Skip to content

A Study to Examine the Safety, Tolerability and Effects on Abnormal Bone Formation of REGN2477 in Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Effects on Heterotopic Bone Formation of REGN2477 in Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03188666
Acronym
LUMINA-1
Enrollment
44
Registered
2017-06-15
Start date
2018-02-26
Completion date
2021-09-16
Last updated
2022-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Brief summary

This is a three period study design consisting of a 6-month, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled treatment (period 1) followed by a 6-month, open-label treatment (period 2) and a follow-up treatment period (period 3). Primary safety objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of REGN2477 in male and female patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). Primary efficacy objective of the study is to assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients with FOP, as determined by 18-NaF uptake in HO lesions by positron emission tomography (PET) and in total volume of HO lesions by computed tomography (CT). Key Secondary objectives are: * To compare the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on pain due to FOP, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) for pain based on daily pain numeric rating scale (NRS) scores * To assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in HO, as determined by the number of new HO lesions identified by 18F-NaF PET or by CT * To assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in 18F-NaF standardized uptake value maximum (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET * To assess the effect of REGN2477, between week 28 and week 56, on the number, activity, and volume of HO lesions identified by 18F-NaF PET or by CT in patients who switch from placebo to REGN2477 at week 28 versus the same patients between baseline and week 28 * To assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in biochemical markers of bone formation * To characterize the concentrations of total activin A at baseline and over time following the first dose of study drug * To characterize the concentration-time profile (pharmacokinetics \[PK\]) of REGN2477 in patients with FOP * To assess the immunogenicity of REGN2477

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: liquid product for injection/infusion; Route of administration: Intravenous (IV); Administered during treatment periods 1 and 2.

DRUGMatching placebo

Pharmaceutical form: Liquid product for injection/infusion; Route of administration: Intravenous (IV); Administered during treatment period 1 only.

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Men and women 18 to 60 years of age at screening. * Clinical diagnosis of FOP (based on findings of congenital malformation of the great toes, episodic soft tissue swelling, and/or progressive heterotopic ossification (HO)). * Confirmation of FOP diagnosis with documentation of any ACVR1 mutation. * FOP disease activity within 1 year of screening visit. FOP disease activity is defined as pain, swelling, stiffness, and other signs and symptoms associated with FOP flare-ups; or worsening of joint function, or radiographic progression of heterotopic ossifications (increase in site or number of HO lesions) with/without being associated with flare-up episodes. * Willing and able to undergo PET and CT imaging procedures and other procedures as defined in this study. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Significant concomitant illness or history of significant illness such as, but not limited to cardiac, renal, rheumatologic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, metabolic or lymphatic disease, that in the opinion of the study investigator might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient by their participation in the study. * Previous history or diagnosis of cancer. * Use of bisphosphonate within 1 year of screening. * Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical study, or a non-interventional study with radiographic measures or invasive procedures (e.g. collection of blood or tissue samples). Participation in the FOP Connection Registry or other studies in which participants complete study questionnaires are allowed. * Treatment with another investigational drug, denosumab, imatinib or isotretinoin in the last 30 days or within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women. * Male and women of childbearing potential participants who are unwilling to practice highly effective contraception. Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsUp to Week 28Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs are reported.
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityUp to Week 28Severity of TEAEs were graded as follows: Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the participant's normal functioning level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief of symptoms but may be given because of personality of the participants. Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. It was uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and was a definite hazard to the participant's health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or participants hospitalized. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity is reported.
Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO)Baseline and Week 2818\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (standardized area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity by 18\^F-NaF PET up to Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO)Week 28CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT during Period 1 at Week 28 is reported.
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. HO detectable by CT that developed after baseline are referred to as new HO lesions. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan is reported.
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 2818\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in Active HO Classic ACVR1 Mutation (AHOC) analysis set up to Week 28 is reported.
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions was assessed by CT at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO)Week 28CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions detectable by CT at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan is reported.
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 5618\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to positron-emission tomography (PET). Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET). Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 5618\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET versus from Baseline to Week 28
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by CT Scan versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Baseline, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline.
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative baseline is reported.
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline were reported.
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 5618\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NAF PET at week 56 relative to baseline is reported.
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 5618\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to baseline.
Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan.
Period 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56TLA is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. Activity of individual HO lesions was calculated as the product of mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) and the PET volume of the active HO lesion. TLA was derived for each participant at each time point as the sum of HO lesion activity of individual target and new active HO lesions.
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported.
Period 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 56Total Lesion Activity (TLA) is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. TLA in New (Relative to Baseline) Lesions at Week 56 is reported.
Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to baseline is reported.
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO)Week 28The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome (PRO) used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 56CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT to Week 56 were reported.
Period 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28 to Week 56Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 is reported.
Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Baseline, Week 56Percent change from baseline in 18\^F-NaF PET SUVmax to week 56
Period 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRSWeek 28 up to Week 56The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome.
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diaryWeek 28 to Week 56Percentage of participants with flare-ups starting between week 28 and week 56 as assessed by participant E-diary is reported.
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-upsWeek 28 to Week 56Percentage of participants with investigator-assessed flare-ups were reported.
Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in SerumWeek 28, Week 56, Week 76Concentration of total activin A in serum over time is reported.
Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in SerumWeek 28, Week 56, Week 76Concentrations of REGN2477 capable of target binding were measured (functional drug).
Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Up to Week 76Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses \< 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, \>= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the REGN2477 ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 56Percent change from baseline in TLA as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET to week 56 were reported.
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28The pain NRS is a PRO used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-Weighted average (standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC)Week 8Standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) was a measurement of the maximum radiopharmaceutical uptake within the volume of interest. Relative accuracy of a particular radiotracer in a particular tissue is determined by expressing the absolute accuracy (obtained in the primary outcome measure) in terms of percent difference between SUVmax values obtained from PET/CT. Percent Change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO)Week 8Percent change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of individual active HO site(s) as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 8 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO)Week 28Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHO analysis set is reported.
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was detectable by CT using AHOC analysis set is reported.

