Skip to content

A Dose-ranging Study of the Efficacy of ESN364 in Postmenopausal Women Suffering Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes)

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Dose-Ranging, Phase 2b Study to Investigate the Efficacy of ESN364 in Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03192176
Enrollment
356
Registered
2017-06-19
Start date
2017-07-19
Completion date
2018-09-19
Last updated
2024-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hot Flashes, Menopause

Keywords

Vasomotor symptoms, Menopause, Hot flashes, Perimenopause

Brief summary

This study determined the effects of different doses and dosing regimens of ESN364 on the frequency and severity of hot flashes. The treatment was administered for 12 weeks to postmenopausal women, aged 40 to 65, suffering at least 50 moderate to severe hot flashes per week.

Detailed description

This was a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, parallel-group, multi-center study to assess the efficacy of ESN364 in postmenopausal women suffering from vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes). This study consisted of a screening period (Days -35 to -1, including the screening visit \[Visit 1\] and a minimum 7-day collection of baseline vasomotor symptom frequency and severity assessments), a 12 week treatment period (Day 1 \[Visit 2\] to Week 12 \[Visit 5\]), and a follow up visit (Week 15 \[Visit 6\]) 3 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The study was performed on an ambulatory basis. The screening visit (Visit 1) occurred up to 35 days prior to randomization. Eligibility was assessed via physical examination, clinical laboratory testing, vital signs, ECG, Pap smear, mammography, and endometrial biopsy. Subjects received an electronic diary to record daily vasomotor symptoms during the duration of the screening period. Subjects who had ≥7 consecutive days of vasomotor symptom recordings participated in the study. Subjects are encouraged to continue recording for the duration of the whole screening period. The electronic diary was reviewed by study site staff on Day 1 (Visit 2) to confirm study eligibility. Subjects were rescreened 1 time upon approval of the medical monitor. During the treatment period, subjects returned to the study site every 4 weeks for assessments. The follow-up visit occurred approximately 3 weeks following the last dose of study drug.

Interventions

DRUGFezolinetant

Oral Capsule

DRUGPlacebo

Oral Capsule

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women \>40 years and ≤65 years of age at the screening visit; * A body mass index between 18 kg/sqm to 38 kg/sqm (extremes included); * Spontaneous amenorrhea for ≥12 consecutive months; or spontaneous amenorrhea for ≥6 months with biochemical criteria of menopause (follicle-stimulating hormone \[FSH\] \>40 IU/L); or having had bilateral oophorectomy ≥6 weeks prior to the screening visit (with or without hysterectomy); * At least 50 moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms per week (ie, 7 consecutive days), as recorded in the daily diary during the screening period; * In good general health as determined on the basis of medical history and general physical examination, including a bimanual clinical pelvic examination and clinical breast examination devoid of relevant clinical findings, performed at the screening visit; hematology and biochemistry parameters, pulse rate and/or blood pressure, and ECG within the reference range for the population studied, or showing no clinically relevant deviations, as judged by the Investigator; * Women \>40 years of age who have documentation of a normal/negative or no clinically significant findings mammogram (obtained at Screening or within the prior 9 months of trial enrollment.) Appropriate documentation includes a written report or an electronic report indicating normal/negative or no clinically significant mammographic findings; * Willing to undergo a transvaginal ultrasound to assess endometrial thickness at Screening and at Week 12 (end-of-treatment, - and subjects) who are withdrawn from the study prior to completion, at the Early Termination (ET) Visit. This is not required for subjects who have had a partial (supracervical) or full hysterectomy; * Willing to undergo an endometrial biopsy at Screening (in the event that the subject's transvaginal ultrasound shows endometrial thickness ≥4 mm) and at Week 12 (end--of--treatment) - all subjects), for subjects with uterine bleeding, and for subjects who are withdrawn from the study prior to completion, at the ET Visit if study drug exposure is ≥10 weeks. This is not required for subjects who have had a partial (supracervical) or full hysterectomy; * Negative alcohol breath test and negative urine test for selected drugs of abuse (amphetamines, tricyclic antidepressants, cocaine, or opiates) at the screening visit; * Negative urine pregnancy test; * Negative serology panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus antibody, and human immunodeficiency virus antibody screens); * Informed Consent Form signed voluntarily before any study-related procedure is performed, indicating that the subject understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and is willing to participate in the study; and * Documentation of a normal Pap smear (or equivalent cervical cytology) or of no clinical significance in the opinion of the Investigator within the previous 9 months or at Screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of a prohibited therapy (hormone therapy, hormonal contraceptive, or vasomotor symptom medication \[prescription, over the counter, or herbal\]) or not willing to wash out drugs * History (in the past year) or presence of drug or alcohol abuse; * Previous or current history of a malignant tumor, except for basal cell carcinoma; * Uncontrolled hypertension and a systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg; * Judged by the Investigator to be unsuited to participate in the study based on findings observed during physical examination, vital sign assessment, or 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG); * History of severe allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to drugs in general, including the study drug and any of its excipients; * Exclusion criterion 7 has been removed in Amendment 1; * An unacceptable result from endometrial biopsy (performed when endometrial thickness is ≥ 4mm measured by transvaginal ultrasound) of endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer, or inadequate specimen at Screening (1 repeat biopsy permitted if technically possible); * History of endometrial hyperplasia or uterine/endometrial cancer; * History of unexplained uterine bleeding; * History of seizures or other convulsive disorders; * Medical condition or chronic disease (including history of neurological \[including cognitive\], hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, pulmonary \[eg, moderate asthma\], endocrine, or gynecological disease) or malignancy that could confound interpretation of the study outcome; * Presence or sequelae of gastrointestinal, liver, kidney, or other conditions known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion (ADME) mechanisms of drugs as judged by the Investigator; * Active liver disease or jaundice, or values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN); or total bilirubin \>1.5 x ULN; or creatinine \>1.5 x ULN; or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula ≤59 mL/min/1.73 sqm at the screening visit; * Concurrent participation in another interventional study (or participation within 3 months prior to screening in this study); * Suicide attempt in the past 3 years; * Unable or unwilling to complete the study procedures; or * Subject is the Investigator or any sub-Investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, or other staff or relative thereof, who is directly involved in the conduct of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4Baseline and week 4The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12Baseline and week 12The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4Baseline and week 4Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day was calculated as follows: \[(number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily moderate/severe VMS. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher score indicates greater severity.
Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12Baseline and week 12Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day was calculated as follows: \[(number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily moderate/severe VMS. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher scores indicates greater severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The hot flash score per 24h (or 12 h day time or 12 h night time) of VMS (mild, moderate, and severe) is calculated as follows: (number of mild VMS x 1) + (number of moderate VMS x 2) + (number of severe VMS x 3). Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant did not wake up but later noticed damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Higher score indicates greater severity.
Change From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The hot flash score per 24h of moderate and severe VMS is calculated as follows: (number of moderate VMS x 2) + (number of severe VMS x 3). Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). VMS. Baseline is the average frequency of 24h vasomotor symptom from 7 non-missing days prior to Day 1. Higher score indicates greater severity.
Mean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, subject does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Mean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, subject does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Change From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15The HFRDIS is a 10-item scale that measures a woman's perceptions of the degree to which VMS interfere with 9 daily life activities (work, social activities, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations with others, sexuality, and enjoying life); the tenth item measures interference with overall quality of life. This scale was modeled after items on the Brief Pain Inventory and Brief Fatigue Inventory, which assess the extent to which pain or fatigue interfere with daily life. Participants were asked to rate the extent to which VMS had interfered with each item during the previous 2-week time interval using a 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) scale. Overall mean score is the average of individual item scores (sum of items/10).
Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15The LSEQ is a 10-item self-rated questionnaire that assesses a participants aspects of sleep and early morning behavior. The questions are grouped into 4 chronological areas: ease of getting to sleep, perceived quality of sleep, ease of awaking from sleep, and integrity of early morning behavior following wakefulness. The LSEQ is a visual analog scale that requires respondents to place marks on a group of 10 cm lines. Lines extend between extremes like more difficult than usual and easier than usual. Responses are measured using a 100 mm scale and are averaged to a score for each domain. Higher scores indicates better sleep and better early morning behavior.
Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15The GCS is a 21-item scale that provides a brief but comprehensive and valid measure of climacteric symptomatology. Each item is rated by the participant according to its severity using a 4-point rating scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The first 20 items of the scale combine into 3 main independent symptom measures by summing up the individual item scores: psychological symptoms (items 1 to 11; score 0 to 33), physical symptoms (items 12 to 18; score 0 to 21), and VMS (items 19 to 20; score 0 to 6). Item 21 is a probe for sexual dysfunction. The total score can range from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15The MENQoL is self-administered and consists of a total of 29 items in a Likert-scale format. Each item assesses the impact of 1 of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last month: vasomotor (items 1 to 3), psychosocial (items 4 to 10), physical (items 11 to 26), and sexual (items 27 to 29). Items pertaining to a specific symptom are rated as present or not present, and if present, how bothersome on a 0 (not bothersome) to 6 (extremely bothersome) scale. Means are computed for each subscale by dividing the sum of the domain's items by the number of items within that domain. Non-endorsement of an item is scored a 1 and endorsement a 2, plus the number of the particular rating, so that the possible score on any item ranges from 1 to 8. Higher scores indicate that menopause symptoms are more bothersome.
Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12Baseline and week 12Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration.
Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12Baseline and week 12Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration.
Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 12Baseline and week 12Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration. The analysis value for Estradiol was imputed as 73.4/2 = 36.7 when result was \< 73.4.
Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 12Baseline and week 12Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration.
Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Severity of mild, moderate & severe VMS per day was calculated as follows \[(number of mild VMS × 1) + (number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily mild/moderate/severe VMS Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant did not wake up but later noticed damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot & was sweating & needed to take action Severity was zero for participants that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher score indicates greater severity.
Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day was calculated as follows: \[(number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily moderate/severe VMS. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for patients that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher score indicates greater severity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Postmenopausal women participants 40 to 65 years of age who had at least 50 moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) per week and who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study.

Pre-assignment details

Prior to randomization, participants had a screening period during which a minimum 7-day collection of baseline VMS frequency and severity assessments were performed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo BID
Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks.
43
Fezolinetant 15 mg BID
Participants received fezolinetant 15 mg capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks.
45
Fezolinetant 30 mg BID
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks.
43
Fezolinetant 60 mg BID
Participants received fezolinetant 60 mg capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks.
45
Fezolinetant 90 mg BID
Participants received fezolinetant 90 mg capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks.
44
Fezolinetant 30 mg QD
Participants received fezolinetant 30 mg capsules orally, QD and matching placebo QD for a period of 12 weeks.
43
Fezolinetant 60 mg QD
Participants received fezolinetant 60 mg capsules orally, QD and matching placebo QD for a period of 12 weeks.
45
Fezolinetant 120 mg QD
Participants received fezolinetant 120 mg capsules orally, QD and matching placebo QD for a period of 12 weeks.
44
Total352

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyAdverse Event10453233
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00123111
Overall StudyMiscellaneous10111201
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10000210
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation11002000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34043442

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalFezolinetant 30 mg BIDFezolinetant 60 mg BIDFezolinetant 90 mg BIDPlacebo BIDFezolinetant 15 mg BIDFezolinetant 30 mg QDFezolinetant 60 mg QDFezolinetant 120 mg QD
Age, Continuous54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
101 Participants9 Participants13 Participants10 Participants15 Participants16 Participants17 Participants12 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
251 Participants34 Participants32 Participants34 Participants28 Participants29 Participants26 Participants33 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per 24h10.5 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.88
10.33 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.88
10.14 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.22
9.85 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.31
9.96 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.49
11.63 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
11.72 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.66
10.15 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.86
10.15 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.78
Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per 24h9.97 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.71
9.85 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.62
9.48 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97
9.32 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.59
9.71 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.53
11.12 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.13
11.18 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.44
9.42 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
9.65 VMS per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.73
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
87 Participants12 Participants15 Participants8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants11 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
257 Participants31 Participants28 Participants36 Participants30 Participants37 Participants31 Participants34 Participants30 Participants
Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per 24h2.38 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
2.37 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
2.38 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.36
2.33 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
2.43 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
2.38 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29
2.38 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34
2.31 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
2.43 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.37
Severity of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per 24h2.44 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
2.43 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
2.45 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
2.38 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
2.46 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
2.45 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.27
2.43 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
2.40 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26
2.49 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
Sex: Female, Male
Female
352 Participants43 Participants45 Participants44 Participants43 Participants45 Participants43 Participants45 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 430 / 450 / 430 / 450 / 440 / 430 / 450 / 44
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 439 / 457 / 4311 / 4511 / 4412 / 4314 / 4511 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 430 / 450 / 430 / 450 / 440 / 431 / 450 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Baseline and week 4

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-4.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-6.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-7.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-6.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline (CFB) in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) at Week 4-6.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
p-value: 0.02495% CI: [-3.56, -0.25]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-4.68, -1.38]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-4.44, -1.14]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.2, -1.89]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.005895% CI: [-4, -0.68]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.65, -1.41]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.004295% CI: [-4.06, 0.76]ANCOVA
Primary

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-5.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.54
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.55
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-7.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-7.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.54
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-7.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
p-value: 0.015495% CI: [-3.3, -0.35]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.004395% CI: [-3.6, -0.67]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.002395% CI: [-3.76, -0.83]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-4.09, -1.16]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.006495% CI: [-3.52, -0.58]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-4.04, -1.15]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.006395% CI: [-3.52, -0.59]ANCOVA
Primary

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12

Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day was calculated as follows: \[(number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily moderate/severe VMS. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher scores indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 12-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
p-value: 0.073695% CI: [-0.8, 0.04]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [-0.98, -0.15]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.002895% CI: [-1.07, -0.22]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.232495% CI: [-0.67, -0.16]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.464795% CI: [-0.58, 0.26]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.01695% CI: [-0.92, -0.1]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.090195% CI: [-0.78, 0.06]ANCOVA
Primary

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4

Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day was calculated as follows: \[(number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily moderate/severe VMS. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for participants that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline and week 4

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDCo-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate to Severe VMS at Week 4-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
p-value: 0.021595% CI: [-0.84, -0.07]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.001795% CI: [-1.01, -0.24]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.21, -0.44]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.37, -0.59]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.032295% CI: [-0.81, -0.04]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.001795% CI: [-0.99, -0.23]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-1.08, -0.31]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15

The GCS is a 21-item scale that provides a brief but comprehensive and valid measure of climacteric symptomatology. Each item is rated by the participant according to its severity using a 4-point rating scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The first 20 items of the scale combine into 3 main independent symptom measures by summing up the individual item scores: psychological symptoms (items 1 to 11; score 0 to 33), physical symptoms (items 12 to 18; score 0 to 21), and VMS (items 19 to 20; score 0 to 6). Item 21 is a probe for sexual dysfunction. The total score can range from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-6.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-6.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-7.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-6.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.17
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-4.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-7.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-5.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-9.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-10.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-9.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.31
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-3.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-5.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-10.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-9.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-3.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-4.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-4.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-4.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-4.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-3.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-8.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-9.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.21
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-5.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-10.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-4.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-10.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.25
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-3.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-6.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-9.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.25
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-4.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-4.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-6.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-10.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-3.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-10.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.27
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-9.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.19
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-4.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-4.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-3.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-4.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-3.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-8.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-4.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-7.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-7.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-9.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-6.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-5.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-2.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-7.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-2.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-7.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Symptoms Score-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Symptoms-4.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Total Score-10.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.24
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: VasomotorSymptoms Score-3.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Symptoms-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Symptoms-4.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Score ;-4.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Total Score-10.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.24
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Total Score-10.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.19
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: VasomotorSymptoms Score-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Symptoms-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Psychological Symptoms-4.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Total Score-8.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Symptoms Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Score-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.215995% CI: [-2.93, 0.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.040595% CI: [-3.7, -0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.011595% CI: [-4.18, -0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.055395% CI: [-3.62, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.275395% CI: [-2.82, 0.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.51495% CI: [-1.2, 2.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.017895% CI: [-4.03, -0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.967595% CI: [-1.02, 0.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.312295% CI: [-1.52, 0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.997795% CI: [-1, 1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.931295% CI: [-1.05, 0.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.600595% CI: [-1.27, 0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.528495% CI: [-0.68, 1.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.111195% CI: [-1.82, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.176495% CI: [-1.16, 0.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptomsp-value: 0.003795% CI: [-1.73, -0.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.3, -0.92]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.21, -0.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.144495% CI: [-1.21, 0.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.008895% CI: [-1.6, -0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.000595% CI: [-1.93, -0.54]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.041695% CI: [-0.69, -0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.035395% CI: [-0.71, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.84, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.049595% CI: [-0.69, 0]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.866595% CI: [-0.31, 0.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.930395% CI: [-0.35, 0.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.103995% CI: [-0.62, 0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Total Scorep-value: 0.254795% CI: [-4.78, 1.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Total Scorep-value: 0.022595% CI: [-6.6, -0.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Total Scorep-value: 0.005895% CI: [-7.38, -1.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Total Scorep-value: 0.030195% CI: [-6.48, -0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Total Scorep-value: 0.32295% CI: [-4.59, 1.51]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Total Scorep-value: 0.878295% CI: [-2.8, 3.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Total Scorep-value: 0.006995% CI: [-7.27, -1.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.08995% CI: [-3.49, 0.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.144495% CI: [-3.25, 0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.102295% CI: [-3.51, 0.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.234295% CI: [-3.07, 0.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.990695% CI: [-1.89, 1.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.57795% CI: [-1.34, 2.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.186595% CI: [-3.14, 0.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.457595% CI: [-1.45, 0.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.601695% CI: [-1.33, 0.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.702695% CI: [-0.86, 1.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.297195% CI: [-1.64, 0.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.549195% CI: [-1.38, 0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.714295% CI: [-0.86, 1.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.115795% CI: [-1.89, 0.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.111495% CI: [-1.3, 0.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.002595% CI: [-1.83, -0.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Symptoms Screp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.2, -0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.509395% CI: [-0.96, 0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.33, -0.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.00995% CI: [-1.67, -0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.002495% CI: [-1.84, -0.4]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.549795% CI: [-0.47, 0.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.027695% CI: [-0.76, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.533295% CI: [-1.46, 0.76]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.127495% CI: [-0.65, 0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.186595% CI: [-0.61, 0.12]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.185795% CI: [-0.61, 0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.863195% CI: [-0.33, 0.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.030495% CI: [-0.75, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Total Scorep-value: 0.124695% CI: [-5.71, 0.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Total Scorep-value: 0.06895% CI: [-6.19, 0.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Total Scorep-value: 0.072995% CI: [-6.28, 0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Total Scorep-value: 0.054195% CI: [-6.49, 0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Total Scorep-value: 0.69695% CI: [-3.87, 2.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Total Scorep-value: 0.972595% CI: [-3.27, 3.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Total Scorep-value: 0.041995% CI: [-6.53, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.079495% CI: [-3.57, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.115395% CI: [-3.47, 0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.11295% CI: [-3.95, 0.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.133495% CI: [-3.47, 0.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.978195% CI: [-2.13, 2.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.20695% CI: [-3.57, 0.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.345795% CI: [-2.93, 1.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.260795% CI: [-3.07, 0.83]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.781695% CI: [-2.18, 1.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.095595% CI: [-3.54, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.258295% CI: [-1.57, 0.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.344895% CI: [-0.53, 1.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.658795% CI: [-0.81, 1.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.829995% CI: [-1.16, 0.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.812995% CI: [-1.17, 0.92]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.21395% CI: [-0.37, 1.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.413195% CI: [-1.42, 0.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.127395% CI: [-1.2, 0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.004695% CI: [-1.69, -0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.19, -0.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.19, -0.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.033395% CI: [-1.45, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.042395% CI: [-1.39, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.020895% CI: [-1.49, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.343595% CI: [-0.55, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.002195% CI: [-0.98, -0.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.040895% CI: [-0.79, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.091195% CI: [-0.73, 0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.789195% CI: [-0.44, 0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.997395% CI: [-0.38, 0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.637795% CI: [-0.47, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Total Scorep-value: 0.086295% CI: [-5.95, 0.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Total Scorep-value: 0.130595% CI: [-5.74, 0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Total Scorep-value: 0.070795% CI: [-6.34, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Total Scorep-value: 0.123295% CI: [-5.92, 0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Total Scorep-value: 0.25395% CI: [-5.18, 1.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Total Scorep-value: 0.913395% CI: [-3.4, 3.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Total Scorep-value: 0.107895% CI: [-5.85, 0.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.071995% CI: [-4.07, 0.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.129895% CI: [-3.8, 0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.953295% CI: [-2.26, 2.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.75195% CI: [-1.84, 2.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.459995% CI: [-1.54, 0.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.475295% CI: [-0.72, 1.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.905195% CI: [-1.21, 1.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.993795% CI: [-1.14, 1.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.695695% CI: [-0.91, 1.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.230295% CI: [-1.81, 0.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.154495% CI: [-1.55, 0.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.684795% CI: [-1.1, 0.72]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.55295% CI: [-1.2, 0.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.363295% CI: [-1.36, 0.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.282895% CI: [-1.43, 0.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.470295% CI: [-1.24, 0.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.826295% CI: [-1.02, 0.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.315295% CI: [-0.6, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.439995% CI: [-0.56, 0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.189895% CI: [-0.67, 0.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.979195% CI: [-0.4, 0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.317895% CI: [-0.61, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.417495% CI: [-0.57, 0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Dysfunction Scorep-value: 0.24995% CI: [-0.63, 0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Total Scorep-value: 0.123395% CI: [-6.57, 0.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Total Scorep-value: 0.285895% CI: [-5.76, 1.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Total Scorep-value: 0.971695% CI: [-3.87, 3.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Total Scorep-value: 0.907295% CI: [-3.58, 4.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Total Scorep-value: 0.233495% CI: [-6.07, 1.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Total Scorep-value: 0.985995% CI: [-3.79, 3.72]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Total Scorep-value: 0.28795% CI: [-5.77, 1.72]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15

