Skip to content

Trial to Evaluate the Short-term Safety & Efficacy of Brexpiprazole Monotherapy in the Treatment of Adolescents With Schizophrenia

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Brexpiprazole Monotherapy for the Treatment in Adolescents (13-17 Years Old) With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03198078
Enrollment
316
Registered
2017-06-23
Start date
2017-06-30
Completion date
2023-04-03
Last updated
2023-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Brexpiprazole, Schizophrenia, Adolescent

Brief summary

To determine the safety & efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy in the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy compared to placebo in adolescent subjects (ages 13-17) with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Interventions

Once-daily, tablets

DRUGAripiprazole

Once-daily, tablets

DRUGPlacebo

Once-daily, tablets

Sponsors

H. Lundbeck A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Subjects randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 double-blind treatment arms to evaluate safety & efficacy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male & female subjects aged 13-17 years, inclusive at time of consent and at baseline visit, with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia as defined by DSM-5 criteria and confirmed by K-SADS-PL and a history of the illness for at least 6 months prior to screening. * PANSS score \>= 80, inclusive, at screening and baseline

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with a DSM-5 diagnosis other than schizophrenia that has been the primary focus of treatment within 3 months of screening. * Subjects with a clinical presentation or history that is consistent with delirium, dementia, amnesia or other cognitive disorders * Subjects who have been hospitalized \> 21 days for a current exacerbation of schizophrenia at the time of baseline. * Any neurological disorder other than Tourette's Syndrome * Subjects at significant risk of committing violent acts, serious self-harm or suicide based on history * Subjects with epilepsy, a history of seizures, severe head trauma or stroke * Subjects who test positive for drugs of abuse at screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total ScoreBaseline to Week 6The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving ResponseUp to 6 weeksResponse was defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in PANSS Total Score or CGI score of 1 or 2. The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel, and ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). The CGI scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Percentage of participants achieving response was determined by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Percentage of Participants Achieving RemissionUp to 6 weeksRemission was defined as a score of ≤ 3 on each of the following specific PANSS items: delusions (positive scale item \[P\] 1), unusual thought content (general scale item \[G\] 9), hallucinatory behavior (P3), conceptual disorganization (P2), mannerisms/posturing (G5), blunted affect (negative scale item \[N\] 1), passive/apathetic social withdrawal (N4), and lack of spontaneity and conversation flow (N6). Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). Percentage of participants achieving remission was determined by LOCF method.
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total ScoreBaseline to Week 6The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social, and school functioning for children aged 6-17 years and provides a global measure of the severity of disturbance. The scale is separated into 10-point sections that are headed with a description of the level of functioning and followed by examples matching the interval. The score ranges from 0-100, 1 to 10 indicates the need for constant supervision and 91 to 100 indicates superior functioning in all areas. Higher scores indicate better functioning. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale ScoreBaseline to Week 6The CGI-S scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 to 7. The investigator answered the question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worse condition. LS mean was determined by the MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6Week 6The efficacy of brexpiprazole in the treatment was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was entirely due to drug treatment on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0 to 7. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Mean CGI-I scale score was determined by LOCF method.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEsFrom the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityFrom the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any AE that results in the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable signs, symptoms, or medical conditions which is fatal, life-threatening, result in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. TEAE is any AE after the start of treatment or if the event was continuous from baseline, medicinal product related, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of medicinal product. TEAEs were graded on a 3-point scale: 1 (Mild: Discomfort noticed, but no disruption to daily activity), 2 (Moderate: Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity), and 3 (Severe: Inability to work or perform normal daily activity).
Mean Change From Baseline in WeightBaseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)Change in weight was reported, in kilograms (kg).
Mean Change From Baseline in HeightBaseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)Change in height was reported in centimeters (cm).
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)Change in BMI was reported in kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2).
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales ScoresBaseline to Week 6PANSS has 7 positive symptom constructs: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, hostility; and 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). PANSS positive & negative subscale scores were the sum of rating scores for 7 positive & 7 negative items respectively. Both scores range from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores denote worsening of symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)C-SSRS is a scale used to report at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any of the following items: actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior. The suicidal ideation total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) and the total score ranges from 0 to 25. Lower scores indicate improvement.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesFrom the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)Potentially clinically relevant laboratory values assessed included - serum chemistry \[including blinded prolactin\], hematology, and urinalysis as defined in SAP.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsFrom the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)Vital sign measurements included body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood pressure measurements were made in the supine, sitting, and standing positions after the participant had been in each position for at least 3 minutes as defined in SAP.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersFrom the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)Twelve-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participant was supine and at rest for at least 5 minutes as defined in SAP.
Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total ScoreBaseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)The SAS consists of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). The SAS total score is the sum of the scores of all 10 items, ranging from 0 to 40 where lower scores indicate less severe condition. LS mean was determined by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total ScoreBaseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)The AIMS assessment consists of 12 items rating the involuntary movements: Facial and oral movements (4 items), extremity movements (2 items), and trunk movements (1 item) were observed unobtrusively while the participant is at rest and the investigator also made global judgments on the participant's dyskinesias (2 items), and dental status (2 items). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). Total Score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items, ranging from 0 to 48, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) ScoreBaseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)The BARS consists of 4 items related to akathisia: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator, subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant, subjective distress due to akathisia, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. The first 3 items were rated on a 4-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe condition) and the global clinical assessment was rated on a 6-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 5 (severe akathisia). Total score is the sum of the scores of all 4 items, ranging from 0 to 14, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleFrom the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)The UKU rating scale is a semi-structured interview used to assess the side effects of participants being treated with antipsychotic drugs. The scale is divided into 6 sub-scales: Psychic, neurological, autonomic, other, global assessment by subject, and global assessment by doctor. The scale has a total of 48 items, each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=not present; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe), and the total score ranges from 0 to 144. Higher ratings indicate greater impairment. The severe side effects are reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)The NY-AACENT is used to detect changes in cognitive function subsequent to pharmacological or similar treatments for neurological or psychiatric problems, specifically designed to be used in pediatric population (ages 12 to 17), but could have been utilized with other age groups, as appropriate. Number of participants with at least one occurrence of the corresponding signs/symptoms are reported in this outcome measure.
Mean Change From Baseline in Waist CircumferenceBaseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)Change in waist circumference was reported in 'cm'.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at investigational sites in the United States, Mexico, France, Italy, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Spain, Ukraine, and Russia from 30 June 2017 to 03 April 2023.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 376 participants were screened, of which 316 participants were enrolled and randomized to brexpiprazole, aripiprazole or placebo groups in 1:1:1 ratio.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Brexpiprazole
Participants were administered with brexpiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 0.5 mg by Day 4, 1 mg by Day 7, 2 mg by Day 14, then between 2-4 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 1 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision.
110
Aripiprazole
Participants were administered with aripiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 2 mg by Day 4, 5 mg by Day 7, 10 mg by Day 14, then 10, 15 or 20 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 5 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision.
102
Placebo
Participants were administered with brexpiprazole or aripiprazole matching placebo oral tablets, daily up to Week 6.
104
Total316

