Skip to content

Effectiveness of Office Bleaching Agents in Patients of Different Age Group

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Office Bleaching Agents in Patients of Different Age Group

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03194984
Enrollment
56
Registered
2017-06-22
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
2018-01-30
Last updated
2018-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Satisfaction

Keywords

dental whitening, Dental office whitening

Brief summary

To evaluate the effectiveness in terms of color variation, patient satisfaction, absolute risk and intensity of dentin sensitivity due to dental bleaching in the office with 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP Automixx 35%, FGM) and Opalescence Boost 38% ( Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) in the same arch in patients of different age groups: 18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years. Data will be collected, tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis

Detailed description

Throughout life, the aging of the human being as a whole is inevitable. The dental structure such as cementum and dentin undergo some changes over time, such as secondary deposition of dentin, which results in the reduction of root canal length. In addition, with aging the teeth undergo color changes, presenting a more yellowish or grayish coloration (Ravindra SV et al., 2015). The fact is that most of the studies that involve the technique of dental bleaching have as inclusion factor only young adult patients, excluding patients of more advanced age groups. Therefore, it is fundamental to evaluate the whitening technique in these older patients, since it is a treatment that does not cause harm to the individuals To assess the effect of dental bleaching in the office with Whiteness HP Automixx, FGM at 35% and Opalescence Boost at 38% in the same arch, in different age groups (18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years) in absolute risk and intensity Of the postoperative dental sensitivity through the visual analog (VAS 0-10) and analogue (NRS 0-4) scales. * Evaluate the efficacy of Whitening HP Automixx, FGM 35% and Opalescence Boost 38% in the same arch in different age groups (18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years) using Color Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide, and the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer. * Evaluate the satisfaction of patients after Whitening HP Automixx at 35, FGM and Opalescence Boost 38% in the same arch in different age groups (18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years).

Interventions

The office bleaching products will be applied on one of dental hemi-arch of young patients (18-25 years) or adult patients (40-65 years), after randomization. The product will apllied according manufacture instrutions.

DRUGHydrogen peroxide 38%

The office bleaching products will be applied on one of dental hemi-arch of young patients (18-25 years) or adult patients (40-65 years), after randomization. The product will apllied according manufacture instrutions.

Sponsors

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do estado de Minas Gerais
CollaboratorOTHER
Federal University of Uberlandia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

the patient did not know in which region each gel was applied the investigator did not know in which region each gel was applied the outcomes assessor did not know in which region each gel was applied

Intervention model description

range of patients aged 18 to 25 years receiving two types of geis and range of patients aged 40-65 years receiving two types of geis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years of age up to 25 years * Patients aged 40 years up to 65 years * Good oral and general health * Teeth free of restorations or with small restorations * Free from carious injury, * Patients with tooth color A2 or darker according to the Vita Classical color scale (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) * Agree to the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* extensive restoration * Patients who have already undergone dental whitening * Pregnant or lactating women * That report dental sensitivity * With non-carious cervical lesion * Parafunctional habits * Orthodontic appliances * Any other type of oral pathology * Smokers, patients who are using analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs, present systemic alterations such as gastric, cardiac, renal and hepatic problems, diabetics, hypertensives or pre-existing neoplasias.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tooth discoloration36 weeksEfficacy of office dental whitening mensured by Easyshade spectrophotometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dentin sensitivity36 weeksIt will analised the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity of dental bleaching
Patient satisfaction36 weeksIt will analised the patient satisfaction by questionnaire of self-perception of aesthetics (PIDAQ)

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026