Skip to content

The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones

The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03206515
Enrollment
86
Registered
2017-07-02
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2017-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Calculi

Keywords

Renal Pelvic Pressure

Brief summary

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has been considered as the first-line choice for the management of \>20mm kidney stones. Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) which takes nephrolithotomy channel size less than or equal to 18, was first used in the treatment of children with kidney stones in 1997, then gradually applied to adult, aims to achieve the similar stone clearance rate as the standard channels, at the same time, reduce the complications. At present, the use of percutaneous renal surgery in our country is more than 18F plastic peel-away sheath, with the access sheath with a suction-evacuation function was first used by Guohua Zeng and so on. But there is still a lack of high quality evidence of Evidence-based medical evidence to compare the two kinds of sheath for the safety and effectiveness. Therefore, this study provides a reliable theoretical basis for the choice of the sheath for the treatment of 2-5cm size Kidney, and ultimately benefit patients with 20mm.

Detailed description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has been considered as the first-line choice for the management of \>20mm kidney stones. Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) which takes nephrolithotomy channel size less than or equal to 18, was first used in the treatment of children with kidney stones in 1997, then gradually applied to adult, aims to achieve the similar stone clearance rate as the standard channels, at the same time, reduce the complications. At present, the use of percutaneous renal surgery in our country is more than 18F plastic peel-away sheath, with the access sheath with a suction-evacuation function was first used by Guohua Zeng and so on. But there is still a lack of high quality evidence of Evidence-based medical evidence to compare the two kinds of sheath for the safety and effectiveness. Therefore, this study provides a reliable theoretical basis for the choice of the sheath for the treatment of 2-5cm size Kidney, and ultimately benefit patients with 20mm.

Interventions

DEVICE18F Peel-Way Sheath

Patients undergoing Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with The 18F peel-way sheath

DEVICE18F access sheath with a suction-evacuation function

Patients undergoing Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with The 18F access sheath with a suction-evacuation function

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients consent for percutaneous renal stone removal * Age 18 to 70 years * Normal renal function * ASA score Ⅰ and Ⅱ * Renal stones 20-50mm

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with solitary kidney * Uncorrected coagulopathy and active urinary tract infection (UTI) * Morbid obese patients * Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion * Congenital abnormalities * Patients will be excluded from the study if the undergoing standard PNL/mini-perc have purulent fluid in the initial puncture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The renal pelvic pressureDuring the procedureTo measure the renal pelvic pressure during mini-PCNL procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perioperative complicationsIntraoperatively or ≤ 1 month postoperativelyInvaluate perioperative complications by modified Clavien system

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactGuohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D
gzgyzgh@vip.tom.com+86 13802916676
Backup ContactGuangming Chen
1172676107@qq.com+8613246888213

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026