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event012
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyPregnancy010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Caregiver135
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject102

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboAripiprazoleBrexpiprazole
Age, Continuous15.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
15.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
15.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
15.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score101.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
102.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
101.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
101.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
100 Participants34 Participants32 Participants34 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
213 Participants68 Participants70 Participants75 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Other
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
7 Participants4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
21 Participants6 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
81 Participants25 Participants27 Participants29 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
204 Participants68 Participants66 Participants70 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
3 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
95 participants32 participants31 participants32 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
11 participants3 participants3 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
18 participants6 participants6 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
11 participants3 participants4 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
31 participants10 participants10 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
102 participants34 participants33 participants35 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
43 participants14 participants14 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
166 Participants51 Participants57 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
150 Participants53 Participants45 Participants52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1100 / 1020 / 104
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 11028 / 10216 / 104
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1101 / 1023 / 104

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score

The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score-22.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score-23.95 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score-17.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.58
p-value: 0.013695% CI: [-9.55, -1.1]MMRM
p-value: 0.003295% CI: [-10.8, -2.21]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score

The AIMS assessment consists of 12 items rating the involuntary movements: Facial and oral movements (4 items), extremity movements (2 items), and trunk movements (1 item) were observed unobtrusively while the participant is at rest and the investigator also made global judgments on the participant's dyskinesias (2 items), and dental status (2 items). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). Total Score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items, ranging from 0 to 48, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.

Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score-0.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score0.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score-0.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
95% CI: [-0.3, 0.18]
95% CI: [-0.13, 0.36]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score

The BARS consists of 4 items related to akathisia: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator, subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant, subjective distress due to akathisia, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. The first 3 items were rated on a 4-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe condition) and the global clinical assessment was rated on a 6-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 5 (severe akathisia). Total score is the sum of the scores of all 4 items, ranging from 0 to 14, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.

Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score0.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score0.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score0.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
95% CI: [-0.08, 0.09]
95% CI: [-0.04, 0.14]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score

The SAS consists of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). The SAS total score is the sum of the scores of all 10 items, ranging from 0 to 40 where lower scores indicate less severe condition. LS mean was determined by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.

Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score0.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score0.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score-0.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
95% CI: [-0.24, 0.39]
95% CI: [-0.14, 0.51]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score

The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social, and school functioning for children aged 6-17 years and provides a global measure of the severity of disturbance. The scale is separated into 10-point sections that are headed with a description of the level of functioning and followed by examples matching the interval. The score ranges from 0-100, 1 to 10 indicates the need for constant supervision and 91 to 100 indicates superior functioning in all areas. Higher scores indicate better functioning. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score10.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 1
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score12.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score8.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.06
p-value: 0.085495% CI: [-0.35, 5.31]MMRM
p-value: 0.007295% CI: [1.09, 6.88]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score

The CGI-S scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 to 7. The investigator answered the question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worse condition. LS mean was determined by the MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score-0.92 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score-1.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score-0.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
p-value: 0.358995% CI: [-0.36, 0.13]MMRM
p-value: 0.111895% CI: [-0.45, 0.05]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores

PANSS has 7 positive symptom constructs: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, hostility; and 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). PANSS positive & negative subscale scores were the sum of rating scores for 7 positive & 7 negative items respectively. Both scores range from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores denote worsening of symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales ScoresChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score-6.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
BrexpiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales ScoresChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score-4.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales ScoresChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score-7.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales ScoresChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score-4.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales ScoresChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score-5.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales ScoresChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score-3.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Comparison: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Scorep-value: 0.020595% CI: [-2.65, -0.22]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Scorep-value: 0.000895% CI: [-3.4, -0.91]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Scorep-value: 0.13695% CI: [-2.04, 0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Scorep-value: 0.115895% CI: [-2.14, 0.24]MMRM
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in BMI was reported in kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2).

Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)0.2 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.1
AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)0.3 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)0.0 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Height

Change in height was reported in centimeters (cm).

Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Height0.2 cmStandard Deviation 1.1
AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Height0.2 cmStandard Deviation 2.9
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Height0.3 cmStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference was reported in 'cm'.

Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference0.6 cmStandard Deviation 3.9
AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference-0.3 cmStandard Deviation 4.3
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference0.0 cmStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Weight

Change in weight was reported, in kilograms (kg).

Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Weight0.8 kgStandard Deviation 2.6
AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Weight0.5 kgStandard Deviation 2.7
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Weight0.0 kgStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6

The efficacy of brexpiprazole in the treatment was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was entirely due to drug treatment on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0 to 7. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Mean CGI-I scale score was determined by LOCF method.

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BrexpiprazoleMean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 62.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
AripiprazoleMean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 62.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
PlaceboMean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 63.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
p-value: 0.028795% CI: [-0.56, -0.03]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.018495% CI: [-0.62, -0.06]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEsTrial Discontinuation Due to AEs0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEsAEs46 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEsAEs56 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEsTrial Discontinuation Due to AEs1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEsAEs44 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEsTrial Discontinuation Due to AEs2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a scale used to report at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any of the following items: actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior. The suicidal ideation total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) and the total score ranges from 0 to 25. Lower scores indicate improvement.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)

