Skip to content

SPIRIT 2: Efficacy and Safety Study of Relugolix in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain

SPIRIT 2: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03204331
Enrollment
623
Registered
2017-07-02
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2021-05-31
Last updated
2021-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis Related Pain

Keywords

Endometriosis, Pain, Dysmenorrhea

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the benefit and safety of relugolix 40 milligrams (mg) once daily, co-administered with low-dose estradiol (E2) and norethindrone acetate (NETA) compared with placebo for 24 weeks, on dysmenorrhea and on nonmenstrual pelvic pain.

Detailed description

This study is an international phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study to evaluate 24 weeks of oral, once-daily relugolix (40 mg) co-administered with either 12 or 24 weeks of low-dose E2 (1.0 mg) and NETA (0.5 mg), compared with placebo. Approximately 600 women with endometriosis-associated pain were enrolled and randomized 1:1:1 to Group A - relugolix plus low-dose hormonal add-back therapy, Group B - relugolix monotherapy for 12 weeks followed by co-administration with low-dose hormonal add-back therapy, or Group C - placebo (N = 200 per group). Eligible participants were randomized on Baseline Day 1 to Treatment Group A, B, or C, in the double-blind period. Eligible participants, including those randomized to placebo, were offered the opportunity to enroll in an 80-week open label extension study where participants received relugolix co-administered with low-dose E2 and NETA. Participants who did not enroll into the extension study had a Follow-Up visit approximately 30 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.

Interventions

DRUGRelugolix

Relugolix 40-mg tablet administered orally once daily.

Capsule containing co-formulated tablet of E2 (1.0 mg)/NETA (0.5 mg) administered orally once daily.

E2 (0 mg)/NETA (0 mg) placebo capsule administered orally once daily and designed to match the E2/NETA capsule in size, shape, color, and odor.

Relugolix (0 mg) placebo tablet administered orally once daily and manufactured to match the relugolix tablet in size, shape, color, and odor.

