Skip to content

Pain Management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent Claudication (PrEPAID)

Pain Management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent Claudication (PrEPAID): Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03204825
Acronym
PrEPAID
Enrollment
95
Registered
2017-07-02
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2020-03-24
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent Claudication

Keywords

Patient education, Pain management, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, Physical activity, Feasibility

Brief summary

Peripheral Arterial disease is a common condition which causes narrowing of the arteries. The most common symptom that patients with PAD experience is Intermittent Claudication (IC), pain in the lower limb(s) on exertion, which is relieved by rest. IC reduces patients' quality of life (QoL) by limiting their ability to walk and engage in daily activities. Regular exercise and physical activity (PA) are central to the management of PAD and help to improve walking distances and reduce the risks associated with PAD such as heart attack and stroke. However, exercise and PA in this population is often limited due to pain. Investigators have shown that Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) can help to reduce pain and increase walking distance in patients with PAD. Investigators have also shown that educating patients about their condition and helping them to set goals has the potential to increase PA, and quality of life. This study will examine the feasibility of designing a definitive trial that investigates whether TENS can improve the physical activity of patients with PAD when delivered alone and/or alongside a patient education programme.

Detailed description

Peripheral Arterial disease (PAD) affects 2.7 million people in the United Kingdom (UK). The most common symptom that patients experience is Intermittent Claudication (IC), which is pain in the buttock, calf or thigh precipitated by exercise and relieved by rest. The underlying cause of PAD is atherosclerosis, which leads to arterial stenosis, inadequate blood flow and build-up of lactic acid during exercise. Patients with IC have impaired quality of life due to reduced physical capacity. Furthermore, due to the diffuse nature of atherosclerosis and the involvement of other arterial beds, they have 3-4 times increased mortality compared to age and sex matched controls. Patients with symptomatic PAD should receive the same secondary prevention management as patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Improving daily physical activity (PA) is particularly important in individuals with IC as lower PA levels have been recognised as a strong predictor of increased morbidity and mortality in this population. Current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of supervised exercise programmes (SEPs), encouraging patients to exercise to the point of maximal pain, as first line treatment. SEPs has been shown to be cost-effective when compared to other treatment options such as endovascular intervention and surgical revascularisation. However, while systematic reviews show that SEPs lead to a significant improvement in the absolute walking distances of patients with IC on a treadmill, it is unclear if this is sustained or leads to improvement in daily PA. Furthermore, due to the considerable extra resources required to deliver the recommended 3 months exercise programme (30-45 minutes 3x weekly), SEPs are not always routinely available to National Health Service (NHS) patients, and time and travel costs tend to lead to low patient uptake and high attrition rates. Therefore, investigating the feasibility of using low-cost, patient-centred interventions that can support increased PA is warranted. Lack of self-efficacy, attributed to poor understanding of the disease and uncertainty regarding the importance of exercise, has been shown to be a major barrier to exercise uptake in this population. Educating patients with IC about their disease pathology and the benefits of walking is key to enhancing success of secondary prevention strategies for people with IC. Investigators recently piloted a structured, patient-centred education intervention (SEDRIC) with the specific aim of educating patients with IC about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking. In addition to improved treadmill walking distances, investigators found out that there was a trend for patients to increase their daily PA. For patients with IC to gain benefits of secondary prevention, exercising beyond the point when pain occurs is recommended, representing another barrier to engagement in PA. Despite this, investigators' systematic review found that pain management as a route to facilitate exercise and PA has rarely been explored. Recent interest has focused on the use of TENS (a low-cost, non-invasive pain management device) to improve angiogenesis, muscle function, pain and walking distances in patients with IC. TENS has a strong placebo effect in pain conditions, and testing effectiveness against placebo is advocated. In a proof-of-concept pilot study, Investigators demonstrated that TENS could significantly improve pain and increase treadmill walking distances above placebo levels. Our exploratory study also established that home use of TENS was both acceptable and provided self-reported improvement in PA in individuals with IC. Although patient-centred education (SEDRIC) and TENS have both demonstrated potential to improve daily PA in people with IC, the use of these components in combination has not previously been evaluated. Investigators therefore propose a 2 x 2 (TENS versus placebo TENS x SEDRIC versus no additional education) feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) that will compare use of TENS against placebo TENS with and without a patient-centred education programme. Investigators have conducted a series of pilot studies underpinning both aspects of the intervention. Investigators have demonstrated in an experimental lower limb ischaemic pain model in healthy volunteers (n=28) that TENS significantly reduced onset of pain (by 29 seconds; 23%), tolerance of pain (by 203 seconds; 53%) and the pain endurance (by 173 seconds; 67%), compared to placebo TENS. Following this, in a proof-of-concept pilot study, investigators demonstrated that TENS when applied to patient with IC exercising on a treadmill (n=40) significantly improved absolute claudication distance (ACD) above placebo levels (approx. mean individual increase in ACD of 40%, p=.025, r= .53). Our phase 2 study also established that home use of TENS was both acceptable and provided self-reported improvement in PA in individuals with IC. Investigators have not assessed the ability of TENS to improve ACD when used during daily life. Similarly, this research group developed and piloted SEDRIC, a structured, patient-centred education intervention with the specific aim of educating patients about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking. Investigators found that in patients with PAD (n=14), treadmill walking distances (30%) and quality of life (32%) improved from baseline after 6 weeks of structured education, and there was a trend for patients to increase their daily PA (approx. 8% change from baseline). The aim is to determine the feasibility of electrical stimulation via a low-cost CE-marked device used within a patient centred education programme to improve walking distances in patients with PAD. The following research questions will be answered by this project: 1. What is the feasibility (i.e. recruitment and retention rates, adherence, safety, sample size for a definitive trial, potential for effectiveness) of conducting a definitive RCT comparing TENS with and without patient-centred education? 2. How acceptable are TENS and patient-centred education as interventions on their own or in combination in patients with IC?

