Skip to content

Optimization of Coronary Sinus Lead Placement Targeted to the Longest Right-to-Left Delay

Optimization of Coronary Sinus Lead Placement Targeted to the Longest Right-to-Left Delay

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03204864
Acronym
Opsite 2
Enrollment
211
Registered
2017-07-02
Start date
2016-03-01
Completion date
2018-03-31
Last updated
2018-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HF Patient

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, multi-center, physician-initiated study, with intra-center control arm of patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without defibrillator therapy. The purpose of this study is to verify whether optimizing the left ventricular lead position at implantation with the pacing cathode corresponding to the longest RV-to-LV electrical delay may result in a better patient outcome. The RV-to-LV electrical delay will be evaluated with RLD value (ms). RLD is the distance between the Right Ventricular pacing marker (VP) and the maximum peak (or the first maximum peak in case of two equally tall peaks) of the LV bipolar deflection.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, multi-center, physician-initiated study, with intra-center control arm of patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without defibrillator therapy. Approximately 300 patients will be included in the study and followed-up for 6 months. Patients recruitment will consist of two sequential phases: Phase 1 - Conventional CS lead placement (Conventional subgroup). The first 100 patients will be implanted with a CRT device with or without defibrillator (P/D) as per standard clinical practice, without CS lead pacing specific optimization. In these patients RLD is measured blind to implanting physician who will place CS lead according to his/her clinical practice. Since these patients follow strictly standard clinical practice, their implantation data can be collected prospectively or even retrospectively when available. Phase 2 - Targeted CS lead placement (RLD subgroup). In the second 200 patients CS placement will be guided by RLD measurement. Physician will place the CS lead in the site of longest RLD with a stable and acceptable pacing threshold.

Interventions

DEVICEConventional CS lead placement

Clinical Practice

DEVICERLD Group

patients CS placement will be guided by RLD measurement. Physician will place the CS lead in the site of longest RLD with a stable and acceptable pacing threshold.

Sponsors

Michele Brignole
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Phase 1. Conventional CS lead placement Phase 2. CS placement guided by RLD measurement

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be in NYHA II or III functional class with approved class I or II standard indications by ESC/EHRA Guidelines * Either patients in sinus rhythm or in atrial fibrillation. In this latter case patients must perform AV node ablation if complete biventricular stimulation cannot be achieved in \>95% of beats * Patients willing and able to comply with study requirements(patients must indicate their understanding of the study and willingness to participate by signing an appropriate informed consent form) * Successful LV lead implant

Exclusion criteria

* Myocardial Infarction, unstable angina within 40 days prior the enrollment * Recent cardiac revascularization (PTCA, Stent or CABG) in the 4 weeks prior to enrollment or planned for the 3 months following * Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the 3 months prior the enrollment * Primary valvular disease * Unable to comply with the follow up schedule * Less than 18 years of age * Pregnant or are planning to become pregnant during the duration of the investigation * Classification of Status 1 for cardiac transplantation or consideration for transplantation over the next 12 months * Undergone a cardiac transplantation * Life expectancy \< 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Composite Score -3 months3 monthsImprovement in clinical composite score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Composite Score-6 months6 monthsClinical composite score evaluation

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026