Skip to content

Vertebral Body Tethering Outcomes for Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis

Safety and Feasibility of a Vertebral Body Tethering Technique for Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03194568
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-06-21
Start date
2017-07-12
Completion date
2022-01-26
Last updated
2024-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Scoliosis

Keywords

Scoliosis, Idiopathic Scoliosis, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Brief summary

This study will assess whether Anterior Vertebral Tethering is a safe and feasible method of anterior approach surgery for spinal deformity in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis.

Detailed description

Scoliosis is a condition in which the spine is deformed by a curvature in the coronal plane. It is generally associated with a twisting (axial plane) deformity as well. It can have a variety of underlying etiologies and the etiology is used to classify the types of scoliosis. Idiopathic scoliosis is sub-classified in two ways: by age of onset and by magnitude of deformity. Curves between 10 and 25 degrees are considered mild. Curves between 25 and 50 degrees are classified as moderate. Curves greater than 50 degrees are termed severe. The current standard of care for moderate scoliosis in patients with remaining growth is to utilize a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO brace) to prevent progression of deformity. The scientific evidence has supported the efficacy of this intervention in avoiding progression of the Cobb angle to 50 degrees or more. If treated with a TLSO brace, many idiopathic scoliosis patients would conceivably be subjected to years of brace wear and the cost and psychological factors inherent therein. Additional downsides of brace treatment include the potentially negative psychosocial impact of wearing an external sign of deformity during adolescence, a key period of emotional development. Prior research has identified negative psychosocial effects related to wearing a brace in children. Recent evidence has suggested that certain curve patterns will likely progress to 50 degrees or more, despite treatment with a TLSO brace. Sanders, et al. demonstrated a correlation of Cobb angle (greater than 35 degrees) and skeletal maturity (bone age 4 or less) to the risk of progression to 50 degrees or more, despite TLSO bracing. The evidence supports that the current practice of TLSO bracing is not an effective treatment to avoid progression to 50 degrees in these patients. It is on this population (thoracic Cobb angle greater than 35 degrees, bone age of 4 or less) that we intend to test the safety and feasibility of Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering to avoid curve progression to 50 degrees. The study intervention is surgical orthopedic implantation of the Anterior Vertebral Tether Device, by way of thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome measures include assessments of safety of the insertion procedure and of the device, as well as the secondary measure of feasibility by determining the ability to successfully implant the investigational device.

Interventions

DEVICEAnterior Vertebral Tether

Vertebral body tethering through anterior thoracoscopic approach under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance.

Sponsors

Patrick Cahill, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females age 8 to 16 years old at time of enrollment (inclusive) 2. Diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis 3. Sanders bone age of less than or equal to 4 4. Thoracic curve of greater than or equal to 35 degrees and less than or equal to 60 degrees 5. Lumbar curve less than 35 degrees 6. Patient has already been identified for and recommended to have surgical intervention 7. Spina bifida occulta is permitted 8. Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis is permitted, as long as it is non-operative, the subject has not had any previous surgery for this, and no surgery is planned in the future

