Skip to content

Clinical and Sociodemographic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Participants With Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease in Spain (CharisMMa Study)

Clinical and Sociodemographic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Patients With Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease in Spain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03188536
Enrollment
282
Registered
2017-06-15
Start date
2017-07-26
Completion date
2019-01-30
Last updated
2020-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to characterize the multiple myeloma (MM) participants with symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in Spain.

Detailed description

Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM who have received at least one previous treatment line and have experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who are still in follow-up at the time of the study visit will be observed in this study. The study will look into sociodemographic data, current clinical and therapeutic data, clinical data relative to the latest relapse and clinical data at diagnosis and previous relapses will be collected. The study will enroll approximately 350 patients. This multi-center trial will be conducted in a total of 30 public sites in Spain. The overall time to collect data will be approximately 1 year from June 2017 to May 2018.

Interventions

OTHERNo Intervention

As it was an observational study, no intervention was administered in this study.

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of MM and has received at least one previous treatment line. * Have experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the 6 months before the study. * Has continued in follow-up at the time of the study visit. * Is currently treated in the site who have clinical records available. * Is capable of understanding and completing the questions in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20) questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

• Participants who do not agree to participate in the study or who do not give written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisDay 1Sociodemographic variables included age(in years), sex(male or female), body mass index(BMI), residence(rural or urban), educational level(illiterate,no studies(can only read/write),primary studies,secondary studies,higher studies), work status(unemployed,active employment,temporarily/ permanently disabled, retired, other), cohabitation(lives-alone,with relatives,alone with help from a caregiver), need for financial assistance (yes/no), degree of dependence(independent,dependent:grade I-requires help to perform activities of daily living \[ADL\] at least once a day,grade II-needs help to perform ADLs 2 or 3 times a day or grade III-needs help to perform ADLs several times a day), healthy habits (high\[jogging;climbing;cycling;swimming;sports;intensive work;moving \>20 kg loads\], moderate\[walking;dancing;domestic chores;sports with children,walking house pets;general construction work;moving \<20 kg loads\] physical activity or inactive, smoking habit (yes/no), alcohol use (yes/no).
Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisDay 1Clinical variables at Diagnosis included age,MM type(heavy/light chain/Bence-Jones protein), international staging system(ISS),disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin\<3.5mg/L and albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),calcium,renal insufficiency,anemia or bone lesions(CRAB) signs(serum calcium\>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance\<40mL/min/serum creatinine\>117μmol/L, anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)\>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb\<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion,cytogenetic abnormalities(t\[4;14\],t\[11;14\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],t\[6;14\],trisomies,d\[17p\],g\[1q\]/others), risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t\[11;14\];t\[6;14\],intermediate:t\[4;14\],g\[1q\], high:d\[17p\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],other), eastern cooperative oncology group(ECOG) status (0:fully active,1:restricted physical activity,2:ambulatory,unable to carry out any work,3:capable of limited selfcare,4:completely disabled,5:dead).
Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeDay 1Clinical variables include date of latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode, ISS disease stage, CRAB signs, other clinical variables (plasmacytomas: medullary or extramedullary, diffuse osteopenia, fractures, neurological symptoms, infections, concomitant diseases like diabetes, neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric and/or neurological disorders, any other secondary disorders, cytogenetic abnormalities, risk according to cytogenetic profile at relapse(standard:trisomies,t\[11;14\];t\[6;14\],intermediate:t\[4;14\],g\[1q\], high:d\[17p\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],other), treatment started after latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale ScoreDay 1The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening.
Percentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeDay 1Clinical and Sociodemographic variables categorized by treatment selection(immunomodulators\[IMiDs\],proteasome inhibitor\[PI\]+IMiDs,PI,monoclonal antibodies\[mAb\]): Age,sex(male/female),prior treatment lines(0,1,2,3 or more),prior relapses(0,1,2,3 or more),ISS disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin\<3.5mg/L,albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),CRAB signs(serum calcium\>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance\<40mL/min/serum creatinine\>117μmol/L,anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)\>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb\<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion),risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t\[11;14\];t\[6;14\];high:d\[17p\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],other),other clinical variables:medullary/extramedullary plasmacytomas,osteopenia,fractures,neurological symptoms,infections,concomitant diseases:diabetes, neuropathy, COPD, cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric, neurological disorders.
Percentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Day 1Healthcare resources used during medical encounters include intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, hospital admissions, visits to the emergency room, days admitted.
HRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Day 1The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module included 4 factors, each factor corresponds to questions related to the particular component of the scale. Factor I indicate symptoms. Factor II indicates future perspectives. Factor III indicate adverse effects of the treatment. Factor IV indicates adverse effects of the treatment and body image. Each of these factors were used for the clinical validity of the scale.
Number of New Relevant Variables That Are Not Currently Collected in Clinical Records and That Could Influence in the Disease Management at RelapseDay 1
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30Day 1The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status/QOL scale. Most of the 30 items have 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much), with 2 questions relying on a 7-point numeric rating scale with a recall period of the previous week. Raw scores are converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL; for the symptom scales, lower scores represent better QOL.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 30 investigative sites in Spain from 26 July 2017 to 30 January 2019.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma with symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease were observed to collect the retrospective data on Day 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
276
Total276