Interventions

TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin.

BEHAVIORALPatient-Centred Education

Group education for patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking

TENS device use with setting so that the stimulation delivered is ineffective

Sponsors

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Glasgow
CollaboratorOTHER
Northumbria University
CollaboratorOTHER
Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Glasgow Caledonian University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Primary outcome assessors will be blinded for patient group allocation

Intervention model description

2x2 randomised feasibility controlled trial blinded for primary outcome

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) including resting Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) \<0.9 in at least one leg * Stable IC for ≥3 months * Walking limited primarily by claudication * Able to exercise on a treadmill * Able to read and speak English to a level allowing satisfactory completion of the study procedures * Able to provide written informed consent for participation

Exclusion criteria

* Planned surgical or endovascular intervention for PAD within the next 3 months * Critical limb ischaemia * The presence of any absolute contraindications to exercise testing/training as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) * Previous experience of using TENS/ structured patient education for PAD * Contraindications to TENS (including epilepsy, dermatological conditions, indwelling electrical pumps/pacemakers) and inability to apply TENS independently. * Patients who require walking aids including artificial limbs * Major surgery, myocardial infarction or stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) in the previous 6 months * Co-morbidities that cause pain or limit walking to a greater extent than IC (e.g. severe arthritis) * \>20% variation in baseline ACD on treadmill * Severe peripheral neuropathies above the ankle. * Participation in another research protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineBaseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Maximal walking distance on graded treadmill test
Recruitment RatesRecruitmentMeasure recruitment rates (ratio of patients who consent to participate to potentially eligible patient recorded via the study screening log
Participant Retention RateEnd of study (18 weeks)Ratio of patients who completed the intervention and outcome assessment to the patient who consented
Adverse EventsEnd of study (18 weeks)Record defined adverse events in all groups
Uptake of InterventionsEnd of study (18 weeks)Measure uptake of intervention via log of TENS use and attendance at education session and follow up phone calls

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Event-based Claudication IndexBaseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Event-based claudication index (ratio of walking events to upright events) participants undertake in a day.
Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Disease specific quality of life questionnaire. ICQ scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing better health status and less impact of claudication
Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentBaseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Generic quality of life questionnaire, physical domain. The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) ranges from 0-100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Pain quality questionnaire. The MPQ-PRI ranges from 0-78, with lower scores representing less pain and higher scores representing worse pain.
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)The PSEQ total score ranges from 0-60, with higher scores indicating better pain self-efficacy and more positive outcomes.
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)The Brief IPQ uses 0-10 scales. Higher scores indicate worse perceptions (greater perceived consequences, concern, emotional impact, chronicity).
Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Depression questionnaire. The GDS-SF ranges 0-15, with higher scores reflecting more depressive symptoms.
SF-36 Mental Component ScoreBaseline, end of intervention and follow-upSF-36 Quality of life scale - mental component. The SF-36 MCS ranges 0-100 (or norm-based mean 50, SD 10), with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Average Pain intensity in the past 7 days. The average pain intensity VAS ranges from 0-100 mm, with lower scores indicating less pain and better outcomes.
Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineBaseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Onset distance of claudication pain on graded treadmill test
Change in Daily Number of StepsBaseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Change in daily number of steps (activpal step counts)
Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayBaseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Total number of upright events per day (activpal upright even count)
Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayBaseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)Total number of walking events per day (activpal walking event counts)

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was open for recruitment between August 2017 and March 2020. In total, 1030 people were screened for eligibility; 763 (74%) were ineligible, mainly because they were on the clinic lists due to other conditions e.g., Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or venous disease (n=343, 45% of ineligible total) or had Critical Limb Ischaemia (CLI) (n=122, 16%). There were 172 individuals that either did not consent to participate or did not respond to invitation.