Sponsors

Myovant Sciences GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Is a premenopausal female aged 18 to 50 years old (inclusive) on the day of signing of the informed consent form. 2. Has agreed to use only study-specified analgesic medications during the study and is not known to be intolerant to these. 3. Has a diagnosis of endometriosis and has had, within 10 years prior to signing the informed consent form, surgical or direct visualization and/or histopathologic confirmation of endometriosis, for example, during a laparoscopy or laparotomy. 4. During the Run-In Period (35 to 70 days prior to treatment period) has a dysmenorrhea NRS score ≥ 4.0 on at least 2 days and 1. Mean NMPP NRS score ≥ 2.5, or 2. Mean NMPP NRS score ≥ 1.25 and NMPP NRS score ≥ 5.0 on ≥ 4 days. Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Has a history of chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis. 2. Has any chronic pain or frequently recurring pain condition, other than endometriosis that is treated with opioids or requires analgesics for ≥ 7 days per month. 3. Has had surgical procedures for treatment of endometriosis within the 3 months prior to the Screening visit. 4. Has a history of or currently has osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease. 5. Has a clinically significant gynecologic condition, other than endometriosis, identified during Screening or Run-In period transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The Dysmenorrhea Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or End Of Treatment (EOT)Week 24 or EOTAssessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an electronic diary (e-Diary). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP) Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or EOTWeek 24 or EOTAssessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary. The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline In NMPP NRS Score At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In Overall Pelvic Pain NRS Score At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In Dyspareunia NRS Scores At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for dyspareunia recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Percentage Of Participants Who Are Not Using Opioids For Endometriosis-associated Pain At Week 24 Or EOTWeek 24 or EOTAssessed based on usage of protocol-specified opioids for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In Analgesic Use For Endometriosis-associated Pain Based On Mean Pill Count At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed based on usage of protocol-specified analgesic for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Percentage Of Participants Who Have A Reduction Of At Least 20 Points In The EHP-30 Pain Domain From Baseline To Week 24Baseline to Week 24Assessed using the pain domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
Dysmenorrhea Responder Rate By MonthBaseline to Week 24The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
NMPP Responder Rate By MonthBaseline to Week 24The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Change In Dysmenorrhea NRS Score By MonthBaseline to Week 24Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change In NMPP NRS Score By MonthBaseline to Week 24Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change In Overall Pelvic Pain NRS Score By MonthBaseline to Week 24Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change In Dyspareunia NRS Score By MonthBaseline to Week 24Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In Ibuprofen Use At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24Assessed using ibuprofen pill counts for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In Opioid Use At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24Assessed using opioid pill counts for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In The Mean Dysmenorrhea Functional Impairment At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed using the subject modified Biberoglu and Behrman 5-point scale for dysmenorrhea recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In The Mean NMPP Functional Impairment At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed using the subject modified Biberoglu and Behrman 4-point scale for pelvic pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In The Mean Dyspareunia Functional Impairment At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed using the subject modified Biberoglu and Behrman 5-point scale for dyspareunia recorded daily in an e-Diary.
Change From Baseline In Patient Global Assessment (PGA) For Dysmenorrhea Symptom Severity At Week 24Baseline, Week 24The PGA for dysmenorrhea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For Dysmenorrhea At Week 24Week 24The PGA for dysmenorrhea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
Change From Baseline In PGA For NMPP Symptom Severity At Week 24Baseline, Week 24The PGA for NMPP is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain when they are not menstruating.
Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For NMPP At Week 24Week 24The PGA for NMPP is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain when they are not menstruating.
Change From Baseline In PGA For Pain Severity At Week 24Baseline, Week 24The PGA for pain severity is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For Pain Severity At Week 24Week 24The PGA for pain severity is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
Change From Baseline In PGA For Function At Week 24Baseline, Week 24The PGA for function is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For Function At Week 24Week 24The PGA for function is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
Percentage Of Participants Who Are Better Or Much Better On The Patient Global Impression Of Change (PGIC) For Dysmenorrhea At Week 24Week 24The PGIC for dysmenorrhea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of change in the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
Percentage Of Participants Who Are Better Or Much Better On The PGIC For NMPP At Week 24Week 24The PGIC for NMPP is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of change in the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
Percentage Of Participants Who Are Better Or Much Better On The PGIC For Dyspareunia At Week 24Week 24The PGIC for dyspareunia is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of change in the severity of pain during sexual intercourse.
Change From Baseline In The Non-Pain Of The EHP-30 Domains At Week 24Baseline, Week 24Assessed using the non-pain domains (Control and Powerlessness, Social Support, Emotional Well-Being, and Self-Image) of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
Change From Baseline In The EHP-30 Scale Total Score At Week 24Baseline, Week 24Assessed using the total score of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
Change From Baseline In The EHP Work Domain Score At Week 24Baseline, Week 24The EHP Work domain is a 5-item questionnaire that assesses impact of pain on ability to work.
Categorical Change From Baseline In Quality Of Life Assessed By European Quality Of Life Five Dimension Five Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire At Week 24Baseline, Week 24The EQ-5D-5L is a 5-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life.
Change From Baseline To Week 24 In EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale Score At Week 24Baseline, Week 24The EQ-5D-5L is a 5-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life.
Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The Dysmenorrhea Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or EOT For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETAWeek 24 or EOTAssessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary. The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The NMPP Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or EOT For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETAWeek 24 or EOTAssessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary. The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Change From Baseline In The EHP-30 Pain Score At Week 24 For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETABaseline, Week 24Assessed using the Pain Domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
Percentage Of Participants Who Have A Reduction Of At Least 20 Points In The EHP-30 Pain Domain From Baseline To Week 24 For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETABaseline to Week 24Assessed using the pain domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
Change From Baseline In The Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP)-30 Pain Score At Week 24Baseline, Week 24Assessed using the Pain Domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
Percentage Change From Baseline In Bone Mineral Density At Lumbar Spine (L1-L4), Femoral Neck, And Total Hip At Week 24Baseline, Week 24Assessed by DXA scan.
Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms At Week 12 Between Group A And BWeek 12
Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Estradiol, And ProgesteroneBaseline, Week 24Blood samples will be collected from participants for hormonal measurements.
Percentage Change From Baseline In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) At Week 12Baseline, Week 12Assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan.
Change From Baseline In Dysmenorrhea NRS Score At Week 24 Or EOTBaseline, Week 24 or EOTAssessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.

Countries

Australia, Brazil, Chile, Czechia, Georgia, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Sweden, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026