The HFRDIS is a 10-item scale that measures a woman's perceptions of the degree to which VMS interfere with 9 daily life activities (work, social activities, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations with others, sexuality, and enjoying life); the tenth item measures interference with overall quality of life. This scale was modeled after items on the Brief Pain Inventory and Brief Fatigue Inventory, which assess the extent to which pain or fatigue interfere with daily life. Participants were asked to rate the extent to which VMS had interfered with each item during the previous 2-week time interval using a 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) scale. Overall mean score is the average of individual item scores (sum of items/10).

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-2.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-3.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-3.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-4.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-4.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-4.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-4.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-3.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-3.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-3.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-3.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-2.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12-3.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15-2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4-3.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.017995% CI: [-1.95, -0.18]Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM)
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.002795% CI: [-2.25, -0.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-2.5, -0.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-2.43, -0.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.580695% CI: [-1.14, 0.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.010595% CI: [-2.03, -0.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.004895% CI: [-2.16, -0.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.180195% CI: [-1.52, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.060995% CI: [-1.76, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.002895% CI: [-2.33, -0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.001895% CI: [-2.4, -0.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.551995% CI: [-1.19, 0.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.192295% CI: [-1.51, 0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.046395% CI: [-1.82, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.128895% CI: [-1.53, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.057795% CI: [-1.72, 0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.002795% CI: [-2.26, -0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.004395% CI: [-2.2, -0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.408995% CI: [-1.27, 0.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.20595% CI: [-1.44, 0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.026595% CI: [-1.84, -0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.761795% CI: [-1.2, 0.88]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.606195% CI: [-0.77, 1.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.799795% CI: [-0.93, 1.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.339195% CI: [-0.55, 1.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.393495% CI: [-1.55, 0.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.97595% CI: [-1.08, 1.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.88395% CI: [-1.13, 0.97]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15

The MENQoL is self-administered and consists of a total of 29 items in a Likert-scale format. Each item assesses the impact of 1 of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last month: vasomotor (items 1 to 3), psychosocial (items 4 to 10), physical (items 11 to 26), and sexual (items 27 to 29). Items pertaining to a specific symptom are rated as present or not present, and if present, how bothersome on a 0 (not bothersome) to 6 (extremely bothersome) scale. Means are computed for each subscale by dividing the sum of the domain's items by the number of items within that domain. Non-endorsement of an item is scored a 1 and endorsement a 2, plus the number of the particular rating, so that the possible score on any item ranges from 1 to 8. Higher scores indicate that menopause symptoms are more bothersome.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-4.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-4.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Sexual Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Overall Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Overall Mean Score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Sexual Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Psychological Mean Score-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Overall Mean Score-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4:Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Sexual Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Score-2.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Overall Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Psychological Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Score-3.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 8: Physical Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Psychological Mean Score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 15: Physical Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Sexual Mean Score-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 4: Physical Mean Score-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15Week 12: Physical Mean Score-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.163295% CI: [-1.41, 0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.004595% CI: [-2.03, -0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.000295% CI: [-2.43, -0.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.7, -1.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.856995% CI: [-0.91, 0.76]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.11195% CI: [-1.49, 0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.018795% CI: [-1.83, -0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.497295% CI: [-0.73, 0.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.256895% CI: [-0.86, 0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.260995% CI: [-0.86, 0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.414895% CI: [-0.78, 0.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.557595% CI: [-0.38, 0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.167195% CI: [-0.16, 0.92]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.946295% CI: [-0.57, 0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.069995% CI: [-0.91, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.005695% CI: [-1.15, -0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.111795% CI: [-0.86, 0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.026595% CI: [-1.02, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.111995% CI: [-0.86, 0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.760795% CI: [-0.54, 0.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.043795% CI: [-0.97, -0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.021195% CI: [-1.51, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.001795% CI: [-1.82, -0.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.059895% CI: [-1.37, 0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.157395% CI: [-1.21, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.725795% CI: [-0.83, 0.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.932495% CI: [-0.72, 0.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.217295% CI: [-1.14, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.074295% CI: [-0.88, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Overall Scorep-value: 0.003595% CI: [-1.16, -0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.026695% CI: [-0.99, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.012495% CI: [-1.06, -0.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.436795% CI: [-0.65, 0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.931895% CI: [-0.48, 0.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.071495% CI: [-0.89, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.202795% CI: [-1.35, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.001395% CI: [-2.16, -0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.53, -0.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.83, -1.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.379195% CI: [-1.19, 0.45]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.021195% CI: [-1.78, -0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.002195% CI: [-2.1, -0.47]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 8: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.88995% CI: [-0.55, 0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.556895% CI: [-0.67, 0.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.398995% CI: [-0.75, 0.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.609495% CI: [-0.66, 0.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.522995% CI: [-0.35, 0.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.440995% CI: [-0.31, 0.72]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.806295% CI: [-0.45, 0.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.366395% CI: [-0.71, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.025795% CI: [-0.99, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.042495% CI: [-0.99, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.159795% CI: [-0.85, 0.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.059595% CI: [-0.97, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Symptoms Scorep-value: 0.216295% CI: [-0.8, 0.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.983395% CI: [-0.49, 0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.203495% CI: [-0.81, 0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.957695% CI: [-0.7, 0.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.04195% CI: [-1.4, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.396195% CI: [-1, 0.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.501295% CI: [-0.94, 0.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.259295% CI: [-1.1, 0.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.614195% CI: [-0.51, 0.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.43995% CI: [-0.95, 0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.452195% CI: [-0.64, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.056495% CI: [-0.93, 0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 8: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.029395% CI: [-0.99, -0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.374295% CI: [-0.68, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.910695% CI: [-0.49, 0.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Overall Mean SCorep-value: 0.184495% CI: [-0.78, 0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.028795% CI: [-1.69, -0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.002895% CI: [-2.05, -0.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.000495% CI: [-2.32, -0.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.87, -1.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.182695% CI: [-1.38, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.017895% CI: [-1.79, -0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.002595% CI: [-2.06, -0.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.916395% CI: [-0.55, 0.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.159795% CI: [-0.92, 0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.487195% CI: [-0.74, 0.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.540195% CI: [-0.72, 0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.378895% CI: [-0.3, 0.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.454195% CI: [-0.33, 0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.923395% CI: [-0.51, 0.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.604395% CI: [-0.61, 0.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.178195% CI: [-0.82, 0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.522195% CI: [-0.66, 0.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.474495% CI: [-0.68, 0.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.516795% CI: [-0.66, 0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.344195% CI: [-0.25, 0.72]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.536295% CI: [-0.64, 0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.934995% CI: [-0.78, 0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.008495% CI: [-1.78, -0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.121295% CI: [-1.38, 0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.770995% CI: [-0.89, 0.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.166795% CI: [-1.33, 0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.921395% CI: [-0.72, 0.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.231595% CI: [-1.21, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.473195% CI: [-0.63, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.03195% CI: [-0.98, -0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.13295% CI: [-0.84, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.121295% CI: [-0.85, 0.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.568995% CI: [-0.62, 0.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.73495% CI: [-0.39, 0.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.270495% CI: [-0.73, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.56195% CI: [-1.24, 0.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.796695% CI: [-0.83, 1.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.396595% CI: [-0.56, 1.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.818995% CI: [-0.87, 1.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.569395% CI: [-1.27, 0.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.521795% CI: [-1.29, 0.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Vasomotor Mean Scorep-value: 0.298895% CI: [-0.46, 1.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.795795% CI: [-0.69, 0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.25495% CI: [-0.97, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.695695% CI: [-0.75, 0.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.869495% CI: [-0.57, 0.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.504795% CI: [-0.84, 0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.751595% CI: [-0.52, 0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Psychological Mean Scorep-value: 0.781895% CI: [-0.7, 0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.57795% CI: [-0.65, 0.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.189395% CI: [-0.85, 0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.299795% CI: [-0.25, 0.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.752995% CI: [-0.6, 0.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.417395% CI: [-0.73, 0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.494495% CI: [-0.34, 0.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Physical Mean Scorep-value: 0.923195% CI: [-0.54, 0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.511295% CI: [-1.04, 0.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.0395% CI: [-1.66, -0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.063495% CI: [-1.57, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.940695% CI: [-0.78, 0.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.116895% CI: [-1.46, 0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.993795% CI: [-0.79, 0.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Sexual Mean Scorep-value: 0.185895% CI: [-1.32, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.576595% CI: [-0.65, 0.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.184895% CI: [-0.86, 0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.729995% CI: [-0.43, 0.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.941595% CI: [-0.54, 0.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.274295% CI: [-0.82, 0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.694695% CI: [-0.41, 0.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Overall Mean Scorep-value: 0.944295% CI: [-0.53, 0.5]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week

The hot flash score per 24h (or 12 h day time or 12 h night time) of VMS (mild, moderate, and severe) is calculated as follows: (number of mild VMS x 1) + (number of moderate VMS x 2) + (number of severe VMS x 3). Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant did not wake up but later noticed damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-13.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-10.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.66
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-11.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.59
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-8.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-10.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-13.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-8.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-10.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.63
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-11.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-13.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-13.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-13.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-11.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-9.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-5.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-17.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-16.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-17.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-16.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-14.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-14.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-9.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-17.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.32
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-14.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-16.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-15.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-13.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.31
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-16.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-12.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-18.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-16.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-18.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-19.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-18.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-18.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-17.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-12.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-11.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-11.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-13.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-18.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-19.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-17.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-19.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-19.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-20.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-17.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-11.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.63
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-17.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-12.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-17.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-18.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-20.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.35
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-19.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-20.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-19.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-14.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-20.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-10.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-20.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-15.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-18.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-19.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-20.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-20.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-20.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-19.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-20.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-20.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-20.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-21.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-14.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-12.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.66
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-11.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-17.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-16.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-15.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-18.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-17.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-16.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.62
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-13.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.65
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-15.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-8.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-17.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-18.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-15.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.67
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-16.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-13.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-15.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-19.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-17.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-19.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.35
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-17.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-19.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.32
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-16.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-14.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-14.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-14.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.62
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-11.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-19.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-18.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-14.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-18.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-17.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-19.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-19.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-18.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-12.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-11.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-15.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-18.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-17.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-19.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-18.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-13.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-10.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.014295% CI: [-8.62, -0.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.73, -4.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.98, -5.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-14.39, -6.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.081995% CI: [-7.36, 0.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-10.78, -3.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-10.69, -3.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.03895% CI: [-8.01, -0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-11.46, -3.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.96, -4.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-13.17, -5.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.024595% CI: [-8.52, -0.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.003195% CI: [-9.83, -2.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.004695% CI: [-9.53, -1.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.006495% CI: [-9.61, -1.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.72, -4.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.78, -4.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-14.27, -6.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-10.54, -2.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-11.71, -3.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-10.96, -2.95]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.007595% CI: [-9.46, -1.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.44, -4.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.15, -4.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-14.3, -6.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-10.46, -2.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.25, -4.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.050295% CI: [-7.37, 0]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-11.58, -3.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.012395% CI: [-8.6, -1.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.63, -4.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.8, -4.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-13.73, -6.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001395% CI: [-10.13, -2.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-10.97, -3.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-10.41, -2.89]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.011995% CI: [-8.54, -1.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-10.58, -3.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.57, -4.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.89, -5.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.005795% CI: [-9.18, -1.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-10.4, -2.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-10.27, -2.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.02195% CI: [-8.27, -0.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-10.98, -3.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-11.12, -3.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.99, -5.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.004795% CI: [-9.45, -1.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-10.29, -2.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-10.28, -2.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.088995% CI: [-7.1, 0.51]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.002395% CI: [-9.76, -2.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-10.36, -2.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-11.36, -3.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.025595% CI: [-8.3, -0.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.003195% CI: [-9.63, -1.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.003795% CI: [-9.45, -1.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.031695% CI: [-7.59, -0.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.003695% CI: [-9.02, -1.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-10.23, -2.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-10.93, -3.54]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.002595% CI: [-9.28, -1.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.006395% CI: [-8.67, -1.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.011795% CI: [-8.58, -1.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.004795% CI: [-9.17, -1.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-10.8, -3.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.51, -3.86]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 10p-value: 0.008395% CI: [-8.97, -1.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-10.1, -2.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001795% CI: [-9.77, -2.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.011995% CI: [-8.37, -1.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.001595% CI: [-9.61, -2.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.38, -3.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.33, -3.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.005195% CI: [-9.07, -1.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-10.33, -2.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-9.64, -2.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.005495% CI: [-8.67, -1.51]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-9.71, -2.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.2, -3.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.88, -4.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.002695% CI: [-9.27, -1.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-10.35, -3.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-9.88, -2.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.012695% CI: [-9.48, -1.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.172495% CI: [-7.06, 1.27]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.354895% CI: [-6.31, 2.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.08695% CI: [-8.04, 0.53]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.011195% CI: [-9.89, -1.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.034995% CI: [-8.94, -0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.220595% CI: [-6.77, 1.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.064595% CI: [-8.29, 0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.503195% CI: [-5.69, 2.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.526395% CI: [-5.84, 2.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.278295% CI: [-6.83, 1.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.019895% CI: [-9.67, -0.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.041795% CI: [-9.05, -0.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.296395% CI: [-6.52, 2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.540895% CI: [-5.39, 2.83]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.747395% CI: [-4.74, 3.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.921495% CI: [-4.07, 4.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.987695% CI: [-4.19, 4.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.237995% CI: [-6.86, 1.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.149195% CI: [-7.45, 1.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.95695% CI: [-3.96, 4.19]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study Week