Pre-assignment details

Participants underwent additional screening prior to randomisation in adherence with the inclusion criteria in the protocol. Thirty-nine participants did not pass screening, 38 (97%) due to having a greater than 20% variance in ACD between the first and second screening visits (one week apart). The other participant who did not pass screening was unable to walk on the treadmill.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active TENS
Participants in the TENS groups will be provided with a TENS machine and training at the baseline visit to the Clinical research Facility (CRF). They will be instructed to use it daily as their symptoms require for 6 weeks. The active group will receive High Frequency-TENS (120 Hz, 200µs and a patient-determined intensity of ''strong but comfortable''). Active TENS: TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin.
14
Placebo TENS
Placebo TENS : Participants will receive the same model, programmed settings and instructions for use as those in the active group except that the device will be set to an ineffective stimulation (120 Hz, 200µs and a patient-determined intensity of '6mA). For the purpose of blinding, participants will be told that different dosages of TENS are being tested, some of which where the stimulation might not be perceivable even though the device is working. Placebo TENS: TENS device use with setting so that the stimulation delivered is ineffective
14
Patient-Centred Education
Patient-Centred Education : a one-off three-hour workshop of structured group education (4-5 persons in each group) and three 2-weekly phone calls. The aim will be to modify patients' illness beliefs and perceptions about IC/PAD by educating them on disease pathology and management philosophy. After the workshop, each patient will be supported to set goals for walking, develop an action plan regarding how these goals will be met and encouraged to repeat this process for each new walking goal. Patient-Centred Education: Group education for patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking
14
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENS
Combination of Patient-Centred Education arm and Active TENS arm. Active TENS: TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin. Patient-Centred Education: Group education for patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking
14
Total56

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive TENSTotalPatient-Centred Education + Active TENSPatient-Centred EducationPlacebo TENS
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD)243.7 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 240.5
296.1 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 277.3
318.4 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 321.6
370.9 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 285.3
251.3 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 266.5
Age, Continuous65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Ankle Brachial Pressure Index0.70 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.21
0.69 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
0.66 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14
0.67 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.74 Ratio of systolic BP - UL / LL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.28
Average daily number of steps ('000s)7.5 Steps per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
5.9 Steps per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
5.1 Steps per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
6.0 Steps per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
4.9 Steps per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
Average daily number of upright events7.0 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
6.4 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
6.1 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
6.6 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
6.1 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
Average daily number of walking events50.0 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24
50.0 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.2
46.4 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
53.6 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26
50.2 Count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2
Body Mass Index26.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
28.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
29.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
30.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
27.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire47.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
47.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
49.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
49.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
43.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Event-based Claudication Index7.3 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
8.3 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
8.5 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
8.4 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
8.9 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Geriatric Depression Scale (short-form)6.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
6.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
7.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
5.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
Initial Claudication Distance (ICD)84.4 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.2
113.1 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 135.7
111.7 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 162.3
130.2 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 129.6
126.1 Metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 165.2
Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire53.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
51.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
47.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
52.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
53.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
McGill Pain Questionnaire30.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
28.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
29.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
31.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
22.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Pain intensity (visual analogue scale)6.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
6.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
5.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
6.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
6.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire35.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
37.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
35.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
36.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
42.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
14 participants56 participants14 participants14 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants14 Participants5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants42 Participants9 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
SF-36 Mental Component Score23.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
24.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
24.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
25.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
22.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
SF-36 Physical Component Score34.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
35.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
38.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
37.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
32.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 140 / 140 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 141 / 141 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 140 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Adverse Events

Record defined adverse events in all groups

Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TENSAdverse Events1 Participants
Placebo TENSAdverse Events0 Participants
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSAdverse Events0 Participants
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSAdverse Events0 Participants
Primary

Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline

Maximal walking distance on graded treadmill test

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-16.8 metres
Active TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)25.0 metres
Placebo TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-17.6 metres
Placebo TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-6.7 metres
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)76.2 metres
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)89.2 metres
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-0.9 metres
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From BaselineChange scores from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-15.1 metres
Primary

Participant Retention Rate

Ratio of patients who completed the intervention and outcome assessment to the patient who consented

Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TENSParticipant Retention Rate13 Participants
Placebo TENSParticipant Retention Rate10 Participants
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSParticipant Retention Rate12 Participants
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSParticipant Retention Rate10 Participants
Primary

Recruitment Rates

Measure recruitment rates (ratio of patients who consent to participate to potentially eligible patient recorded via the study screening log

Time frame: Recruitment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TENSRecruitment Rates95 Participants
Primary

Uptake of Interventions

Measure uptake of intervention via log of TENS use and attendance at education session and follow up phone calls

Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)

Population: Population described as a whole rather than per-arm as data per arm was not recorded due to blinding. All participants were randomised to receive some type of TENS hence 56 total and 50% of participants received education, hence n=28.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TENSUptake of Interventions39 Participants
Placebo TENSUptake of Interventions27 Participants
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSUptake of Interventions18 Participants
Secondary

Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)

The Brief IPQ uses 0-10 scales. Higher scores indicate worse perceptions (greater perceived consequences, concern, emotional impact, chronicity).

