Skip to content

V-Y Flap Versus Occlusive Dressing in Treating Fingertip Injuries With Exposed Bone

V-Y Flap Versus Occlusive Dressing in Treating Fingertip Injuries With Exposed Bone

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03193983
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-06-21
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2020-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injury Arm

Keywords

occlusive dressing

Brief summary

Fingertip is a complex structure that is responsible for the fine function of the fingers and the whole hand. A fingertip injury is any soft tissue, nail or bony injury distal to the insertions of the long flexor and extensor tendons of a finger .Fingertip injury is a serious condition that if untreated properly could lead to significant functional disability and disuse of the injured finger. Up to date, defining the best treatment option for this injury remains controversial. Hand surgeons are divided between proponents of flap coverage and conservative treatment, driven by beliefs, training programs and financial aspects. After recently reviewing the literature for the current best evidence and fundamentals of conservative treatment, Krauss and Lalandei in their recent review of the literature, pointed out to the necessity for implementing controlled trials to compare both ways of treatment.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and the results of occlusive dressing in treating fingertip injuries in comparison to flaps with much concern to certain factors that are closely related to our locality including patient compliance for regular follow up , functional outcome , time to return to work and its socioeconomical impact and cosmetic results . Surgical group will undergo surgical coverage of the fingertip defect by V-Y flap using the skin on the volar aspect of the same finger designed as V shaped then mobilized dorsally to cover the defect and stitches to be Y shaped. Stitches are removed after 2 weeks. Conservative group will undergo minimal trimming of the bone end and an occlusive dressing that is changed on a weekly basis till complete healing of the defect that occurs after 6 weeks

Interventions

PROCEDUREFlaps Coverage

Surgical group will undergo surgical coverage of the fingertip defect by V-Y flap using the skin on the volar aspect of the same finger designed as V shaped then mobilized dorsally to cover the defect and stitches to be Y shaped. Stitches are removed after 2 weeks.

Conservative group will undergo minimal trimming of the bone end and an occlusive dressing that is changed on a weekly basis till complete healing of the defect that occurs after 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

two groups Surgical group will undergo surgical coverage of the fingertip defect by V-Y flap using the skin on the volar aspect of the same finger designed as V shaped then mobilized dorsally to cover the defect and stitches to be Y shaped. Stitches are removed after 2 weeks. Conservative group will undergo minimal trimming of the bone end and an occlusive dressing that is changed on a weekly basis till complete healing of the defect that occurs after 6 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* a. Inclusion criteria: 1. Age Adults 12 - 60 years 2. Diagnosis of fingertip injury with exposed bone (Allen type 2, 3 or 4) in any finger. 3. Informed consent obtained by the patient.

Exclusion criteria

* · Old or complicated fingertip injuries. * Non-exposed bone fingertip injury (Allen type1). * Patients with severe debilitating disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
quick DASH score6 monthsA questionnaire consisting of eleven items that test the functional recovery following upper limb injury

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
presence of painful neuroma6 monthsabsent or present if present either affect patient function or not
The presence of nail deformity.6 monthsany nail deformity will be reported the most common is hook nail deformity and then the deformity wiil be classified according to the severity to mild moderate and severe
Pulp volume compared to the contralateral finger: on lateral X-ray6 monthseither no decrease in the pulp volume or decreased to less than the half compared to the contralateral finger or more than the half compared to the contralateral finger
Sensory related outcome in the form of Two point discrimination test (Weber index)6 monthsmeasurement and classification of Two point discrimination can be done by Touch-Test 2-Point Discriminator which consists of two sturdy, rotating, plastic disks that are joined together.Rounded tips are spaced at standard testing intervals from 1 to 15 mm apart. A 20 and 25 mm spacing also are given. One disk setting tests from 1 to 8mm, and the other setting tests from 9 to 15 mm. To change settings, just rotate the top disk until it clicks in place
Finger length: expressed as a shortage in mm. compared to contralateral finger.6 monthsthe shortage is classified to three items a) no shortage b) less half compared to contralateral finger and c) more than compared to contralateral finger

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026