Skip to content

Optimizing Regulation of a Cochlear Implant in Patients With Functional Contralateral Audition.

Optimizing Regulation of a Cochlear Implant in Patients With Functional Contralateral Audition Using an Evolutionary Algorithm.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03202797
Acronym
BIMODALITE
Enrollment
9
Registered
2017-06-29
Start date
2017-03-17
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2026-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cochlear Implant, Functional Contralateral Audition

Brief summary

360 million people in the world suffer from debilitating hearing deficiency. The cochlear implant is indicated in certain patients with severe profound deafness. The principle of the cochlear implant is to directly stimulate auditory nerve fibres by electrodes inserted in the cochlea. The steps in auditory rehabilitation are the surgical insertion of the cochlear implant, activation, and follow-up regulation. There is no formal consensus to define the exact modalities for regulation during activation or follow-up, but the principles are respected according to centres that regulate cochlear implant. Bimodal audition is the fact of having a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. In patients with cochlear implants, having binaural bimodal audition improves their auditory vocal performance in silence and in noisy environments. It needs to be considered when a second cochlear implant is not indicated for the contralateral ear. It has been shown that by allocating frequencies different from the default frequencies attributed by the manufacturer, intelligibility and perception of music are modified. The investigators therefore with to study this working hypothesis and to develop a simple protocol for the reallocation of frequencies in order to optimise auditory performance in the everyday lives of patients with implants by using an evolutionary algorithm.

Interventions

tone and speech audiometry

OTHERQuestionnaires

APHAB (Abbreviate Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit), HISQUI (Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index), Munich music questionnaire

OTHERSettings of cochlear implants

pitch matching, evolutionary algorithm setting

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have provided consent * Patients over 18 years old * Profound post-lingual deafness with a cochlear implant and a functional contralateral ear (normal audition or mild to severe deafness but with a hearing aid). * Patients fitted with one of the following cochlear implants with the most recent processor: Cochlear, Med-El, Neurelec Oticon or Advanced Bionics. * Patients with at least 6 months experience with the cochlear implant and using both aids for at least 6 hours per day.

Exclusion criteria

* Persons without health insurance cover * Adults under guardianship * Pregnant or breast-feeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the audiometric test performances (tone and speech audiometry) before and after the cochlear implant settings based on the evolutionary algorithm with a signal to noise ratio of +5dBBaseline and 60 days

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026