Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
Brexpiprazole, Schizophrenia, Adolescent
Brief summary
To determine the safety & efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy in the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy compared to placebo in adolescent subjects (ages 13-17) with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia.
Interventions
Once-daily, tablets
Once-daily, tablets
Once-daily, tablets
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Subjects randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 double-blind treatment arms to evaluate safety & efficacy
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male & female subjects aged 13-17 years, inclusive at time of consent and at baseline visit, with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia as defined by DSM-5 criteria and confirmed by K-SADS-PL and a history of the illness for at least 6 months prior to screening. * PANSS score \>= 80, inclusive, at screening and baseline
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects with a DSM-5 diagnosis other than schizophrenia that has been the primary focus of treatment within 3 months of screening. * Subjects with a clinical presentation or history that is consistent with delirium, dementia, amnesia or other cognitive disorders * Subjects who have been hospitalized \> 21 days for a current exacerbation of schizophrenia at the time of baseline. * Any neurological disorder other than Tourette's Syndrome * Subjects at significant risk of committing violent acts, serious self-harm or suicide based on history * Subjects with epilepsy, a history of seizures, severe head trauma or stroke * Subjects who test positive for drugs of abuse at screening
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score | Baseline to Week 6 | The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Response | Up to 6 weeks | Response was defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in PANSS Total Score or CGI score of 1 or 2. The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel, and ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). The CGI scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Percentage of participants achieving response was determined by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission | Up to 6 weeks | Remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3 on each of the following specific PANSS items: delusions (positive scale item \[P\] 1), unusual thought content (general scale item \[G\] 9), hallucinatory behavior (P3), conceptual disorganization (P2), mannerisms/posturing (G5), blunted affect (negative scale item \[N\] 1), passive/apathetic social withdrawal (N4), and lack of spontaneity and conversation flow (N6). Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). Percentage of participants achieving remission was determined by LOCF method. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score | Baseline to Week 6 | The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social, and school functioning for children aged 6-17 years and provides a global measure of the severity of disturbance. The scale is separated into 10-point sections that are headed with a description of the level of functioning and followed by examples matching the interval. The score ranges from 0-100, 1 to 10 indicates the need for constant supervision and 91 to 100 indicates superior functioning in all areas. Higher scores indicate better functioning. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score | Baseline to Week 6 | The CGI-S scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 to 7. The investigator answered the question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worse condition. LS mean was determined by the MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance. |
| Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6 | Week 6 | The efficacy of brexpiprazole in the treatment was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was entirely due to drug treatment on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0 to 7. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Mean CGI-I scale score was determined by LOCF method. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any AE that results in the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable signs, symptoms, or medical conditions which is fatal, life-threatening, result in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. TEAE is any AE after the start of treatment or if the event was continuous from baseline, medicinal product related, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of medicinal product. TEAEs were graded on a 3-point scale: 1 (Mild: Discomfort noticed, but no disruption to daily activity), 2 (Moderate: Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity), and 3 (Severe: Inability to work or perform normal daily activity). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Weight | Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks) | Change in weight was reported, in kilograms (kg). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Height | Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks) | Change in height was reported in centimeters (cm). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks) | Change in BMI was reported in kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2). |
| Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores | Baseline to Week 6 | PANSS has 7 positive symptom constructs: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, hostility; and 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). PANSS positive & negative subscale scores were the sum of rating scores for 7 positive & 7 negative items respectively. Both scores range from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores denote worsening of symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance. |
| Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks) | C-SSRS is a scale used to report at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any of the following items: actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior. The suicidal ideation total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) and the total score ranges from 0 to 25. Lower scores indicate improvement. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks) | Potentially clinically relevant laboratory values assessed included - serum chemistry \[including blinded prolactin\], hematology, and urinalysis as defined in SAP. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks) | Vital sign measurements included body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood pressure measurements were made in the supine, sitting, and standing positions after the participant had been in each position for at least 3 minutes as defined in SAP. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks) | Twelve-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participant was supine and at rest for at least 5 minutes as defined in SAP. |
| Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score | Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks) | The SAS consists of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). The SAS total score is the sum of the scores of all 10 items, ranging from 0 to 40 where lower scores indicate less severe condition. LS mean was determined by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate. |
| Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score | Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks) | The AIMS assessment consists of 12 items rating the involuntary movements: Facial and oral movements (4 items), extremity movements (2 items), and trunk movements (1 item) were observed unobtrusively while the participant is at rest and the investigator also made global judgments on the participant's dyskinesias (2 items), and dental status (2 items). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). Total Score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items, ranging from 0 to 48, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate. |
| Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score | Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks) | The BARS consists of 4 items related to akathisia: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator, subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant, subjective distress due to akathisia, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. The first 3 items were rated on a 4-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe condition) and the global clinical assessment was rated on a 6-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 5 (severe akathisia). Total score is the sum of the scores of all 4 items, ranging from 0 to 14, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate. |
| Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks) | The UKU rating scale is a semi-structured interview used to assess the side effects of participants being treated with antipsychotic drugs. The scale is divided into 6 sub-scales: Psychic, neurological, autonomic, other, global assessment by subject, and global assessment by doctor. The scale has a total of 48 items, each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=not present; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe), and the total score ranges from 0 to 144. Higher ratings indicate greater impairment. The severe side effects are reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks) | The NY-AACENT is used to detect changes in cognitive function subsequent to pharmacological or similar treatments for neurological or psychiatric problems, specifically designed to be used in pediatric population (ages 12 to 17), but could have been utilized with other age groups, as appropriate. Number of participants with at least one occurrence of the corresponding signs/symptoms are reported in this outcome measure. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks) | Change in waist circumference was reported in 'cm'. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants took part in the study at investigational sites in the United States, Mexico, France, Italy, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Spain, Ukraine, and Russia from 30 June 2017 to 03 April 2023.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 376 participants were screened, of which 316 participants were enrolled and randomized to brexpiprazole, aripiprazole or placebo groups in 1:1:1 ratio.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole Participants were administered with brexpiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 0.5 mg by Day 4, 1 mg by Day 7, 2 mg by Day 14, then between 2-4 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 1 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision. | 110 |
| Aripiprazole Participants were administered with aripiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 2 mg by Day 4, 5 mg by Day 7, 10 mg by Day 14, then 10, 15 or 20 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 5 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision. | 102 |
| Placebo Participants were administered with brexpiprazole or aripiprazole matching placebo oral tablets, daily up to Week 6. | 104 |
| Total | 316 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Caregiver | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Placebo | Aripiprazole | Brexpiprazole |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 15.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 | 15.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 | 15.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 | 15.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 |
| Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score | 101.4 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7 | 102.1 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 | 101.0 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 | 101.1 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino | 100 Participants | 34 Participants | 32 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Missing | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino | 213 Participants | 68 Participants | 70 Participants | 75 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Other | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race American Indian or Alaska Native | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Asian | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black or African American | 21 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Missing | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 81 Participants | 25 Participants | 27 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 204 Participants | 68 Participants | 66 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 3 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 95 participants | 32 participants | 31 participants | 32 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 11 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Romania | 18 participants | 6 participants | 6 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 11 participants | 3 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Serbia | 31 participants | 10 participants | 10 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 1 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ukraine | 102 participants | 34 participants | 33 participants | 35 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 43 participants | 14 participants | 14 participants | 15 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 166 Participants | 51 Participants | 57 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 150 Participants | 53 Participants | 45 Participants | 52 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 110 | 0 / 102 | 0 / 104 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 19 / 110 | 28 / 102 | 16 / 104 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 110 | 1 / 102 | 3 / 104 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score | -22.75 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.49 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score | -23.95 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.57 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score | -17.42 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.58 |
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score
The AIMS assessment consists of 12 items rating the involuntary movements: Facial and oral movements (4 items), extremity movements (2 items), and trunk movements (1 item) were observed unobtrusively while the participant is at rest and the investigator also made global judgments on the participant's dyskinesias (2 items), and dental status (2 items). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). Total Score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items, ranging from 0 to 48, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score | -0.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score | 0.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score | -0.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.09 |
Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score
The BARS consists of 4 items related to akathisia: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator, subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant, subjective distress due to akathisia, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. The first 3 items were rated on a 4-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe condition) and the global clinical assessment was rated on a 6-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 5 (severe akathisia). Total score is the sum of the scores of all 4 items, ranging from 0 to 14, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score | 0.01 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.03 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score | 0.06 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.03 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score | 0.01 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.03 |
Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
The SAS consists of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). The SAS total score is the sum of the scores of all 10 items, ranging from 0 to 40 where lower scores indicate less severe condition. LS mean was determined by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score | 0.04 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score | 0.15 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score | -0.03 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score
The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social, and school functioning for children aged 6-17 years and provides a global measure of the severity of disturbance. The scale is separated into 10-point sections that are headed with a description of the level of functioning and followed by examples matching the interval. The score ranges from 0-100, 1 to 10 indicates the need for constant supervision and 91 to 100 indicates superior functioning in all areas. Higher scores indicate better functioning. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score | 10.56 score on a scale | Standard Error 1 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score | 12.07 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.05 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score | 8.08 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.06 |
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
The CGI-S scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 to 7. The investigator answered the question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worse condition. LS mean was determined by the MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score | -0.92 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score | -1.01 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score | -0.80 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores
PANSS has 7 positive symptom constructs: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, hostility; and 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). PANSS positive & negative subscale scores were the sum of rating scores for 7 positive & 7 negative items respectively. Both scores range from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores denote worsening of symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score | -6.58 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Brexpiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score | -4.70 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.41 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score | -7.29 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.45 |
| Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score | -4.77 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score | -5.14 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.46 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score | -3.82 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.44 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Change in BMI was reported in kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2).