Countries

Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 48 participants were screened, out of which, 44 participants were randomized and treated.

Pre-assignment details

This was a three period study design which consisted of a 6-month (28 weeks), randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (Period 1) followed by a 6-month (28 weeks), open-label treatment period (Period 2) and a 20 week follow-up treatment period (Period 3). Participants could continue receiving REGN2477 every 4 weeks beyond week 76 provided that no safety signals were identified.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to REGN2477 intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1.
24
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W
Participants received a single dose of REGN2477 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1.
20
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)Adverse Event0100
Period 2 (28 Weeks Open-label)Death0001
Period 3 (20 Weeks Follow-up)Death0012
Period 3 (20 Weeks Follow-up)Withdrawal by Subject0020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous27.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.67
27.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
27.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants44 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Genetic Mutation
Active HO classic ACVR1 (R206H)
20 Participants42 Participants22 Participants
Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Genetic Mutation
Other
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants39 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants25 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Total Lesion Activity by 18F-NaF PET (AHOC Analysis Set)418.18 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 372.801
442.32 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 357.581
464.27 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 350.479
Total Lesion Activity by fluorine-18 sodium fluoride (18 F-NaF) PET (AHO Analysis Set)418.18 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 372.801
448.30 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 356.51
473.40 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 348.373
Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) (AHO Analysis Set)251.43 cubic centimeter (cm^3)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 327.881
242.89 cubic centimeter (cm^3)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 286.167
235.78 cubic centimeter (cm^3)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 253.329
Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT (AHOC Analysis Set)251.43 cubic centimeter (cm^3)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 327.881
245.29 cubic centimeter (cm^3)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 292.408
239.72 cubic centimeter (cm^3)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 263.813

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 202 / 243 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 2420 / 2024 / 2418 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 244 / 206 / 247 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

Severity of TEAEs were graded as follows: Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the participant's normal functioning level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief of symptoms but may be given because of personality of the participants. Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. It was uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and was a definite hazard to the participant's health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or participants hospitalized. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity is reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 28

Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityParticipants with at least one Mild TEAE9 Participants
PlaceboPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityParticipants with at least one Moderate TEAE12 Participants
PlaceboPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityParticipants with at least one Severe TEAE3 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityParticipants with at least one Mild TEAE7 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityParticipants with at least one Moderate TEAE10 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityParticipants with at least one Severe TEAE3 Participants
Primary

Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs are reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 28

Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPeriod 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with at least one TEAE24 Participants
PlaceboPeriod 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with at least one serious TEAE2 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with at least one TEAE20 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with at least one serious TEAE4 Participants
Primary

Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT during Period 1 at Week 28 is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO)32.0 Percent ChangeStandard Error 18.66
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO)7.1 Percent ChangeStandard Error 20.43
p-value: 0.372695% CI: [-80.8, 30.9]Mixed Model with Repeated Measure (MMRM)
Primary

Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions was assessed by CT at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)34.9 Percent ChangeStandard Error 19.9
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)7.0 Percent ChangeStandard Error 20.87
p-value: 0.340795% CI: [-86.1, 30.5]Mixed Model with Repeated Measure (MMRM)
Primary

Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO)

18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (standardized area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity by 18\^F-NaF PET up to Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 28

Population: Baseline-active heterotopic ossification analysis set (AHO) included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO)16.6 Percent ChangeStandard Error 9.11
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO)-8.1 Percent ChangeStandard Error 9.93
p-value: 0.074195% CI: [-51.8, 2.5]ANCOVA
Primary

Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)

18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in Active HO Classic ACVR1 Mutation (AHOC) analysis set up to Week 28 is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)17.6 Percent ChangeStandard Error 9.73
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)-8.0 Percent ChangeStandard Error 10.14
p-value: 0.075695% CI: [-53.9, 2.8]ANCOVA
Primary

Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. HO detectable by CT that developed after baseline are referred to as new HO lesions. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)0 New HO Lesions
Comparison: Compared number of new lesions per participant by CT at week 28 (relative to baseline) and week 56 (relative to week 28).p-value: 0.0039Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO)

Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHO analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO)-1.0 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 2.59
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO)-2.3 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 2.24
Secondary

Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)

Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)-1.0 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 2.66
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)-2.3 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 2.24
Secondary

Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions detectable by CT at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO)1.2 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 1.93
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO)-0.3 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 1.34
Secondary

Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was detectable by CT using AHOC analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)1.2 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 2
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)-0.3 HO LesionsStandard Deviation 1.34
Secondary

Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO)

Percent change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of individual active HO site(s) as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 8 in AHO analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO)-7.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 28.8
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO)-21.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 30.25
Secondary

Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC)

Standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) was a measurement of the maximum radiopharmaceutical uptake within the volume of interest. Relative accuracy of a particular radiotracer in a particular tissue is determined by expressing the absolute accuracy (obtained in the primary outcome measure) in terms of percent difference between SUVmax values obtained from PET/CT. Percent Change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHOC analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC)-6.7 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 28.79
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC)-21.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 30.25
Secondary

Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO)

The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome (PRO) used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO)-0.17 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.205
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO)-0.51 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.231
p-value: 0.265695% CI: [-0.96, 0.27]ANCOVA
Secondary

Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC)

The pain NRS is a PRO used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-Weighted average (standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC)-0.12 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.221
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC)-0.48 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.237
p-value: 0.265195% CI: [-1.01, 0.29]ANCOVA
Secondary

Period 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRS

The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome.

Time frame: Week 28 up to Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRS1.60 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.969
Secondary

Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NAF PET at week 56 relative to baseline is reported.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)1 New HO Lesions
Secondary

Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)1 New HO lesions
Comparison: Compared number of new lesions per participant by PET at week 28 (relative to baseline) and week 56 (relative to week 28).p-value: 0.0039Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 only (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)2 New HO Lesions
Secondary

Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative baseline is reported.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who receive a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan is collected and the period between any consecutive doses is less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)1 New HO Lesions
Secondary

Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to positron-emission tomography (PET). Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)3 New HO lesions
Secondary

Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diary

Percentage of participants with flare-ups starting between week 28 and week 56 as assessed by participant E-diary is reported.