The NY-AACENT is used to detect changes in cognitive function subsequent to pharmacological or similar treatments for neurological or psychiatric problems, specifically designed to be used in pediatric population (ages 12 to 17), but could have been utilized with other age groups, as appropriate. Number of participants with at least one occurrence of the corresponding signs/symptoms are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Working Memory88 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Attention/Vigilance98 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Verbal Learning71 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Visual Learning46 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Reasoning97 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Speed of Processing88 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Social Cognition91 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Any Signs/Symptoms100 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Verbal Learning70 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Social Cognition87 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Visual Learning46 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Reasoning86 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Any Signs/Symptoms91 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Speed of Processing84 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Working Memory79 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Attention/Vigilance90 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Attention/Vigilance91 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Any Signs/Symptoms92 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Working Memory83 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Visual Learning44 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Social Cognition84 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Speed of Processing82 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Reasoning83 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)Verbal Learning69 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Vital sign measurements included body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood pressure measurements were made in the supine, sitting, and standing positions after the participant had been in each position for at least 3 minutes as defined in SAP.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with at least one post-baseline result for the specified vital signs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Sitting (mmHg): Low0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Standing (mmHg): Low1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Supine (mmHg): Low0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP Standing (mmHg): Low1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP Supine (mmHg): Low0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsWeight (kg): Low5 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsWeight (kg): High9 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsOrthostatic Hypotension (mmHg): Low2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Supine (mmHg): Low0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsWeight (kg): High5 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP Standing (mmHg): Low0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP Supine (mmHg): Low1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsWeight (kg): Low2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Sitting (mmHg): Low0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Standing (mmHg): Low1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsOrthostatic Hypotension (mmHg): Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Supine (mmHg): Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Standing (mmHg): Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP Sitting (mmHg): Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP Standing (mmHg): Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsWeight (kg): High5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsWeight (kg): Low4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP Supine (mmHg): Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital SignsOrthostatic Hypotension (mmHg): Low2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values

Potentially clinically relevant laboratory values assessed included - serum chemistry \[including blinded prolactin\], hematology, and urinalysis as defined in SAP.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' indicates the number of participants with at least one post-baseline numeric result for the specified parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): Low12 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesCholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High2 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHematocrit (%): Low4 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High2 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesBilirubin (mg/dL): High0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesEosinophils/Leukocytes (%): High2 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesTriglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL): High13 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLeukocytes (10^9/L): Low0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesUrate (mg/dL): High0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesCreatine kinase (U/L): High5 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesProtein, Urine: High2 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L): High1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesGlucose, Fasting (mg/dL): High16 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLeukocytes (10^9/L): High0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHemoglobin (g/dL): Low2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHemoglobin (g/dL): Low0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L): High2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesBilirubin (mg/dL): High1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesCholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High3 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesCreatine kinase (U/L): High4 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesGlucose, Fasting (mg/dL): High15 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): Low10 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High3 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesTriglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL): High7 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesUrate (mg/dL): High0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesEosinophils/Leukocytes (%): High0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHematocrit (%): Low0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLeukocytes (10^9/L): Low1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLeukocytes (10^9/L): High0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesProtein, Urine: High2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): Low13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLeukocytes (10^9/L): High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHematocrit (%): Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesGlucose, Fasting (mg/dL): High9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesCreatine kinase (U/L): High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesHemoglobin (g/dL): Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesCholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L): High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLeukocytes (10^9/L): Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesTriglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL): High10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesBilirubin (mg/dL): High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesUrate (mg/dL): High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesLDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesProtein, Urine: High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test ValuesEosinophils/Leukocytes (%): High0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

Twelve-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participant was supine and at rest for at least 5 minutes as defined in SAP.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' indicates the number of participants with at least one post-baseline numeric result for the specified parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRate: Bradycardia0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Sinus Bradycardia0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Supraventricular Premature Beat0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Ventricular Premature Beat1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersST/T Morphology: QTcF0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersST/T Morphology: QTcN0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersST/T Morphology: QTcN1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRate: Bradycardia0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Ventricular Premature Beat0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersST/T Morphology: QTcF1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Sinus Bradycardia0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Supraventricular Premature Beat1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Sinus Bradycardia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Supraventricular Premature Beat1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRhythm: Ventricular Premature Beat0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersST/T Morphology: QTcN0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersRate: Bradycardia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersST/T Morphology: QTcF0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale

The UKU rating scale is a semi-structured interview used to assess the side effects of participants being treated with antipsychotic drugs. The scale is divided into 6 sub-scales: Psychic, neurological, autonomic, other, global assessment by subject, and global assessment by doctor. The scale has a total of 48 items, each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=not present; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe), and the total score ranges from 0 to 144. Higher ratings indicate greater impairment. The severe side effects are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Micturition Disturbances0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Reduced Duration of Sleep4 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Asthenia/Lassitude6 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Concentration Difficulties7 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Increased Dream Activity0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Weight Gain0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Nausea/Vomiting0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Emotional Indifference3 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Depression0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleNeurologic: Akathisia1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Migraine0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Increased Tendency to Sweating1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Tension/Inner Unrest4 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Amenorrhoea0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Palpitations/Tachycardia1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Increased Duration of Sleep0 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Failing Memory2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Nausea/Vomiting0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Concentration Difficulties10 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Asthenia/Lassitude3 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Failing Memory2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Depression2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Tension/Inner Unrest3 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Increased Duration of Sleep1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Reduced Duration of Sleep1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Increased Dream Activity2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Emotional Indifference6 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleNeurologic: Akathisia1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Micturition Disturbances1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Palpitations/Tachycardia0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Increased Tendency to Sweating0 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Weight Gain1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Amenorrhoea1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Migraine0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Asthenia/Lassitude1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Micturition Disturbances0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Tension/Inner Unrest9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Migraine1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Palpitations/Tachycardia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Depression1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Amenorrhoea0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Increased Tendency to Sweating0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Failing Memory4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Concentration Difficulties8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Emotional Indifference6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleOther: Weight Gain0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleNeurologic: Akathisia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Increased Dream Activity0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Reduced Duration of Sleep1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScaleAutonomic: Nausea/Vomiting1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating ScalePsychic: Increased Duration of Sleep0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any AE that results in the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable signs, symptoms, or medical conditions which is fatal, life-threatening, result in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. TEAE is any AE after the start of treatment or if the event was continuous from baseline, medicinal product related, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of medicinal product. TEAEs were graded on a 3-point scale: 1 (Mild: Discomfort noticed, but no disruption to daily activity), 2 (Moderate: Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity), and 3 (Severe: Inability to work or perform normal daily activity).

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)

Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityModerate TEAEs17 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityMild TEAEs33 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityTEAEs44 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeveritySerious TEAEs1 Participants
BrexpiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeveritySevere TEAEs2 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityMild TEAEs47 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityTEAEs53 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeveritySerious TEAEs1 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityModerate TEAEs16 Participants
AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeveritySevere TEAEs0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeveritySevere TEAEs1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityModerate TEAEs13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityTEAEs42 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeverityMild TEAEs32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by SeveritySerious TEAEs3 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission

Remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3 on each of the following specific PANSS items: delusions (positive scale item \[P\] 1), unusual thought content (general scale item \[G\] 9), hallucinatory behavior (P3), conceptual disorganization (P2), mannerisms/posturing (G5), blunted affect (negative scale item \[N\] 1), passive/apathetic social withdrawal (N4), and lack of spontaneity and conversation flow (N6). Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). Percentage of participants achieving remission was determined by LOCF method.

Time frame: Up to 6 weeks

Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BrexpiprazolePercentage of Participants Achieving Remission29.09 percentage of participants
AripiprazolePercentage of Participants Achieving Remission35.64 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Remission23.30 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.441595% CI: [0.77, 1.81]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.047295% CI: [1.01, 2.16]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Response

Response was defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in PANSS Total Score or CGI score of 1 or 2. The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel, and ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). The CGI scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Percentage of participants achieving response was determined by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame: Up to 6 weeks

Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BrexpiprazolePercentage of Participants Achieving Response43.64 percentage of participants
AripiprazolePercentage of Participants Achieving Response43.56 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Response28.16 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.011195% CI: [1.09, 2.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.022495% CI: [1.06, 2.16]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026