Skip to content

LESS Surgery Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopy in Ovarian Drilling

Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery Versus Conventional Multi-port Laparoscopy in Ovarian Drilling: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03206892
Enrollment
70
Registered
2017-07-02
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2019-06-01
Last updated
2019-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Successful Surgical Procedure, Operative Time, Cosmetic Outcome, Intra- and Post- Operative Complications

Keywords

LESS surgery, conventional multi-port laparoscopy, SILS, Single-site surgery, Covidien, laparoscopy, minimally invasive surgery, ovarian drilling, PCOS, Diagnostic laparoscopy

Brief summary

laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopy for polycystic ovary syndrome in infertile women undergoing ovarian drilling as regards successful surgical procedure with less side effects

Detailed description

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; one of the most recent advances in the field of minimally invasive surgery, is the use of a single incision in the umbilicus for laparoscopic surgeries, is compared to the conventional multi-port laparoscopy for polycystic ovary syndrome in infertile women undergoing ovarian drilling as regards successful surgical procedure without conversion to laparotomy or use of an additional port in the single site group. in addition to operative time, intra- and post- operative complications and cosmetic outcome.

Interventions

laparoscopic ovarian drilling for polycystic ovary syndrome in infertile women comparing LESS surgery to conventional multiport laparoscopy

Sponsors

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

using sequentially numbered, opaque sealed enveloped; each envelope contains the method of intervention according to the random sequence and will be opened just before the intervention.

Intervention model description

women fulfilled the inclusion criteria and consented will be included in the study and randomly assigned into two groups using computer random sequence generator.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* PCOS according to Rotterdam Criteria (2 out of 3): * polycystic ovaries (12 or more follicles in each ovary and/or increased ovarian volume \>10 cm3). * oligo- or an-ovulation. * clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenisim. After exclusion of other aetiologies for irregular cycles. * Indications of laparoscopic ovarian drilling: * clomiphene citrate- resistance or failure: failure to conceive after 6 to 9 cycles. * other indications for laparoscopy. * before gonadotropin administration to decrease risk of OHSS and multiple pregnancy. * before ART to decrease risk of severe OHSS in women who previously had canceled IVF cycles due to OHSS risk or who suffered from OHSS in a previous treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* previous 2 or more laparotomies. * chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory diseases to avoid pelvic adhesions and bias in the quantification of postoperative pain. * High BMI (\>35kg/m2) * do not possess a native umbilicus. * advanced gynaecological surgeries or malignant disorders (TLH, ALVH, laparoscopic myomectomy). * contraindication to any laparoscopy like any medical condition worsened by pneumoperitoneum or Trendelnburg position.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
successful surgical procedure1 hour (minutes)without conversion to laparotomy or the use of an additional port in the single-site group (number of ports).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intraoperative blood loss24 hour after end of procedureamount of blood in the suction bottle (mL), drop in postoperative haemoglobin (g/dl)
intraoperative complications1 hourblood transfusion (number of units), bowel, bladder or ureteric injuries
postoperative hospital stay3 daysnumber of days
operative time1 hour (minutes)from trocar insertion to last skin stitch (minutes)
postoperative complications1st weekhematoma, wound infection, ileus, UTI
cosmetic outcomeday 1 and day 7scar image
postoperative pain1st dayvisual analogue scale (0-10 scale), number of postoperative analgesic ampules needed

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026