Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a three period study design consisting of a 6-month, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled treatment (period 1) followed by a 6-month, open-label treatment (period 2) and a follow-up treatment period (period 3). Primary safety objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of REGN2477 in male and female patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). Primary efficacy objective of the study is to assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients with FOP, as determined by 18-NaF uptake in HO lesions by positron emission tomography (PET) and in total volume of HO lesions by computed tomography (CT). Key Secondary objectives are: * To compare the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on pain due to FOP, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) for pain based on daily pain numeric rating scale (NRS) scores * To assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in HO, as determined by the number of new HO lesions identified by 18F-NaF PET or by CT * To assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in 18F-NaF standardized uptake value maximum (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET * To assess the effect of REGN2477, between week 28 and week 56, on the number, activity, and volume of HO lesions identified by 18F-NaF PET or by CT in patients who switch from placebo to REGN2477 at week 28 versus the same patients between baseline and week 28 * To assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in biochemical markers of bone formation * To characterize the concentrations of total activin A at baseline and over time following the first dose of study drug * To characterize the concentration-time profile (pharmacokinetics \[PK\]) of REGN2477 in patients with FOP * To assess the immunogenicity of REGN2477
Interventions
Pharmaceutical form: liquid product for injection/infusion; Route of administration: Intravenous (IV); Administered during treatment periods 1 and 2.
Pharmaceutical form: Liquid product for injection/infusion; Route of administration: Intravenous (IV); Administered during treatment period 1 only.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Men and women 18 to 60 years of age at screening. * Clinical diagnosis of FOP (based on findings of congenital malformation of the great toes, episodic soft tissue swelling, and/or progressive heterotopic ossification (HO)). * Confirmation of FOP diagnosis with documentation of any ACVR1 mutation. * FOP disease activity within 1 year of screening visit. FOP disease activity is defined as pain, swelling, stiffness, and other signs and symptoms associated with FOP flare-ups; or worsening of joint function, or radiographic progression of heterotopic ossifications (increase in site or number of HO lesions) with/without being associated with flare-up episodes. * Willing and able to undergo PET and CT imaging procedures and other procedures as defined in this study. Key
Exclusion criteria
* Significant concomitant illness or history of significant illness such as, but not limited to cardiac, renal, rheumatologic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, metabolic or lymphatic disease, that in the opinion of the study investigator might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient by their participation in the study. * Previous history or diagnosis of cancer. * Use of bisphosphonate within 1 year of screening. * Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical study, or a non-interventional study with radiographic measures or invasive procedures (e.g. collection of blood or tissue samples). Participation in the FOP Connection Registry or other studies in which participants complete study questionnaires are allowed. * Treatment with another investigational drug, denosumab, imatinib or isotretinoin in the last 30 days or within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women. * Male and women of childbearing potential participants who are unwilling to practice highly effective contraception. Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Up to Week 28 | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs are reported. |
| Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Up to Week 28 | Severity of TEAEs were graded as follows: Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the participant's normal functioning level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief of symptoms but may be given because of personality of the participants. Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. It was uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and was a definite hazard to the participant's health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or participants hospitalized. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity is reported. |
| Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO) | Baseline and Week 28 | 18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (standardized area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity by 18\^F-NaF PET up to Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO) | Week 28 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT during Period 1 at Week 28 is reported. |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. HO detectable by CT that developed after baseline are referred to as new HO lesions. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan is reported. |
| Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | Week 28 | 18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in Active HO Classic ACVR1 Mutation (AHOC) analysis set up to Week 28 is reported. |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | Week 28 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions was assessed by CT at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO) | Week 28 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions detectable by CT at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan is reported. |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | 18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to positron-emission tomography (PET). Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET). Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | 18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET versus from Baseline to Week 28 |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by CT Scan versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Baseline, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline. |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative baseline is reported. |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline were reported. |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | 18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NAF PET at week 56 relative to baseline is reported. |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | 18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to baseline. |
| Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan. |
| Period 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | TLA is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. Activity of individual HO lesions was calculated as the product of mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) and the PET volume of the active HO lesion. TLA was derived for each participant at each time point as the sum of HO lesion activity of individual target and new active HO lesions. |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28, Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported. |
| Period 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | Total Lesion Activity (TLA) is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. TLA in New (Relative to Baseline) Lesions at Week 56 is reported. |
| Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to baseline is reported. |
| Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO) | Week 28 | The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome (PRO) used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT to Week 56 were reported. |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 28 to Week 56 | Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 is reported. |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Baseline, Week 56 | Percent change from baseline in 18\^F-NaF PET SUVmax to week 56 |
| Period 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRS | Week 28 up to Week 56 | The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diary | Week 28 to Week 56 | Percentage of participants with flare-ups starting between week 28 and week 56 as assessed by participant E-diary is reported. |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-ups | Week 28 to Week 56 | Percentage of participants with investigator-assessed flare-ups were reported. |
| Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Week 28, Week 56, Week 76 | Concentration of total activin A in serum over time is reported. |
| Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Week 28, Week 56, Week 76 | Concentrations of REGN2477 capable of target binding were measured (functional drug). |
| Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Up to Week 76 | Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses \< 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, \>= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the REGN2477 ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing. |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Week 56 | Percent change from baseline in TLA as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET to week 56 were reported. |
| Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC) | Week 28 | The pain NRS is a PRO used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-Weighted average (standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC) | Week 8 | Standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) was a measurement of the maximum radiopharmaceutical uptake within the volume of interest. Relative accuracy of a particular radiotracer in a particular tissue is determined by expressing the absolute accuracy (obtained in the primary outcome measure) in terms of percent difference between SUVmax values obtained from PET/CT. Percent Change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHOC analysis set is reported. |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO) | Week 8 | Percent change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of individual active HO site(s) as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 8 in AHO analysis set is reported. |
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | Week 28 | Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. |
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO) | Week 28 | Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHO analysis set is reported. |
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | Week 28 | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was detectable by CT using AHOC analysis set is reported. |
Countries
Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 48 participants were screened, out of which, 44 participants were randomized and treated.
Pre-assignment details
This was a three period study design which consisted of a 6-month (28 weeks), randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (Period 1) followed by a 6-month (28 weeks), open-label treatment period (Period 2) and a 20 week follow-up treatment period (Period 3). Participants could continue receiving REGN2477 every 4 weeks beyond week 76 provided that no safety signals were identified.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to REGN2477 intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1. | 24 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W Participants received a single dose of REGN2477 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1. | 20 |
| Total | 44 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind) | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 2 (28 Weeks Open-label) | Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Period 3 (20 Weeks Follow-up) | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Period 3 (20 Weeks Follow-up) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 27.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.67 | 27.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 | 27.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 20 Participants | 44 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Genetic Mutation Active HO classic ACVR1 (R206H) | 20 Participants | 42 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Genetic Mutation Other | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 17 Participants | 39 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants | 25 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 19 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Total Lesion Activity by 18F-NaF PET (AHOC Analysis Set) | 418.18 gram (g) STANDARD_DEVIATION 372.801 | 442.32 gram (g) STANDARD_DEVIATION 357.581 | 464.27 gram (g) STANDARD_DEVIATION 350.479 |
| Total Lesion Activity by fluorine-18 sodium fluoride (18 F-NaF) PET (AHO Analysis Set) | 418.18 gram (g) STANDARD_DEVIATION 372.801 | 448.30 gram (g) STANDARD_DEVIATION 356.51 | 473.40 gram (g) STANDARD_DEVIATION 348.373 |
| Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) (AHO Analysis Set) | 251.43 cubic centimeter (cm^3) STANDARD_DEVIATION 327.881 | 242.89 cubic centimeter (cm^3) STANDARD_DEVIATION 286.167 | 235.78 cubic centimeter (cm^3) STANDARD_DEVIATION 253.329 |
| Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT (AHOC Analysis Set) | 251.43 cubic centimeter (cm^3) STANDARD_DEVIATION 327.881 | 245.29 cubic centimeter (cm^3) STANDARD_DEVIATION 292.408 | 239.72 cubic centimeter (cm^3) STANDARD_DEVIATION 263.813 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 24 | 0 / 20 | 2 / 24 | 3 / 19 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 24 / 24 | 20 / 20 | 24 / 24 | 18 / 19 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 24 | 4 / 20 | 6 / 24 | 7 / 19 |
Outcome results
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity
Severity of TEAEs were graded as follows: Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the participant's normal functioning level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief of symptoms but may be given because of personality of the participants. Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. It was uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and was a definite hazard to the participant's health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or participants hospitalized. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity is reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 28
Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Participants with at least one Mild TEAE | 9 Participants |
| Placebo | Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Participants with at least one Moderate TEAE | 12 Participants |
| Placebo | Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Participants with at least one Severe TEAE | 3 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Participants with at least one Mild TEAE | 7 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Participants with at least one Moderate TEAE | 10 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Participants with at least one Severe TEAE | 3 Participants |
Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs are reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 28
Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with at least one TEAE | 24 Participants |
| Placebo | Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with at least one serious TEAE | 2 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with at least one TEAE | 20 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with at least one serious TEAE | 4 Participants |
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT during Period 1 at Week 28 is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO) | 32.0 Percent Change | Standard Error 18.66 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO) | 7.1 Percent Change | Standard Error 20.43 |
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions was assessed by CT at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | 34.9 Percent Change | Standard Error 19.9 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | 7.0 Percent Change | Standard Error 20.87 |
Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO)
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (standardized area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity by 18\^F-NaF PET up to Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 28
Population: Baseline-active heterotopic ossification analysis set (AHO) included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO) | 16.6 Percent Change | Standard Error 9.11 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO) | -8.1 Percent Change | Standard Error 9.93 |
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in Active HO Classic ACVR1 Mutation (AHOC) analysis set up to Week 28 is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | 17.6 Percent Change | Standard Error 9.73 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | -8.0 Percent Change | Standard Error 10.14 |
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. HO detectable by CT that developed after baseline are referred to as new HO lesions. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 0 New HO Lesions |
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO)
Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHO analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO) | -1.0 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO) | -2.3 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 2.24 |
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)
Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | -1.0 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | -2.3 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 2.24 |
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions detectable by CT at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO) | 1.2 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 1.93 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO) | -0.3 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was detectable by CT using AHOC analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | 1.2 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 2 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | -0.3 HO Lesions | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO)
Percent change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of individual active HO site(s) as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 8 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO) | -7.9 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO) | -21.6 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 30.25 |
Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC)
Standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) was a measurement of the maximum radiopharmaceutical uptake within the volume of interest. Relative accuracy of a particular radiotracer in a particular tissue is determined by expressing the absolute accuracy (obtained in the primary outcome measure) in terms of percent difference between SUVmax values obtained from PET/CT. Percent Change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC) | -6.7 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 28.79 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC) | -21.6 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 30.25 |
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO)
The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome (PRO) used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO) | -0.17 Score on a Scale | Standard Error 0.205 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO) | -0.51 Score on a Scale | Standard Error 0.231 |
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC)
The pain NRS is a PRO used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-Weighted average (standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Time frame: Week 28
Population: AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC) | -0.12 Score on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.221 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC) | -0.48 Score on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.237 |
Period 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRS
The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome.