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyNo relapse/refractoriness(last 6 months)5
Overall StudyNot participated/met inclusion criteria1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMultiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Age, Continuous67.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Body Mass Index (BMI)27.5 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
276 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
147 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 276
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Diagnosis

Clinical variables at Diagnosis included age,MM type(heavy/light chain/Bence-Jones protein), international staging system(ISS),disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin\<3.5mg/L and albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),calcium,renal insufficiency,anemia or bone lesions(CRAB) signs(serum calcium\>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance\<40mL/min/serum creatinine\>117μmol/L, anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)\>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb\<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion,cytogenetic abnormalities(t\[4;14\],t\[11;14\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],t\[6;14\],trisomies,d\[17p\],g\[1q\]/others), risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t\[11;14\];t\[6;14\],intermediate:t\[4;14\],g\[1q\], high:d\[17p\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],other), eastern cooperative oncology group(ECOG) status (0:fully active,1:restricted physical activity,2:ambulatory,unable to carry out any work,3:capable of limited selfcare,4:completely disabled,5:dead).

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Participants are repeated for multiple CRAB signs and cytogenic abnormalities. Percentages were rounded off.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Light Chain, No Light Chain3.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Light Chain, Kappa59.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Light Chain, Lambda37.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Bence Jones Protein, Yes53.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisISS Disease Stage I28.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisISS Disease Stage II28.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisAge, Adults (27-90 years)100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Heavy chain, IgA24.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Heavy chain, IgD1.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Heavy chain, IgG56.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Heavy chain, IgM0.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisMM Type, Heavy chain, No Heavy Chain16.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCytogenetic abnormalities, t (4;14)11.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisISS Disease Stage III43.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCRAB Signs, None12.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCRAB Signs, Some, Increase in blood calcium levels12.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCRAB Signs, Some, Renal failure18.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCRAB Signs, Some, Anemia52.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCRAB Signs, Some, Bone lesions76.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCytogenetic abnormalities, Other66.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisRisk, High19.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisRisk, Standard12.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisRisk, Intermediate23.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisRisk, Other44.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisECOG Status, 029.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisECOG Status, 141.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisECOG Status, 222.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisECOG Status, 36.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCytogenetic abnormalities, t (11;14)14.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCytogenetic abnormalities, t (14;16)1.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCytogenetic abnormalities, Trisomies3.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCytogenetic abnormalities, d (17p)17.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at DiagnosisCytogenetic abnormalities, g (1q)21.7 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Episode

