Peripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent Claudication
Conditions
Keywords
Patient education, Pain management, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, Physical activity, Feasibility
Brief summary
Peripheral Arterial disease is a common condition which causes narrowing of the arteries. The most common symptom that patients with PAD experience is Intermittent Claudication (IC), pain in the lower limb(s) on exertion, which is relieved by rest. IC reduces patients' quality of life (QoL) by limiting their ability to walk and engage in daily activities. Regular exercise and physical activity (PA) are central to the management of PAD and help to improve walking distances and reduce the risks associated with PAD such as heart attack and stroke. However, exercise and PA in this population is often limited due to pain. Investigators have shown that Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) can help to reduce pain and increase walking distance in patients with PAD. Investigators have also shown that educating patients about their condition and helping them to set goals has the potential to increase PA, and quality of life. This study will examine the feasibility of designing a definitive trial that investigates whether TENS can improve the physical activity of patients with PAD when delivered alone and/or alongside a patient education programme.
Detailed description
Peripheral Arterial disease (PAD) affects 2.7 million people in the United Kingdom (UK). The most common symptom that patients experience is Intermittent Claudication (IC), which is pain in the buttock, calf or thigh precipitated by exercise and relieved by rest. The underlying cause of PAD is atherosclerosis, which leads to arterial stenosis, inadequate blood flow and build-up of lactic acid during exercise. Patients with IC have impaired quality of life due to reduced physical capacity. Furthermore, due to the diffuse nature of atherosclerosis and the involvement of other arterial beds, they have 3-4 times increased mortality compared to age and sex matched controls. Patients with symptomatic PAD should receive the same secondary prevention management as patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Improving daily physical activity (PA) is particularly important in individuals with IC as lower PA levels have been recognised as a strong predictor of increased morbidity and mortality in this population. Current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of supervised exercise programmes (SEPs), encouraging patients to exercise to the point of maximal pain, as first line treatment. SEPs has been shown to be cost-effective when compared to other treatment options such as endovascular intervention and surgical revascularisation. However, while systematic reviews show that SEPs lead to a significant improvement in the absolute walking distances of patients with IC on a treadmill, it is unclear if this is sustained or leads to improvement in daily PA. Furthermore, due to the considerable extra resources required to deliver the recommended 3 months exercise programme (30-45 minutes 3x weekly), SEPs are not always routinely available to National Health Service (NHS) patients, and time and travel costs tend to lead to low patient uptake and high attrition rates. Therefore, investigating the feasibility of using low-cost, patient-centred interventions that can support increased PA is warranted. Lack of self-efficacy, attributed to poor understanding of the disease and uncertainty regarding the importance of exercise, has been shown to be a major barrier to exercise uptake in this population. Educating patients with IC about their disease pathology and the benefits of walking is key to enhancing success of secondary prevention strategies for people with IC. Investigators recently piloted a structured, patient-centred education intervention (SEDRIC) with the specific aim of educating patients with IC about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking. In addition to improved treadmill walking distances, investigators found out that there was a trend for patients to increase their daily PA. For patients with IC to gain benefits of secondary prevention, exercising beyond the point when pain occurs is recommended, representing another barrier to engagement in PA. Despite this, investigators' systematic review found that pain management as a route to facilitate exercise and PA has rarely been explored. Recent interest has focused on the use of TENS (a low-cost, non-invasive pain management device) to improve angiogenesis, muscle function, pain and walking distances in patients with IC. TENS has a strong placebo effect in pain conditions, and testing effectiveness against placebo is advocated. In a proof-of-concept pilot study, Investigators demonstrated that TENS could significantly improve pain and increase treadmill walking distances above placebo levels. Our exploratory study also established that home use of TENS was both acceptable and provided self-reported improvement in PA in individuals with IC. Although patient-centred education (SEDRIC) and TENS have both demonstrated potential to improve daily PA in people with IC, the use of these components in combination has not previously been evaluated. Investigators therefore propose a 2 x 2 (TENS versus placebo TENS x SEDRIC versus no additional education) feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) that will compare use of TENS against placebo TENS with and without a patient-centred education programme. Investigators have conducted a series of pilot studies underpinning both aspects of the intervention. Investigators have demonstrated in an experimental lower limb ischaemic pain model in healthy volunteers (n=28) that TENS significantly reduced onset of pain (by 29 seconds; 23%), tolerance of pain (by 203 seconds; 53%) and the pain endurance (by 173 seconds; 67%), compared to placebo TENS. Following this, in a proof-of-concept pilot study, investigators demonstrated that TENS when applied to patient with IC exercising on a treadmill (n=40) significantly improved absolute claudication distance (ACD) above placebo levels (approx. mean individual increase in ACD of 40%, p=.025, r= .53). Our phase 2 study also established that home use of TENS was both acceptable and provided self-reported improvement in PA in individuals with IC. Investigators have not assessed the ability of TENS to improve ACD when used during daily life. Similarly, this research group developed and piloted SEDRIC, a structured, patient-centred education intervention with the specific aim of educating patients about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking. Investigators found that in patients with PAD (n=14), treadmill walking distances (30%) and quality of life (32%) improved from baseline after 6 weeks of structured education, and there was a trend for patients to increase their daily PA (approx. 8% change from baseline). The aim is to determine the feasibility of electrical stimulation via a low-cost CE-marked device used within a patient centred education programme to improve walking distances in patients with PAD. The following research questions will be answered by this project: 1. What is the feasibility (i.e. recruitment and retention rates, adherence, safety, sample size for a definitive trial, potential for effectiveness) of conducting a definitive RCT comparing TENS with and without patient-centred education? 2. How acceptable are TENS and patient-centred education as interventions on their own or in combination in patients with IC?