Time frame: Week 28 up to Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRS | 1.60 Score on a Scale | Standard Deviation 1.969 |
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NAF PET at week 56 relative to baseline is reported.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 1 New HO Lesions |
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 1 New HO lesions |
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 only (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 2 New HO Lesions |
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative baseline is reported.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who receive a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan is collected and the period between any consecutive doses is less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 1 New HO Lesions |
Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to positron-emission tomography (PET). Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 3 New HO lesions |
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diary
Percentage of participants with flare-ups starting between week 28 and week 56 as assessed by participant E-diary is reported.
Time frame: Week 28 to Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diary | 13.6 Percentage of Participants |
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-ups
Percentage of participants with investigator-assessed flare-ups were reported.
Time frame: Week 28 to Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-ups | 13.6 Percentage of Participants |
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to baseline.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 5.6 Percentage of Participants |
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline were reported.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 11.1 Percentage of Participants |
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 0.0 Percentage of Participants |
Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET). Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 9.1 Percentage of Participants |
Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
Percent change from baseline in 18\^F-NaF PET SUVmax to week 56
Time frame: Baseline, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -41.9 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 29.16 |
Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT to Week 56 were reported.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 2.6 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 10.18 |
Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
Percent change from baseline in TLA as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET to week 56 were reported.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -16.4 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 53.1 |
Period 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 is reported.
Time frame: Week 28 to Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -30.3 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 15.03 |
Period 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
Total Lesion Activity (TLA) is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. TLA in New (Relative to Baseline) Lesions at Week 56 is reported.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 0.7 gram (g) | Standard Deviation 2.13 |
Period 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
TLA is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. Activity of individual HO lesions was calculated as the product of mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) and the PET volume of the active HO lesion. TLA was derived for each participant at each time point as the sum of HO lesion activity of individual target and new active HO lesions.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 13.2 gram (g) | Standard Deviation 61.89 |
Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 0.0 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to baseline is reported.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 0.0 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET versus from Baseline to Week 28
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -1.2 Active lesions | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 1.3 Active lesions | Standard Deviation 3.26 |
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by CT Scan versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan is collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -1.3 Active lesions | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 0.3 Active lesions | Standard Deviation 1.24 |
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -31.8 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 132.47 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -11.1 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 24.07 |
Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT)
Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56
Population: COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | -66.9 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 181.06 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 14.0 Percent Change | Standard Deviation 41.17 |
Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum
Concentration of total activin A in serum over time is reported.
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56, Week 76
Population: The PK analysis set included all treated participants who received any study drug and who had at least 1 non-missing drug concentration following the first dose of study drug. (Number Analyzed equals number of participants evaluable at that time point)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Week 28 | 0.0000813 milligram per Liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.000164 |
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Week 56 | 0.0563 milligram per Liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.0172 |
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Week 76 | 0.0487 milligram per Liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.0192 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Week 28 | 0.0537 milligram per Liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.0116 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Week 56 | 0.0503 milligram per Liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.0113 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Week 76 | 0.0497 milligram per Liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.0176 |
Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum
Concentrations of REGN2477 capable of target binding were measured (functional drug).
Time frame: Week 28, Week 56, Week 76
Population: The PK analysis set included all treated participants who received any study drug and who had at least 1 non-missing drug concentration following the first dose of study drug. (Number Analyzed equals number of participants evaluable at that time point)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Week 56 | 100 mg/L | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Week 76 | 113 mg/L | Standard Deviation 27 |
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Week 28 | 0 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Week 28 | 130 mg/L | Standard Deviation 46.6 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Week 56 | 122 mg/L | Standard Deviation 54.8 |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Week 76 | 113 mg/L | Standard Deviation 23 |
Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477
Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses \< 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, \>= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the REGN2477 ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
Time frame: Up to Week 76
Population: The Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) analysis set included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result following the first study dose. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Negative | 24 Participants |
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Pre-existing Immunoreactivity | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Treatment-Boosted Response | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Treatment-Emergent Response | 0 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Treatment-Emergent Response | 1 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Negative | 18 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Treatment-Boosted Response | 0 Participants |
| REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Pre-existing Immunoreactivity | 0 Participants |