Skip to content

Expanded Quantitative Urinary Culture (EQUC) vs Standard Culture (SUC) Techniques in the Clinical Care

The Use of Expanded Quantitative Urinary Culture (EQUC) Versus Standard Culture (SUC) Techniques in the Clinical Care of Women With Symptoms of Urinary Tract Infections.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03190421
Enrollment
225
Registered
2017-06-16
Start date
2017-06-15
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2020-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections

Brief summary

This purpose of this study is to see if expanded urine culture techniques used in the laboratory improve the clinical care of women over standard urine culture techniques.

Detailed description

The investigators request permission to recruit 225 women who respond yes to the question do you feel you have a urinary tract infection. All participants will provide baseline urine specimens obtained by transurethral catheter (to avoid vulvo-vaginal contamination) and will complete a UTISA questionnaire to assess their current urinary tract symptoms. Participants will be randomized to the SUC treatment algorithm or the EQUC treatment algorithm. Treating physicians will receive either the SUC results or the EQUC results from the clinical laboratory and the results will be part of their clinical record. Treating physicians will follow the Loyola FPMRS treatment algorithm. Women in the study will also give consent for us to contact them using email, text messaging or phone call within 7-10 days after treatment plan has been implemented. The treatment plan options will include no treatment if the culture results show no pathogenic bacteria. All participants will be queried 7-10 days after their treatment plan (by email or text) do you feel you continue to have a urinary tract infection. Women who respond yes' will be asked to return for a second urine specimen which is our standard protocol. The second urine specimen will be analyzed using EQUC culture techniques only. Again, a treatment plan will be developed by the attending physician and the patient participant will be queried 7-10 days after the plan is implemented.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTStandard Urine Culture (SUC)

involves inoculation of 0.001 mL of urine onto 5% sheep blood agar plate (BAP) and MacConkey agar plate with the plates being incubated aerobically at 35°C for 24 h. Thus, the level of detection for standard culture is 103 CFU/mL, represented by 1 colony of growth on either plate. Standard culture is designed specifically to grow Gram-negative rods, especially UPEC.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTExpanded Urinary Culture

involves the inoculation of 100X (0.1mL) more urine onto diverse types of media (BAP, chocolate agar, colistin and nalidixic acid (CNA) agar, CDC anaerobe 5% BAP) with incubation in more environments and temperatures (5% CO2 at 35°C for 48 h, aerobic conditions at 35°C and 30°C for 48 h, Campy gas mixture (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N) or anaerobic conditions at 35°C for 48 h). The level of detection for EQUC is 10 CFU/mL, represented by 1 colony of growth on any of the plates. EQUC is designed to isolate a broad array of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including anaerobes and fastidious bacteria that grow slowly.

Sponsors

Loyola University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Expanded Quantitative Urinary Culture (EQUC) versus Standard Culture (SUC) Techniques

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A yes answer to the screening question do you feel you have a UTI? * Non-pregnant women ages 18 years or older * Agreement to respond to a text or email question 7-10 days after treatment plan for their UTI (note: the treatment plan may include no treatment).

Exclusion criteria

* Women currently on antibiotics * Patients who cannot communicate or read in English * Patients under the age of 18 * Pregnant patients * Women with an indwelling catheter and intermittent self-catheterization * Men * Urine obtained via the clean catch method (i.e. voided urine) * Women who refuse to be catheterized * Women who cannot or will not agree to respond to an email or text message 7-10 days after treatment plan is initiated.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare UTI symptom resolution rates in women with symptoms of UTI who are treated based on EQUC versus SUC results.4 weeksUsing the FPMRS treatment algorithms (see appendix I & II Standard Urine Culture Treatment and Expanded Urine Culture Treatment Algorithms), attending physicians will treat participants based on their randomization to EQUC versus SUC. Following a 3-5 day standard course of treatment (which may include no antibiotics if the culture is negative), participants will be queried 7-10 days do you continue to have UTI symptoms. Women who report no will be categorized as successful treatment, women who respond yes will be categorized as treatment failures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Revise the EQUC treatment algorithm.6 monthsThe EQUC treatment algorithm was based on known uropathogens that we had previously identified as most likely to be symptomatic. During the course of this work we may identify other pathogens that are present and causing symptoms. These organisms will be identified and added to the treatment algorithm. This interim analysis is planned and was part of the statistical calculations to determine sample size.
Identify the symptom profile associated with specific organisms.1 yearUsing the UTISA questionnaire, we will perform a symptoms association study with specific bacteria.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026