The hot flash score per 24h of moderate and severe VMS is calculated as follows: (number of moderate VMS x 2) + (number of severe VMS x 3). Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). VMS. Baseline is the average frequency of 24h vasomotor symptom from 7 non-missing days prior to Day 1. Higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-8.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-9.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-13.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-11.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-5.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-12.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-10.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.65
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-8.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-11.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-10.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-13.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-9.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-13.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-10.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.65
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-12.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.34
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-16.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-16.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-10.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-16.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-13.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-12.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-18.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.31
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-14.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-15.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-17.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-15.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-14.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-16.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-19.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-13.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-18.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-18.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-11.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-19.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-18.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-11.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-19.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-19.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-19.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-17.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-18.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-13.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-20.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-14.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-16.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-17.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-17.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-18.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-19.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-18.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-19.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-19.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-19.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-20.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-13.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-11.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.66
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-11.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.67
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-14.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.64
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-20.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-20.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-19.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-20.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-20.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-19.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-10.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.66
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-20.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-15.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-21.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-12.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.69
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-20.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-20.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-17.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.65
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-17.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-15.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-18.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-15.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-17.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-18.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-13.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-19.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-8.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-17.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-17.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-17.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-16.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-14.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.71
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-15.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-18.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-19.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.34
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-19.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.32
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-18.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-17.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-12.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-19.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-18.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-19.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-14.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.66
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-14.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-19.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.35
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-15.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-12.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-18.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-13.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-17.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-11.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-19.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-16.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-16.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-18.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-15.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-17.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-10.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-18.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Hot Flash Score of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-14.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.49, -4.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-11.12, -3.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.008995% CI: [-9.01, -1.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.22, -4.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-13.06, -5.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-14.58, -6.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.06395% CI: [-7.65, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-11.04, -3.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-10.53, -2.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.023195% CI: [-8.43, -0.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.94, -4.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.87, -4.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-13.21, -5.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.017795% CI: [-8.8, -0.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001295% CI: [-10.45, -2.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.007295% CI: [-9.26, -2.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.004495% CI: [-9.86, -1.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-13.27, -5.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.302695% CI: [-6.64, 2.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.57, -4.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-14.29, -6.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-11.04, -2.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.44, -4.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001295% CI: [-10.65, -2.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.005395% CI: [-9.72, -1.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.77, -4.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-11.84, -3.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-14.12, -5.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-10.92, -2.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.005795% CI: [-9.15, -1.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.15, -4.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.68, -4.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-13.66, -5.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-10.54, -2.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.55, -3.95]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-10.16, -2.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.006495% CI: [-8.99, -1.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-10.94, -3.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-11.29, -3.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.69, -5.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-9.62, -1.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-10.92, -3.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.001395% CI: [-9.91, -2.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.013795% CI: [-8.61, -0.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-11.24, -3.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-10.79, -3.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-12.74, -4.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.002895% CI: [-9.82, -2.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-10.6, -2.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-9.82, -2.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.058895% CI: [-7.46, 0.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.001895% CI: [-9.9, 0.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.001795% CI: [-9.98, -2.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-11.09, -3.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.08195% CI: [-8.55, -0.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-9.88, -2.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.007695% CI: [-8.98, -1.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.018295% CI: [-8.01, -0.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.001995% CI: [-9.42, -2.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-10.02, -2.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-10.76, -3.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.026395% CI: [-7.89, -0.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.001595% CI: [-9.61, -2.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.011395% CI: [-8.32, -1.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.005995% CI: [-9.04, -1.54]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001895% CI: [-9.76, -2.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-10.62, -3.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-11.39, -3.73]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 10p-value: 0.004495% CI: [-9.4, -1.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-10.4, -2.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.002595% CI: [-9.57, -2.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.005995% CI: [-8.81, -1.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-10.06, -2.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.18, -3.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-11.18, -3.72]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.002295% CI: [-9.56, -2.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-10.56, -3.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-9.44, -2.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.002395% CI: [-9.18, -2.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-10.06, -2.89]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.05, -3.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11.8, -4.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-9.77, -2.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-10.54, -3.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-9.71, -2.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.005495% CI: [-10.26, -1.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.114595% CI: [-7.63, 0.83]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.210695% CI: [-7.13, 1.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.068595% CI: [-8.39, 0.31]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.002995% CI: [-11.02, -2.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.023995% CI: [-9.42, -0.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.222495% CI: [-6.86, 1.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.030895% CI: [-9.17, -0.45]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.419495% CI: [-6.13, 2.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.375995% CI: [-6.55, 2.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.228595% CI: [-7.26, 1.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.007295% CI: [-10.71, -1.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.033895% CI: [-9.46, -0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.31295% CI: [-6.45, 2.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.681695% CI: [-5.11, 3.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.859995% CI: [-4.85, 4.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.909395% CI: [-4.64, 4.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.078895% CI: [-8.43, 0.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.127895% CI: [-7.92, 1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.984895% CI: [-4.19, 4.27]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, subject does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-2.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-5.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-4.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-4.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-5.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-4.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-4.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-3.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-4.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-4.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-3.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-5.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-5.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.55
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-6.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-3.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.54
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-5.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-4.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-7.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-6.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-6.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-4.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-6.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-7.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-4.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-5.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-8.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-8.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-8.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-8.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-8.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-8.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-8.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-8.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-8.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-6.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-8.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-8.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-8.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 37.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-6.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-3.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-6.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-6.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-5.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-5.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-6.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-7.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-5.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.55
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-4.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-6.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-5.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-4.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-6.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-8.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-6.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.086595% CI: [-2.92, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-4.22, -1.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.0000195% CI: [-5.06, -1.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.0000195% CI: [-5.63, -2.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.23695% CI: [-2.55, 0.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.003295% CI: [-3.92, -0.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-4.29, -1.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.131895% CI: [-2.86, 0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-4.3, -1.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-4.82, -1.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.3, -2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.075295% CI: [-3.15, 0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.034395% CI: [-3.38, -0.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.004995% CI: [-3.95, -0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.028595% CI: [-3.5, -0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-4.69, -1.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.14, -1.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.65, -2.28]MMRm
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.016995% CI: [-3.74, -0.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.004995% CI: [-4.04, -0.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-4.48, -1.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.042895% CI: [-3.36, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-4.65, -1.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.0000195% CI: [-4.88, -1.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.73, -2.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.022595% CI: [-3.64, -0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-4.49, -1.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.7, -1.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.116895% CI: [-2.8, 0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001295% CI: [-4.15, -1.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-4.54, -1.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.44, -2.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.013495% CI: [-3.58, -0.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.005795% CI: [-3.76, -0.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001695% CI: [-4.06, -0.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.084395% CI: [-2.94, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.003595% CI: [-3.9, -0.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-4.66, -1.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.28, -2.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.031595% CI: [-3.33, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.006395% CI: [-3.75, -0.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-4.25, -1.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.10995% CI: [-2.89, 0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001895% CI: [-4.14, -0.95]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-4.54, -1.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.4, -2.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.023195% CI: [-3.5, -0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.005695% CI: [-3.86, -0.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-4.35, -1.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.356895% CI: [-2.35, 0.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.012995% CI: [-3.65, -0.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.001895% CI: [-4.19, -0.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.7, -1.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.100495% CI: [-3, 0.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.017395% CI: [-3.57, -0.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.003895% CI: [-3.97, -0.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.176795% CI: [-2.57, 0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.030895% CI: [-3.2, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.001395% CI: [-4.07, -1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.47, -1.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.210995% CI: [-2.55, 0.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.015295% CI: [-3.44, -0.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.007595% CI: [-3.61, -0.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.086995% CI: [-2.96, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.05295% CI: [-3.14, 0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-4.3, -1.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-4.68, -1.46]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 10p-value: 0.045695% CI: [-3.25, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.007395% CI: [-3.76, -0.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.002695% CI: [-4.01, -0.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.087895% CI: [-2.87, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.018295% CI: [-3.39, -0.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-4.55, -1.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-4.53, -1.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.038795% CI: [-3.22, -0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.003195% CI: [-3.89, -0.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.002995% CI: [-3.88, -0.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.065395% CI: [-2.9, 0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.010295% CI: [-3.46, -0.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-4.38, -1.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.72, -1.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.023195% CI: [-3.3, -0.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-3.88, -0.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-3.88, -0.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.001395% CI: [-3.96, -0.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.14695% CI: [-2.89, 0.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.606695% CI: [-2.1, 1.23]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.842295% CI: [-1.88, 1.54]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.234695% CI: [-2.74, 0.67]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.112895% CI: [-3.11, 0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.181195% CI: [-2.89, 0.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.352195% CI: [-2.45, 0.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.35795% CI: [-2.44, 0.88]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.922795% CI: [-1.73, 1.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.889495% CI: [-1.84, 1.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.507495% CI: [-2.29, 1.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.175395% CI: [-2.91, 0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.121295% CI: [-3.09, 0.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.370295% CI: [-2.41, 0.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.645995% CI: [-1.22, 1.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.824895% CI: [-1.4, 1.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.422695% CI: [-0.98, 2.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.646995% CI: [-1.25, 2.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.764295% CI: [-1.41, 1.91]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.406895% CI: [-2.36, 0.966]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.797495% CI: [-1.37, 1.78]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-3.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-5.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-3.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-4.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-4.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-5.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-2.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-5.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-4.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-4.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.66
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.54
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-3.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-5.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-5.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-6.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-5.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-6.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.55
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-6.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.55
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-6.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-6.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.54
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-5.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-7.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-7.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-4.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.66
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-8.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-6.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-8.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-8.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.64
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-5.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.67
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-3.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-5.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-6.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-6.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-6.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-6.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.67
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-8.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.54
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.55
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.55
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-5.5 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-6.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.62
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-6.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-6.0 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-5.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.9 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.54
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-4.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.56
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-4.8 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.63
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-7.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-5.2 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-7.1 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-4.4 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.61
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-4.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.58
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-7.6 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-5.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.59
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-6.7 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-7.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.57
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-6.3 VMS per dayStandard Error 0.6
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.29, -2.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.002395% CI: [-3.91, -0.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-4.25, -1.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.029795% CI: [-3.23, -0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.66, -1.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.0000195% CI: [-5.1, -2.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.78, -2.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.131895% CI: [-2.76, 0.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-4.13, -1.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-4.1, -1.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.040595% CI: [-3.2, -0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-4.7, -1.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-4.66, -1.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.26, -2.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.032595% CI: [-3.34, -0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.003595% CI: [-3.92, -0.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.010295% CI: [-3.61, -0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.009895% CI: [-3.69, -0.51]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.18, -1.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.89, -1.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.61, -2.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-4.17, -0.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-4.71, -1.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-4.11, -0.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.02195% CI: [-3.27, -0.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.59, -1.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.34, -1.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.003695% CI: [-3.73, -0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.019595% CI: [-3.33, -0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-4.21, -1.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-4.32, -1.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.01, -1.92]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.006195% CI: [-3.71, -0.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-4.19, -1.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-3.81, -0.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.038395% CI: [-3.17, -0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-4.33, -1.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-4.14, -1.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.07, -1.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.005595% CI: [-3.8, -0.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-4.09, -0.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-3.8, -0.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.150295% CI: [-2.68, 0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.005795% CI: [-3.74, -0.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.005495% CI: [-3.76, -0.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-4.38, -1.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.041295% CI: [-3.21, -0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.005495% CI: [-3.76, -0.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.016795% CI: [-3.43, -0.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.053395% CI: [-2.94, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.006595% CI: [-3.54, -0.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.002595% CI: [-3.8, -0.82]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-4.22, -1.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.054195% CI: [-2.99, 0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.003995% CI: [-3.69, -0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.024595% CI: [-3.18, -0.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.018795% CI: [-3.36, -0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-3.68, -0.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-4.06, -0.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.49, -1.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-3.61, -0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001995% CI: [-3.98, -0.91]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.004995% CI: [-3.73, -0.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.018695% CI: [-3.25, -0.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.002495% CI: [-3.77, -0.82]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.28, -1.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-4.3, -1.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.005895% CI: [-3.63, -0.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-4.04, -1.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-3.59, -0.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.020595% CI: [-3.63, -0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.281895% CI: [-2.58, 0.75]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.310295% CI: [-2.6, 0.83]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.142295% CI: [-2.99, 0.43]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.006495% CI: [-4.12, -0.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.075295% CI: [-3.28, 0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.363295% CI: [-2.43, 0.89]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.062595% CI: [-3.32, 0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.661395% CI: [-2.07, 1.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.420995% CI: [-2.48, 1.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.328895% CI: [-2.63, 0.88]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.020295% CI: [-3.86, -0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.068295% CI: [-3.42, 0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.391295% CI: [-2.44, 0.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.496495% CI: [-2.25, 1.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.98395% CI: [-1.64, 1.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.971595% CI: [-1.71, 1.78]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.871595% CI: [-1.58, 1.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.223395% CI: [-2.83, 0.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.288295% CI: [-2.69, 0.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.864395% CI: [-1.52, 1.8]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study Week

Severity of mild, moderate & severe VMS per day was calculated as follows \[(number of mild VMS × 1) + (number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily mild/moderate/severe VMS Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant did not wake up but later noticed damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot & was sweating & needed to take action Severity was zero for participants that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 150.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 4-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 12-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.010495% CI: [-0.53, -0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-0.56, -0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.71, -0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.85, -0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.697795% CI: [-0.28, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.012195% CI: [-0.53, -0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.008695% CI: [-0.54, -0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.013895% CI: [-0.66, -0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-0.78, -0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.02, -0.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.19, -0.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.283195% CI: [-0.46, 0.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.005195% CI: [-0.72, -0.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-0.81, -0.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.005895% CI: [-0.83, -0.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-0.97, -0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.14, -0.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.27, -0.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.080795% CI: [-0.66, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-0.91, -0.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-1.02, -0.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.004695% CI: [-0.85, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.99, -0.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.14, -0.45]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.14, -0.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.020995% CI: [-0.77, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-0.93, -0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.07, -0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.095695% CI: [-0.67, 0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-0.89, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.18, -0.45]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.4, -0.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.091595% CI: [-0.69, 0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.037895% CI: [-0.75, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.005395% CI: [-0.89, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.061495% CI: [-0.83, -0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.92, -0.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.33, -0.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.47, -0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.531795% CI: [-0.54, 0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.096795% CI: [-0.7, 0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.006395% CI: [-0.9, -0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.13, -0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.063295% CI: [-0.75, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-1, -0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.29, -0.51]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.48, -0.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.030895% CI: [-0.82, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.010595% CI: [-0.89, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.03, -0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.146995% CI: [-0.69, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.031595% CI: [-0.84, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-1.18, -0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.26, -0.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.449495% CI: [-0.56, 0.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.059595% CI: [-0.79, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.006595% CI: [-0.96, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.074595% CI: [-0.77, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.05495% CI: [-0.8, 0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-1.22, -0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.26, -0.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.042495% CI: [-0.83, -0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.013495% CI: [-0.91, -0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.0395% CI: [-0.84, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.060595% CI: [-0.78, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-1.2, -0.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.38, -0.56]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 10p-value: 0.184895% CI: [-0.68, 0.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.032195% CI: [-0.84, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.002595% CI: [-1.01, -0.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.044195% CI: [-0.81, -0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.042295% CI: [-0.82, -0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.27, -0.45]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.44, -0.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.146495% CI: [-0.71, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.014495% CI: [-0.91, -0.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.001395% CI: [-1.06, -0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.059695% CI: [-0.8, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.03695% CI: [-0.85, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-1.15, -0.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-1.23, -0.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.322795% CI: [-0.62, 0.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.02295% CI: [-0.89, -0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.03895% CI: [-0.84, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.006795% CI: [-0.6, -0.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.122795% CI: [-0.45, 0.05]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.020895% CI: [-0.57, -0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.239695% CI: [-0.41, 0.1]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.002295% CI: [-0.67, -0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.047995% CI: [-0.53, 0]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.415295% CI: [-0.35, 0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.026295% CI: [-0.52, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.12195% CI: [-0.43, 0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.036995% CI: [-0.52, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.585595% CI: [-0.32, 0.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.004195% CI: [-0.62, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.061495% CI: [-0.5, 0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.339195% CI: [-0.36, 0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.051595% CI: [-0.49, 0]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.066795% CI: [-0.47, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.004795% CI: [-0.63, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.51395% CI: [-0.34, 0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-0.75, -0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.012695% CI: [-0.6, -0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.350795% CI: [-0.36, 0.13]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study Week

Severity of moderate to severe VMS per day was calculated as follows: \[(number of moderate VMS × 2) + (number of severe VMS × 3)\]/number of daily moderate/severe VMS. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Severity was zero for patients that had no moderate or severe VMS. Higher score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 150.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Placebo BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 9-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 6-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 2-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 11-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 8-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 7-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 13-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 10-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 5-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 15-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 14-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 1-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange From Baseline in The Mean Severity of Moderate and Severe VMS to Each Study WeekWeek 3-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.009895% CI: [-0.6, -0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.004895% CI: [-0.63, -0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.8, -0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1, -0.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.676195% CI: [-0.32, 0.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.018895% CI: [-0.57, -0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.006795% CI: [-0.61, -0.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.033595% CI: [-0.68, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-0.91, -0.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.14, -0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.41, -0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.322795% CI: [-0.5, 0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.008595% CI: [-0.77, -0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-0.95, -0.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.010295% CI: [-0.87, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.15, -0.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.29, -0.54]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.46, -0.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.07495% CI: [-0.73, 0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002495% CI: [-0.97, -0.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.17, -0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.119795% CI: [-0.72, 0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.004695% CI: [-0.98, -0.18]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.28, -0.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.51, -0.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.055395% CI: [-0.8, 0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.082395% CI: [-0.76, 0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-0.96, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.037495% CI: [-0.83, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.004295% CI: [-1, -0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.38, -0.56]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.54, -0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.07195% CI: [-0.79, 0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.01695% CI: [-0.91, -0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-1.15, -0.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.101395% CI: [-0.76, 0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-1.11, -0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.36, -0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.57, -0.72]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.047695% CI: [-0.85, 0]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.02295% CI: [-0.9, -0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001995% CI: [-1.07, -0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.145795% CI: [-0.74, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.028495% CI: [-0.91, -0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-1.26, -0.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.36, -0.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.422395% CI: [-0.61, 0.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.033695% CI: [-0.89, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.044295% CI: [-0.87, -0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.007195% CI: [-1.02, -0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.082395% CI: [-0.8, 0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.32, -0.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.34, -0.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.481995% CI: [-0.59, 0.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.037195% CI: [-0.88, -0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.012195% CI: [-0.97, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.028195% CI: [-0.89, -0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.043695% CI: [-0.86, -0.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.34, -0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.47, -0.6]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 10p-value: 0.148895% CI: [-0.75, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.025195% CI: [-0.91, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.002795% CI: [-1.08, -0.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.105395% CI: [-0.77, 0.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.030495% CI: [-0.9, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.33, -0.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.49, -0.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.087395% CI: [-0.81, 0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.012495% CI: [-0.97, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-1.12, -0.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.047995% CI: [-0.68, 0]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.234295% CI: [-0.54, 0.13]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-0.84, -0.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.429195% CI: [-0.49, 0.21]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.007695% CI: [-0.83, -0.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.150695% CI: [-0.62, 0.1]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.547995% CI: [-0.44, 0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.142795% CI: [-0.57, 0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.149895% CI: [-0.56, 0.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.010395% CI: [-0.79, -0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.898495% CI: [-0.36, 0.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.009595% CI: [-0.79, -0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.13795% CI: [-0.6, 0.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.422395% CI: [-0.46, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.326595% CI: [-0.5, 0.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.085295% CI: [-0.62, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-0.91, -0.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.571795% CI: [-0.45, 0.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.008495% CI: [-0.82, -0.12]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.027795% CI: [-0.75, -0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.462795% CI: [-0.46, 0.21]MMRM
Secondary

Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 12

Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration. The analysis value for Estradiol was imputed as 73.4/2 = 36.7 when result was \< 73.4.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS population with available data at baseline and specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 121.49 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 7.41
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 12-1.29 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 53.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 1220.47 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 93.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 1210.15 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 96.52
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 12-4.85 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 56.56
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 12-15.99 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 213.04
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 12-32.08 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 198.54
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Estradiol (E2) at Week 121.32 picomole per milliliter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 5.68
Secondary

Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12

Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS population with available data at baseline and specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-0.91 IU/LStandard Deviation 9.79
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-1.52 IU/LStandard Deviation 12.88
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-1.00 IU/LStandard Deviation 13.51
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-6.49 IU/LStandard Deviation 25.58
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-9.43 IU/LStandard Deviation 17.4
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-0.98 IU/LStandard Deviation 26.9
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-0.07 IU/LStandard Deviation 8.97
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at Week 12-9.94 IU/LStandard Deviation 16.96
Secondary

Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12

Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS population with available data at baseline and specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-1.14 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 8
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-1.28 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 8.53
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-3.28 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 8.93
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-7.30 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 15.49
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-10.86 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 12.64
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-3.69 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 11.21
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-3.97 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 9.55
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) at Week 12-8.62 International unit per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 11.95
Secondary

Change Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 12

Change was calculated as the post-baseline measurement minus the baseline measurement. Baseline was the last measurement taken prior to initial study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS population with available data at baseline and specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 121.877 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 12.27
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 120.720 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 14.22
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 124.867 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 10.492
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 121.621 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 16.329
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 126.643 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 11.107
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 122.350 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 17.852
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 120.143 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 8.741
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDChange Over Time From Baseline in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 120.583 Nanomole per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 14.283
Secondary

Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15

The LSEQ is a 10-item self-rated questionnaire that assesses a participants aspects of sleep and early morning behavior. The questions are grouped into 4 chronological areas: ease of getting to sleep, perceived quality of sleep, ease of awaking from sleep, and integrity of early morning behavior following wakefulness. The LSEQ is a visual analog scale that requires respondents to place marks on a group of 10 cm lines. Lines extend between extremes like more difficult than usual and easier than usual. Responses are measured using a 100 mm scale and are averaged to a score for each domain. Higher scores indicates better sleep and better early morning behavior.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking35.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.82
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep41.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.63
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep33.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake40.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.49
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep38.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.75
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking41.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep40.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.35
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep39.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.62
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.68
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep36.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.76
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep40.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.09
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep40.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.18
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep32.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking40.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.15
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep43.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.31
Placebo BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep39.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.54
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep37.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.46
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep37.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.04
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep43.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.06
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep34.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.88
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep36.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.52
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep40.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.64
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep34.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.19
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep47.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.18
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking35.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.81
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking42.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.23
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep39.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 2.96
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep39.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.29
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep38.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.22
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking38.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.54
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake40.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.33
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.41
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking46.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.01
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.08
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking36.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep43.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.36
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep38.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.41
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking41.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep35.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.77
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep42.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake38.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.47
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep38.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.89
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.34
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep44.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.25
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep39.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.62
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep41.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.1
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep36.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.81
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep37.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep33.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.75
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking37.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.93
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep36.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.92
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep36.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.21
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake35.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.56
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.38
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep32.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.84
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.82
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking32.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.44
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep41.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep36.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.25
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep36.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.52
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep35.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.18
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking42.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.11
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep36.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.46
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep37.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.44
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep49.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.91
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking38.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.61
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep38.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.28
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep41.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.38
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep42.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep41.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.53
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep38.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.86
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep41.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.56
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake41.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.69
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep39.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.69
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep34.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.22
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking41.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.18
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.06
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep45.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.95
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep45.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.57
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking50.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.48
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep38.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.85
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.53
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep33.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.88
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep41.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking35.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.43
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep43.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.35
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep36.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.98
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.15
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking35.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.27
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake35.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.66
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking43.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep35.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.51
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep39.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.78
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep36.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.83
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep41.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.24
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep37.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.35
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking41.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.16
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake41.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.36
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep44.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.27
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking44.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.67
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep37.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.54
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep37.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.1
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep44.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.45
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep38.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.53
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep42.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep41.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep43.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 2.98
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking47.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.98
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep49.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.08
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep41.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.19
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep40.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 2.98
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep37.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.64
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleep43.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.48
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleep40.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.78
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking41.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.56
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Quality of Sleep36.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.88
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awake40.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.55
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8: Quality of Sleep38.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.71
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Awaking From Sleep41.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.43
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleep45.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.26
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking43.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.19
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 8:Ease of Getting to Sleep43.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.15
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Quality of Sleep42.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.95
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 15:Ease of Getting Sleep44.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.64
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awaking39.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.92
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 15: Quality of Sleep41.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.6
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleep44.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.32
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDLeeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Domain Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 15Wek 12: Ease of Getting Sleep38.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.39
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.587295% CI: [-6.09, 10.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.377995% CI: [-4.7, 12.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.350695% CI: [-12.61, 4.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.823695% CI: [-7.66, 9.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.594995% CI: [-6.24, 10.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.923795% CI: [-8.65, 7.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.359995% CI: [-4.54, 12.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.742295% CI: [-8.33, 11.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.60395% CI: [-12.67, 7.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.247895% CI: [-16.07, 4.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.529595% CI: [-6.94, 13.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.693895% CI: [-12.2, 8.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.976595% CI: [-9.93, 9.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.477195% CI: [-6.45, 13.76]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.425695% CI: [-5.19, 12.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.955995% CI: [-8.52, 9.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.200395% CI: [-14.6, 3.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.669295% CI: [-10.86, 6.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.689495% CI: [-10.68, 7.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.162795% CI: [-14.66, 2.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.937195% CI: [-9.18, 8.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Integrity of Behavior following Awakingp-value: 0.852195% CI: [-8.07, 9.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Integrity of Behavior following Awakingp-value: 0.936795% CI: [-8.62, 9.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Integrity of Behavior following Awakingp-value: 0.055195% CI: [-17.82, 0.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Integrity of Behavior following Awakingp-value: 0.493695% CI: [-12.32, 5.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Integrity of Behavior following Awakingp-value: 0.640495% CI: [-6.89, 11.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Integrity of Behavior following Awakingp-value: 0.895595% CI: [-8.17, 9.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4: Integrity of Behavior following Awakingp-value: 0.977695% CI: [-8.91, 9.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.785295% CI: [-9.27, 7.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.781295% CI: [-7.02, 9.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.264895% CI: [-13.07, 3.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.631295% CI: [-10.41, 6.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.741695% CI: [-6.89, 9.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.425495% CI: [-4.83, 11.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.403895% CI: [-4.66, 11.54]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.32795% CI: [-14.49, 4.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.733395% CI: [-11.21, 7.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.131995% CI: [-17.36, 2.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.613295% CI: [-12.38, 7.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.402495% CI: [-13.98, 5.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.490495% CI: [-12.97, 6.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.552195% CI: [-12.48, 6.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.73795% CI: [-10.38, 7.35]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.526995% CI: [-11.62, 5.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.393795% CI: [-12.93, 5.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.84695% CI: [-8.15, 9.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.567395% CI: [-11.62, 6.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.379195% CI: [-4.88, 12.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.83495% CI: [-7.86, 9.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.945795% CI: [-9.51, 8.88]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.65795% CI: [-11.22, 7.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.23195% CI: [-15, 3.64]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.906695% CI: [-8.84, 9.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.291495% CI: [-14.26, 4.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.927795% CI: [-8.73, 9.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.936795% CI: [-9.51, 8.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.240795% CI: [-3.46, 13.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.130595% CI: [-2.06, 15.89]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.215295% CI: [-3.34, 14.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.109995% CI: [-1.73, 16.89]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.121995% CI: [-1.99, 16.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.031695% CI: [0.85, 18.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.155795% CI: [-2.44, 15.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.859295% CI: [-8.91, 10.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.689195% CI: [-8.08, 12.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.948195% CI: [-10.59, 9.92]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.724695% CI: [-12.46, 8.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.884295% CI: [-9.94, 11.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.810395% CI: [-8.74, 11.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.963195% CI: [-9.81, 10.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.978895% CI: [-9.73, 9.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.787595% CI: [-11.26, 8.54]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.974695% CI: [-9.85, 10.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.909295% CI: [-9.67, 10.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.974595% CI: [-10.55, 10.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.345895% CI: [-5.08, 14.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.465795% CI: [-6.17, 13.45]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.583895% CI: [-7.2, 12.76]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.832295% CI: [-9.18, 11.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.736695% CI: [-8.59, 12.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.297195% CI: [-4.99, 16.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.956295% CI: [-10.96, 10.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.092695% CI: [-1.44, 18.76]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.499695% CI: [-6.7, 13.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.89695% CI: [-9.99, 8.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.547195% CI: [-6.68, 12.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.73895% CI: [-8.06, 11.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.064495% CI: [-0.58, 19.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.847595% CI: [-10.9, 8.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.304495% CI: [-4.57, 14.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Getting to Sleepp-value: 0.389595% CI: [-5.42, 13.86]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.455195% CI: [-16.5, 7.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.718295% CI: [-14.21, 9.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.625995% CI: [-15.26, 9.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.31295% CI: [-6.22, 19.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.329795% CI: [-18.89, 6.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.61395% CI: [-9.02, 15.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Quality of Sleepp-value: 0.729295% CI: [-10.09, 14.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.869595% CI: [-1.11, 11.96]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.5895% CI: [-7.99, 14.25]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.702495% CI: [-9.11, 13.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.057295% CI: [-0.35, 23.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.78395% CI: [-10.04, 13.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.007495% CI: [4.19, 26.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Ease of Awaking From Sleepp-value: 0.055195% CI: [-0.24, 22.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.295995% CI: [-16.63, 5.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.297695% CI: [-5.14, 16.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.723695% CI: [-9.07, 13.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.088495% CI: [-1.52, 21.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.388795% CI: [-16.35, 6.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.267195% CI: [-4.8, 17.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15: Integrity of Behavior Following Awakingp-value: 0.607695% CI: [-8.2, 13.99]MMRM
Secondary

Mean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, subject does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 332.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.66
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1051.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.03
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1343.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.69
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 114.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.33
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 953.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.9
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1253.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.87
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1153.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.88
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1439.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.12
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 645.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.01
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 230.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.3
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 850.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.13
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 541.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.32
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.58
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 745.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.17
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1545.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.97
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1168.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.63
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1268.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.62
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 455.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.33
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 860.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.87
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 556.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.08
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 965.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.64
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1067.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.78
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 660.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.74
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 129.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.01
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 759.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.92
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1442.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.5
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 246.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.99
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1537.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.49
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1353.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.07
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 352.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.37
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1542.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.56
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 665.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.93
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 360.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.58
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 566.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.26
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1345.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.24
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1168.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.81
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 463.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.52
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 254.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.2
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 869.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.05
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 968.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.81
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1270.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.8
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1441.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.6
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1064.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.95
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 768.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.1
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 137.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.21
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 572.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.17
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 876.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.01
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 675.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.86
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 774.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.05
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1077.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.95
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1279.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.8
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1439.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.99
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1345.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.47
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 264.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.09
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1537.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.06
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 368.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.44
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 468.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.39
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1180.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.81
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 978.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.78
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 580.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.49
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 476.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.72
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 681.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.16
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 881.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.32
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1083.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.2
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 155.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.39
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 268.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.39
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 372.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.77
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 781.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.34
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 983.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.06
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1183.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.05
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1284.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.04
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1350.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.59
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1443.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.08
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1539.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.01
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1167.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.02
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 560.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1532.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.21
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 760.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.29
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 351.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.75
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.4
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1268.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.01
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1066.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.17
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1349.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.66
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 244.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.38
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 862.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.26
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1441.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 660.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.12
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 454.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.69
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 962.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.03
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.02
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 563.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.06
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 972.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.67
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1073.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.82
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 464.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.3
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 665.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.75
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1175.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.66
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 356.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1275.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.65
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 249.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.01
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1354.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.44
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1551.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1452.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.01
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 766.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.93
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 869.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.9
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 974.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.88
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 362.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.56
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 566.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.28
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1348.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.32
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1176.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.87
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 467.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.5
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 772.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.14
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1447.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.72
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 672.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.97
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 256.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.21
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1076.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.02
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 144.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.22
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 874.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.11
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1543.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.64
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Mild, Moderate, And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1276.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.86
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.256995% CI: [-5.98, 22.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001295% CI: [9.17, 37.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [23.41, 51.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [26.88, 55.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.038895% CI: [0.76, 28.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000395% CI: [11.65, 39.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.39, 44.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.02495% CI: [2.11, 29.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000695% CI: [10.62, 38.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [19.87, 47.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [23.93, 52.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000495% CI: [11.24, 39.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.044195% CI: [0.38, 28.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.006195% CI: [5.58, 33.28]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000395% CI: [11.96, 39.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.007895% CI: [5.36, 35.07]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000295% CI: [13.36, 43.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [22.07, 51.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [25.41, 55.67]MMRm
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.010895% CI: [4.59, 34.88]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001195% CI: [10.09, 39.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.03, 45.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.006395% CI: [5.84, 35.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000295% CI: [13.98, 43.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.66, 48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [26.52, 56.41]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.009895% CI: [4.78, 34.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [15.26, 44.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.5, 47.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.030395% CI: [1.48, 29.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000695% CI: [10.77, 38.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.77, 44.75]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [24.55, 53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.008695% CI: [4.88, 33.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001895% CI: [8.33, 36.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.028295% CI: [1.56, 27.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.002995% CI: [6.85, 32.92]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.58, 42.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [22.42, 48.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.030495% CI: [1.4, 27.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.002295% CI: [7.38, 33.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [13.56, 39.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.036295% CI: [0.93, 27.95]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000995% CI: [9.41, 36.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [15.27, 42.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [22.99, 50.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.026595% CI: [1.83, 29.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.002395% CI: [7.6, 34.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [13.64, 40.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.15895% CI: [-3.75, 22.99]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.008295% CI: [4.72, 31.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000395% CI: [11.77, 38.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.93, 44.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.107495% CI: [-2.45, 24.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.007795% CI: [4.87, 31.76]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000695% CI: [10.29, 37.01]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.068995% CI: [-0.92, 24.53]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.02595% CI: [1.84, 27.27]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000295% CI: [11.54, 37.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.6, 42.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.204195% CI: [-4.58, 21.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.004995% CI: [5.62, 31.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.001595% CI: [8, 33.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.018495% CI: [2.68, 28.89]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.055195% CI: [-0.28, 25.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000295% CI: [12.51, 39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.17, 44.93]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 10p-value: 0.036795% CI: [0.89, 27.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001795% CI: [7.99, 34.34]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000395% CI: [11.29, 37.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.025595% CI: [1.78, 27.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.018695% CI: [2.57, 27.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [13.71, 39.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.94, 42.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.034795% CI: [1.01, 26.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000895% CI: [9.16, 34.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000395% CI: [10.75, 36.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.022195% CI: [2.13, 27.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.008795% CI: [4.32, 29.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [13.65, 39.23]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.13, 43.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.024495% CI: [1.92, 27.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000895% CI: [9.21, 34.62]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000395% CI: [10.63, 35.83]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.187195% CI: [-4.77, 24.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.755295% CI: [-12.23, 16.83]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.840795% CI: [-13.44, 16.5]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.34595% CI: [-7.77, 22.14]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.45595% CI: [-9.34, 20.8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.174795% CI: [-4.64, 25.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.547695% CI: [-10.08, 18.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.795495% CI: [-13.69, 17.84]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.873195% CI: [-14.41, 16.95]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.968995% CI: [-16.68, 16.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.637895% CI: [-12.4, 20.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.850395% CI: [-14.82, 17.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.122495% CI: [-3.51, 29.44]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.374395% CI: [-8.62, 22.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.317395% CI: [-23.44, 7.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.790595% CI: [-17.48, 13.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.380495% CI: [-23.46, 8.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.490595% CI: [-21.58, 10.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.128995% CI: [-28.83, 3.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.439895% CI: [-9.86, 22.61]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.792195% CI: [-17.45, 13.33]MMRM
Secondary

