Skip to content

The Depth of Endotracheal Tube Insertion

The Depth of Endotracheal Tube Insertion - Use of Direct Laryngoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy (GlideScope), Comparison of Methods

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03184246
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-06-12
Start date
2017-06-30
Completion date
2018-12-04
Last updated
2018-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Complication

Keywords

Videolaryngoscopy (GlideScope), Direct laryngoscopy

Brief summary

The investigators suppose that direct laryngoscopy is connected with deeper insertion of endotracheal tube in comparison to videolaryngoscopy. Correction of this malposition can cause postoperative discomfort and further complications in some patients.Routine use of videolaryngoscopy could minimize these problems.

Detailed description

100 patients scheduled for elective neurosurgical procedures will be randomized into two groups. Patients in group A will be intubated by videolaryngoscopy (GlideScope), patients in group B by direct laryngoscopy, in both groups will be rigid stylet used. Intubation will be done under propofol anesthesia, targeted entropy 40 to 50, and deep relaxation (neuromuscular transmission target level 0). Sufentanil will be used to block tracheal reflexes. In both groups the depth of insertion of tracheal tube will be measured in the mouth corner immediately after intubation. Next day, the unpleasant sensations and complications will be recorded (sore throat, stridor, hoarseness, cough and nausea and vomiting) during control visit of patients.

Interventions

DEVICEGlideScope

videolaryngoscopy (GlideScope) will be used for intubation

DEVICEDirect laryngoscopy

direct laryngoscopy will be used for intubation

Sponsors

University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Interventional group will be intubated by videolaryngoscopy, control group by direct laryngoscopy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I - III

Exclusion criteria

* postoperative ventilation, laryngeal tumors, conditions after tracheotomy or laryngeal operations, cervical spinal hernia extraction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the depth of primary insertion of tracheal tubein a minute after intubationcm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sums of manipulation with tracheal tube2 minutes after intubationnumber
complications after intubation24 hours after surgerynumber

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026