Interventions
TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin.
Group education for patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking
TENS device use with setting so that the stimulation delivered is ineffective
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Primary outcome assessors will be blinded for patient group allocation
Intervention model description
2x2 randomised feasibility controlled trial blinded for primary outcome
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) including resting Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) \<0.9 in at least one leg * Stable IC for ≥3 months * Walking limited primarily by claudication * Able to exercise on a treadmill * Able to read and speak English to a level allowing satisfactory completion of the study procedures * Able to provide written informed consent for participation
Exclusion criteria
* Planned surgical or endovascular intervention for PAD within the next 3 months * Critical limb ischaemia * The presence of any absolute contraindications to exercise testing/training as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) * Previous experience of using TENS/ structured patient education for PAD * Contraindications to TENS (including epilepsy, dermatological conditions, indwelling electrical pumps/pacemakers) and inability to apply TENS independently. * Patients who require walking aids including artificial limbs * Major surgery, myocardial infarction or stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) in the previous 6 months * Co-morbidities that cause pain or limit walking to a greater extent than IC (e.g. severe arthritis) * \>20% variation in baseline ACD on treadmill * Severe peripheral neuropathies above the ankle. * Participation in another research protocol
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Maximal walking distance on graded treadmill test |
| Recruitment Rates | Recruitment | Measure recruitment rates (ratio of patients who consent to participate to potentially eligible patient recorded via the study screening log |
| Participant Retention Rate | End of study (18 weeks) | Ratio of patients who completed the intervention and outcome assessment to the patient who consented |
| Adverse Events | End of study (18 weeks) | Record defined adverse events in all groups |
| Uptake of Interventions | End of study (18 weeks) | Measure uptake of intervention via log of TENS use and attendance at education session and follow up phone calls |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Event-based claudication index (ratio of walking events to upright events) participants undertake in a day. |
| Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Disease specific quality of life questionnaire. ICQ scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing better health status and less impact of claudication |
| Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Generic quality of life questionnaire, physical domain. The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) ranges from 0-100, with higher scores representing better outcomes. |
| McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Pain quality questionnaire. The MPQ-PRI ranges from 0-78, with lower scores representing less pain and higher scores representing worse pain. |
| Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | The PSEQ total score ranges from 0-60, with higher scores indicating better pain self-efficacy and more positive outcomes. |
| Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | The Brief IPQ uses 0-10 scales. Higher scores indicate worse perceptions (greater perceived consequences, concern, emotional impact, chronicity). |
| Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Depression questionnaire. The GDS-SF ranges 0-15, with higher scores reflecting more depressive symptoms. |
| SF-36 Mental Component Score | Baseline, end of intervention and follow-up | SF-36 Quality of life scale - mental component. The SF-36 MCS ranges 0-100 (or norm-based mean 50, SD 10), with higher scores representing better outcomes. |
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Average Pain intensity in the past 7 days. The average pain intensity VAS ranges from 0-100 mm, with lower scores indicating less pain and better outcomes. |
| Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Onset distance of claudication pain on graded treadmill test |
| Change in Daily Number of Steps | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Change in daily number of steps (activpal step counts) |
| Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Total number of upright events per day (activpal upright even count) |
| Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up) | Total number of walking events per day (activpal walking event counts) |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The trial was open for recruitment between August 2017 and March 2020. In total, 1030 people were screened for eligibility; 763 (74%) were ineligible, mainly because they were on the clinic lists due to other conditions e.g., Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or venous disease (n=343, 45% of ineligible total) or had Critical Limb Ischaemia (CLI) (n=122, 16%). There were 172 individuals that either did not consent to participate or did not respond to invitation.