Mean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1441.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.47
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 956.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.91
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 438.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.57
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1344.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.02
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1545.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.49
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 334.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.61
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.51
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1255.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.85
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 543.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.31
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 854.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.09
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1053.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.03
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 749.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.16
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1155.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.82
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 648.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.02
Placebo BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.34
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1450.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.83
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 563.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.06
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 461.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.31
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1174.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.55
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1361.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.37
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1274.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.58
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 972.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.64
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 253.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.01
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1544.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.98
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 358.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.31
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 868.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.81
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 136.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.18
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1074.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.77
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 766.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.9
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 667.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.75
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 874.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.01
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 774.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.09
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1351.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.55
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1444.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.93
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 144.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.39
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 262.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.23
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 369.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.53
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 470.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.5
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 574.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.25
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 672.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.94
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 974.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.82
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1072.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.95
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1175.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.75
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1275.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.77
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1545.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.04
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 157.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.3
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 675.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.87
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 370.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.4
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 774.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.04
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1180.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.73
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1280.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.77
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 267.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.12
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1077.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.95
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 572.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.17
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 470.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.37
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1546.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.61
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1352.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.78
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 979.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.78
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1445.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.34
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 876.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.96
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 273.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.42
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 480.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.71
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 583.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.49
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 684.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.19
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 162.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.57
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 785.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.34
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 884.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.28
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 985.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.08
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1085.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.21
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1541.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.54
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1185.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.99
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1286.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.02
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1355.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.92
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 377.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.73
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1447.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.44
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 568.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.42
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1361.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.98
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 869.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.23
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1072.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.18
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1451.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.49
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 360.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.71
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 464.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.68
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 251.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.41
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1175.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.96
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1545.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.76
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 769.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.28
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 970.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.05
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 668.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.14
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1275.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.99
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 129.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 672.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.76
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 145.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.2
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 874.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.85
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1553.2 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.57
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 257.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.03
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 976.5 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.68
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 570.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.04
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1455.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.36
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 366.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.32
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1076.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.81
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1277.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.61
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1179.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.59
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1356.6 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.76
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 470.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.28
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 772.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.91
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1177.3 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.82
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1542.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.12
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 363.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.52
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 771.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.14
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 567.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.28
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 671.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.99
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 147.0 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.4
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1348.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.63
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 874.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.08
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1447.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 6.06
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 468.1 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.49
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1276.9 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.84
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1076.4 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.03
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 973.8 Percent ReductionStandard Error 4.9
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDMean Percent Reduction of Moderate And Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 257.7 Percent ReductionStandard Error 5.25
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.00995% CI: [4.82, 33.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000395% CI: [12.61, 41.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [25.14, 53.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [30.27, 59.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.101995% CI: [-2.43, 26.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000295% CI: [13.45, 42.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [15.21, 43.82]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.004995% CI: [6.1, 33.76]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.64, 42.46]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [19.96, 47.69]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [25.4, 53.58]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.014695% CI: [3.5, 31.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000795% CI: [10.21, 38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000895% CI: [10.05, 37.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.00295% CI: [8.56, 37.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [19.6, 49.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [20.96, 50.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [28.03, 57.93]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000995% CI: [10.48, 40.37]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.49, 45.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000195% CI: [14.24, 43.52]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.002195% CI: [8.46, 37.66]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [17.42, 46.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.73, 45.91]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [26.95, 56.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000895% CI: [10.77, 40.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.75, 45.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.91, 43.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.004595% CI: [6.31, 34.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.68, 44.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [15.14, 42.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [25.96, 54.26]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000795% CI: [10.28, 38.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000295% CI: [1.78, 40.55]MMRM
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.00195% CI: [9.55, 37.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.00495% CI: [6.13, 32.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000495% CI: [10.8, 36.83]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.1, 40.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [22.34, 48.88]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.003295% CI: [6.76, 33.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000395% CI: [11.02, 37.13]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000595% CI: [10.17, 36.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.010295% CI: [4.2, 31.04]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000295% CI: [12.42, 39.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000295% CI: [12.29, 39.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [22.58, 49.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.003195% CI: [7, 34.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.960795% CI: [-17.28, 18.17]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.662595% CI: [-21.33, 13.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000995% CI: [9.43, 36.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000995% CI: [9.42, 36.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.040895% CI: [0.58, 26.97]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.003195% CI: [6.77, 33.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.001295% CI: [8.8, 35.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.39, 43.42]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.030395% CI: [1.42, 28.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.00495% CI: [6.3, 32.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.003895% CI: [6.34, 32.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.013795% CI: [3.29, 28.68]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.005295% CI: [5.44, 30.82]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000695% CI: [9.81, 35.39]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.41, 42.32]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.037895% CI: [0.78, 26.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.00295% CI: [7.31, 32.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.007195% CI: [4.77, 30.09]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00295% CI: [7.61, 33.71]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00595% CI: [5.68, 31.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000395% CI: [11.2, 37.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.77, 45.42]MMRM
Comparison: Wek 10p-value: 0.00595% CI: [5.79, 32.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000695% CI: [9.95, 36.22]MMRM
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000695% CI: [9.79, 35.85]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.003695% CI: [6.11, 30.98]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.001595% CI: [7.77, 32.65]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000195% CI: [12.41, 37.57]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: <0.000195% CI: [17.12, 42.49]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.002695% CI: [6.9, 32.21]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000395% CI: [10.92, 35.94]MMRM
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000695% CI: [9.34, 34.14]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.002695% CI: [6.78, 31.83]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.001295% CI: [8.29, 33.33]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000195% CI: [12.48, 37.82]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [19.11, 44.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.002195% CI: [7.32, 32.81]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000495% CI: [10.1, 35.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000695% CI: [9.42, 34.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.030495% CI: [1.62, 32.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.385795% CI: [-8.6, 22.19]MMMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.349795% CI: [-8.31, 23.4]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.177195% CI: [-4.95, 26.75]LSMean difference
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.044495% CI: [0.41, 32.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.1595% CI: [-4.25, 27.63]MMRM
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.619695% CI: [-11.51, 19.29]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.266495% CI: [-7.25, 26.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.638895% CI: [-12.66, 20.59]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.579795% CI: [-12.43, 22.19]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.481795% CI: [-11.1, 23.47]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.235895% CI: [-6.87, 27.79]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.10795% CI: [-3.11, 31.77]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.426895% CI: [-9.94, 23.43]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.919795% CI: [-17.81, 16.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.995495% CI: [-16.77, 16.87]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.995295% CI: [-17.81, 17.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.400195% CI: [-10.16, 25.36]MMRM
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.75195% CI: [-19.52, 14.1]MMRM
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1518 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 120 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 430 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 228 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 834 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 934 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 636 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1422 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1330 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 127 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1234 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 234 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1133 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1518 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 835 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 734 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 637 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 335 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1520 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 937 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1326 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 836 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1426 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 538 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 736 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 238 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 834 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 135 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 337 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 435 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1322 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1416 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 733 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1033 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 435 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1322 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1520 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1421 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 335 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1133 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 433 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 334 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1033 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 123 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1420 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1321 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 536 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 538 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 440 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1235 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1136 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1516 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 236 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 737 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1325 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1421 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1036 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 637 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 335 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 937 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 134 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 837 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1522 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1136 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 837 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1235 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1425 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 439 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1328 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 339 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 937 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 738 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1036 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 536 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 639 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.225195% CI: [0.71, 4.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.008495% CI: [1.39, 9.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000795% CI: [2.09, 15.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.668995% CI: [0.2, 2.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.801995% CI: [0.29, 4.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001595% CI: [1.87, 14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.697695% CI: [0.48, 2.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.002195% CI: [1.73, 12.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.017195% CI: [1.22, 7.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.222495% CI: [0.69, 5.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.271695% CI: [0.65, 4.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.011295% CI: [1.41, 14.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.046195% CI: [1.02, 9.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.346395% CI: [0.59, 4.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.041995% CI: [1.04, 8.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.297795% CI: [0.63, 4.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.2395% CI: [0.67, 5.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.065595% CI: [0.94, 8.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.024595% CI: [1.19, 12.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.012995% CI: [1.44, 21.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.125995% CI: [0.79, 7.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.101595% CI: [0.84, 6.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.016795% CI: [1.31, 15.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.523295% CI: [0.5, 3.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.205595% CI: [0.68, 5.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.065895% CI: [0.93, 9.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.013695% CI: [1.51, 35.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.323895% CI: [0.59, 5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.011895% CI: [1.48, 23.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.016395% CI: [1.36, 20.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.959195% CI: [0.23, 4.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.636395% CI: [0.42, 4.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.072295% CI: [0.89, 15.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.201995% CI: [0.63, 8.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.033795% CI: [1.2, 86.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.220795% CI: [0.61, 8.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.084995% CI: [0.84, 14.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.084495% CI: [0.84, 14.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.238395% CI: [0.6, 7.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.165395% CI: [0.68, 9.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.183695% CI: [0.65, 9.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.052995% CI: [0.97, 70.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.319795% CI: [0.52, 7.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.037695% CI: [1.11, 31.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.034395% CI: [1.19, 85.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.443595% CI: [0.49, 5.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.180595% CI: [0.67, 8.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.085795% CI: [0.84, 14.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.031695% CI: [1.23, 89.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.796895% CI: [0.23, 3.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.907495% CI: [0.3, 3.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.347195% CI: [0.52, 6.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.031395% CI: [1.18, 32.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.020895% CI: [1.47, 106.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.866995% CI: [0.31, 3.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.659295% CI: [0.37, 4.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.292395% CI: [0.5, 9.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.114595% CI: [0.65, 51.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.44795% CI: [0.4, 7.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.075395% CI: [0.82, 65.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.082995% CI: [0.78, 60.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.997895% CI: [0.28, 3.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.457195% CI: [0.43, 6.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.368195% CI: [0.44, 8.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.103895% CI: [0.69, 54.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.463995% CI: [0.39, 7.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.07795% CI: [0.81, 63.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.983895% CI: [0.26, 4.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.699595% CI: [0.21, 2.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.880895% CI: [0.26, 4.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.15795% CI: [0.54, 45.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.374295% CI: [0.39, 12.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.143695% CI: [0.57, 48.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.127795% CI: [0.61, 50.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.336495% CI: [0.42, 13.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.369895% CI: [0.39, 12.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.158795% CI: [0.54, 45.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.1395% CI: [0.61, 50.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.415295% CI: [0.43, 7.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.964595% CI: [0.27, 3.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.388495% CI: [0.43, 8.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.26795% CI: [0.48, 14.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.086195% CI: [0.76, 62.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.077495% CI: [0.8, 64.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.038995% CI: [1.08, 20.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.369595% CI: [0.5, 6.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.350195% CI: [0.48, 7.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.202195% CI: [0.61, 10.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.620195% CI: [0.36, 5.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.023595% CI: [1.42, 132]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.092995% CI: [0.81, 14.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.98295% CI: [0.29, 3.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.495695% CI: [0.44, 5.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.570895% CI: [0.2, 2.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.198595% CI: [0.61, 10.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.836895% CI: [0.31, 4.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.139795% CI: [0.68, 14.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.036695% CI: [0.52, 6.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.198795% CI: [0.1, 1.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.20495% CI: [0.6, 11.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.331895% CI: [0.13, 1.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.743795% CI: [0.31, 5.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.684895% CI: [0.36, 4.71]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1518 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 733 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 230 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 835 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 532 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1519 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 935 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 836 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 236 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 735 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1135 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 636 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1235 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1423 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1329 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1035 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1426 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 836 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 937 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1327 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1522 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 637 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 336 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 736 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 539 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 336 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1028 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1126 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1321 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1514 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 237 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 135 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 532 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 632 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1132 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 436 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1420 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 535 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1519 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 336 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1324 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 734 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1033 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 236 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 136 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 236 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 128 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1324 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1423 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 436 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1232 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 634 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 734 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 934 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 835 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 537 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 337 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1514 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1422 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1322 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 238 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 837 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 337 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1235 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 134 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 737 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 937 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 440 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 539 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 637 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1136 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1036 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1517 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1235 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 638 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1035 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 339 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 738 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 937 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1136 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1521 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 837 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 439 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 535 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1425 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 2 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1327 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.042995% CI: [1.03, 6.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.029695% CI: [1.11, 7.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.003295% CI: [1.65, 12.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.31, 21.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.207395% CI: [0.72, 4.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.009695% CI: [1.36, 9.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.046295% CI: [1.02, 6.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.138795% CI: [0.77, 6.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.31395% CI: [0.6, 4.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.039295% CI: [1.06, 10.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.013595% CI: [1.43, 22.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.08495% CI: [0.87, 9.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.016395% CI: [1.32, 15.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.505695% CI: [0.52, 3.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.335895% CI: [0.58, 4.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.069695% CI: [0.91, 10.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.079495% CI: [0.89, 8.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.014995% CI: [1.48, 36.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.037795% CI: [1.09, 17.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.045495% CI: [1.03, 10.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.03995% CI: [1.07, 13.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.194795% CI: [0.68, 6.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.291395% CI: [0.61, 5.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.166595% CI: [0.72, 6.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.015795% CI: [1.63, 110.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.084695% CI: [0.86, 10.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.017195% CI: [1.35, 21.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.026295% CI: [1.2, 18.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.285895% CI: [0.59, 5.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.015595% CI: [1.47, 39.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.124995% CI: [0.76, 9.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.061695% CI: [0.94, 15.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.012695% CI: [1.58, 43.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.085395% CI: [0.85, 11.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.156295% CI: [0.7, 9.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.129795% CI: [0.74, 10.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.200195% CI: [0.64, 8.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.049595% CI: [1, 73.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.155395% CI: [0.67, 12.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.019995% CI: [1.38, 42.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.047295% CI: [1.02, 27.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.373695% CI: [0.51, 5.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.262895% CI: [0.58, 7.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.199895% CI: [0.63, 9.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.150795% CI: [0.68, 12.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.038595% CI: [1.1, 31.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.029995% CI: [1.26, 93.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.803495% CI: [0.3, 4.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.853295% CI: [0.29, 4.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.882395% CI: [0.28, 4.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.165195% CI: [0.52, 43.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.104895% CI: [0.68, 59.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.116895% CI: [0.64, 53.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.693695% CI: [0.35, 4.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.431595% CI: [0.44, 6.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.793695% CI: [0.31, 4.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.09995% CI: [0.71, 56.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.112895% CI: [0.66, 52.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.073295% CI: [0.83, 65.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.655995% CI: [0.33, 5.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.733395% CI: [0.21, 2.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.926695% CI: [0.24, 3.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.151895% CI: [0.55, 46.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.171495% CI: [0.51, 42.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.129995% CI: [0.6, 51.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.249595% CI: [0.49, 15.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.706595% CI: [0.31, 5.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.750495% CI: [0.3, 5.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.786295% CI: [0.21, 3.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.15595% CI: [0.54, 45.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.170695% CI: [0.51, 42.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.141595% CI: [0.57, 49.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.124195% CI: [0.62, 51.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.216995% CI: [0.57, 12.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.998295% CI: [0.28, 3.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.536495% CI: [0.38, 6.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.12195% CI: [0.63, 51.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.072695% CI: [0.83, 70.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.074995% CI: [0.82, 65.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.090195% CI: [0.81, 16.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.05395% CI: [0.98, 16.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.213495% CI: [0.62, 8.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.368895% CI: [0.48, 7.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.056395% CI: [0.96, 22.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.093595% CI: [0.79, 19.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.136695% CI: [0.72, 11.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.787695% CI: [0.34, 4.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.465895% CI: [0.45, 5.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.870795% CI: [0.25, 3.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.358495% CI: [0.49, 7.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.145595% CI: [0.67, 14.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.066195% CI: [0.9, 28.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.303495% CI: [0.54, 7.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.990195% CI: [0.28, 3.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.50795% CI: [0.42, 5.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.792795% CI: [0.21, 3.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.442695% CI: [0.44, 6.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.892595% CI: [0.23, 3.56]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.428595% CI: [0.42, 7.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.995% CI: [0.31, 3.72]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 219 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 114 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1517 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1316 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 930 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 324 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 430 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1324 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1515 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 629 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1418 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 123 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 230 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1518 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 734 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1421 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 834 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 230 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 536 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 129 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1320 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 330 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1321 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 236 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 336 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 632 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 829 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 128 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 334 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1132 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1230 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 118 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 228 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1320 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1511 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1136 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 435 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 334 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 936 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1514 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 837 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 535 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1036 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1234 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 737 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1319 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1418 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 636 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1326 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 332 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 231 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1517 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 934 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1423 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 638 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 129 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1233 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 738 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 834 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.111495% CI: [0.84, 5.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001395% CI: [1.83, 12.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.65, 18.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.91, 12.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.638495% CI: [0.49, 3.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.23, 14.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.002595% CI: [1.65, 10.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.027995% CI: [1.12, 7.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.011495% CI: [1.31, 8.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.66, 21.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000595% CI: [2.25, 18.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.069595% CI: [0.93, 6.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001595% CI: [1.83, 12.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.3, 8.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.66295% CI: [0.94, 6.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.101995% CI: [0.85, 5.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002395% CI: [1.83, 16.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001595% CI: [2.15, 25.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.23895% CI: [0.68, 4.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.33, 9.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.09195% CI: [0.88, 5.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.192695% CI: [0.72, 5.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.101795% CI: [0.85, 6.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.015395% CI: [1.29, 11.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.003495% CI: [1.95, 28.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.453995% CI: [0.55, 3.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.032795% CI: [1.1, 8.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.055595% CI: [0.98, 7.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.350595% CI: [0.58, 4.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.026595% CI: [1.17, 13.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.017495% CI: [1.32, 17.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.007595% CI: [1.8, 44.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.122895% CI: [0.78, 7.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.043195% CI: [1.04, 10.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.085195% CI: [0.87, 8.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.472695% CI: [0.53, 3.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.128995% CI: [0.79, 6.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.0495% CI: [1.06, 10.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.009795% CI: [1.67, 40.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.22695% CI: [0.66, 5.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.003195% CI: [2.07, 35.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.004395% CI: [2.07, 49.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.557195% CI: [0.47, 4.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.191195% CI: [0.69, 6.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.110195% CI: [0.8, 9.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.019995% CI: [1.36, 34.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.2695% CI: [0.61, 6.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.73, 46.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.008995% CI: [2.04, 145.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.896695% CI: [0.36, 3.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.503195% CI: [0.48, 4.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.260395% CI: [0.59, 6.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.244795% CI: [0.59, 7.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.423995% CI: [0.49, 5.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.02495% CI: [1.38, 99.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.145795% CI: [0.72, 9.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.995% CI: [0.34, 3.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.764495% CI: [0.39, 3.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.224595% CI: [0.6, 8.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.047595% CI: [1.02, 27.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.256995% CI: [0.57, 8.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.041295% CI: [1.09, 79.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.120195% CI: [0.76, 10.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.381495% CI: [0.53, 5.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.854995% CI: [0.38, 3.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.127495% CI: [0.75, 10.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.070395% CI: [0.9, 15.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.182195% CI: [0.66, 8.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.018795% CI: [1.53, 109.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.045895% CI: [1.03, 17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.680695% CI: [0.41, 3.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.80995% CI: [0.38, 3.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.235295% CI: [0.6, 8.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.123195% CI: [0.74, 12.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.144595% CI: [0.7, 11.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.02395% CI: [1.41, 102.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.080195% CI: [0.86, 14.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.415295% CI: [0.5, 5.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.384595% CI: [0.51, 5.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.186495% CI: [0.65, 9.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0126895% CI: [0.73, 12.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.1695% CI: [0.67, 11.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.031795% CI: [1.17, 32.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.070995% CI: [0.89, 15.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.453395% CI: [0.47, 5.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.705395% CI: [0.24, 2.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.367795% CI: [0.49, 6.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.73595% CI: [0.35, 4.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.644395% CI: [0.36, 5.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.486595% CI: [0.43, 5.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.162895% CI: [0.69, 9.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.693595% CI: [0.24, 2.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.975395% CI: [0.32, 3.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.740795% CI: [0.23, 2.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.492995% CI: [0.44, 5.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.849695% CI: [0.25, 3.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.324895% CI: [0.52, 7.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.258995% CI: [0.59, 6.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.331895% CI: [0.16, 1.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.853695% CI: [0.26, 3.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.281795% CI: [0.12, 1.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.409195% CI: [0.17, 2.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.314795% CI: [0.13, 1.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.854795% CI: [0.24, 3.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.502395% CI: [0.2, 2.19]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1316 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1518 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 930 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 115 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 222 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1028 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 125 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 332 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1232 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1033 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1325 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1421 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1517 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1132 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 733 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1030 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1421 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1322 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 536 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1518 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1126 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1320 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 235 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 334 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 433 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1028 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1132 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1418 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1321 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 733 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 335 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 435 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1033 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1515 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 234 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 536 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 123 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1419 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1322 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 433 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 934 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 235 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1036 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1234 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1136 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 835 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1321 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1516 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 537 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 734 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 636 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 337 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1419 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 437 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 434 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1517 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 637 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 934 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 230 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1233 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1133 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 128 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 737 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1422 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 3 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1326 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.060295% CI: [0.96, 6.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.89, 12.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.03, 13.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.23, 25.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.125995% CI: [0.82, 5.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.65, 18.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.41, 8.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.019395% CI: [1.2, 8.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.014895% CI: [1.27, 8.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001895% CI: [1.83, 13.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000795% CI: [2.32, 22.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.024695% CI: [1.16, 8.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001695% CI: [1.87, 14.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.082595% CI: [0.9, 5.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.054295% CI: [0.98, 7.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.083795% CI: [0.89, 6.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.013195% CI: [1.31, 10.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001295% CI: [2.41, 36.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.035995% CI: [1.08, 8.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001995% CI: [1.91, 17.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.071595% CI: [0.93, 6.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.046595% CI: [1.02, 8.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.083995% CI: [0.89, 6.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.019195% CI: [1.23, 10.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.001995% CI: [2.52, 58.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.059395% CI: [0.96, 7.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.004895% CI: [1.63, 15.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.049495% CI: [1, 7.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.188795% CI: [0.69, 6.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.071795% CI: [0.91, 10.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.141995% CI: [0.74, 7.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.014195% CI: [1.71, 120.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.077595% CI: [0.88, 11.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.028395% CI: [1.17, 16.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.176795% CI: [0.7, 6.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.167595% CI: [0.72, 6.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.271795% CI: [0.62, 5.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.136795% CI: [0.76, 7.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.016295% CI: [1.62, 113]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.076595% CI: [0.88, 11.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.006195% CI: [1.79, 33.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.018195% CI: [1.33, 21.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.392595% CI: [0.53, 4.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.37495% CI: [0.54, 5.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.175395% CI: [0.69, 7.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.019595% CI: [1.51, 109.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.193295% CI: [0.66, 8.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.053795% CI: [0.98, 12.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.014495% CI: [1.5, 39.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.66695% CI: [0.41, 4.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.792395% CI: [0.37, 3.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.379695% CI: [0.51, 5.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.087495% CI: [0.81, 21.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.192595% CI: [0.62, 10.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.065195% CI: [0.92, 17.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.536195% CI: [0.44, 4.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.625895% CI: [0.42, 4.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.627595% CI: [0.43, 4.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.221295% CI: [0.62, 7.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.02895% CI: [1.3, 95.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.058995% CI: [0.94, 25.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.079995% CI: [0.86, 15.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.111295% CI: [0.78, 10.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.095995% CI: [0.84, 9.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.388695% CI: [0.54, 4.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.086495% CI: [0.85, 10.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.014595% CI: [1.69, 119.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.01895% CI: [1.56, 110]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00895% CI: [2.14, 160.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.023695% CI: [1.24, 20.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.43030.4303% CI: [0.5, 5.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.552995% CI: [0.45, 4.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.326895% CI: [0.53, 6.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.034395% CI: [1.19, 84.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.039195% CI: [1.12, 79.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.018795% CI: [1.54, 115.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.147595% CI: [0.71, 9.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.216195% CI: [0.63, 7.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.347895% CI: [0.53, 6.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.226995% CI: [0.61, 8.