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | 0.2 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | 0.3 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | 0.0 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Height
Change in height was reported in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Height | 0.2 cm | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Height | 0.2 cm | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Height | 0.3 cm | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Change in waist circumference was reported in 'cm'.
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis at the specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | 0.6 cm | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | -0.3 cm | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | 0.0 cm | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Change in weight was reported, in kilograms (kg).
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Weight | 0.8 kg | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Weight | 0.5 kg | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Weight | 0.0 kg | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6
The efficacy of brexpiprazole in the treatment was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was entirely due to drug treatment on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0 to 7. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Mean CGI-I scale score was determined by LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6 | 2.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Aripiprazole | Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6 | 2.79 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Placebo | Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6 | 3.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | AEs | 46 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | AEs | 56 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | AEs | 44 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
C-SSRS is a scale used to report at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any of the following items: actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior. The suicidal ideation total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) and the total score ranges from 0 to 25. Lower scores indicate improvement.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)
The NY-AACENT is used to detect changes in cognitive function subsequent to pharmacological or similar treatments for neurological or psychiatric problems, specifically designed to be used in pediatric population (ages 12 to 17), but could have been utilized with other age groups, as appropriate. Number of participants with at least one occurrence of the corresponding signs/symptoms are reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Working Memory | 88 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Attention/Vigilance | 98 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Verbal Learning | 71 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Visual Learning | 46 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Reasoning | 97 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Speed of Processing | 88 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Social Cognition | 91 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Any Signs/Symptoms | 100 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Verbal Learning | 70 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Social Cognition | 87 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Visual Learning | 46 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Reasoning | 86 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Any Signs/Symptoms | 91 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Speed of Processing | 84 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Working Memory | 79 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Attention/Vigilance | 90 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Attention/Vigilance | 91 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Any Signs/Symptoms | 92 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Working Memory | 83 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Visual Learning | 44 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Social Cognition | 84 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Speed of Processing | 82 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Reasoning | 83 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) | Verbal Learning | 69 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Vital sign measurements included body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood pressure measurements were made in the supine, sitting, and standing positions after the participant had been in each position for at least 3 minutes as defined in SAP.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with at least one post-baseline result for the specified vital signs.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Sitting (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Standing (mmHg): Low | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Supine (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP Standing (mmHg): Low | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP Supine (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Weight (kg): Low | 5 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Weight (kg): High | 9 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Orthostatic Hypotension (mmHg): Low | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Supine (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Weight (kg): High | 5 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP Standing (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP Supine (mmHg): Low | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Weight (kg): Low | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Sitting (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Standing (mmHg): Low | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Orthostatic Hypotension (mmHg): Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Supine (mmHg): Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Standing (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP Sitting (mmHg): Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP Standing (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Weight (kg): High | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Weight (kg): Low | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP Supine (mmHg): Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Orthostatic Hypotension (mmHg): Low | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values
Potentially clinically relevant laboratory values assessed included - serum chemistry \[including blinded prolactin\], hematology, and urinalysis as defined in SAP.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' indicates the number of participants with at least one post-baseline numeric result for the specified parameter.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | HDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): Low | 12 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 2 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Hematocrit (%): Low | 4 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | LDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 2 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Bilirubin (mg/dL): High | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%): High | 2 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 13 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Leukocytes (10^9/L): Low | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Urate (mg/dL): High | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Creatine kinase (U/L): High | 5 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Protein, Urine: High | 2 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L): High | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 16 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Leukocytes (10^9/L): High | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Hemoglobin (g/dL): Low | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Hemoglobin (g/dL): Low | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L): High | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Bilirubin (mg/dL): High | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 3 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Creatine kinase (U/L): High | 4 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 15 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | HDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): Low | 10 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | LDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 3 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 7 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Urate (mg/dL): High | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%): High | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Hematocrit (%): Low | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Leukocytes (10^9/L): Low | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Leukocytes (10^9/L): High | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Protein, Urine: High | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | HDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): Low | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Leukocytes (10^9/L): High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Hematocrit (%): Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 9 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Creatine kinase (U/L): High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Hemoglobin (g/dL): Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L): High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Leukocytes (10^9/L): Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Bilirubin (mg/dL): High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Urate (mg/dL): High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | LDL Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL): High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Protein, Urine: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values | Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%): High | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Twelve-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participant was supine and at rest for at least 5 minutes as defined in SAP.