Pre-assignment details
Participants underwent additional screening prior to randomisation in adherence with the inclusion criteria in the protocol. Thirty-nine participants did not pass screening, 38 (97%) due to having a greater than 20% variance in ACD between the first and second screening visits (one week apart). The other participant who did not pass screening was unable to walk on the treadmill.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active TENS Participants in the TENS groups will be provided with a TENS machine and training at the baseline visit to the Clinical research Facility (CRF). They will be instructed to use it daily as their symptoms require for 6 weeks. The active group will receive High Frequency-TENS (120 Hz, 200µs and a patient-determined intensity of ''strong but comfortable'').
Active TENS: TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin. | 14 |
| Placebo TENS Placebo TENS : Participants will receive the same model, programmed settings and instructions for use as those in the active group except that the device will be set to an ineffective stimulation (120 Hz, 200µs and a patient-determined intensity of '6mA). For the purpose of blinding, participants will be told that different dosages of TENS are being tested, some of which where the stimulation might not be perceivable even though the device is working.
Placebo TENS: TENS device use with setting so that the stimulation delivered is ineffective | 14 |
| Patient-Centred Education Patient-Centred Education : a one-off three-hour workshop of structured group education (4-5 persons in each group) and three 2-weekly phone calls. The aim will be to modify patients' illness beliefs and perceptions about IC/PAD by educating them on disease pathology and management philosophy. After the workshop, each patient will be supported to set goals for walking, develop an action plan regarding how these goals will be met and encouraged to repeat this process for each new walking goal.
Patient-Centred Education: Group education for patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking | 14 |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS Combination of Patient-Centred Education arm and Active TENS arm.
Active TENS: TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin.
Patient-Centred Education: Group education for patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking | 14 |
| Total | 56 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Active TENS | Total | Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Patient-Centred Education | Placebo TENS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) | 243.7 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 240.5 | 296.1 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 277.3 | 318.4 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 321.6 | 370.9 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 285.3 | 251.3 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 266.5 |
| Age, Continuous | 65.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | 66.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 66.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 | 64.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 | 69.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 |
| Ankle Brachial Pressure Index | 0.70 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.21 | 0.69 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 | 0.66 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14 | 0.67 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15 | 0.74 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.28 |
| Average daily number of steps ('000s) | 7.5 Steps per day STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 | 5.9 Steps per day STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 | 5.1 Steps per day STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 | 6.0 Steps per day STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 | 4.9 Steps per day STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 |
| Average daily number of upright events | 7.0 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 | 6.4 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 | 6.1 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 | 6.6 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 | 6.1 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 |
| Average daily number of walking events | 50.0 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 24 | 50.0 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.2 | 46.4 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1 | 53.6 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 26 | 50.2 Count STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2 |
| Body Mass Index | 26.4 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 | 28.5 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 | 29.4 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 | 30.2 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 | 27.9 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 |
| Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire | 47.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 | 47.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 49.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 | 49.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | 43.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 |
| Event-based Claudication Index | 7.3 Ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 | 8.3 Ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 | 8.5 Ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 | 8.4 Ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 | 8.9 Ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 |
| Geriatric Depression Scale (short-form) | 6.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 | 6.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 | 6.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 | 7.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 | 5.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 |
| Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) | 84.4 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.2 | 113.1 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 135.7 | 111.7 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 162.3 | 130.2 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 129.6 | 126.1 Metres STANDARD_DEVIATION 165.2 |
| Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire | 53.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 | 51.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 | 47.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 | 52.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 | 53.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 |
| McGill Pain Questionnaire | 30.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 | 28.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | 29.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 31.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 | 22.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 |
| Pain intensity (visual analogue scale) | 6.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 | 6.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 | 5.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 | 6.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 | 6.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 |
| Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire | 35.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 | 37.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 | 35.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 | 36.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8 | 42.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — | — | — |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 14 participants | 56 participants | 14 participants | 14 participants | 14 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 14 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 42 Participants | 9 Participants | 10 Participants | 13 Participants |
| SF-36 Mental Component Score | 23.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 | 24.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 24.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 | 25.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 22.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 |
| SF-36 Physical Component Score | 34.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 | 35.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 | 38.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 | 37.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 | 32.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 14 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 14 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 14 | 1 / 14 | 1 / 14 | 0 / 14 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 14 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 14 |
Outcome results
Adverse Events
Record defined adverse events in all groups
Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Adverse Events | 1 Participants |
| Placebo TENS | Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline
Maximal walking distance on graded treadmill test
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -16.8 metres |
| Active TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 25.0 metres |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -17.6 metres |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -6.7 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 76.2 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 89.2 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -0.9 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline | Change scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -15.1 metres |
Participant Retention Rate
Ratio of patients who completed the intervention and outcome assessment to the patient who consented
Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Participant Retention Rate | 13 Participants |
| Placebo TENS | Participant Retention Rate | 10 Participants |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Participant Retention Rate | 12 Participants |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Participant Retention Rate | 10 Participants |
Recruitment Rates
Measure recruitment rates (ratio of patients who consent to participate to potentially eligible patient recorded via the study screening log
Time frame: Recruitment
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Recruitment Rates | 95 Participants |
Uptake of Interventions
Measure uptake of intervention via log of TENS use and attendance at education session and follow up phone calls
Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)
Population: Population described as a whole rather than per-arm as data per arm was not recorded due to blinding. All participants were randomised to receive some type of TENS hence 56 total and 50% of participants received education, hence n=28.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Uptake of Interventions | 39 Participants |
| Placebo TENS | Uptake of Interventions | 27 Participants |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Uptake of Interventions | 18 Participants |
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)
The Brief IPQ uses 0-10 scales. Higher scores indicate worse perceptions (greater perceived consequences, concern, emotional impact, chronicity).