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.068395% CI: [0.89, 24.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.022895% CI: [1.31, 38.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.06295% CI: [0.93, 16.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.225195% CI: [0.62, 7.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.790895% CI: [0.35, 3.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.373595% CI: [0.48, 7.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.185695% CI: [0.64, 9.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.0179895% CI: [0.64, 11.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.110195% CI: [0.77, 13.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.10695% CI: [0.79, 11.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.525895% CI: [0.45, 4.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.874695% CI: [0.34, 3.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.743495% CI: [0.24, 2.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.321195% CI: [0.53, 6.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.53395% CI: [0.41, 5.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.111995% CI: [0.77, 11.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.35495% CI: [0.53, 5.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.507695% CI: [0.19, 2.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.580195% CI: [0.21, 2.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.278595% CI: [0.13, 1.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.565695% CI: [0.19, 2.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.644595% CI: [0.19, 2.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.736395% CI: [0.32, 4.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.345595% CI: [0.17, 1.86]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 524 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 422 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 318 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1225 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1027 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1515 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 727 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 216 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 627 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1312 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 18 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1416 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 427 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 328 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 121 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 829 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 930 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1320 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1514 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 727 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1027 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 121 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 229 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 327 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 428 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1316 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 627 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1126 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 530 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1028 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 233 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1412 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 159 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 126 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 829 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 430 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 228 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1413 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1030 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 124 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1030 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 326 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 116 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 225 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 626 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 726 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1416 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1510 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 935 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 834 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1135 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 733 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 634 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1233 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1034 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1418 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 830 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 129 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1232 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 226 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1323 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.009395% CI: [1.41, 11.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.003595% CI: [1.66, 13.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.01, 23.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.65, 21.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.166495% CI: [0.73, 6.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001295% CI: [1.94, 14.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.49, 27.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.033495% CI: [1.08, 6.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.003495% CI: [1.6, 10.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.45, 17.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001495% CI: [1.85, 12.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.087295% CI: [0.89, 5.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.013195% CI: [1.28, 7.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.038695% CI: [1.05, 6.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.019195% CI: [1.2, 8.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.029195% CI: [1.11, 7.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.23, 16.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.49, 21.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.099295% CI: [0.86, 5.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.11, 15.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.46, 9.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.147295% CI: [0.78, 5.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.128495% CI: [0.81, 5.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.011795% CI: [1.32, 9.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.006795% CI: [1.49, 12.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.408895% CI: [0.59, 3.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.019495% CI: [1.2, 7.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.042395% CI: [1.03, 6.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.215195% CI: [0.7, 4.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.053195% CI: [0.99, 7.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.011895% CI: [1.37, 12.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.066895% CI: [0.93, 8.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.000695% CI: [3.29, 80.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.369895% CI: [0.59, 4.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.005995% CI: [1.55, 13.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.024195% CI: [1.17, 9.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.530895% CI: [0.5, 3.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.860395% CI: [0.41, 2.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.026495% CI: [1.17, 11.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.018895% CI: [1.29, 16.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.764295% CI: [0.42, 3.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.010195% CI: [1.46, 16.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.057295% CI: [0.97, 8.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.734895% CI: [0.44, 3.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.139795% CI: [0.77, 6.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.023195% CI: [1.21, 13.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.019695% CI: [1.27, 16.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.770395% CI: [0.42, 3.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.022295% CI: [1.21, 12.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.753395% CI: [0.43, 3.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.332595% CI: [0.59, 4.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.089995% CI: [0.86, 8.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.064295% CI: [0.93, 11.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.596495% CI: [0.46, 3.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.022495% CI: [1.23, 15.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.313995% CI: [0.6, 4.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.634395% CI: [0.45, 3.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.655795% CI: [0.45, 3.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.051695% CI: [0.99, 13.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0495% CI: [1.07, 17.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.582595% CI: [0.44, 4.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.015295% CI: [1.47, 37.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.156595% CI: [0.73, 7.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.493295% CI: [0.5, 4.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.850495% CI: [0.39, 3.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.075995% CI: [0.89, 10.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.047795% CI: [1.01, 13.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.144895% CI: [0.73, 8.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.017395% CI: [1.35, 22.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.110195% CI: [0.81, 8.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.602295% CI: [0.46, 3.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.612895% CI: [0.46, 3.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.100195% CI: [0.82, 9.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.025595% CI: [1.22, 20.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.152195% CI: [0.72, 8.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.007195% CI: [1.84, 47.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.11595% CI: [0.8, 7.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.810195% CI: [0.4, 3.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.466395% CI: [0.51, 4.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.045395% CI: [1.03, 14.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.065995% CI: [0.92, 12.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.311795% CI: [0.57, 5.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.012995% CI: [1.46, 24.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.030395% CI: [1.14, 14.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.277295% CI: [0.59, 6.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.943295% CI: [0.29, 3.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.257795% CI: [0.59, 7.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.149695% CI: [0.71, 9.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.287495% CI: [0.55, 7.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.198195% CI: [0.65, 7.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.053195% CI: [0.98, 11.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.585895% CI: [0.22, 2.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.512295% CI: [0.21, 2.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.341595% CI: [0.16, 1.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.826395% CI: [0.25, 2.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.808595% CI: [0.24, 3.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.674595% CI: [0.38, 4.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.901995% CI: [0.34, 3.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.442595% CI: [0.18, 2.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.310695% CI: [0.17, 1.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.091295% CI: [0.08, 1.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.568195% CI: [0.2, 2.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.426195% CI: [0.15, 2.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.751495% CI: [0.24, 2.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.271295% CI: [0.16, 1.67]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1515 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 216 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1225 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1313 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 320 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 423 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1027 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 527 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 829 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 111 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 428 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1323 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1515 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 230 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1229 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1419 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 125 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1416 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 629 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 229 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 123 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 930 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1027 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1124 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 830 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 629 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 126 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1510 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1411 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1225 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1229 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1319 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1416 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1514 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 830 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 126 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 119 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 226 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1133 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1229 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1320 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1418 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 328 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 934 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1135 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1035 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 126 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1511 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 634 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 535 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 433 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 834 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 336 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 229 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 632 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 127 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1321 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 830 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 430 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 226 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 4 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.003795% CI: [1.6, 11.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.005795% CI: [1.49, 10.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.26, 16.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.37, 17.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.14195% CI: [0.78, 5.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.2, 15.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.08, 14.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.003795% CI: [1.58, 10.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.121295% CI: [0.78, 8.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.002695% CI: [1.67, 11.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.63, 16.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.23, 27.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.043195% CI: [1.03, 6.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.72, 11.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.029195% CI: [1.11, 6.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.006395% CI: [1.48, 10.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.020295% CI: [1.19, 8.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.004495% CI: [1.55, 10.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.89, 29.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.070695% CI: [0.93, 6.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.79, 24.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.014695% CI: [1.26, 8.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.081695% CI: [0.9, 6.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.09395% CI: [0.87, 5.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.36595% CI: [1.07, 7.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.004295% CI: [1.65, 14.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.048895% CI: [1.01, 7.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.007595% CI: [1.43, 10.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.098495% CI: [0.86, 5.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.222695% CI: [0.68, 5.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.146795% CI: [0.76, 6.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.070595% CI: [0.92, 8.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.002595% CI: [3.16, 223.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.075795% CI: [0.9, 8.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.004595% CI: [1.71, 18.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.077195% CI: [0.9, 7.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.185695% CI: [0.71, 5.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.597395% CI: [0.48, 3.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.093595% CI: [0.85, 7.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.015795% CI: [1.38, 22.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.196395% CI: [0.68, 6.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.008595% CI: [1.53, 18.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.143395% CI: [0.76, 6.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.157795% CI: [0.74, 6.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.160895% CI: [0.74, 6.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.069395% CI: [0.92, 9.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.006395% CI: [1.89, 48.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.163795% CI: [0.72, 7.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.032695% CI: [1.11, 11.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.145595% CI: [0.76, 6.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.195195% CI: [0.69, 6.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.409795% CI: [0.54, 4.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.155495% CI: [0.73, 7.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.04495% CI: [1.04, 17.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.192895% CI: [0.67, 7.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.022295% CI: [1.25, 17.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.407595% CI: [0.54, 4.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.365995% CI: [0.56, 4.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.787895% CI: [0.41, 3.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.063595% CI: [0.94, 11.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.013795% CI: [1.73, 123.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.106995% CI: [0.79, 10.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.018695% CI: [1.33, 23.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.143495% CI: [0.75, 7.56]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.16795% CI: [0.72, 6.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.78195% CI: [0.41, 3.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.168295% CI: [0.71, 7.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.021595% CI: [1.28, 21.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.030695% CI: [1.16, 19.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.005995% CI: [1.92, 52.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.100495% CI: [0.83, 8.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.183795% CI: [0.7, 6.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.592995% CI: [0.47, 3.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.258895% CI: [0.62, 6.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.012995% CI: [1.54, 38.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.016895% CI: [1.42, 35.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.005895% CI: [1.94, 50.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.193495% CI: [0.69, 6.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.218195% CI: [0.66, 6.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.411695% CI: [0.53, 4.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.093895% CI: [0.84, 9.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.012595% CI: [1.57, 41.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.076195% CI: [0.88, 12.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.030595% CI: [1.14, 14.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.050195% CI: [1, 11.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.833295% CI: [0.35, 3.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.428595% CI: [0.48, 5.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.095495% CI: [0.83, 10.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.11195% CI: [0.78, 11.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.164295% CI: [0.69, 8.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.197695% CI: [0.66, 7.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.576195% CI: [0.43, 4.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.45495% CI: [0.2, 2.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.373295% CI: [0.17, 1.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.466595% CI: [0.46, 5.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.563495% CI: [0.41, 5.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.429795% CI: [0.48, 5.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.978995% CI: [0.31, 3.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.735795% CI: [0.24, 2.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.197795% CI: [0.14, 1.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.320395% CI: [0.14, 1.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.973995% CI: [0.3, 3.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.671495% CI: [0.36, 4.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.637595% CI: [0.22, 2.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.29895% CI: [0.17, 1.71]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 622 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 139 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 214 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 722 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 926 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 15 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 520 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 316 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1511 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1124 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1022 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 417 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 822 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1223 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 424 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 624 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 727 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1511 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 225 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 925 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1223 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 524 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 159 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1313 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 926 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 119 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 727 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1125 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 526 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1412 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 625 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1023 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 224 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1025 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1124 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 425 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1314 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 526 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 727 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1222 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 158 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1314 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 149 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 157 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 428 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 327 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 224 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 121 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 627 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 625 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 113 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 221 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 424 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 526 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 724 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 823 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 923 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1025 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1224 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1416 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 159 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1133 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 532 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1313 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1511 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1413 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 223 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 118 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 930 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 830 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 327 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 120 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 226 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1229 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1030 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 427 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Mild, Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.010395% CI: [1.46, 16.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001195% CI: [2.2, 23.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.41, 35.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000195% CI: [3.18, 34.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.157195% CI: [0.71, 8.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.00195% CI: [2.21, 23.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000895% CI: [2.29, 23.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.034295% CI: [1.08, 7.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.023195% CI: [1.16, 7.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.003295% CI: [1.6, 10.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.005995% CI: [1.48, 10.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.247195% CI: [0.68, 4.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.038195% CI: [1.05, 6.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.011395% CI: [1.31, 8.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.048695% CI: [1.01, 6.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.03595% CI: [1.07, 6.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002795% CI: [1.65, 10.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.76, 12.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.068695% CI: [0.94, 6.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.003495% CI: [1.58, 10.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.022295% CI: [1.16, 7.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.087695% CI: [0.89, 5.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.034595% CI: [1.08, 6.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.031995% CI: [1.09, 6.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.001395% CI: [1.92, 14.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.175195% CI: [0.75, 4.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.001995% CI: [1.73, 11.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.028495% CI: [1.11, 6.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.26595% CI: [0.66, 4.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.123895% CI: [0.82, 5.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.021995% CI: [1.18, 8.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.002295% CI: [1.84, 16.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.22395% CI: [0.69, 4.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001895% CI: [1.83, 13.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.020595% CI: [1.19, 8.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.462895% CI: [0.54, 3.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.401595% CI: [0.58, 3.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.003195% CI: [1.76, 16.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.011595% CI: [1.38, 12.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.251395% CI: [0.66, 4.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.009995% CI: [1.39, 11.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.024295% CI: [1.16, 8.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.151895% CI: [0.77, 5.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.181195% CI: [0.73, 5.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.01595% CI: [1.3, 11.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.590395% CI: [0.26, 2.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.004695% CI: [1.67, 16.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.378895% CI: [0.57, 4.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.042495% CI: [1.04, 7.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.013995% CI: [1.3, 10.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.305795% CI: [0.63, 4.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.371795% CI: [0.59, 4.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.025295% CI: [1.16, 9.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.023595% CI: [1.19, 10.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.65895% CI: [0.46, 3.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.006195% CI: [1.54, 13.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.014995% CI: [1.29, 10.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.928295% CI: [0.35, 2.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.790295% CI: [0.33, 2.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.160395% CI: [0.73, 6.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.114495% CI: [0.8, 8.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.02995% CI: [1.15, 13.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.172195% CI: [0.72, 6.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.243995% CI: [0.66, 5.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.740295% CI: [0.44, 3.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.042295% CI: [1.04, 9.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.006195% CI: [1.62, 18.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.319195% CI: [0.59, 4.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.003795% CI: [1.78, 19.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.013995% CI: [1.33, 12.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.375795% CI: [0.57, 4.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.708795% CI: [0.45, 3.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.108395% CI: [0.81, 7.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.047395% CI: [1.01, 10.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.248195% CI: [0.64, 5.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.006695% CI: [1.64, 20.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.046695% CI: [1.02, 9.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.876995% CI: [0.34, 2.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.544895% CI: [0.49, 3.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.412595% CI: [0.53, 4.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0595% CI: [1, 11.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.616795% CI: [0.45, 3.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.023395% CI: [1.21, 13.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.080395% CI: [0.89, 8.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.127495% CI: [0.76, 9.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.944595% CI: [0.29, 3.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.420495% CI: [0.47, 6.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.131595% CI: [0.74, 10.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.094495% CI: [0.82, 12.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.280195% CI: [0.57, 6.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.152495% CI: [0.72, 8.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.612995% CI: [0.4, 4.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.461795% CI: [0.18, 2.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.651995% CI: [0.2, 2.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.801195% CI: [0.22, 3.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.325495% CI: [0.51, 7.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.27395% CI: [0.58, 6.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.660195% CI: [0.39, 4.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.658895% CI: [0.2, 2.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.325795% CI: [0.14, 1.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.222995% CI: [0.1, 1.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.242595% CI: [0.1, 1.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.967295% CI: [0.23, 4.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.583895% CI: [0.4, 5.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.936195% CI: [0.28, 3.24]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 825 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1022 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 924 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1223 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 723 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 159 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 623 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 523 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 316 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 214 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 419 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1124 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 139 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 424 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 626 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1320 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1129 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 927 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1225 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 225 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1027 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 119 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 525 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1315 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1413 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 929 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1510 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 327 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 428 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 526 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 158 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1221 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 926 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 149 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1123 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1024 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 123 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 328 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 627 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1313 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 328 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 225 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 157 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 929 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1314 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 425 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 114 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 927 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 224 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 727 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1511 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 827 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1320 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 627 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1313 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1510 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 533 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1412 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1316 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 829 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 527 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 224 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 929 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 629 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1413 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Absolute Reduction of 5 in Mean Number of Moderate and Severe VMS Per Day From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.004495% CI: [1.69, 16.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.79, 26.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.49, 33.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.2, 31.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.126695% CI: [0.77, 8.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.002495% CI: [1.85, 17.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.59, 24.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.021795% CI: [1.18, 8.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.002195% CI: [1.75, 12.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001695% CI: [1.8, 12.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001895% CI: [1.79, 12.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.046795% CI: [1.01, 7.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001695% CI: [1.8, 12.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.023495% CI: [1.16, 7.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.029495% CI: [1.11, 7.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.006895% CI: [1.44, 9.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002595% CI: [1.68, 11.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.13, 15.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.057295% CI: [0.97, 6.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.28, 15.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.04695% CI: [1.02, 6.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.140695% CI: [0.79, 5.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.023495% CI: [1.16, 7.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.030295% CI: [1.1, 7.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.001695% CI: [1.87, 14.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.210595% CI: [0.71, 4.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.003395% CI: [1.61, 10.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.108795% CI: [0.85, 5.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.3695% CI: [0.6, 4.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.139495% CI: [0.79, 5.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.052295% CI: [0.99, 7.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.011995% CI: [1.63, 11.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.147495% CI: [0.77, 5.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.002695% CI: [1.76, 14.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.126395% CI: [0.81, 5.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.232795% CI: [0.68, 4.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.135995% CI: [0.79, 5.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.025895% CI: [1.16, 9.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.007695% CI: [1.51, 15.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.108895% CI: [0.83, 6.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.004595% CI: [1.64, 14.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.049395% CI: [1, 7.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.037695% CI: [1.06, 8.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.072395% CI: [0.92, 6.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.039695% CI: [1.06, 9.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.003195% CI: [1.85, 20.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.104495% CI: [0.83, 6.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.002995% CI: [1.78, 16.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.036495% CI: [1.07, 8.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.639695% CI: [0.47, 3.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.437895% CI: [0.55, 3.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.204595% CI: [0.7, 5.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.095895% CI: [0.85, 7.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.32195% CI: [0.6, 4.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.019995% CI: [1.23, 11.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.121995% CI: [0.8, 6.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.297595% CI: [0.62, 4.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.276395% CI: [0.64, 4.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.123595% CI: [0.79, 6.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.01995% CI: [1.27, 14.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.221395% CI: [0.66, 5.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.00595% CI: [1.71, 20.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.105395% CI: [0.83, 6.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.099195% CI: [0.85, 6.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.205695% CI: [0.7, 5.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.040795% CI: [1.05, 9.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.005995% CI: [1.63, 18.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.02395% CI: [1.2, 12.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001595% CI: [2.14, 25.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.024895% CI: [1.17, 10.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.109195% CI: [0.82, 6.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.305495% CI: [0.61, 4.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.112995% CI: [0.81, 7.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.043295% CI: [1.04, 10.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.031595% CI: [1.13, 12.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.014795% CI: [1.33, 13.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.040595% CI: [1.05, 9.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.523895% CI: [0.5, 3.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.30695% CI: [0.6, 4.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.374795% CI: [0.55, 4.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.044395% CI: [1.03, 11.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.126995% CI: [0.77, 8.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.009595% CI: [1.49, 17.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.125495% CI: [0.79, 6.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.040295% CI: [1.06, 12.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.454795% CI: [0.47, 5.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.400895% CI: [0.49, 5.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.153595% CI: [0.71, 9.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.005595% CI: [1.79, 28.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.211695% CI: [0.64, 7.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.166895% CI: [0.7, 7.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.182495% CI: [0.67, 7.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.79795% CI: [0.25, 2.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.706595% CI: [0.21, 2.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.912695% CI: [0.29, 3.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.128295% CI: [0.74, 10.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.266195% CI: [0.58, 7.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.745795% CI: [0.36, 4.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.409595% CI: [0.47, 6.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.957195% CI: [0.28, 3.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.882795% CI: [0.23, 3.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.594495% CI: [0.17, 2.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.164795% CI: [0.66, 11.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.268495% CI: [0.57, 7.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.533895% CI: [0.43, 5.07]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 31 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 128 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 41 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 93 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 21 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 71 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 61 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 113 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 82 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 53 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 104 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 33 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 107 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 75 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 87 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 97 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 42 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 52 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 22 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 127 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 66 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 87 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 53 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 63 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 75 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 911 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 33 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1210 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 44 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 106 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 20 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1211 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 912 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 25 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 39 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 46 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 510 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 611 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1113 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 713 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 109 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 815 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 812 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 27 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 38 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 411 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 510 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 613 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 711 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 915 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1016 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1117 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1214 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 76 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 53 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 32 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 125 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 93 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 85 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 43 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 103 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 20 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 63 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 108 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 76 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 65 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 118 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 56 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1212 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 46 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 34 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 23 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 97 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 86 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 24 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1015 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 912 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 56 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 814 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1113 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 39 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 48 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1210 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 714 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 612 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.789995% CI: [0.04, 12.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.918695% CI: [0.05, 14.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.530395% CI: [0.19, 25.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.114995% CI: [0.65, 52.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.044295% CI: [1.06, 77.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.285195% CI: [0.35, 35.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.207395% CI: [0.45, 39.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.2795% CI: [0.36, 37.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.298295% CI: [0.34, 34.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.020495% CI: [1.47, 102.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.02795% CI: [1.31, 93.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.522495% CI: [0.19, 25.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.163595% CI: [0.52, 46.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.026695% CI: [1.32, 91.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.429995% CI: [0.23, 31.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.166795% CI: [0.52, 45.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.059295% CI: [0.92, 71.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00795% CI: [2.21, 151.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.259495% CI: [0.37, 38.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.058995% CI: [0.92, 71.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.033895% CI: [1.19, 85.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.775695% CI: [0.12, 4.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.924695% CI: [0.2, 5.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.017795% CI: [1.34, 21.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.017895% CI: [1.34, 21.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.856495% CI: [0.22, 6.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.220295% CI: [0.58, 11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.249895% CI: [0.55, 10.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.057695% CI: [0.93, 72.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.306595% CI: [0.33, 33.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.005695% CI: [2.4, 165.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.002795% CI: [3.05, 205.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.276295% CI: [0.36, 36.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.085195% CI: [0.77, 62.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.008195% CI: [2.09, 138.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.099595% CI: [0.7, 57.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.118495% CI: [0.64, 51.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.002395% CI: [3.23, 218.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.006295% CI: [2.31, 157.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.069595% CI: [0.85, 65.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.05295% CI: [0.98, 75.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.003695% CI: [2.75, 180.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.067695% CI: [0.89, 24.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.090395% CI: [0.8, 21.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000795% CI: [3.18, 75.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.003295% CI: [2.22, 53.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.203195% CI: [0.55, 16.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.097295% CI: [0.77, 22.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.002795% CI: [2.3, 53.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.130695% CI: [0.72, 13.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.024895% CI: [1.22, 19.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.005495% CI: [1.79, 28.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.00195% CI: [2.55, 39.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.827195% CI: [0.23, 6.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.108995% CI: [0.77, 13.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.013895% CI: [1.42, 21.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.198795% CI: [0.63, 9.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.398495% CI: [0.46, 7.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.040295% CI: [1.06, 14.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00195% CI: [2.32, 27.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.828795% CI: [0.17, 4.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.108395% CI: [0.79, 10.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.004395% CI: [1.76, 20.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.112695% CI: [0.76, 13.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.147995% CI: [0.69, 12.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.00195% CI: [2.59, 42.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000295% CI: [3.31, 51.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.148395% CI: [0.68, 12.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.055795% CI: [0.97, 16.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.007295% CI: [1.66, 25.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.971595% CI: [0.32, 3.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.47295% CI: [0.5, 4.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.126295% CI: [0.79, 7.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.039695% CI: [1.05, 8.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.513795% CI: [0.19, 2.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.13795% CI: [0.77, 6.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.552695% CI: [0.47, 4.07]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 31 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 61 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 54 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 129 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 21 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 84 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 71 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 107 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 115 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 95 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 41 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 99 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 109 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 55 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 35 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 89 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 128 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 77 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 68 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 22 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 43 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 119 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 812 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 912 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 23 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 152 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 142 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 36 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 48 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1212 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 58 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 610 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1111 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 710 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1011 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 612 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 816 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 915 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 136 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 39 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 27 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 142 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 153 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 714 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 13 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 510 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1115 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1214 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 410 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1016 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 414 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 13 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 210 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 312 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 515 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 616 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 716 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 816 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 918 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1019 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1119 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1216 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 142 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 79 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 106 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 65 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 129 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1110 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 56 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 44 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 34 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 20 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 95 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 86 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 57 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 48 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1214 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 36 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 89 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 912 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 24 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 710 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 109 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 66 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 119 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 615 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 49 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 715 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 915 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1213 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1115 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 312 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 815 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 58 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1017 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 100% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 26 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.967195% CI: [0.06, 16.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.328995% CI: [0.31, 31.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.315795% CI: [0.32, 32.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.99195% CI: [0.06, 16.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.513995% CI: [0.2, 26.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.307995% CI: [0.33, 33.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.046995% CI: [1.03, 75.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.013495% CI: [1.74, 119.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.160695% CI: [0.53, 46.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.085495% CI: [0.77, 58.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.108295% CI: [0.67, 54.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.073795% CI: [0.83, 63.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.021795% CI: [1.44, 99.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.005895% CI: [2.36, 157.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.192495% CI: [0.47, 41.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.06895% CI: [0.86, 66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.009595% CI: [1.97, 129.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.26995% CI: [0.36, 37.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.032195% CI: [1.22, 86.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.013195% CI: [1.75, 119.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.002595% CI: [3.11, 204.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.178895% CI: [0.49, 43.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.03295% CI: [1.22, 87.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.025195% CI: [1.35, 93.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.615495% CI: [0.35, 5.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.190695% CI: [0.65, 8.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.04595% CI: [1.03, 13.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001795% CI: [2.1, 24.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.393995% CI: [0.47, 6.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.286995% CI: [0.55, 7.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.181795% CI: [0.66, 8.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.025695% CI: [1.35, 96.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.015395% CI: [1.65, 112.