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for the outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' indicates the number of participants with at least one post-baseline numeric result for the specified parameter.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rate: Bradycardia | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Sinus Bradycardia | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Supraventricular Premature Beat | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Ventricular Premature Beat | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | ST/T Morphology: QTcF | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | ST/T Morphology: QTcN | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | ST/T Morphology: QTcN | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rate: Bradycardia | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Ventricular Premature Beat | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | ST/T Morphology: QTcF | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Sinus Bradycardia | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Supraventricular Premature Beat | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Sinus Bradycardia | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Supraventricular Premature Beat | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rhythm: Ventricular Premature Beat | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | ST/T Morphology: QTcN | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | Rate: Bradycardia | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters | ST/T Morphology: QTcF | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale
The UKU rating scale is a semi-structured interview used to assess the side effects of participants being treated with antipsychotic drugs. The scale is divided into 6 sub-scales: Psychic, neurological, autonomic, other, global assessment by subject, and global assessment by doctor. The scale has a total of 48 items, each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=not present; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe), and the total score ranges from 0 to 144. Higher ratings indicate greater impairment. The severe side effects are reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Micturition Disturbances | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Reduced Duration of Sleep | 4 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Asthenia/Lassitude | 6 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Concentration Difficulties | 7 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Increased Dream Activity | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Weight Gain | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Nausea/Vomiting | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Emotional Indifference | 3 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Depression | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Neurologic: Akathisia | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Migraine | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Increased Tendency to Sweating | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Tension/Inner Unrest | 4 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Amenorrhoea | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Palpitations/Tachycardia | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Increased Duration of Sleep | 0 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Failing Memory | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Nausea/Vomiting | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Concentration Difficulties | 10 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Asthenia/Lassitude | 3 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Failing Memory | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Depression | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Tension/Inner Unrest | 3 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Increased Duration of Sleep | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Reduced Duration of Sleep | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Increased Dream Activity | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Emotional Indifference | 6 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Neurologic: Akathisia | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Micturition Disturbances | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Palpitations/Tachycardia | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Increased Tendency to Sweating | 0 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Weight Gain | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Amenorrhoea | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Migraine | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Asthenia/Lassitude | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Micturition Disturbances | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Tension/Inner Unrest | 9 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Migraine | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Palpitations/Tachycardia | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Depression | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Amenorrhoea | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Increased Tendency to Sweating | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Failing Memory | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Concentration Difficulties | 8 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Emotional Indifference | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Other: Weight Gain | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Neurologic: Akathisia | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Increased Dream Activity | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Reduced Duration of Sleep | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Autonomic: Nausea/Vomiting | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale | Psychic: Increased Duration of Sleep | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any AE that results in the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable signs, symptoms, or medical conditions which is fatal, life-threatening, result in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. TEAE is any AE after the start of treatment or if the event was continuous from baseline, medicinal product related, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of medicinal product. TEAEs were graded on a 3-point scale: 1 (Mild: Discomfort noticed, but no disruption to daily activity), 2 (Moderate: Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity), and 3 (Severe: Inability to work or perform normal daily activity).
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)
Population: Safety sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Moderate TEAEs | 17 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Mild TEAEs | 33 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | TEAEs | 44 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Serious TEAEs | 1 Participants |
| Brexpiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Severe TEAEs | 2 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Mild TEAEs | 47 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | TEAEs | 53 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Serious TEAEs | 1 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Moderate TEAEs | 16 Participants |
| Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Severe TEAEs | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Severe TEAEs | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Moderate TEAEs | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | TEAEs | 42 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Mild TEAEs | 32 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity | Serious TEAEs | 3 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission
Remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3 on each of the following specific PANSS items: delusions (positive scale item \[P\] 1), unusual thought content (general scale item \[G\] 9), hallucinatory behavior (P3), conceptual disorganization (P2), mannerisms/posturing (G5), blunted affect (negative scale item \[N\] 1), passive/apathetic social withdrawal (N4), and lack of spontaneity and conversation flow (N6). Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). Percentage of participants achieving remission was determined by LOCF method.
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission | 29.09 percentage of participants |
| Aripiprazole | Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission | 35.64 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission | 23.30 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Response
Response was defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in PANSS Total Score or CGI score of 1 or 2. The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel, and ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). The CGI scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Percentage of participants achieving response was determined by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Population: Efficacy sample included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP, had a baseline assessment, and at least one post-baseline assessment of the PANSS Total Score. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Percentage of Participants Achieving Response | 43.64 percentage of participants |
| Aripiprazole | Percentage of Participants Achieving Response | 43.56 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Response | 28.16 percentage of participants |