Skip to content

Comparison Between TICL and ICL+AK for High Myopic Astigmatism

Comparison Between Toric and Spherical Implantable Collamer Lens Combined With Astigmatic Keratotomy for High Myopic Astigmatism

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03202485
Enrollment
62
Registered
2017-06-28
Start date
2014-03-03
Completion date
2017-01-01
Last updated
2017-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism, High Myopia

Keywords

astigmatism, high myopia, phakic intraocular lens, astigmatic keratotomy, toric

Brief summary

To compare the outcomes of a toric Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) and a spherical Implantable Collamer Lens combined with astigmatic keratotomy (AK) in the correction of high myopic astigmatism.

Interventions

uses Toric Implantable Collamer Lens implantation to correct the high myopic astigmatism.

DEVICEICL + Astigmatic keratotomy

uses Implantable Collamer Lens implantation combined with Astigmatic keratotomy to correct the high myopic astigmatism

Sponsors

Wenzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective comparative case series

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age ranged from 18 to 40 years, * myopia greater than -8.00 diopters (D), and refractive cylinder in the range of 1.50D to 5.50D, * for the patients who were planned to undergo AK+ICL implantation, the axial difference between the corneal astigmatism and the manifest refractive astigmatism was less than 10 degree, * a stable refractive error during the previous 2 years, * anterior chamber depth more than 2.8 mm, * endothelial cell density (ECD) more than 2500 cells/mm2, and * scotopic pupillary diameter less than 7 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* subjects had significant irregular astigmatism, corneal pathological changes, glaucoma, ocular inflammation, or previous ocular trauma or surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) at distance2 years after surgerymeasured at 5 meter
astigmatism2 years after surgeryastigmatism getting from subjective refraction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at distance2 years after surgerysubjective refraction
Spherical Equivalent (SE)2 years after surgerysubjective refraction
mean postoperative BCVA/mean preoperative BCVA2 years after surgerysafety index
mean postoperative UCVA/mean preoperative BCVA2 years after surgeryefficacy index

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026