Skip to content

Effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in Chronic Neck Pain

Effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program (ECRP) to Decrease Pain and Increase Mobility in the Cervical Area Compared to a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain Symptoms.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03197285
Enrollment
44
Registered
2017-06-23
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2017-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain, Eye Strain

Keywords

neck pain, eye, propioception, range of motion, pain

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is to value the effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program (ECRP) to decrease pain and increase mobility in the cervical area compared to a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) in patients with chronic neck pain symptoms.

Detailed description

Background: In Physiotherapy there is a growing interest of authors to clarify the relationship between the visual system and the neck. Aspects such as deficiencies in eye movement during cervical rotation are common disorders in patients who have suffered whiplash trauma or have dizzy syndromes. On the other hand, deep muscle disorders of the neck are related to the decrease in cervical-ocular reflex. Furthermore, some disorders in eye movements in patients with idiopathic neck pain have been identified. Consequently, a pragmatic approach to multimodal intervention has been recommended to address changes in sensorimotor control at the cervical level. For this purpose, head-neck sensitization exercises (joint position sense training with head relocation), oculo-motor exercises (ie, eye stability, eye-neck coordination) or balance training have been proposed. These programs lead to a sensorimotor control, reducing pain and disability in the neck. However, it is not known if this approach to treatment is a significant improvement when compared to the implementation of other physiotherapy procedures, so it is unknown if the application of training oculocervical proprioception is more advisable than other modalities of physiotherapy treatment for the improvement of CNP symptoms. Material and method: This research is an analytical, longitudinal, prospective, experimental, evaluator blinded study. It is controlled with two parallel groups, randomized clinical trial. The sample consisted of patients recruited in a Physiotherapy consultation in Cadiz (Spain). These assessments were made before and after the start of program and to the end of intervention (8 months). Patients were randomized to control or experimental group. All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol, no apply an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in subjects in the first group and performing an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in the second. This program was carried out by the physiotherapist. Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days.

Interventions

Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days. This includes a total of 10 exercises that has proprioceptive reprogramming in the cervical area with the following phases: 1. To stimulate ocular mobility without including the cervical movement. The patient was placed in the supine position and the physiotherapist seated, at the height of the head. 2. To exercise cervical mobility with restricted eye movement. The patient is placed on a rotating stool. The ocular mobility is excluded with opaque glasses that allowed exclusively the foveal vision 3. Finally we stimulate eye and neck movement coordination. The patient continued to sit on the stool, this time without the glasses.

OTHERCombined Physiotherapy Protocol

Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful).

Sponsors

University of Cadiz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria were: to show symptoms and clinical signs of neck pain, have a medical diagnosis, meet the following lines according to the classification proposed by the Working Group Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 (Axis 1:Health problem receiving health care, Axis II: tertiary care; healthcare in a private Physiotherapy center, Axis III: Grades I and II, Axis IV: Long term, more than three months, Line V: isolated, periodic or permanent Crises) and cervical pain of a mechanical origin, due to repetitive motion or maintenance of positions for long periods.

Exclusion criteria

* Dizziness syndrome, microwave contraindications and analgesic currents (therapeutic procedures used), post-traumatic, rheumatologic, neurological, infectious or tumor cervical pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of painBaseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)Algometer in 6 points (two trapezius, two in angular of the scapula and two sub-occipital)
Change of range of motionBaseline and end of treatment (4 weeks)Measured with inclinometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Rating IndexBaseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)McGill questionnaire in Spanish version
Numerical rating scale for painBaseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)VAS visual analogue scale

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026