Skip to content

Platelet Rich Plasma for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

The Long-term Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a Prospective Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03184688
Enrollment
26
Registered
2017-06-14
Start date
2017-09-08
Completion date
2019-10-30
Last updated
2019-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

platelet rich plasma, Perineural injection therapy, hydrodissection

Brief summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy with involving compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. Although many conservative managements of CTS, the effectiveness of these methods is insignificant or only persist for a short duration. The platelet rich plasma (PRP) is a new and potential treatment for patients with kinds of musculoskeletal disorders and recent reports showed being beneficial for peripheral neuropathy in animal studies. Since 2014, four small clinical trials showed the positive effect of PRP in peripheral neuropathy. Among these studies, two small trials showed beneficial effect of PRP for patients with mild CTS. However, the definite clinical effect of PRP for peripheral neuropathy from currently published studies is unclarified because these studies enrolled a few patients and lacked long-term follow-up (no more than 6 months follow-up).

Detailed description

After obtaining written informed consent, patients of clinically diagnosed with bilateral CTS were randomized into intervention and control side. Intervention group received one-dose ultrasound-guided PRP injection and control group received one-dose ultrasound-guided normal saline injection. No additional treatment after injection through the study period. The primary outcome is Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) and secondary outcomes include visual analog scale (VAS), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve, and finger pinch strength. The evaluation was performed pretreatment as well as on the 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after the treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDUREplatelet rich plasma

Ultrasound-guided PRP injection between proximal carpal tunnel and median nerve.

DRUGNormal saline

Ultrasound-guided normal saline injection between proximal carpal tunnel and median nerve.

Sponsors

Tri-Service General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 20-80 year-old. * Diagnosis was confirmed using an electrophysiological study

Exclusion criteria

* Cancer * Coagulopathy * Pregnancy * Inflammation status * Polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy * Thoracic outlet syndrome * Previously undergone wrist surgery or steroid injection for CTS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline of pain on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after the treatment.Baseline, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after treatment.Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ) is a frequently used patient-based questionnaire for measurement of carpal tunnel syndrome which encompasses symptom severity and functional status. Each question ranges from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating severer symptom or a higher degree of disability. Total score ranges from 19 to 95 and the mean of total scores divided with each item score were used for further analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in severity of symptoms and functional status on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after the treatment.Baseline, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after treatment.Using the Visual analog scale (VAS) to measure the pain scale before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
Change from baseline in cross-sectional area of the median nerve on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after the treatment.Baseline, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after treatment.Using the musculoskeletal sonogram to measure the cross-sectional area of the median nerve.
Change from baseline in conduction velocity, amplitude of median nerve on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after the treatment.Baseline, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after treatment.The antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve was performed on all subjects according to the protocol reported by the American Academy of Neurology (USA). The median nerve was stimulated at the wrist between the palmar longus and flexor carpal radialis tendon at a distance of approximately 14 cm from the active electrode.
Change from baseline in finger pinch on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after the treatment.Baseline, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month and one year after treatment.The finger pinch strength was measured using dynamometer (Fabrication Enterprises Inc., USA). The subject was seated with shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated with the elbow flexed at 90°. The forearm and wrist were positioned in a neutral position for the palmar pinch

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026