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.004295% CI: [2.64, 179.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000895% CI: [4.39, 291.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.096795% CI: [0.71, 58.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.056495% CI: [0.94, 72.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.00395% CI: [2.93, 190.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.038495% CI: [1.13, 83.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.015395% CI: [1.65, 112.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001595% CI: [3.72, 250.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000895% CI: [4.41, 293.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.019295% CI: [1.51, 106.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.008995% CI: [2.03, 141]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.002595% CI: [3.09, 201.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.09195% CI: [0.84, 10.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.029695% CI: [1.15, 13.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000995% CI: [2.38, 28.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000795% CI: [2.46, 29.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.415295% CI: [0.45, 6.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.0795% CI: [0.91, 11.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.004895% CI: [1.71, 19.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.149795% CI: [0.72, 8.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.060895% CI: [0.95, 9.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.002895% CI: [1.85, 19.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000595% CI: [2.45, 25.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.839395% CI: [0.3, 4.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.021595% CI: [1.23, 13.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.011295% CI: [1.4, 13.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.349895% CI: [0.55, 5.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.198195% CI: [0.69, 6.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.002995% CI: [1.76, 15.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.001195% CI: [2.03, 17.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.951195% CI: [0.29, 3.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.324195% CI: [0.57, 5.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.011195% CI: [1.36, 11.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.137595% CI: [0.74, 8.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.06795% CI: [0.93, 9.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000995% CI: [2.29, 25.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.91, 30.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.098295% CI: [0.83, 9.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.123395% CI: [0.77, 8.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.009195% CI: [1.46, 14.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.96295% CI: [0.34, 3.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.352795% CI: [0.58, 4.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.039495% CI: [1.06, 8.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.022495% CI: [1.19, 9.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.789195% CI: [0.39, 3.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.085195% CI: [0.88, 6.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.288595% CI: [0.63, 4.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.861195% CI: [0.05, 13.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.754995% CI: [0.13, 17.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.565895% CI: [0.17, 24.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.631995% CI: [0.15, 21.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.952695% CI: [0.06, 18.96]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 624 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1411 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 419 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 316 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 522 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1221 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 15 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1023 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1514 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 927 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1312 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 214 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1123 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 226 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1319 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1028 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 119 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 524 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 624 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 326 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 929 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1510 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 229 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 124 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 156 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1125 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1314 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 530 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 230 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 332 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1413 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 125 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 159 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1315 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 110 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 222 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 326 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 425 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 624 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 825 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 925 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1224 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1316 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1415 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 159 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 530 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 226 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1232 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 121 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1314 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1133 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 930 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 633 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1232 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 228 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 123 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1417 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1032 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001895% CI: [1.95, 18.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.7, 25.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.53, 33.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.91, 37.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.224495% CI: [0.64, 6.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.77, 26.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.71, 25.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.014995% CI: [1.24, 7.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001195% CI: [1.85, 11.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.46, 16.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.56, 18.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.089795% CI: [0.89, 5.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.42, 8.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.004195% CI: [1.52, 9.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.025495% CI: [1.13, 6.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.003295% CI: [1.59, 10.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.37, 16.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3, 25.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.021495% CI: [1.17, 7.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.004995% CI: [1.48, 9.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.007895% CI: [1.38, 8.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.072795% CI: [0.93, 5.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.019995% CI: [1.19, 7.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.003495% CI: [1.61, 11.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000795% CI: [2.16, 18.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.120695% CI: [0.83, 4.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.42, 9.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.008895% CI: [1.36, 8.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.448595% CI: [0.58, 3.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.025595% CI: [1.14, 7.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.006695% CI: [1.49, 11.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.006195% CI: [1.53, 13.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.087995% CI: [0.89, 5.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.038995% CI: [1.05, 6.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.044695% CI: [1.02, 6.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.819695% CI: [0.45, 2.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.14595% CI: [0.79, 5.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.011495% CI: [1.37, 12.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.030795% CI: [1.12, 9.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.592195% CI: [0.51, 3.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.050295% CI: [1, 7.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.022495% CI: [1.18, 9.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.722595% CI: [0.47, 2.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.076295% CI: [0.91, 6.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.025295% CI: [1.17, 10.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.04995% CI: [1, 8.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.177395% CI: [0.74, 5.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.060995% CI: [0.96, 7.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.136495% CI: [0.79, 5.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.526895% CI: [0.53, 3.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.164595% CI: [0.75, 5.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.021595% CI: [1.22, 12.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.0695% CI: [0.95, 9.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.650395% CI: [0.47, 3.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.068395% CI: [0.93, 7.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.061895% CI: [0.95, 8.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.562195% CI: [0.5, 3.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.218295% CI: [0.68, 5.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0695% CI: [0.95, 10.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.02995% CI: [1.17, 18.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.848595% CI: [0.4, 3.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.165295% CI: [0.73, 6.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.224495% CI: [0.67, 5.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.209795% CI: [0.71, 4.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.370895% CI: [0.6, 3.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.070495% CI: [0.92, 7.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.88, 27.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.162595% CI: [0.75, 5.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.009395% CI: [1.46, 14.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.010395% CI: [1.42, 13.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.196595% CI: [0.72, 4.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.054995% CI: [0.98, 7.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.050395% CI: [1, 9.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.004695% CI: [1.82, 27.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.086695% CI: [0.88, 6.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.004595% CI: [1.74, 20.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.020795% CI: [1.22, 10.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.212795% CI: [0.7, 4.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.152195% CI: [0.77, 5.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.009895% CI: [1.48, 17.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.004795% CI: [1.82, 27.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.181795% CI: [0.72, 5.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.004295% CI: [1.77, 20.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.003995% CI: [1.78, 20.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.702595% CI: [0.42, 3.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.959995% CI: [0.36, 2.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.967195% CI: [0.34, 3.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.68195% CI: [0.42, 3.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.634695% CI: [0.43, 4.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.792995% CI: [0.38, 3.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.818895% CI: [0.39, 3.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.822695% CI: [0.3, 2.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.908895% CI: [0.32, 2.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.618995% CI: [0.24, 2.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.646395% CI: [0.42, 4.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.50695% CI: [0.47, 4.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.384295% CI: [0.53, 5.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.502195% CI: [0.49, 4.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.134995% CI: [0.14, 1.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.319195% CI: [0.19, 1.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.062395% CI: [0.09, 1.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.195895% CI: [0.15, 1.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.435395% CI: [0.19, 2.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.972995% CI: [0.31, 3.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.421195% CI: [0.22, 1.89]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1312 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 318 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1222 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 423 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 927 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 215 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 726 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1411 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 625 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1125 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 523 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1025 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 930 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1419 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 121 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1322 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 530 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 231 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 629 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1416 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 534 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 125 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 733 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 933 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 331 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1229 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 231 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 149 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 127 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1314 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 158 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 631 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1125 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 128 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 232 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 531 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 730 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 931 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1229 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1318 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 731 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 532 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 330 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1319 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1514 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 830 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 114 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 225 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1418 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1316 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 123 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1035 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 634 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1134 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 535 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1232 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 432 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 333 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 229 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1512 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1414 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 932 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 833 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1513 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1031 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 929 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 530 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 832 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1418 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1131 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 125 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 329 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 431 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1231 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 729 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1316 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 50% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 632 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.81, 23.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001295% CI: [1.99, 16.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.06, 25.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.94, 33.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.55, 40.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.055595% CI: [0.98, 8.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.75, 23.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001295% CI: [1.82, 11.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000595% CI: [2.06, 13.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.2, 14.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.99, 23.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.027795% CI: [1.12, 6.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.002295% CI: [1.66, 10.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.031495% CI: [1.26, 7.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.004195% CI: [1.54, 9.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002895% CI: [1.64, 10.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001195% CI: [1.9, 12.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.86, 26.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.003695% CI: [1.59, 10.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001895% CI: [1.75, 11.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.024395% CI: [1.14, 6.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.07795% CI: [0.91, 5.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.045195% CI: [1.02, 6.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.016595% CI: [1.25, 9.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.003795% CI: [1.72, 16.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.081295% CI: [0.9, 5.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.057795% CI: [0.97, 6.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.070695% CI: [0.93, 5.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.040495% CI: [1.04, 7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.005495% CI: [1.54, 11.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.018695% CI: [1.22, 9.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.002395% CI: [1.96, 22.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.011895% CI: [1.33, 9.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.88, 16.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.04395% CI: [1.03, 7.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.219795% CI: [0.7, 4.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.134195% CI: [0.8, 5.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.019695% CI: [1.23, 11.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.012195% CI: [1.41, 16.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.151195% CI: [0.77, 5.56]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.006895% CI: [1.55, 15.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.074195% CI: [0.91, 6.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.277295% CI: [0.65, 4.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.070595% CI: [0.92, 7.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.02295% CI: [1.22, 12.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.019695% CI: [1.27, 14.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.043395% CI: [1.03, 9.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.035595% CI: [1.08, 9.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.323895% CI: [0.62, 4.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.320895% CI: [0.6, 4.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.228195% CI: [0.67, 5.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.056695% CI: [0.97, 10.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.149195% CI: [0.73, 7.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.147795% CI: [0.74, 7.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.053295% CI: [0.98, 10.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.161695% CI: [0.73, 6.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.43295% CI: [0.55, 4.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.223195% CI: [0.68, 5.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.034795% CI: [1.1, 13.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.029195% CI: [1.17, 18.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.280595% CI: [0.61, 5.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.060295% CI: [0.95, 10.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.508795% CI: [0.51, 3.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.122495% CI: [0.8, 6.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.22895% CI: [0.68, 5.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.183595% CI: [0.71, 6.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.010795% CI: [1.51, 22.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.057695% CI: [0.97, 8.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.004795% CI: [2, 46.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.056995% CI: [0.97, 8.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.107895% CI: [0.83, 6.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.077295% CI: [0.9, 7.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.131195% CI: [0.77, 7.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.0125595% CI: [1.45, 21.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.012895% CI: [1.41, 17.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.007995% CI: [1.62, 24.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.057295% CI: [0.97, 8.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.028495% CI: [1.14, 9.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.070595% CI: [0.92, 7.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.013695% CI: [1.38, 16.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.004395% CI: [2.06, 48.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.07695% CI: [0.9, 7.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.005995% CI: [1.65, 20]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.014395% CI: [1.33, 13.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.277995% CI: [0.62, 5.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.755995% CI: [0.41, 3.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.90595% CI: [0.35, 3.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.216395% CI: [0.66, 6.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.171395% CI: [0.7, 7.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.398195% CI: [0.52, 5.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.969295% CI: [0.35, 2.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.297895% CI: [0.6, 5.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.852595% CI: [0.38, 3.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.502895% CI: [0.21, 2.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.459495% CI: [0.5, 4.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.112495% CI: [0.8, 8.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.341595% CI: [0.55, 5.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.363595% CI: [0.56, 4.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.571695% CI: [0.24, 2.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.502895% CI: [0.23, 2.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.398295% CI: [0.18, 1.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.9395% CI: [0.3, 2.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.236495% CI: [0.61, 7.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.709595% CI: [0.39, 4.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.601195% CI: [0.26, 2.2]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1119 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 148 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 818 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 158 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1016 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 614 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 515 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 715 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 12 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 410 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 311 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 29 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 918 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 134 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1218 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 819 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1021 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 154 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 414 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 146 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 317 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1221 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 719 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 517 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 215 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1125 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 921 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 618 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1312 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 724 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 521 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 621 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1020 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1222 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 137 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 145 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 155 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1123 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 111 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 219 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 320 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 422 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 825 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 922 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1225 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 139 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 153 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 327 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 627 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 143 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1124 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1023 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 526 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 927 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 424 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 824 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 226 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 142 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 224 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 827 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 137 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 430 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 118 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 327 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1120 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1222 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1021 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1310 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 152 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 819 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 213 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 720 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 317 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 919 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 419 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 522 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 619 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 147 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 17 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 147 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 522 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 622 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 424 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 722 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 316 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 924 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 213 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 155 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 821 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 135 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1024 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 221 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1311 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 426 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 626 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 326 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 926 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 525 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 157 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 116 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.193895% CI: [0.57, 16.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.016295% CI: [1.43, 33.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000895% CI: [3.04, 67.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000595% CI: [3.39, 75.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.197195% CI: [0.56, 16.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.081195% CI: [0.83, 22.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.002195% CI: [2.43, 53.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.13795% CI: [0.79, 5.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.018195% CI: [1.22, 8.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.43, 17.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.26, 16.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.324195% CI: [0.61, 4.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.224995% CI: [0.68, 5.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.009695% CI: [1.36, 9.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.076895% CI: [0.91, 6.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0025195% CI: [1.14, 7.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.3, 15.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.7, 19.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.114495% CI: [0.83, 5.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.134195% CI: [0.8, 5.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001795% CI: [1.75, 11.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.148895% CI: [0.77, 5.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.004395% CI: [1.54, 10.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000595% CI: [2.1, 14.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.85, 43.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.026295% CI: [1.14, 7.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000995% CI: [1.95, 13.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.06, 13.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.367395% CI: [0.61, 3.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.120795% CI: [0.83, 4.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001195% CI: [1.9, 13.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.08, 27.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.059495% CI: [0.97, 5.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.0595% CI: [1, 6.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.012395% CI: [1.29, 8.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.224395% CI: [0.71, 4.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.097695% CI: [0.87, 5.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.25, 16.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.04, 27.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.123795% CI: [0.82, 5.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.022695% CI: [1.16, 7.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.006995% CI: [1.42, 8.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.166695% CI: [0.76, 4.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.031795% CI: [1.09, 6.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001195% CI: [1.94, 14.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.81, 25.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.114295% CI: [0.84, 5.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.02595% CI: [1.14, 7.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.016695% CI: [1.23, 7.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.603395% CI: [0.52, 3.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.11795% CI: [0.84, 5.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.0495% CI: [1.05, 6.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.88, 16.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.517795% CI: [0.54, 3.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.211795% CI: [0.72, 4.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.042695% CI: [1.03, 6.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.350895% CI: [0.62, 3.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.443195% CI: [0.58, 3.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.00595% CI: [1.55, 11.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.002395% CI: [1.84, 16.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.566395% CI: [0.52, 3.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.046195% CI: [1.02, 6.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.055295% CI: [0.98, 6.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.153695% CI: [0.78, 4.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.257595% CI: [0.68, 4.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.009695% CI: [1.38, 10.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.69, 26.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.104795% CI: [1.48, 10.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.48, 10.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.041495% CI: [1.04, 6.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.080995% CI: [0.9, 5.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.237795% CI: [0.69, 4.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.008795% CI: [1.44, 12.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.002295% CI: [1.9, 18.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.478895% CI: [0.55, 3.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.007495% CI: [1.45, 10.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.018795% CI: [1.22, 8.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.344395% CI: [0.62, 4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.286795% CI: [0.65, 4.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.004495% CI: [1.66, 15.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.003895% CI: [1.74, 17.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.142495% CI: [0.78, 5.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.019195% CI: [1.22, 9.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.024495% CI: [1.16, 8.56]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.146295% CI: [0.71, 9.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.740395% CI: [0.32, 4.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.214495% CI: [0.61, 9.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.432195% CI: [0.44, 6.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.177895% CI: [0.66, 9.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.801695% CI: [0.28, 5.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.148695% CI: [0.71, 9.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.288195% CI: [0.15, 1.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.121795% CI: [0.1, 1.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.102795% CI: [0.07, 1.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.042895% CI: [0.03, 0.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.594395% CI: [0.21, 2.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.92895% CI: [0.27, 3.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.91695% CI: [0.3, 2.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.226295% CI: [0.11, 1.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.268295% CI: [0.13, 1.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.234495% CI: [0.09, 1.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.083595% CI: [0.04, 1.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.632295% CI: [0.19, 2.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.484595% CI: [0.2, 2.17]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 618 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 516 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 413 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 311 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 157 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 12 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 921 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 135 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1220 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1121 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1018 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 819 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 718 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 29 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 149 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1224 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 111 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 218 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 322 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 420 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 520 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 621 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 723 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 926 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1127 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1317 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 159 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 225 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 629 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 831 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 429 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 732 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 148 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 158 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 530 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1028 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 114 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 929 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 327 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 139 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1023 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 328 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1124 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 525 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 425 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 147 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 627 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1311 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 227 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1224 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 154 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 927 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 121 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 529 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1227 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 122 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 929 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 828 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 225 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 138 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 430 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 328 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 628 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 143 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1126 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 425 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 525 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 623 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 925 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 821 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1023 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1225 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 158 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1315 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 215 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 321 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 928 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 111 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1228 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 728 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 428 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 137 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 157 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 630 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 220 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 324 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 528 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1029 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 147 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1130 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 325 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1128 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 826 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1410 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 526 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1226 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 725 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 425 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1025 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 158 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 117 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 222 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 926 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1312 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 70% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 626 participants
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.155695% CI: [0.76, 5.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.018195% CI: [1.39, 33.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.003995% CI: [2.1, 47.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.000195% CI: [4.51, 99.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.09, 112.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.176695% CI: [0.59, 16.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.011695% CI: [1.58, 37.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.001395% CI: [2.71, 59.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.035995% CI: [1.07, 7.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.2, 15.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.68, 18.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.53, 18.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.15495% CI: [0.76, 5.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.006595% CI: [1.46, 10.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.58, 15.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.005295% CI: [1.5, 10.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.006495% CI: [1.44, 9.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.26, 15.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.47, 16.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.01, 22.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.017195% CI: [1.22, 7.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.71, 11.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.003495% CI: [1.58, 9.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.039995% CI: [1.05, 6.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.23, 14.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.003195% CI: [1.6, 10.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.41, 28.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.003695% CI: [1.57, 10.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000995% CI: [1.89, 12.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.009195% CI: [1.35, 8.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.204395% CI: [0.73, 4.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.001295% CI: [1.84, 12.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.005895% CI: [1.47, 9.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.73, 23.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.022195% CI: [1.16, 7.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.003495% CI: [1.58, 10.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.012395% CI: [1.29, 8.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.329195% CI: [0.64, 3.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.011895% CI: [1.3, 8.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.005895% CI: [1.49, 10.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.001295% CI: [2.03, 17.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.104395% CI: [0.85, 5.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.001595% CI: [1.85, 13.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.065895% CI: [0.95, 5.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.125395% CI: [0.82, 4.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001395% CI: [1.88, 13.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.009695% CI: [1.37, 9.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.001295% CI: [2.04, 17.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.034495% CI: [1.08, 7.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.004595% CI: [1.55, 10.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.08195% CI: [0.91, 5.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.076195% CI: [0.92, 5.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.007895% CI: [1.41, 9.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.025395% CI: [1.15, 7.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.001795% CI: [1.99, 19.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.351295% CI: [0.62, 3.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.035295% CI: [1.07, 7.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.070495% CI: [0.93, 5.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.165195% CI: [0.76, 4.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.096495% CI: [0.87, 5.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.027695% CI: [1.13, 8.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.020295% CI: [1.21, 9.18]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.206395% CI: [0.72, 4.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.038395% CI: [1.06, 6.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.011895% CI: [1.32, 9.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.031495% CI: [1.1, 7.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.00195% CI: [2.17, 21.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.095695% CI: [0.87, 5.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.002795% CI: [1.72, 13.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.06695% CI: [0.94, 6.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.085395% CI: [0.89, 6.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.015995% CI: [1.26, 9.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.030395% CI: [1.12, 9.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.007195% CI: [1.54, 15.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.062195% CI: [0.95, 7.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.008195% CI: [1.45, 12.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.053395% CI: [0.99, 7.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.266695% CI: [0.66, 4.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.075495% CI: [0.91, 6.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.031395% CI: [1.11, 9.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.005695% CI: [1.67, 19.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.073695% CI: [0.91, 7.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.018495% CI: [1.24, 10]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.118795% CI: [0.82, 5.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.029995% CI: [1.14, 12.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.598995% CI: [0.4, 4.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.133795% CI: [0.74, 9.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.460595% CI: [0.45, 5.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.018895% CI: [1.28, 15.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.585495% CI: [0.39, 5.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.176895% CI: [0.68, 7.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.842695% CI: [0.29, 2.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.301795% CI: [0.17, 1.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.595895% CI: [0.21, 2.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.051595% CI: [0.05, 1.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.973495% CI: [0.31, 3.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.796995% CI: [0.25, 2.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.663795% CI: [0.25, 2.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.492195% CI: [0.45, 5.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.89195% CI: [0.33, 3.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.588195% CI: [0.16, 2.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.052395% CI: [0.01, 1.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.464695% CI: [0.46, 5.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.580695% CI: [0.4, 5.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 15p-value: 0.92295% CI: [0.28, 3.12]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of mild, moderate and severe VMS was the number of mild, moderate and severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Mild VMS was defined as sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant does not wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 69 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 56 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 34 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 22 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1213 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1114 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1013 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 913 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 813 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 76 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 46 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 410 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 25 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 39 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 57 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 69 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 78 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 811 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 911 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1012 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1113 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1215 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 130 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 39 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 715 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 817 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 412 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1113 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 142 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1215 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 616 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1014 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 915 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 511 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 26 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1020 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 215 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1119 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 621 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 720 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 518 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 822 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 419 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 921 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 319 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1217 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 823 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1125 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 216 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 316 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1222 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 623 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 417 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 925 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 724 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 520 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1026 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 59 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 69 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 710 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 10 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 810 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 910 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1011 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 22 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1112 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1210 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 47 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 36 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1015 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 914 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 140 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1216 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 814 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 13 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 39 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 712 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 412 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 510 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 69 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 25 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1118 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1120 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 720 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1020 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1220 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 822 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 418 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 212 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 12 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 920 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 518 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 317 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Mild, Moderate, and Severe VMS From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 621 participants
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.089895% CI: [0.84, 10.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.002795% CI: [1.9, 21.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.124295% CI: [0.78, 7.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.081595% CI: [0.88, 8.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.028195% CI: [1.12, 7.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.958795% CI: [0.06, 17.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.989595% CI: [0.06, 16.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.073695% CI: [0.83, 63.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.802895% CI: [0.33, 2.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.076795% CI: [0.81, 61.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.28895% CI: [0.35, 35.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.589495% CI: [0.17, 22.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.309395% CI: [0.44, 13.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.160695% CI: [0.62, 17.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.001995% CI: [2.5, 56.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000895% CI: [3.02, 68.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.880395% CI: [0.11, 6.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.209695% CI: [0.54, 16.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.01195% CI: [1.6, 37.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.084595% CI: [0.86, 11.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.109495% CI: [0.79, 10.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.68, 30.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.001695% CI: [2.1, 24.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.437595% CI: [0.44, 6.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000995% CI: [2.11, 18.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.002795% CI: [1.78, 15.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.626795% CI: [0.41, 4.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.070995% CI: [0.92, 8.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.004995% CI: [1.59, 13.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.510795% CI: [0.45, 4.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.129795% CI: [0.78, 7.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000595% CI: [2.34, 21.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.82, 25.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.29995% CI: [0.58, 5.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.135595% CI: [0.76, 7.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.002895% CI: [1.76, 15.14]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.742295% CI: [0.41, 3.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.07595% CI: [0.91, 6.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.684695% CI: [0.48, 3.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.16, 16.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.69, 21.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.840595% CI: [0.38, 3.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.625795% CI: [0.45, 3.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.48, 10.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.355695% CI: [0.54, 5.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.01995% CI: [1.24, 10.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.2, 30.68]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.67, 47.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.193695% CI: [0.68, 6.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.033595% CI: [1.1, 10.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000995% CI: [2.1, 18.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.83395% CI: [0.34, 2.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.34195% CI: [0.62, 3.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.007595% CI: [1.42, 9.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.78, 13.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.621695% CI: [0.29, 2.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.461595% CI: [0.55, 3.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.014995% CI: [1.26, 8.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.000995% CI: [2.03, 15.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.643495% CI: [0.29, 2.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.478495% CI: [0.54, 3.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.095595% CI: [0.87, 5.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.908295% CI: [0.4, 2.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.647895% CI: [0.48, 3.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.010495% CI: [1.35, 9.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.34, 18.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.85695% CI: [0.34, 2.45]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.331995% CI: [0.62, 4.17]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.074795% CI: [0.92, 5.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.898695% CI: [0.41, 2.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.971295% CI: [0.38, 2.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.09195% CI: [1.22, 8.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.001195% CI: [2.01, 16.06]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.846695% CI: [0.35, 2.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.140995% CI: [0.79, 5.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.121295% CI: [0.82, 5.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.426995% CI: [0.56, 3.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.545495% CI: [0.52, 3.49]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.059595% CI: [0.96, 7.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.004195% CI: [1.62, 12.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.612195% CI: [0.28, 2.13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.232995% CI: [0.68, 4.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.089195% CI: [0.88, 5.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.685795% CI: [0.03, 9.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.729195% CI: [0.12, 19.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.895195% CI: [0.05, 14.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.686595% CI: [0.14, 19.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.913295% CI: [0.07, 20.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.798295% CI: [0.12, 16.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.902995% CI: [0.09, 15.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.797195% CI: [0.04, 11.94]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study Week