Time frame: Week 28 to Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diary13.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-ups

Percentage of participants with investigator-assessed flare-ups were reported.

Time frame: Week 28 to Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-ups13.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to baseline.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)5.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)4.5 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Compared percent of participants with new lesions by PET at week 28 (relative to baseline) and week 56 (relative to week 28).p-value: 0.0047McNemar
Secondary

Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline were reported.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)11.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Compared percent of participants with new lesions by CT at week 28 (relative to baseline) and week 56 (relative to week 28).p-value: 0.0027McNemar
Secondary

Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET). Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)9.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

Percent change from baseline in 18\^F-NaF PET SUVmax to week 56

Time frame: Baseline, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-41.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 29.16
Secondary

Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT to Week 56 were reported.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)2.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 10.18
Secondary

Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

Percent change from baseline in TLA as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET to week 56 were reported.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-16.4 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 53.1
Secondary

Period 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 is reported.

Time frame: Week 28 to Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-30.3 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 15.03
Secondary

Period 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

Total Lesion Activity (TLA) is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. TLA in New (Relative to Baseline) Lesions at Week 56 is reported.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)0.7 gram (g)Standard Deviation 2.13
Secondary

Period 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

TLA is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. Activity of individual HO lesions was calculated as the product of mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) and the PET volume of the active HO lesion. TLA was derived for each participant at each time point as the sum of HO lesion activity of individual target and new active HO lesions.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)13.2 gram (g)Standard Deviation 61.89
Comparison: Compared total lesion activity per participant in new lesions by PET at week 28 (relative to baseline) and week 56 (relative to week 28).p-value: 0.0273Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)0.0 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.21
Comparison: Compared total new lesion volume per participant by CT at week 28 (relative to baseline) and week 56 (relative to week 28).p-value: 0.0039Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to baseline is reported.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)0.0 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Deviation 0.02
Secondary

Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET versus from Baseline to Week 28

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-1.2 Active lesionsStandard Deviation 4.31
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)1.3 Active lesionsStandard Deviation 3.26
p-value: 0.3663Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by CT Scan versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan is collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-1.3 Active lesionsStandard Deviation 2.4
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)0.3 Active lesionsStandard Deviation 1.24
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-31.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 132.47
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-11.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 24.07
p-value: 0.1528Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)

Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56

Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)-66.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 181.06
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriod 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)14.0 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 41.17
p-value: 0.2123Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum

Concentration of total activin A in serum over time is reported.

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56, Week 76

Population: The PK analysis set included all treated participants who received any study drug and who had at least 1 non-missing drug concentration following the first dose of study drug. (Number Analyzed equals number of participants evaluable at that time point)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in SerumWeek 280.0000813 milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.000164
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in SerumWeek 560.0563 milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.0172
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in SerumWeek 760.0487 milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.0192
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in SerumWeek 280.0537 milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.0116
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in SerumWeek 560.0503 milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.0113
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in SerumWeek 760.0497 milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.0176
Secondary

Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum

Concentrations of REGN2477 capable of target binding were measured (functional drug).

Time frame: Week 28, Week 56, Week 76

Population: The PK analysis set included all treated participants who received any study drug and who had at least 1 non-missing drug concentration following the first dose of study drug. (Number Analyzed equals number of participants evaluable at that time point)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in SerumWeek 56100 mg/LStandard Deviation 27.3
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in SerumWeek 76113 mg/LStandard Deviation 27
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in SerumWeek 280 mg/LStandard Deviation 0
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in SerumWeek 28130 mg/LStandard Deviation 46.6
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in SerumWeek 56122 mg/LStandard Deviation 54.8
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in SerumWeek 76113 mg/LStandard Deviation 23
Secondary

Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477

Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses \< 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, \>= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the REGN2477 ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.

Time frame: Up to Week 76

Population: The Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) analysis set included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result following the first study dose. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Negative24 Participants
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Pre-existing Immunoreactivity0 Participants
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
PlaceboPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Treatment-Emergent Response0 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Treatment-Emergent Response1 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Negative18 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WPeriods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477Pre-existing Immunoreactivity0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026