Clinical variables include date of latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode, ISS disease stage, CRAB signs, other clinical variables (plasmacytomas: medullary or extramedullary, diffuse osteopenia, fractures, neurological symptoms, infections, concomitant diseases like diabetes, neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric and/or neurological disorders, any other secondary disorders, cytogenetic abnormalities, risk according to cytogenetic profile at relapse(standard:trisomies,t\[11;14\];t\[6;14\],intermediate:t\[4;14\],g\[1q\], high:d\[17p\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],other), treatment started after latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Participants are repeated across multiple categories. Percentages were rounded off.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage III27.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma15.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma15.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAnti-CD38 mAb Monotherapy, Second Line0.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAnti-CD38 mAb Monotherapy, Third Line13.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeDouble PI therapy+Steroids/Alkylating Agent,3 Line10.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAutologous or Allogeneic Transplant, Second Line2.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities,Psychiatric or Neurological Disorder14.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Diabetes24.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Neuropathy20.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Nephropathy15.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidity, COPD11.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Cardiovascular disease48.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Liver failure1.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCytogenetic Abnormalities, t(11;14)8.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCytogenetic Abnormalities, t(14;16)5.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCytogenetic Abnormalities, Trisomies4.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCytogenetic Abnormalities, d (17p)19.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCytogenetic Abnormalities, g (1q)27.96 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCytogenetic Abnormalities, other64.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, High38.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, Standard12.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, Intermediate49.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeDiffuse osteopathy15.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures15.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological symptoms8.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCytogenetic Abnormalities, t(4;14)11.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeDouble PI Therapy+Steroids/Alkylating Agent,2 Line9.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAnti-CD38 mAb Monotherapy, Fourth Line or Later20.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAllogeneic transplant, Third Line1.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAllogeneic transplant, Fourth Line or Later2.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAutologous or Allogeneic Transplant, Third Line8.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAutologous or Allogeneic Transplant, >=4 Lines3.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeDoublePI Therapy+Steroids/Alkylating Agent,>=4Line6.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAutologous transplant, Second Line2.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAutologous transplant, Third Line7.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAutologous transplant, Fourth Line or Later1.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAllogeneic transplant, Second Line0.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Other secondary disorders45.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, None25.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some-Increase in blood calcium levels9.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some-Renal Failure20.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some-Anemia43.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some-Bone lesions65.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections15.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRelapse Within 6 Months of Last Relapse61.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage I37.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage II35.5 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at Diagnosis

Sociodemographic variables included age(in years), sex(male or female), body mass index(BMI), residence(rural or urban), educational level(illiterate,no studies(can only read/write),primary studies,secondary studies,higher studies), work status(unemployed,active employment,temporarily/ permanently disabled, retired, other), cohabitation(lives-alone,with relatives,alone with help from a caregiver), need for financial assistance (yes/no), degree of dependence(independent,dependent:grade I-requires help to perform activities of daily living \[ADL\] at least once a day,grade II-needs help to perform ADLs 2 or 3 times a day or grade III-needs help to perform ADLs several times a day), healthy habits (high\[jogging;climbing;cycling;swimming;sports;intensive work;moving \>20 kg loads\], moderate\[walking;dancing;domestic chores;sports with children,walking house pets;general construction work;moving \<20 kg loads\] physical activity or inactive, smoking habit (yes/no), alcohol use (yes/no).

