Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002) 180mg When Added to PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002) 180mg QD When Added to Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9)-Inhibitor Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03193047
Enrollment
59
Registered
2017-06-20
Start date
2017-04-07
Completion date
2018-02-19
Last updated
2020-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

Cholesterol, PCSK9, Repatha, evolocumab, LDL-C

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) 180mg added to PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab) therapy is effective and safe in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol.

Interventions

Daily bempedoic acid 180mg tablet in addition to monthly PCSK9i (evolocumab) background therapy

OTHERplacebo

Daily matching placebo tablet in addition to monthly PCSK9i (evolocumab) background therapy

DRUGevolocumab

Monthly PCSK9i (evolocumab) background therapy

Sponsors

Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years or legal age of majority depending on regional law * Fasting, calculated LDL-C at screening ≥160 mg/dL and following PCSK9i therapy ≥70 mg/dL * Men and nonpregnant, nonlactating women

Exclusion criteria

* Heterozygous (HeFH) or Homozygous (HoFH) Familial Hypercholesterolemia * Total fasting TG ≥500 mg/dL * Renal dysfunction or a glomerulonephropathy; eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2 * Known cardiovascular disease (CVD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), or cerebrovascular disease (CD) * History of type 1 or type 2 diabetes * Uncontrolled hypertension * Uncontrolled hypothyroidism * Liver disease or dysfunction * Gastrointestinal conditions or procedures (including Lap-Band® or gastric bypass) * History of hematologic or coagulation disorders * History of malignancy (except non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and cervical carcinoma in situ) * Unexplained creatine kinase (CK) \>3 × ULN * Use of a cholesterylester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor in the last 12 months prior to screening, such as: anacetrapib, dalcetrapib, or evacetrapib * Pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during treatment and/ or within 30 days after the end of treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Month 2Baseline; Month 2Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the average of the last two non-missing values within Month -1 (Screening Visit 4) and Day 1 (Treatment Visit 1) values (including unscheduled assessments). If only one value was available, then that single value was used at Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) (only post-Baseline values were carried forward).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1 and Month 2Baseline; Month 1 and Month 2Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the average of the Screening Visit 4 and the Day 1 value. If only 1 value is available, then that single value is used as Baseline. Change from Baseline was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Observed data were used for analysis at Month 1. Missing Month 2 data were handled by LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2Baseline; Month 1 and Month 2Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline apolipoprotein B (apoB) is defined as the Day 1 value. Baseline total cholesterol (TC) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) are defined as the average of the Month -1 (Screening Visit 4) and the Day 1 (Treatment Visit 1) values. If a missing value presented at Month -1 or Day 1, then the last non-missing value prior to the first dose of double-blind study medication (including unscheduled assessments) within Month -1 and Day 1 was used to compute the Baseline measurements. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Observed data were used for analysis at Month 1. Missing Month 2 data were handled by LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1Baseline; Month 1Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the average of the last two non-missing values within Month -1 (Screening Visit 4) and Day 1 (Treatment Visit 1) values (including unscheduled assessments). If only one value was available, then that single value was used at Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Observed data were used for analysis.
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)up to Month 2 (until 30 days after last dose)Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and SAEs (TESAEs) were reported and defined as any AE that began or worsened after the first dose of investigational medicinal product.
Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2Month 1 and Month 2The number of participants with ALT or AST \>3x ULN was measured.
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Month 1 and Month 2Baseline; Month 1 and Month 2Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the Day 1 value. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using a non-parametric approach. Missing Month 2 data were handled by LOCF. Observed data were used for analysis at Month 1.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

170 participants were screened; out of 170, 59 participants were randomized. One participant never received study medication and withdrew from the study due to the Sponsor's decision.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo Plus Evolocumab
Participants received a matching oral placebo tablet taken once a day, plus evolocumab 420 milligrams (mg) injected over 9 minutes once a month as background therapy.
30
Bempedoic Acid Plus Evolocumab
Participants received a bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet orally once a day (with or without food), plus evolocumab 420 mg injected over 9 minutes once a month as background therapy.
28
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyParticipant Left State10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabTotalPlacebo Plus Evolocumab
Age, Continuous62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.36
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.16
Baseline Apolipoprotein B (apoB) Values87.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.13
87.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.29
87.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8
Baseline High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) Values3.125 milligrams per Liter2.340 milligrams per Liter2.090 milligrams per Liter
Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (L-DLC) Values102.09 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.982
103.14 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.395
104.12 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.121
Baseline Total Cholesterol (TC) and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) Values
non-HDL-C
129.68 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.301
131.37 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.172
132.95 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.599
Baseline Total Cholesterol (TC) and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) Values
TC
186.20 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.343
188.34 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.601
190.33 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.387
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
24 Participants52 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants36 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants22 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 308 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 301 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Month 2

Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the average of the last two non-missing values within Month -1 (Screening Visit 4) and Day 1 (Treatment Visit 1) values (including unscheduled assessments). If only one value was available, then that single value was used at Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) (only post-Baseline values were carried forward).

