Skip to content

Comparison of Ambulatory and Functional Improvement by Morning Walk

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety for Ambulatory and Functional Improvement in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty With Morning Walk

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03183856
Enrollment
9
Registered
2017-06-12
Start date
2017-09-15
Completion date
2018-05-25
Last updated
2018-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Robotics

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy and feasability of gait rehabilitation robot through approving functional improvement by an end-effector typed gait robot in patients underwent total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed description

pre-interventional evaluation; within 1 day of initiation of the intervention; 5 days after initiation of the intervention; 10 days after intervention after initiation of the intervention; 42 days after intervention start

Interventions

a end-effector typed gait robot with a saddle

OTHERno Morning walk

ambulation voluntary or with a help of walker

Sponsors

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Ulsan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients underwent Unilateral or both Total Knee Arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* brain disease, spinal cord injury, peripheral neuropathy, myopathy * Inability to ambulate fully due to muscukoskeletal disorders * MMSE\<23 * history of arthroplasty surgery on either of legs * Cardiac pacemaker * Refusal of participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of WOMAC index1 day before the initiation of intervention), 5 day, 10 day, and 31 days after the initiation of interventionWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of VAS1 day before the initiation of intervention), 5 day, 10 day, and 31 days after the initiation of interventionvisual analogue scale

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of ROM1 day before the initiation of intervention), 5 day, 10 day, and 31 days after the initiation of interventionrange of motion of the operated knee
Change of drug consumption5 day, and 10 day after the initiation of interventionweekly amount of tridol consumption
Change of 6 minute walk test1 day before the initiation of intervention), 5 day, 10 day, and 31 days after the initiation of intervention6 minute walk test

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026