Skip to content

Initiation of Home Mechanical Ventilation at Home in Patients With Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Initiation of Home Mechanical Ventilation at Home in a Selectve Group of Patients With Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure in the Netherlands

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03203577
Acronym
Homerun
Enrollment
96
Registered
2017-06-29
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2018-05-31
Last updated
2018-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ambulatory Monitoring, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Neuromuscular Diseases, Noninvasive Ventilation, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Therapy

Brief summary

Objective: To prove that initiation of chronic ventilatory support at home, in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular disease (NMD) or thoracic cage problem is not inferior compared to initiation in a hospital based setting. In addition we believe that the start at home is cheaper compared to an in-hospital start. Hypothesis: Initiation of chronic ventilatory support at home is effective, safe and cost effective compared to a hospital-based initiation. Study design: A nationwide non-inferiority multi-center randomized parallel active control study. Study population: Patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency due to a neuromuscular disease (NMD) or thoracic cage problem who are referred for chronic ventilator support. Intervention: The start of HMV at home Standard intervention to be compared to: The start of HMV is normally in a clinical setting as recommended in the national guideline. Outcome measures: Primary: PaCO2. Secondary: Health related quality of life; lung function; nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide assessment and saturation, and costs Sample size calculation/data analysis: This is a non-inferiority trial based on PaCO2 as primary outcome. A difference in favor of the hospital care group of smaller than 0.5 kPa will be labeled as non-inferior. To retain 72 evaluable patients, and allow for drop-outs, we will include 96 patients in total. Cost-effectiveness analysis: A cost analysis will be conducted alongside the clinical trial. Costs of the initiation of HMV at home and in the hospital will be estimated form a societal perspective over a time horizon of 6 months. Time schedule: After an initial phase of 6 months recruitment will start and will take 24 months. Thirty-six months after the start of the study the last assessments will be done and analysis and writing of the papers will start. After 42 months the study will end.

Interventions

In patient with chronic respiratory insufficient chronic mechanical ventilation will be initiated in the patient his/her setting.

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indication to initiate non-invasive ventilatory support in patients with a neuromuscular disease or thoracic cage abnormality who suffer from complaints of alveolar hypoventilation (fatigue, headache of dyspnoea) combined with all following elements: * arterial carbon dioxide \> 6.0 kPa daytime or arterial or transcutaneous carbon dioxide \> 6.0 kPa at night or orthopnea as a result of diaphragm paralysis * Age \> 18 years * Existence, of a sufficient network (social or professional) according to the supervising HMV center making initiation of HMV at home possible and safe.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who already have had HMV due to acute respiratory failure * Necessity for invasive ventilatory support * Patients admitted to a nursing home

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daytime arterial carbon dioxide6 months after initiation of mechanical ventilationDaytime arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) assessed without oxygen supplementation and ventilatory support while the patient is in sitting position

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life6 months after initiation of mechanical ventilationHealth related quality of life by using the following questionnaires: SF 36, MRF 28, HADS, SRI
Lung function6 months after initation of mechanical ventilationevaluate lungfunction in time; with measurments of flow/volume in a sitting and horizontal position
Nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide and saturation6 months after initiation of mechanical ventilationNocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide and saturation in time
costs6 months after initiation of mechanical ventilationevaluation of the costs during initiation and the follow-up for 6 months. This will be objective by using the EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026