Time frame: Baseline; Month 2

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all randomized participants with a Baseline lipid value and at least 1 post-Baseline lipid value who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) within 2 days before the lipid measurement and evolocumab 420 mg within 30 days plus or minus 3 days before the lipid measurement

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Month 22.783 percent changeStandard Error 3.412
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Month 2-27.478 percent changeStandard Error 4.31
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-41.324, -19.199]ANCOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1 and Month 2

Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the average of the Screening Visit 4 and the Day 1 value. If only 1 value is available, then that single value is used as Baseline. Change from Baseline was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Observed data were used for analysis at Month 1. Missing Month 2 data were handled by LOCF.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 1 and Month 2

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Plus EvolocumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1 and Month 2Month 11.75 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.118
Placebo Plus EvolocumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1 and Month 2Month 2-0.02 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.386
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1 and Month 2Month 1-36.51 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 46.41
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1 and Month 2Month 2-29.92 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.461
Comparison: Month 1p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-49.558, -26.944]ANCOVA
Comparison: Month 2p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-41.176, -18.626]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2

The number of participants with ALT or AST \>3x ULN was measured.

Time frame: Month 1 and Month 2

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2ALT, Month 10 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2ALT, Month 20 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2AST, Month 10 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2AST, Month 20 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2AST, Month 20 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2ALT, Month 10 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2AST, Month 10 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 1 and Month 2ALT, Month 20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and SAEs (TESAEs) were reported and defined as any AE that began or worsened after the first dose of investigational medicinal product.

Time frame: up to Month 2 (until 30 days after last dose)

Population: Safety Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants in the Safety Population were included in the treatment group that they received, regardless of their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAEs related to IMP1 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TESAEs related to IMP0 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Deaths0 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any TEAE7 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAEs related to evolocumab1 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TESAEs0 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TESAEs related to evolocumab0 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Discontinuation of IMP due to TEAE0 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Mild TEAEs5 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Moderate TEAEs2 Participants
Placebo Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Severe TEAEs0 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Mild TEAEs4 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAEs related to IMP1 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TESAEs related to evolocumab0 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TESAEs related to IMP0 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Deaths0 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Severe TEAEs1 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any TEAE9 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Discontinuation of IMP due to TEAE0 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAEs related to evolocumab0 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Moderate TEAEs4 Participants
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TESAEs1 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Month 1 and Month 2

Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the Day 1 value. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using a non-parametric approach. Missing Month 2 data were handled by LOCF. Observed data were used for analysis at Month 1.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 1 and Month 2

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Month 1 and Month 2hs-CRP at Month 110.658 percent change
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Month 1 and Month 2hs-CRP at Month 2-1.623 percent change
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Month 1 and Month 2hs-CRP at Month 1-23.349 percent change
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Month 1 and Month 2hs-CRP at Month 2-34.444 percent change
Comparison: hs-CRP at Month 1p-value: 0.04695% CI: [-70.524, -2.339]Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: hs-CRP at Month 2p-value: 0.02995% CI: [-51.455, -3.93]Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1

Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the average of the last two non-missing values within Month -1 (Screening Visit 4) and Day 1 (Treatment Visit 1) values (including unscheduled assessments). If only one value was available, then that single value was used at Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Observed data were used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 1

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 13.172 percent changeStandard Error 2.7
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 1-32.712 percent changeStandard Error 4.385
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-46.303, -25.466]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2

Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline apolipoprotein B (apoB) is defined as the Day 1 value. Baseline total cholesterol (TC) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) are defined as the average of the Month -1 (Screening Visit 4) and the Day 1 (Treatment Visit 1) values. If a missing value presented at Month -1 or Day 1, then the last non-missing value prior to the first dose of double-blind study medication (including unscheduled assessments) within Month -1 and Day 1 was used to compute the Baseline measurements. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group as a factor and Baseline as a covariate. Observed data were used for analysis at Month 1. Missing Month 2 data were handled by LOCF.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 1 and Month 2

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2TC at Month 11.170 percent changeStandard Error 1.877
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2apo-B at Month 10.547 percent changeStandard Error 2.948
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2non-HDL-C at Month 12.077 percent changeStandard Error 2.378
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2apo-B at Month 22.706 percent changeStandard Error 2.182
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2non-HDL-C at Month 21.285 percent changeStandard Error 2.783
Placebo Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2TC at Month 20.557 percent changeStandard Error 2.009
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2non-HDL-C at Month 2-22.960 percent changeStandard Error 3.951
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2apo-B at Month 2-21.763 percent changeStandard Error 3.736
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2apo-B at Month 1-26.484 percent changeStandard Error 4.175
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2TC at Month 2-16.963 percent changeStandard Error 3.228
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2non-HDL-C at Month 1-29.563 percent changeStandard Error 4.031
Bempedoic Acid Plus EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Month 1 and Month 2TC at Month 1-20.770 percent changeStandard Error 3.025
Comparison: Apo B at Month 1p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-37.509, -16.553]ANCOVA
Comparison: Apo B at Month 2p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-33.225, -15.713]ANCOVA
Comparison: non-HDL-C at Month 1p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-41.116, -22.163]ANCOVA
Comparison: non-HDL-C at Month 2p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-33.987, -14.505]ANCOVA
Comparison: TC at Month 1p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-29.153, -14.729]ANCOVA
Comparison: TC at Month 2p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-25.201, -9.839]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026