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.7 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1.5 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 0.6 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -7.7 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -3.2 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -8.1 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -5.6 units on a scale |
Change in Daily Number of Steps
Change in daily number of steps (activpal step counts)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1942 steps |
| Active TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1568 steps |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -237 steps |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -183 steps |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 1076 steps |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 1615 steps |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1637 steps |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Daily Number of Steps | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 442 steps |
Change in Event-based Claudication Index
Event-based claudication index (ratio of walking events to upright events) participants undertake in a day.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -0.4 calculated ratio index |
| Active TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1.2 calculated ratio index |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -0.7 calculated ratio index |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -0.4 calculated ratio index |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 0.9 calculated ratio index |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 0.0 calculated ratio index |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -0.2 calculated ratio index |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Event-based Claudication Index | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -0.6 calculated ratio index |
Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline
Onset distance of claudication pain on graded treadmill test
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 37.8 metres |
| Active TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 55.2 metres |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 77.1 metres |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 23.2 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 107.6 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 122.7 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 52.2 metres |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 54.1 metres |
Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day
Total number of upright events per day (activpal upright even count)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.1 upright events per day |
| Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -2.1 upright events per day |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -2.3 upright events per day |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 2.5 upright events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -3.9 upright events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -4.7 upright events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -3.4 upright events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 1.7 upright events per day |
Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day
Total number of walking events per day (activpal walking event counts)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -27.7 events per day |
| Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -53.5 events per day |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 0.1 events per day |
| Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -22.1 events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -27.6 events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -36.9 events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 16.3 events per day |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -39.4 events per day |
Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)
Depression questionnaire. The GDS-SF ranges 0-15, with higher scores reflecting more depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.5 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -0.9 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 0.2 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -0.8 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -2.2 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.8 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.2 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1.0 units on a scale |
Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)
Disease specific quality of life questionnaire. ICQ scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing better health status and less impact of claudication
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 4.5 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 4.4 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 2.3 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 5.6 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 8.5 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 9.3 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 9.6 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 8.0 units on a scale |
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)
Pain quality questionnaire. The MPQ-PRI ranges from 0-78, with lower scores representing less pain and higher scores representing worse pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 4.3 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 2.5 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 2.6 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 3.5 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -5.9 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -7.4 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -6.5 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -3.0 units on a scale |
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
The PSEQ total score ranges from 0-60, with higher scores indicating better pain self-efficacy and more positive outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 1.9 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 0.4 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 0.8 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 5.2 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 5.8 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 6.9 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 3.6 units on a scale |
SF-36 Mental Component Score
SF-36 Quality of life scale - mental component. The SF-36 MCS ranges 0-100 (or norm-based mean 50, SD 10), with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention and follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -0.1 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -2.8 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 0.5 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 0.1 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -3.0 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -2.7 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -0.4 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | SF-36 Mental Component Score | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.8 units on a scale |
Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component
Generic quality of life questionnaire, physical domain. The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) ranges from 0-100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 1.4 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -0.6 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | 0.0 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -5.2 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -3.7 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -4.5 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -3.3 units on a scale |
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Average Pain intensity in the past 7 days. The average pain intensity VAS ranges from 0-100 mm, with lower scores indicating less pain and better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -0.7 units on a scale |
| Active TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1.2 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1.4 units on a scale |
| Placebo TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.0 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -2.0 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | -1.8 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks) | -1.5 units on a scale |
| Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks) | 0.1 units on a scale |