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy (current) 2. Prior spinal or chest surgery 3. MRI abnormalities (including syrinx greater than 4mm, Chiari malformation, or tethered cord) 4. Neuromuscular, thoracogenic, cardiogenic scoliosis, or any other non-idiopathic scoliosis 5. Associated syndrome, including Marfan syndrome or neurofibromatosis 6. Sanders bone age greater than 4 7. Thoracic curve less than 35 degrees or greater than 60 degrees 8. Lumbar curve greater than or equal to 35 degrees 9. Unable or unwilling to firmly commit to returning for required follow-up visits 10. Investigator judgement that the subject/family may not be a candidate for the intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Eventsup to 2 yearsIntra-operative and post-intervention medical events or signs and symptoms of complications arising after the start of study intervention will be captured. The event description, date of onset, end date, severity, and outcome will be documented. The frequencies, type, body system, severity, and relationship to the study intervention will also be summarized. A distinction will be made between those events which are device-related and non device-related.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Cobb Angleup to 2 yearsThe exploratory therapeutic endpoint used for feasibility will be change in post-operative Cobb angle compared to pre-operative Cobb angle, measured on coronal radiograph of the spine.
Comparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 Scoresup to 2 yearsThe Scoliosis Research Society 30 (SRS-30) questionnaire will be administered at pre-operative and post-operative time points. This questionnaire measures health-related quality of life outcomes. It consists of 30 questions divided into five domains: Function/Activity (5 questions), Pain (5 questions), Self-image/Appearance (5 questions), Mental Health (5 questions), and Satisfaction with management (2 questions). The remaining 8 questions are a combination of different domains. Each question is scored on a 5-point scale (1 = worst, 5 = best). To score each domain, sum the scores of the questions within that domain and then divide by the number of questions in that domain to get an average score. To calculate the total overall score, sum all the individual question scores and then divide by the total number of questions (30). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anterior Vertebral Tethering
Subjects receiving Anterior Vertebral Tethering intervention. Anterior Vertebral Tether: Vertebral body tethering through anterior thoracoscopic approach under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawn due to need for re-operation related to an anticipated device SAE4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnterior Vertebral Tethering
Age, Continuous12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.94
Age, Customized
Age at first diagnosis of Idiopathic Scoliosis
9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.38
Bending Lumbar Cobb Angle5 Degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.83
Bending Thoracic Cobb Angle20.5 Degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56
Coronal Lumbar Cobb Angle29 Degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.77
Coronal Thoracic Cobb Angle51.5 Degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25
Degree of lumbar rib hump6 Degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.72
Degree of thoracic rib hump13 Degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.64
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Height (cm)159.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43
Lumbar rib hump side
Left
20 Participants
Lumbar rib hump side
Right
0 Participants
Menarche status
N/A, Male
4 Participants
Menarche status
No
10 Participants
Menarche status
Yes
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
Sanders Bone Age
0
0 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
1
0 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
2
2 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
3
10 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
4
8 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
5
0 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
6
0 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
7
0 Participants
Sanders Bone Age
8
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Thoracic Rib Hump Side
Left
0 Participants
Thoracic Rib Hump Side
Right
20 Participants
Weight (kg)45.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.82

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Intra-operative and post-intervention medical events or signs and symptoms of complications arising after the start of study intervention will be captured. The event description, date of onset, end date, severity, and outcome will be documented. The frequencies, type, body system, severity, and relationship to the study intervention will also be summarized. A distinction will be made between those events which are device-related and non device-related.

Time frame: up to 2 years

Population: Four of the subjects were withdrawn from the study prior to the 2 year completion date due to need for re-operation related to an anticipated device SAE. All data reported for these subjects were obtained prior to withdrawal.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anterior Vertebral TetheringIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSubjects that experienced a device-related AE11 Participants
Anterior Vertebral TetheringIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSubjects that experienced a device-related SAE7 Participants
Anterior Vertebral TetheringIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSubjects that experienced a non-device related AE20 Participants
Anterior Vertebral TetheringIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSubjects that experienced a non-device related SAE0 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Cobb Angle

The exploratory therapeutic endpoint used for feasibility will be change in post-operative Cobb angle compared to pre-operative Cobb angle, measured on coronal radiograph of the spine.

Time frame: up to 2 years

Population: Four of the subjects were withdrawn from the study prior to the 2 year completion date due to need for re-operation related to an anticipated device SAE. All data reported for these subjects were obtained prior to withdrawal.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Cobb AngleThoracic curve <50° without a secondary spinal fusion or other revision surgery14 Participants
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Cobb AngleThoracic curve >50°, or requiring a secondary spinal fusion or other revision surgery6 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 Scores

The Scoliosis Research Society 30 (SRS-30) questionnaire will be administered at pre-operative and post-operative time points. This questionnaire measures health-related quality of life outcomes. It consists of 30 questions divided into five domains: Function/Activity (5 questions), Pain (5 questions), Self-image/Appearance (5 questions), Mental Health (5 questions), and Satisfaction with management (2 questions). The remaining 8 questions are a combination of different domains. Each question is scored on a 5-point scale (1 = worst, 5 = best). To score each domain, sum the scores of the questions within that domain and then divide by the number of questions in that domain to get an average score. To calculate the total overall score, sum all the individual question scores and then divide by the total number of questions (30). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Time frame: up to 2 years

Population: Four of the 20 initial subjects were withdrawn from the study prior to final follow-up administration of SRS questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPre-operative Function/Activity4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPre-operative Pain4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPre-operative Self-image/Appearance3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPre-operative Mental Health4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPre-operative Satisfaction with management3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPre-operative total score4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPost-operative Function/Activity4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPost-operative Pain4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPost-operative Self-image/Appearance4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPost-operative Mental Health4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPost-operative Satisfaction with management4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Anterior Vertebral TetheringComparison of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative SRS 30 ScoresPost-operative total score4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026