Skip to content

The Best Method for ACL Reconstruction.

The Best Method for ACL Reconstruction. A Study Comparing Reconstructions of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using Grafts Taken From Three Different Anatomical Locations at the Knee and Thigh. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03192761
Enrollment
90
Registered
2017-06-20
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2019-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Brief summary

The investigators wish to compare 3 methods for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using 3 different grafts: bone-patella tendon-bone, hamstrings and iliotibial tract graft, as these methods influence the muscles around the knee differently. Methods using bone-patella tendon-bone and hamstrings are performed as standard operations, and the use of the iliotibial tract graft using a new method of reconstruction. The purpose is: 1. To assess whether one of three different grafts used for reconstruction of the ACL shows superior results compared to the others in relation to mechanical stability and re-rupture rates. 2. To assess whether one of three different methods for reconstruction of the ACL shows superior results compared to the others in subjective patient outcome measures. 3. To assess whether one of three different methods for reconstruction of the ACL shows superior results compared to the others when considering specific symptoms and complications that can be related to donor-site morbidity. 4. To assess whether one of three different methods for reconstruction of the ACL shows superior results compared to the others when considering muscular power, muscle coordination, and function.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study is described in the Brief Summary section. Patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction at the Section of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports Traumatology M51, Department of Orthopedics, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital are eligible for this study Eligibility criteria are described in the Eligibility section. The patients are scheduled for ACL surgery at consultation with a doctor from the Section of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports Traumatology after usual, clinical criteria. The doctor informs the patient about the project, gives the patient the written patient information, and if the patient shows interest in the study, an appointment is scheduled with one of the surgeons involved in the project. At this appointment the patient is informed about the project by the surgeon. The patients will be granted the reflection time they need before consenting or rejecting. Before the day of surgery muscle power, muscle coordination and functional tests are performed, and objective tests and PROMs are completed. Surgery is performed by one of two surgeons experienced in all three methods of surgery as described in the Arms and Interventions section. After the patient is put under general anaesthesia the method of ACL reconstruction is chosen by opening a sealed envelope. Outcome measures are recorded at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. All three methods of reconstruction are believed to have the same risk for basic complications: infection (approx. 1%), stiffening of the knee (approx. 2%) and deep venous thrombosis (approx. 1 %) It is assumed that a 20% difference in a patient reported outcome score (KNEES-ACL) represents a clinically relevant difference. Based on standard deviations for the outcome score, and with a 90% power, significant differences of 20 % can be shown in a sample of 20 patients. Significance level is set at 5%. The investigators aim for 30 patients in each group, considering potential drop-outs.

Interventions

PROCEDUREACL reconstruction hamstrings

HG reconstruction is performed according to the standard procedure of the department: A double semi-Tendinosus and gracillis graft is used. Placement of the bony tunnels is anatomical, and the femoral tunnel is positioned through the antero-medial portal. Fixation proximally is by CL-endobutton and at the tibia by Intrafix sheet and screw

PROCEDUREACL reconstruction patella tendon

PTBG reconstruction is performed according to the standard procedure of the department: A bone patella tendon bone graft of 1 cm width from the midportion of the tendon is used. Placement of the bony tunnels is anatomical, the femoral being positioned through the antero-medial portal. Fixation proximally and distally is by interference screws.

PROCEDUREACL reconstruction iliotibial tract

TIFLG reconstruction is performed as follows: The TIFL graft is harvested using two lateral incisions. The graft is left attached to the distal iliotibial tract. Placement of the bony tunnels is anatomical, the femoral being drilled outside-in. The tibial drill tunnel is made by retrograde drilling 20 mm, leaving cortical bone at the distal end of the tunnel. Fixation distally is by CL-endobutton or interference screw and on femur by an interference screw outside-in.

Sponsors

Lars Konradsen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessor is not involved in the surgical procedures. Participants wear long trousers at follow-up procedures to mask surgical incisions.

Intervention model description

When the patient has been anaesthetized for surgery, the method of reconstruction is defined by opening a sealed envelope in the operating theatre.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with an ACL rupture scheduled for ACL reconstruction after clinical investigation by an orthopedic specialist at the Section of Sports Traumatology M51. * Age 18-40 years. * Patients able to understand given information in relation to the study and to complete out-come questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient activity (sports or work) that excludes one or more of the three methods of surgery, e.g. work predominantly performed kneeling would exclude the use of the BPTBG. * Other ligament injuries (except non-surgically treated lesion of MCL - medial collateral ligament) to the same knee or ligament injury (except non-surgically treated lesion of MCL - medial collateral ligament) to the contralateral knee * Conditions in either knee with pain of such intensity, that participation in the functional tests of this study are impossible. * Auto-immune disease that involves lower limb joints or muscles. * Local or systemic infection. * Actual or previous systemic corticosteroid, chemotherapeutic, or immunosuppressive treatment. * BMI\>30.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in KNEES-ACL scorepre-op, 1 year, 2 yearspatient-reported outcome measure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in anterior-posterior stability (quantified by Rolimeter)pre-op, 1 year, 2 yearsMeasure of anterio-posterior laxity
Change in graded pivot shiftpre-op, 1 year, 2 yearsSubluxation of the tibia relative to the femur
Change in muscle strength and forward lunge abilitypre-op, 1 year, 2 yearsResult of muscle power and muscle coordination tests

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactLars Konradsen
Lars.Konradsen@Regionh.dk+4540284517
Backup ContactMichael Krogsgaard
Michael.Krogsgaard@regionh.dk+4520512714

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026