Skip to content

A Comparison of Different Concentration Ropivacaine for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia

A Comparison of Different Concentration Ropivacaine Combination With Fentanyl for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03195309
Acronym
PCEA
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-06-22
Start date
2017-01-20
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2017-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section, Epidural Anesthesia

Keywords

Cesarean Delivery, Ropivacaine, Fentanyl, Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia

Brief summary

To compare the postoperative analgesic effect and the intensity of motor block in different concentration ropivacaine plus fentanyl when used epidurally with a patient-controlled analgesia device after Cesarean delivery.

Detailed description

1. Written informed consent must be obtained before any study specific procedures are undertaken. 2. All patients were received epidural anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for post- operative pain control. PCEA randomly allocated into three groups. Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl, Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl, and Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl. Dermographic data, dosage of PCEA during first 48 hours post-operation,NRS scores, patient satisfaction and the intensity of motor block will be recorded and analyzed.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

DRUGFentanyl

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Sponsors

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Participant do not know which formula they are receive. Nor do the daily care providers.

Intervention model description

All patients were received epidural anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for post- operative pain control. PCEA randomly allocated into three groups. Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl, Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl, and Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl. Dermographic data, dosage of PCEA during first 48 hours post-operation,NRS scores, patient satisfaction and the intensity of motor block will be recorded and analyzed.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female undergoing elective Cesarean delivery and receive patient-controlled epidural analgesia

Exclusion criteria

* With the comorbidity of chronic heart, lung, liver and renal disease, chronic alcoholism, allergy to ropivacaine, poor epidural function and combine other anesthesia method

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the numeric rating scaleThe investigators measured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.The investigators use numeric rating scale(0\ 10) for pain severity measurement, 0 for no pain, 10 is the most severe pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Patient satisfaction scaleThe investigators measured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.Patient satisfaction scale (1\ 4), 1 for very satisfied, 2 for satisfied, 3 for fair, and 4 for unsatisfied

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in modified Bromage scaleThe investigatorsmeasured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.The investigators use modified Bromage scale for motor block evaluation. Modified Bromage scale(0\ 3), 0 for no motor block. 1 for inability to raise extended leg, able to move knees and feet. 2 for inability to raise extended leg and move knee, able to move feet. 3 for complete block of motor limb

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026