Skip to content

Novel PET/CT and Treatment Strategies to Reduce PTS Following DVT

Novel PET/CT and Treatment Strategies to Reduce PTS Following DVT

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03195777
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-06-22
Start date
2017-12-20
Completion date
2025-06-27
Last updated
2026-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Venous Thrombosis, Post-thrombotic Syndrome

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to develop strategies that will improve outcomes for patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), using in vivo FDG-PET inflammation imaging to better predict the development of the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). New approaches are needed to improve the outcomes of patients with DVT, a disease that affects up to 600,000 patients per year in the US alone. DVT acutely places patients at risk of death from pulmonary embolism and causes 50,000 deaths annually in the US. Moreover, up to 30-50% of patients will develop PTS, an illness characterized by inflammation-driven fibrotic vein wall injury, and persistent thrombus obstruction. PTS occurs despite anticoagulant therapy, and produces chronic disability from leg pain, heaviness, edema, skin pigmentation, and ulcers; some patients may even require amputation. PTS impairs quality of life to the same extent as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or diabetes. Therefore new diagnostic insights into PTS are urgently needed. There are several major challenges to improve outcomes in PTS: A) Limited in vivo knowledge regarding inflammation and the development of PTS; B) L Lack of predictive approaches to identify patients at high risk for PTS that will preferentially benefit from novel therapies. Recently, our laboratories have harnessed FDG-PET molecular imaging to illuminate DVT inflammation in vivo, and to provide a new strategy to diagnose recurrent DVT, a vexing clinical problem (Hara et al. Circulation 2014). We now propose to further develop FDG-PET to improve outcomes in DVT and PTS. The objective of this application is to develop FDG-PET as an inflammation imaging approach to assess DVT inflammation and predict risk of developing PTS in human subjects; Hypothesis 1A: Inflammatory activity in DVT (quantified acutely, using FDG-PET imaging within 0-7 days after DVT) will predict PTS incidence (primary) and severity (secondary) within a 24 month follow-up period. Hypothesis 1B: Inflammatory activity in DVTs (quantified sub-acutely, using FDG-PET imaging within 21-28 days after DVT), will predict PTS incidence and severity. Eighty patients with DVT will be imaged using FDG-PET/CT acutely (0-7 days of DVT diagnosis), and sub-acutely (21-28 days after diagnosis). Subjects will be evaluated repeatedly for up to 2 years to detect clinical evidence of PTS (Villalta score), ultrasound findings for structural venous injury, and soluble biomarkers of systemic inflammation. Subsequently, we will evaluate the relationship between FDG DVT activity and the development of PTS.

Detailed description

This study is a one-center observational study examining DVT with PET/CT. 80 individuals with recent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) will be recruited from MGH. Imaging and clinical evaluation will be performed to look for predictors of a major complication of DVT: the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) There are 5 visits to attend. The imaging visits will last 2-3 hours. The clinical evaluation visits will last 1-2 hours. 1. Screening - This visit will take place after initial DVT (deep venous thrombosis) diagnosis. It will involve clinical assessments and blood labs, to determine subject eligibility. If an ultrasound was not performed at the time of DVT diagnosis, an ultrasound should be performed. 2. Visit 1 (0-7 days after DVT diagnosis) - Imaging Visit 1 - At this visit, patients will receive a positron-emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) scan, and contrast-enhanced CT of the lower extremity (CTA) and will have blood labs drawn. 3. Visit 2 (21-28 days after DVT diagnosis) - Imaging Visit 2 - At this visit, patients will receive a PET/CT scan and will have blood labs drawn. 4. Visit 3 (6 months after DVT diagnosis) - Clinical Evaluation - At this visit, patients will meet to evaluate symptoms of DVT and PTS. Blood labs will be drawn. An ultrasound will be performed as well. 5. Visit 4 (24 months after DVT diagnosis OR time of PTS diagnosis) - Clinical Evaluation - At this visit, patients will meet to evaluate symptoms of DVT and PTS. Blood labs will be drawn. An ultrasound will be performed as well.

Interventions

DEVICEPET/CT

PET/CT imaging will be performed (with fluorodeoxyglucose, \[FDG\] as a tracer). Thereafter, subjects will be monitored for development of PTS. We will then assess the ability of PET/CT top predict the subsequent development of PTS.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Investigators who are analyzing images will be blinded to all clinical data, including clinical follow-up data to determine PTS

Intervention model description

This study is a one-center observational study examining DVT with FDG- PET/CT. 80 individuals with DVT will be imaged with PET/CT and followed for development of PTS

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age above 30 * Patient presents with a first symptomatic, proximal DVT (with or without concurrent distal DVT or pulmonary embolism).

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has May-Thurner syndrome * Patient has an expected life span of \< 6 months * Patient can't receive anticoagulation therapy * Patient received thrombolytic therapy for the initial treatment of acute DVT * Patient has DVT signs of symptoms that occur more than 1 week prior to presentation, as assessed by clinical history * Renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/ml or estimated creatinine clearance \< 60 ml/min)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hazard Ratio: for Baseline FDG Activity Within the Thrombus vs. the Subsequent Development of Post-thrombotic Syndrome6 - 24 month follow-up periodCox regression assessing the relationship between DVT-associated inflammation (at baseline) and the development of PTS. The predictor is baseline DVT inflammation (as target to background ratio of the FDG signal within the thrombus). The outcome is the development of post-thrombotic syndrome (defined as Villata Score \>/= 5 ) at any time during the 6- 24 months follow-up period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We conducted a prospective cohort study at Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, United States) between 12/20/2017 and 6/27/25

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants
Age, Continuous56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Deep Vein Thrombus target to background ratio1.58 TBR (Target to Background Ratio)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
45 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 50

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 19, 2026