Skip to content

CathiportTM Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation

a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open, Parallel Controlled Noninferiority Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CathiportTM Implantable Drug Delivery Device

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03198312
Enrollment
220
Registered
2017-06-26
Start date
2016-10-20
Completion date
2018-01-20
Last updated
2017-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Brief summary

Develop a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open, parallel controlled noninferiority clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CathiportTM implantable drug delivery device

Detailed description

I-Port is also called the implantable infusion Port typed central venous catheter and suite, it is a kind of the closed venous infusion system that can fully implanted, can be used for all kinds of high concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs, completely parenteral nutrient solution infusion, blood transfusion and blood samples, It can be used to reduce painfulness and the difficulty of repeated venipuncture, to prevent external stimulants weeks vein injury, and the daily life of patients is not limited, they don't need to change medicine, can bathe, so can improve the quality of life. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CathiportTM. The CathiportTM will be compared to an active control group represented by the FDA approved commercially available Bard Implant Port. The study consists of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in China which will enroll approximately 220 subjects (1:1 randomization CathiportTM : Implant Port) with patients required repeated and chronic drug input and fluid. All subjects in the RCT will be screened per the protocol required inclusion/exclusion criteria. The data collected will be compared to data from the subjects enrolled into the Implant Port of US RCT. All subjects will have clinical follow-up at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 months and be provided nursing service to t maintain he Port , and verify whether the pipe is blocked and to prevent the Port into the liquid pipe clogging, and to observe the hematoma and infection situation of the operation or puncture points, observe whether if there is blocking pipe, and fluid extravasation surrounding skin tissue of judging when using, whether there are conditions such as shift or discount.

Interventions

DEVICECathiportTM

fully implanted

DEVICEImplant Port

fully implanted

Sponsors

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shandong Branden Med.Device Co.,Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Older than 18 years old; 2. Need for long-term intravenous fluids; 3. Lack of peripheral venous access ; 4. Need stimulants infusion, such as chemotherapy drugs; 5. Need infusion of high permeability or sticky liquid, such as parenteral nutrient solution, fat emulsion; 6. Need repeated blood or blood products transfusion and repeated blood collection; 7. Fit and need implanted Port; 8. Willing to participate in clinical research and signed informed consent; Patient meet 1 and 8 firstly, and then meet any one item with 2-7 above can be accepted.

Exclusion criteria

1. Cancer patients whose vascular related to the surgery is compressed ; 2. Women patients with pregnancy and lactation; 3. Participate other studies before achieving the primary end point already; 4. Confirmed or suspected catheter-related infections, disseminated intravascular coagulation, bacteremia, sepsis; 5. Body size is not suitable for implanting the infusion port ; 6. Confirmed or suspected allergic to silicone material; 7. Having a history of radiation therapy at the pre-implant site; 8. Having occurred acute myocardial infarction within 1 week or stroke in the past 6 months; 9. Having a history of venous thrombosis, trauma, or vascular surgery; 10. Superior vena cava syndrome; 11. Having poor compliance behavior; 12. Having installed the cardiac pacemaker device, bypass, accepted heart transplant or diagnosed with kidney failure(GFR≤30ml/Min).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Normal usage rate of the equipmentat 6 monthsThe probability of normally drugs or liquid infusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate of equipment0 to 24 hours after implantationRefers to the equipment can be get to the therapeutic part as expected successfully , the catheter can infused smoothly and the blood samples can be get back normally
Success rate of surgery0 to 24 hours after operationThe fluid can be infused and withdraw normally, and no pneumothorax, air embolism, mediastinal hematoma surgical complications appeared
the evaluation of the efficiencyat 1,2,3,4,5,6 monthCatheter indwelling time
the evaluation of the convenienceintraoperativeall the operaters will give a convenience evaluation timely by answering the questionnare
the evaluation of the comfortintraoperativephysical performance evaluation of the device

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026