Skip to content

Adult Study to Evaluate Placement of Tympanostomy Tubes In-office (ADEPT)

A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Lidocaine Iontophoresis and Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using the Tula Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery Systems for Adults in an Office Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03197558
Acronym
ADEPT
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-06-23
Start date
2017-06-27
Completion date
2017-09-14
Last updated
2020-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AOM - Acute Otitis Media, Barotrauma;Ear, Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, OME - Otitis Media With Effusion

Brief summary

A prospective, multicenter study to evaluate effectiveness and safety of Tymbion iontophoresis and tympanostomy tube placement using the Tula iontophoresis and tube delivery systems for adults in an office setting. This study cohort is called Group B and includes tube placement. Protocol CPR007003 also included a first study group ('A', without tube placement) that was completed and described in a separate registration (NCT03119181).

Detailed description

The objective for Group B in the study is to evaluate tolerability and safety of tympanostomy tube (TT) placement in adults following local anesthesia in a physician's clinic setting. Group B will consist of 30 evaluable adults who require unilateral or bilateral tube insertion. The iontophoresis system (IPS) will be used to facilitate anesthetic delivery to the tympanic membrane (TM). The lidocaine-based solution used for local anesthesia of the TM is Tymbion (2% lidocaine HCl/ 1:100,000 epinephrine). Subjects will receive active Tymbion iontophoresis and will have tubes placed using the TDS in all ears indicated for tube placement. The subject will rate the pain upon TDS tube insertion using the VAS, and the pain score will be compared to a performance goal. Safety will be evaluated post procedure and at a follow-up visit.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTTymbion Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery System (TDS)

Subjects will receive active Tymbion iontophoresis and tube insertion using the Tube Delivery System in all ears indicated for tube placement.

Sponsors

Tusker Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults at least 18 years of age at time of consent 2. Indication for tympanostomy tube insertion per Clinical Practice Guideline,or indicated for tympanostomy tube insertion due to barotrauma or Eustachian tube dysfunction per AAO-HNS Clinical Indicators. 3. Subject is able and willing to comply with the protocol and attend all study visits. 4. Subject is able and willing to provide informed consent. 5. Subject is able to read and understand English.

Exclusion criteria

by Ear: 1. Significantly atrophic, retracted or retraction pocket at location of tube placement, bimeric, monomeric or atelectatic tympanic membrane. 2. Perforated tympanic membrane. 3. Otitis externa. 4. Hemotympanum. 5. Damaged/denuded skin in the auditory canal. 6. Cerumen impaction resulting in a significant amount of cleaning required to visualize the tympanic membrane potentially causing abrasion or irritation to the external ear canal. 7. Notable ear discomfort experienced during audiologic or otoscopic examination. 8. Anatomy that precludes sufficient visualization of and access to the tympanic membrane. 9. Anatomy that necessitates tympanostomy tube placement in the posterior half of the tympanic membrane. General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject-reported Pain Score Following Tube Delivery System (TDS) Tube Placement Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) by Subject Compared to a Performance Goal.Day of procedure (Day 0)- Immediately after tube placementThe VAS consists of a 100 millimeter (mm) line with a statement at each end representing the extreme limits of pain intensity where a score of 0 represents No pain and a score of 100 represents The worst possible pain. Following TDS tube placement, the subject will report their post-tube placement ear discomfort for each ear undergoing tube placement using the VAS. For subjects treated bilaterally, the highest (worst) score reported will be used as the unit of analysis.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tube Insertion Using Tube Delivery System (TDS)
Active Tymbion iontophoresis and tubes using the TDS Tymbion Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery System (TDS): Subjects will receive active Tymbion iontophoresis and will have tubes placed using the TDS in all ears indicated for tube placement.
30
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyTubes not placed1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTube Insertion Using Tube Delivery System (TDS)
Age, Continuous54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Subject-reported Pain Score Following Tube Delivery System (TDS) Tube Placement Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) by Subject Compared to a Performance Goal.

The VAS consists of a 100 millimeter (mm) line with a statement at each end representing the extreme limits of pain intensity where a score of 0 represents No pain and a score of 100 represents The worst possible pain. Following TDS tube placement, the subject will report their post-tube placement ear discomfort for each ear undergoing tube placement using the VAS. For subjects treated bilaterally, the highest (worst) score reported will be used as the unit of analysis.

Time frame: Day of procedure (Day 0)- Immediately after tube placement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tube Insertion Using Tube Delivery System (TDS)Subject-reported Pain Score Following Tube Delivery System (TDS) Tube Placement Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) by Subject Compared to a Performance Goal.9.4 millimetersStandard Deviation 15.7
Comparison: Mean VAS score compared to performance goal using a bootstrap method test at 2.5% significance.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026