The frequency of moderate to severe VMS was the number of moderate to severe VMS per 24 hours. A daily frequency and severity per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. Moderate VMS was defined as sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. Severe VMS was defined as sensation of intense heat with sweating, caused disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., remove layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1214 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 23 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 916 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 35 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 814 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 131 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 79 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 58 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 48 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1115 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1014 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 610 participants
Placebo BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 11 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 14 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 817 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 712 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1218 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 28 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 144 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1018 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1118 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 312 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 613 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 152 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 412 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 917 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 512 participants
Fezolinetant 15 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 135 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 621 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1120 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1219 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 822 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 418 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 722 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 922 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 518 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 153 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1019 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 315 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 213 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 15 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 143 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1020 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1218 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 139 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 153 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 218 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 822 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 323 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 423 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 520 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 622 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 721 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 144 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 924 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1120 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 110 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 150 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 625 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 827 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 524 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 422 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1224 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 927 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 323 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 221 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1028 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 112 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1126 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 726 participants
Fezolinetant 90 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 612 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 27 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 145 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 513 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 712 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 812 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 12 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1116 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 412 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1216 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1016 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 138 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 912 participants
Fezolinetant 30 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 39 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 154 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 614 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 920 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 14 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 27 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 314 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 414 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 513 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 717 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 819 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1018 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1121 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1219 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 133 participants
Fezolinetant 60 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 143 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1222 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1121 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 921 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 822 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 721 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 519 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 621 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 141 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 418 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 318 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 214 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 16 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 151 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 1022 participants
Fezolinetant 120 mg QDNumber of Participants With Mean Percent Reduction of 90% in The Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline to Each Study WeekWeek 132 participants
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.193395% CI: [0.47, 42.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.12495% CI: [0.62, 50.44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.01495% CI: [1.71, 117.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.007595% CI: [2.15, 142.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.585395% CI: [0.17, 22.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.159695% CI: [0.53, 47.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.090895% CI: [0.74, 56.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.131895% CI: [0.72, 12.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.009395% CI: [1.56, 23.04]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.69, 38.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.11, 59.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.205495% CI: [0.6, 10.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.159295% CI: [0.67, 11.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.66, 24.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.039295% CI: [1.06, 10.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.009695% CI: [1.44, 13.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.28, 31.16]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.75, 36.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.221795% CI: [0.64, 7.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.013195% CI: [1.36, 13.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.003195% CI: [1.76, 16.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.148595% CI: [0.76, 6.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.012895% CI: [1.31, 9.56]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.37, 17.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000395% CI: [2.32, 17.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.235495% CI: [0.67, 5.26]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.089495% CI: [0.87, 6.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.020195% CI: [1.2, 8.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.161495% CI: [0.74, 5.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.012395% CI: [1.32, 9.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.17, 17.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.4, 28.36]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.160995% CI: [0.75, 5.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.09395% CI: [0.86, 6.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.006395% CI: [1.48, 10.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.262195% CI: [0.65, 4.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.009295% CI: [1.37, 9.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.000795% CI: [2.09, 15.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.08, 25.43]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.425995% CI: [0.55, 4.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.133495% CI: [0.79, 5.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.31, 8.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.244395% CI: [0.66, 5.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.002295% CI: [1.73, 12.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.35, 18.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.05, 36.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.310195% CI: [0.61, 4.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.011695% CI: [1.34, 10]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.004595% CI: [1.56, 11.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.350595% CI: [0.62, 3.88]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.073995% CI: [0.92, 5.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.016395% CI: [1.24, 8.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.000195% CI: [2.81, 25.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.835895% CI: [0.35, 2.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.100695% CI: [0.86, 5.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.048495% CI: [1.01, 6.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.649295% CI: [0.5, 3.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.22395% CI: [0.71, 4.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.012695% CI: [1.3, 9.02]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.001495% CI: [1.94, 15.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.471395% CI: [0.27, 1.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.139795% CI: [0.79, 5.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.227295% CI: [0.71, 4.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.202495% CI: [0.72, 4.64]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.171695% CI: [0.76, 4.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.019995% CI: [1.2, 8.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.000295% CI: [2.8, 25.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.424395% CI: [0.57, 3.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.150795% CI: [0.78, 5.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 10p-value: 0.044995% CI: [1.02, 6.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.275995% CI: [0.66, 4.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.1795% CI: [0.76, 4.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.015395% CI: [1.27, 9.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.000995% CI: [2.08, 17.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.622895% CI: [0.5, 3.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.04695% CI: [1.02, 6.76]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 11p-value: 0.121595% CI: [0.82, 5.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.24795% CI: [0.68, 4.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.207295% CI: [0.72, 4.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.062195% CI: [0.95, 6.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.001695% CI: [1.93, 16.69]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.437295% CI: [0.56, 3.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.1195% CI: [0.84, 5.66]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.053395% CI: [0.99, 6.59]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.176995% CI: [0.5, 44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.494295% CI: [0.22, 23.53]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.021495% CI: [1.46, 112.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.601395% CI: [0.16, 22.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.053795% CI: [0.97, 76.58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.266295% CI: [0.36, 39.91]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 13p-value: 0.743195% CI: [0.13, 17.84]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.282995% CI: [0.35, 35.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.531195% CI: [0.2, 22.29]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.185795% CI: [0.47, 46.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.987995% CI: [0.06, 17.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.185395% CI: [0.48, 43.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.21795% CI: [0.42, 46.93]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 14p-value: 0.835495% CI: [0.04, 12.62]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026