Skip to content

Detecting Malingering Detection Using Eye Movements and Response Time (MDER)

Detecting Malingering Detection Using Eye Movements and Response Time

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03201887
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-06-28
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2019-01-01
Last updated
2017-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Traumatic Brain Damage

Brief summary

Performance Validity Tests (PVTs) are widely used for the detection of sub-optimal effort and malingering in neuropsychological assessments. Threats to their validity however likely to intensify with time (e.g., information available on the web or from legal representatives) and may lead to a decline in their ability to differentiate between malingerers and non-malingerers. Eye movements and response time (RT) are less obvious outcome measures and under less conscious control than more conventional PVT indices (e.g., accuracy). They are therefore promising measures that can aid in detecting malingering when used in conjunction with more conventional PVT indices. The Word Memory Test (WMT) is a widely used PVT in neuropsychological evaluations. As part of the proposed study, TBI patients, chronic pain patients and healthy adults (60 in each group) will be randomly divided to one of two conditions; optimal effort or sub-optimal effort (participants will be asked to play a TBI patient who wishes to present himself as having cognitive deficits or exaggerate existing cognitive deficits). The proposed study will improve the WMT's efficacy in detection of sub-optimal effort in neuropsychological evaluations and therefore protect its validity from future threats. In addition, the proposed study will provide us with better understanding of the effect of TBI on eye movements and RTs in general.

Detailed description

Same as in the brief summary

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSub-optimal effort

Participants will be asked to play a patient who wishes to present himself as having cognitive deficits or exaggerate existing cognitive deficits

BEHAVIORALoptimal effort

Participants will be asked to perform tasks to the best of their abilities.

Sponsors

Ariel University
CollaboratorOTHER
Loewenstein Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for all participants: * Adult (18-65) female and males. * Signed informed consent form. Inclusion criteria for TBI group: * TBI of at least mild severity, as operationalized by Post traumatic amnesia (PTA) \< 24 hours * Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 13-15 * Loss of consciousness (LOC) of 30 minutes or less. Inclusion criteria for chronic pain patients: • Pain without apparent biological value that has persisted beyond three months. This will be based on the participant self-report, electronic medical records and consultation with treating physician.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eye Movements1 monthEye tracking used to evaluate eye behavior.

Contacts

Primary ContactMoti Ratmansky, MD
MottiR@clalit.org.il972-9-7709140
Backup ContactYoram Braw, PHD
yoramb@ariel.ac.il972-54-8132604

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026