ perfusion, and vasodilation of both pulmonary and systemic circulations. Two of the most commonly used agents are Milrinone, a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, and Dobutamine, a synthetic catecholamine with affinity for both beta-1 and 2 receptors. Both the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) support inotropes for acute and chronic heart failure management with low cardiac output states. Furthermore, the ACC recommends consideration of inotropic therapy within the STEMI guidelines when ACS is complicated by cardiogenic shock, heart failure or for hemodynamic support in isolated right ventricle infarctions. Beyond primarily cardiac etiologies, inotropes have been identified as first-line additive therapy for cardiac augmentation to Norepinephrine in patients with septic shock complicated by myocardial dysfunction. Despite the lack of convincing data supporting a morbidity or mortality benefit with the use of inotropes in severe, decompensated heart failure, cardiogenic or septic shock, or in ACS, inotropic therapy is still widely used across various critical care settings. Furthermore, to date, there has been no head to head comparison of the two more commonly used positive inotropes: Dobutamine and Milrinone. Selection of one inotrope over another is often guided by physician and center preference, and consideration of and purported avoidance of possible adverse effects. In this pilot study, the investigators aim to describe that characteristics of patients receiving inotropic support in the CCU setting and identify possible differences in morbidity and mortality between Dobutamine and Milrinone among a heterogeneous population of patients admitted to the CCU at UOHI, which may help to inform a larger clinical trial in the future. The purpose of this pilot study is to: (a) describe the characteristics of patients receiving inotropic support in the coronary care unit (CCU) setting (hemodynamics prior to inotrope initiation, etiology of cardiogenic shock state, use of PA catheter and values if deemed necessary by medical team) and (b) identify possible differences in morbidity \[atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, hepatic and renal function, markers of end-organ perfusion (lactate, urine output, mentation status), use of vasopressors, sustained hypotension of systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mmHg for greater than 30 minutes, need for mechanical support, cardiac transplant, total length of CCU stay, length of CCU stay greater than 14 days\] and mortality between patients in cardiogenic shock treated with Dobutamine versus Milrinone.

Interventions

DRUGMilrinone

Patients will be initiated on Milrinone at 0.125 mcg/kg/min \[stage 1\] and will be titrated according to a blinded protocol from stages 2 to 5 \[0.250, 0.375, 0.5 and \>0.5 ug/kg/min\]. All orders to initiate and titrate the dose of the allocated inotrope will be written in the chart as follows: 'Study inotrope dose to be \[increased/decreased/maintained\] at stage \[1-5\]' so as to ensure that treating physicians remain blinded to the allocated drug.

DRUGDobutamine

Patients will be initiated on Dobutamine at 2.5 mcg/kg/min \[stage 1\] and will be titrated according to a blinded protocol from stages 2 to 5 \[5.0, 7.5, 10 and \>10 ug/kg/min\]. All orders to initiate and titrate the dose of the allocated inotrope will be written in the chart as follows: 'Study inotrope dose to be \[increased/decreased/maintained\] at stage \[1-5\]' so as to ensure that treating physicians remain blinded to the allocated drug.

Sponsors

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The study participants, treating medical team and research team will be blinded to randomization; the pharmacy staff, CCU nurses and allied healthcare team members will not be blinded to the randomization.

Intervention model description

Consecutive patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) at the Ottawa Heart Institute from start of study (tentatively set for August 2017 with anticipated end date of June 2020) and identified by the treating medical team as requiring initiation of inotrope therapy will be screened and randomized based on the healthcare team's clinical assessment of predominantly LV or RV systolic dysfunction (biventricular dysfunction will be assigned to predominantly LV dysfunction). All decisions to initiate inotrope therapy will be made by the primary care team with no involvement from the research team.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have one or more of the following: * Low cardiac output state, evidenced by sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg) and end organ dysfunction (altered level of consciousness, elevated lactate, renal or hepatic dysfunction) * Clinical evidence of systemic and/or pulmonary congestion despite use of vasodilators and/or diuretics * ACS complicated by cardiogenic shock (defined as persistent hypotension with systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg with severe reduction in cardiac index \[\<1.8 L/min/m2 without support or \<2.2 L/min/m2 with support\], left ventricular end-diastolic pressure \>18 mmHg) * Augmentation of cardiac output when patient already on maximal vasopressor therapy * Or medical team's decision that patient needs inotropic therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent by the patient or substitute decision maker for healthcare decisions * Female participants who are currently pregnant * Patients presenting with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) * Healthcare team preference for use of specific inotrope (Milrinone or Dobutamine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for advanced mechanical support [specifically, intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, ventricular assist device or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation] or cardiac transplantThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionNeed for new mechanical support or cardiac transplant
Non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI]Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionAs defined by Thygesen et al., 2012 (Circulation)
Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapyThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionAcute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (intermittent hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy)
Stay in CCU greater than or equal to 7 daysThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionStay in CCU greater than or equal to 7 days
Transient ischemic attack [TIA] or cerebrovascular accident [CVA]Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionTransient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident as diagnosed by a Neurologist either clinically and/or radiographically
Composite Primary End PointThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionComposite of all-cause in-hospital death, non-fatal MI, TIA or CVA diagnosed by a Neurologist, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, need for cardiac transplant or new mechanical support, any atrial or ventricular arrhythmia leading to cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
All-cause in-hospital deathThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionAll-cause in-hospital death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum lactateThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionNormalization of serum lactate
Arrhythmia requiring medical team interventionThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionArrhythmia requiring medical team intervention, either through electrical or chemical cardioversion or any intravenous anti-arrhythmia medication administration
Change in systemic vascular resistance [SVR]Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionChange in systemic vascular resistance measured with PA catheter
Time on inotropesThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionTotal time on inotropes (in hours)
Non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilationThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionTotal number of days requiring non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation
Change in cardiac index ([CI]Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionChange in cardiac index measured with PA catheter
Change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP]Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionChange in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measured with PA catheter
Change in pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR]Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionChange in pulmonary vascular resistance measured with PA catheter
Presence of acute kidney injuryThrough duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admissionPresence of acute kidney injury (defined by KDIGO as creatinine increased by 26.5 umol/L, 1.5 times baseline within prior 7 days, or urine volume \<0.5 mL/kg/hour for greater than or equal to 6 hours

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained hypotension of systolic BPThrough duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admissionSustained systolic blood pressure hypotension of less than or equal to 90 mmHg for greater than or equal to 30 minutes (or requiring medical intervention)
Need for up-titration or addition of new vasopressor therapyThrough duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admissionNeed for up-titration or addition of new vasopressor therapy
Ventricular arrhythmiasThrough duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admissionVentricular arrhythmias (monomorphic or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia \[VT\] greater than 30 seconds or hemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmia requiring intervention, or VF)
Need for intravenous or oral anti-arrhythmic therapyThrough duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admissionInitiation of intravenous or oral anti-arrhythmic therapy
Atrial arrhythmias requiring medical interventionThrough duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admissionAtrial flutter, fibrillation or tachycardia requiring medical intervention

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026