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Percentages were rounded off.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisWork Status, Active5.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisEducational level, Illiteracy0.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisEducational level, No Studies (just read/write)10.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisEducational level, Primary studies43.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisEducational level, Secondary studies34.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisAge, Adults (27-90 years)100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisSex, Male53.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisSex, Female46.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisBMI, 15 to 52 kg/m^2100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisArea of Residence, Rural24.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisEducational level, Higher studies11.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisArea of Residence, Urban75.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisWork Status, Unemployed5.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisNeed of Financial Support, No93.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisWork Status, Temporary/permanent disability20.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisLevel of Dependence, Independent71.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisLevel of Dependence, Grade I14.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisLevel of Dependence, Grade II12.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisLevel of Dependence, Grade III1.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisPhysical Activity, High1.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisPhysical Activity, Moderate45.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisWork Status, Retired65.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisWork Status, Other4.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisCohabitation status, Living Alone12.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisCohabitation status, Living with Relatives85.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisCohabitation, Living Alone with Assistance1.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisPhysical Activity, Inactive52.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisCurrent smoking habit, Yes3.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisCurrent smoking habit, No96.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisAlcohol Use, Yes6.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at DiagnosisAlcohol Use, No93.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status/QOL scale. Most of the 30 items have 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much), with 2 questions relying on a 7-point numeric rating scale with a recall period of the previous week. Raw scores are converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL; for the symptom scales, lower scores represent better QOL.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 3053.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Secondary

HRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale Score

The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale ScoreFuture perspective58.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale ScoreBody image72.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 34.4
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale ScoreSymptoms of the disease30.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale ScoreAdverse effects of the treatment25.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Secondary

HRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)

The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module included 4 factors, each factor corresponds to questions related to the particular component of the scale. Factor I indicate symptoms. Factor II indicates future perspectives. Factor III indicate adverse effects of the treatment. Factor IV indicates adverse effects of the treatment and body image. Each of these factors were used for the clinical validity of the scale.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Future perspective, Factors III53.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Symptoms of the disease, Factors III27.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Adverse effects of the treatment, Factors I-II24.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Adverse effects of the treatment, Factors III29.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Body image, Factors III73.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.7
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Body image, Factors I-II73.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.5
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Future perspective, Factors I-II60.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.2
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsHRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Symptoms of the disease, Factors I-II31.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
Secondary

Number of New Relevant Variables That Are Not Currently Collected in Clinical Records and That Could Influence in the Disease Management at Relapse

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Percentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Episode

