Pain, Inpatient, Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
Cancer pain is one of the problems of treating cancer pain. Although, there is a WHO analgesic ladder to improve this problem, it is still inadequate pain control. Pain does not affect only physical but also emotional and quality of life. From review literatures we found that patients' knowledge about cancer pain management is inaccurate; for example, fear to use opioid, try to patience of pain, concerning only cancer treatments, which can cause of unfavorable pain management outcome. Therefore, we will conduct the RCT of using pain education by video comparing to conventional face to face pain education by nurse in hospitalized cancer pain patients.We will use 25 MCQs examination for testing pre-post intervention to test level of understanding of patients. The measurements are NRS, ThaiHADs and FACT-G at the first and last day of study. We expect that NRS should improve more than 50% at the seven day of study.
Detailed description
protocol Randomized controlled trial study Sample size is 70 patients divided to 2 groups (35 for video group and 35 for conventional face to face group) Inclusion criteria 1. patients' age 18-70 years old 2. moderate to severe cancer pain 3. ECOG(Eastern cooperative Oncology Group) performance status \<= 3 4. Patients can write and read Thai language Exclusion criteria 1.Clinical unstability 2.Confusion and delirium 3.Bed ridden 4.Psychotic problem We will randomly allocate patients by using computer program nQuery advice 6.0. After patients sign inform consent we will record baseline characteristics, assess baseline Numerical rating scale (NRS), emotional status (ThaiHADs), Quality of life status (FACT-G). All patients will do the 25 MCQs test within 30 minutes before intervention. Video group will watch video 10 minutes and conventional group will receive pain education from trained nurse in the same period. The knowledge includes cancer pain definition, cancer pain management, pain assessment and role of patients in cancer pain management. After finishing intervention patients will the same 25 MCQs test (30 minutes) and patients can ask questions to the trained nurse. All patients will be educated to record pain diary everyday for seven days. All patients will receive standard pain management from the physicians. At the day seven we will assess NRS, ThaiHADs and FACT-G and finish the study.
Interventions
OTHERVideo group
Using video for educate cancer pain patients
OTHERconventional group
Face to face cancer pain education by trained nurse
Sponsors
Mahidol University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* moderate to severe pain (NRS\>4) cancer pain * ECOG (Eastern cooperative Oncology group) performance status \<=3 * Can read, listen, write Thai language
Exclusion criteria
* Clinical instability * Confusion and delirium * Bed ridden * Psychotic problem
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity | seven days | The pain reduction will be assessed and compared using numerical rating (NRS) from 0-10; 0 designating no pain and 10 designating worst possible pain scale between the first day and the seventh day of study |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Emotional status | seven days | The emotional status of participants will be assessed and compared using Thai-HADs (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) between the first day and the seventh day of study. The score will be analyzed into depression and anxiety. the score 0-7 for either sub scale being in normal range, 8-10; being just suggestive of the presence of the respective state, a score of 11 or higher indicating probable presence of the mood disorder(Depression and Anxiety). |
| Functional assessment | seven days | Functional status will be assessed and compared using FACT-G between the first day and the seventh day of study. The subscale including physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being. Each items scored from 0-4; from 0 means not at all to 4 means very much. The higher score would indicate better quality of life. |
Countries
Thailand
Outcome results
None listed