Skip to content

Collaborative Care for Infants at Risk

Collaborative Care for Infants at Risk

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03199326
Acronym
CCIR
Enrollment
468
Registered
2017-06-26
Start date
2017-08-15
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2020-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Child Abuse, Child Welfare, Primary Health Care

Brief summary

This study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a collaborative care practice for infants investigated by state Child Protective Services (CPS) for suspected maltreatment. Recognizing the vulnerability of infants referred into CPS in the first year of life, as well as the frequent contact of infants with health care providers in the first year of life, the investigators will conduct a RCT to measure the impact of a collaborative practice model linking CPS caseworkers with primary health care providers during an investigation for suspected infant maltreatment. With this trial, the investigators will ask (3a) Can a collaborative practice model improve parent-reported infant health-related quality of life 6 months following child welfare involvement for suspected infant maltreatment? and (3b) Does a collaborative practice model impact repeat child welfare involvement for suspected child maltreatment over 6 months?

Interventions

OTHERCollaborative Care

CPS caseworkers will explain collaborative care to parents, ask parents to allow communication with an infant's primary care provider, and have willing parents sign a release allowing communication with the infant's provider during the investigation. Caseworkers will make at least two attempts to contact identified providers with parental consent. In the first week, caseworkers will contact the provider, identify the infant, and summarize the child maltreatment concerns. The caseworker will ask whether the provider recognizes any additional strengths or vulnerabilities for the infant. Prior to case closure, caseworkers will provide a summary of investigation findings, disposition, and service referrals including placement changes, safety planning, family preservation, and community resources, with a summary letter delivered to the provider after case closure.

Sponsors

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Surveys will be collected without knowledge of intervention assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Days to 364 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Less than 12 months of age at referral * Involved in a child welfare investigation for suspected maltreatment * Investigation occurring in Utah DCFS Salt Lake Valley or Western regions

Exclusion criteria

For the primary and selected secondary outcomes, * Caregiver with primary spoken language other than English or Spanish, * CPS caseworkers not yet randomized to a practice arm * Infants in out-of-home placement at the time of referral or case closure, * Infants suffering fatal maltreatment * Prior investigation of an infant in a household during study timeframe (e.g., twins, infant siblings, and repeat referrals will be excluded). For other secondary outcomes related to CPS outcomes, language exclusion will not be considered.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infant Health Related Quality of LifeChange from baseline to 6 months following CPS case closureDifference in Change in Infant Health Related Quality of Life based on practice arm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parent Perception of Child Welfare and Child Health Careat baseline (child welfare) and at 6 months (child health care)Difference in parent perceptions of child welfare and child health care based on practice arm
Repeat Child Welfare Involvement6 months after CPS case closureRepeat Child Welfare Involvement

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Engagement of child welfare caseworkersbaselineProportion of eligible cases investigated that were offered collaborative practice
Acceptance of parentsbaselineProportion of cases offered collaborative practice in which parents allowed practice
Recruiting and retention of high-risk longitudinal cohortbaseline and 6 monthsProportion of eligible cases willing to enroll in and follow-up with researchers

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026