Clinical and Sociodemographic variables categorized by treatment selection(immunomodulators\[IMiDs\],proteasome inhibitor\[PI\]+IMiDs,PI,monoclonal antibodies\[mAb\]): Age,sex(male/female),prior treatment lines(0,1,2,3 or more),prior relapses(0,1,2,3 or more),ISS disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin\<3.5mg/L,albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),CRAB signs(serum calcium\>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance\<40mL/min/serum creatinine\>117μmol/L,anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)\>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb\<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion),risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t\[11;14\];t\[6;14\];high:d\[17p\],t\[14;16\],t\[14;20\],other),other clinical variables:medullary/extramedullary plasmacytomas,osteopenia,fractures,neurological symptoms,infections,concomitant diseases:diabetes, neuropathy, COPD, cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric, neurological disorders.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Percentages were rounded off.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAge, 38-85 years, IMiDs100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAge, 43-76 years, PI + IMiDs100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAge, 47-84 years, PI100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAge, 39-80 years, mAb100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeAge, 53-90 years, Other100 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Male, IMiDs49.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Female, IMiDs50.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Male, PI + IMiDs61.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Female, PI + IMiDs38.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Male, PI47.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Female, PI52.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Male, mAb55.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Female, mAb44.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Male, Other57.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeSex, Female, Other42.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 1, IMiDs50.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 2, IMiDs28.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 3 or more, IMiDs21.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 1, mAb26.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 2, mAb29.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 3 or more, mAb44.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 1, Other11.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 2, Other26.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 3 or more, Other61.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 0, IMiDs43.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 1, IMiDs31.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 2, IMiDs12.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 3 and more, IMiDs12.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 0, PI + IMiDs49.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 1, PI + IMiDs36.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 2, PI + IMiDs2.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 3 or more, PI + IMiDs12.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 0, PI47.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 1, PI32.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 2, PI2.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 3 or more, PI17.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 2, Other23.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 3 or more, Other38.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage I, IMiDs38.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage II, IMiDs38.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage III, IMiDs23.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage I, PI + IMiDs51.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage II, PI + IMiDs28.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage III, PI + IMiDs20.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage I, PI20.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage II, PI54.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage III, PI25.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage I, mAb40.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some, IMiDs70.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, None, PI + IMiDs14.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some, PI + IMiDs85.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, None, PI20.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some, PI79.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, None, mAb31.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Some, PI + IMiDs51.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, None, PI35.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Some, PI64.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, None, mAb32.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Some, mAb67.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, None, Other23.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, Standard, PI50.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, High, mAb60.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, Standard, mAb40.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, High, Other50.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, Standard, Other50.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, IMiDs15.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, No, IMiDs84.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI + IMiDs25.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI + IMiDs75.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI14.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI85.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, mAb8.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI + IMiDs66.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI11.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI88.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, mAb6.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, mAb93.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, Other24.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, No, PI91.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, Yes, mAb13.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, No, mAb86.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, Yes, Other23.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, No, Other76.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, Yes, IMiDs15.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, No, IMiDs84.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, Yes, PI + IMiDs18.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, No, PI + IMiDs81.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, Yes, PI11.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, No, PI88.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, Yes, mAb14.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, No, PI + IMiDs89.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, Yes, PI5.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, No, PI94.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, Yes, mAb1.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, No, mAb98.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, Yes, Other11.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, PI94.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, mAb0.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, mAb100.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, Other7.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, Other92.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, Yes, IMiDs14.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, No, mAb88.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, Yes, Other11.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, No, Other88.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 1, PI + IMiDs63.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 2, PI + IMiDs16.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 3 or more, PI + IMiDs20.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 1, PI44.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 2, PI35.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodePrior lines of treatment, 3 or more, PI20.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 0, mAb27.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 1, mAb26.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 2, mAb18.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 3 or more, mAb27.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 0, Other11.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNumber of prior relapses, 1, Other26.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage II, mAb32.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage III, mAb28.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage I, Other23.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage II, Other23.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeISS Disease Stage III, Other52.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, None, IMiDs29.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some, mAb68.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, None, Other23.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeCRAB Signs, Some, Other76.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, None, IMiDs41.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Some, IMiDs58.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, None, PI + IMiDs49.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeComorbidities, Some, Other76.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, High, IMiDs50.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, Standard, IMiDs50.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, High, PI + IMiDs41.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, Standard, PI + IMiDs58.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeRisk, High, PI50.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, No, mAb91.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, Other16.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMedullary Plasmacytoma, No, Other84.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, IMiDs12.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, IMiDs87.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI + IMiDs33.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeExtramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, Other76.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, Yes, IMiDs23.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, No, IMiDs76.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, Yes, PI + IMiDs6.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, No, PI + IMiDs93.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeOsteopenia, Yes, PI8.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, No, mAb85.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, Yes, Other15.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeFractures, No, Other84.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, Yes, IMiDs10.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, No, IMiDs89.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, Yes, PI + IMiDs10.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeNeurological Symptoms, No, Other88.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, IMiDs5.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, IMiDs94.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, PI + IMiDs8.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, PI + IMiDs91.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeMM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, PI5.9 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, No, IMiDs85.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, Yes, PI + IMiDs20.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, No, PI + IMiDs79.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, Yes, PI14.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, No, PI85.3 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory EpisodeInfections, Yes, mAb11.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)

Healthcare resources used during medical encounters include intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, hospital admissions, visits to the emergency room, days admitted.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All participants eligible for analyses were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Admitted at some healthcare service56.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Admitted to Hospital59.4 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Used ambulance to attend to the hospital7.0 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Used their own transport67.8 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Consultation with the primary care physician21.7 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Consultation with the oncologist2.5 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Consultation with the psychologist3.6 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Attended psychologist60 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Attended hematologist89.1 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Required some test82.2 percentage of participants
Multiple Myeloma (MM) ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)Had undergone X-ray test43.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026