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.7 units on a scale
Active TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1.5 units on a scale
Placebo TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)1.0 units on a scale
Placebo TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)0.6 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-7.7 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-3.2 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-8.1 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-5.6 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in Daily Number of Steps

Change in daily number of steps (activpal step counts)

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1942 steps
Active TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1568 steps
Placebo TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-237 steps
Placebo TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-183 steps
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)1076 steps
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)1615 steps
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1637 steps
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Daily Number of StepsChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)442 steps
Secondary

Change in Event-based Claudication Index

Event-based claudication index (ratio of walking events to upright events) participants undertake in a day.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-0.4 calculated ratio index
Active TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1.2 calculated ratio index
Placebo TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-0.7 calculated ratio index
Placebo TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-0.4 calculated ratio index
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)0.9 calculated ratio index
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)0.0 calculated ratio index
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-0.2 calculated ratio index
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Event-based Claudication IndexChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-0.6 calculated ratio index
Secondary

Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline

Onset distance of claudication pain on graded treadmill test

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)37.8 metres
Active TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)55.2 metres
Placebo TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)77.1 metres
Placebo TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)23.2 metres
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)107.6 metres
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)122.7 metres
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)52.2 metres
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From BaselineChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)54.1 metres
Secondary

Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day

Total number of upright events per day (activpal upright even count)

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.1 upright events per day
Active TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-2.1 upright events per day
Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-2.3 upright events per day
Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)2.5 upright events per day
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-3.9 upright events per day
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-4.7 upright events per day
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-3.4 upright events per day
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Total Number of Upright Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)1.7 upright events per day
Secondary

Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day

Total number of walking events per day (activpal walking event counts)

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-27.7 events per day
Active TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-53.5 events per day
Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)0.1 events per day
Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-22.1 events per day
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-27.6 events per day
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-36.9 events per day
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)16.3 events per day
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSChange in Total Number of Walking Events Per DayChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-39.4 events per day
Secondary

Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)

Depression questionnaire. The GDS-SF ranges 0-15, with higher scores reflecting more depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.5 units on a scale
Active TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-0.9 units on a scale
Placebo TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)0.2 units on a scale
Placebo TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-0.8 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-2.2 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.8 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.2 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSGeriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)

Disease specific quality of life questionnaire. ICQ scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing better health status and less impact of claudication

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)4.5 units on a scale
Active TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)4.4 units on a scale
Placebo TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)2.3 units on a scale
Placebo TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)5.6 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)8.5 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)9.3 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)9.6 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSIntermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)8.0 units on a scale
Secondary

McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)

Pain quality questionnaire. The MPQ-PRI ranges from 0-78, with lower scores representing less pain and higher scores representing worse pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)4.3 units on a scale
Active TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)2.5 units on a scale
Placebo TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)2.6 units on a scale
Placebo TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)3.5 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-5.9 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-7.4 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-6.5 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSMcGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-3.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)

The PSEQ total score ranges from 0-60, with higher scores indicating better pain self-efficacy and more positive outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)1.0 units on a scale
Active TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)1.9 units on a scale
Placebo TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)0.4 units on a scale
Placebo TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)0.8 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)5.2 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)5.8 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)6.9 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)3.6 units on a scale
Secondary

SF-36 Mental Component Score

SF-36 Quality of life scale - mental component. The SF-36 MCS ranges 0-100 (or norm-based mean 50, SD 10), with higher scores representing better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention and follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-0.1 units on a scale
Active TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-2.8 units on a scale
Placebo TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)0.5 units on a scale
Placebo TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)0.1 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-3.0 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-2.7 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-0.4 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSSF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.8 units on a scale
Secondary

Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component

Generic quality of life questionnaire, physical domain. The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) ranges from 0-100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)1.4 units on a scale
Active TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-0.6 units on a scale
Placebo TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)1.0 units on a scale
Placebo TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)0.0 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-5.2 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-3.7 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-4.5 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSShort-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical ComponentChange from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-3.3 units on a scale
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Average Pain intensity in the past 7 days. The average pain intensity VAS ranges from 0-100 mm, with lower scores indicating less pain and better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Active TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-0.7 units on a scale
Active TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1.2 units on a scale
Placebo TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1.4 units on a scale
Placebo TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.0 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-2.0 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education and Placebo TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)-1.8 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to end of intervention (6 weeks)-1.5 units on a scale
Patient-Centred Education + Active TENSVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)Change from baseline to follow-up (18 weeks)0.1 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026