Cervical Spine Disease, Psychological Impairment
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a single-center prospective randomized investigation of patients undergoing surgical arthrodesis for single or multi-level cervical disease, resulting in cervical radiculopathy. Patients indicated for surgery for cervical degenerative disease (CDD) will be screened for yellow flags using validated tools to assess pain. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) will be used to modify yellow flags in spine patients. All patients at risk will be stratified by risk rating and randomly assigned to 2 groups; sham treatment (N=20) or CBT (N=20). The goal of this study is to unmask the relationship between psychological distress and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for cervical degenerative disease resulting in combinations of neck pain and radiculopathy, and to determine the effectiveness of a brief psychological intervention on subset of patients who screen positive for psychological distress prior to their surgeries.
Interventions
Psychologically symptomatic patients will then be randomized to 4-8 weeks of placebo phone calls (Group PS-PL-Sx) or 4-8 weeks of cognitive behavior therapy treatment (PS-CBT-Sx) based on a 1:1 randomization ratio. Subjects randomized to receive CBT before surgery will proceed to 6 sessions given within 4-8 weeks by a licensed psychologist specializing in pain. CBT sessions will be 30 minutes in length, and focus on empirically supported behavior management, problem solving, cognitive restructuring, and relaxation training. The first session will be performed in person, and the subsequent 5 sessions will be performed over the phone.
Study nurse will conduct six sessions (30 minutes/ session) over a 4-8 week time period. The first session will be performed in person, and the subsequent 5 sessions will be performed over the phone. Sham sessions will entail how to prepare for surgery and expectations for recovery, and will go over content that the treatment and control groups will receive in handout form.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients at Risk: * Diagnosed of primary symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease confirmed with appropriate imaging studies. * Etiologies will be limited to cervical disc herniation, spinal stenosis, low-grade (I and II) spondylolisthesis, spondylosis and degenerative disc disease. * Will be undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, not to exceed 5 levels. * Presence of both axial (neck pain) and appendicular (arm pain/dysesthesia/weakness) symptoms, regardless of proportion * Subject must be able to be contacted by telephone during study participation * NDI \> 20% * Read and comprehend English Inclusion Criteria for patients with zero risk: * Diagnosed of primary symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease confirmed with appropriate imaging studies. * Etiologies will be limited to cervical disc herniation, spinal stenosis, low-grade (I and II) spondylolisthesis, spondylosis and degenerative disc disease. * Will be undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, not to exceed 5 levels. * Presence of both axial (neck pain) and appendicular (arm pain/dysesthesia/weakness) symptoms, regardless of proportion * Subject must be able to be contacted by telephone during study participation * NDI \> 20% * Read and comprehend English
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) | 2 Years | The DRAM assesses and profiles patients: those showing no psychological distress, those at risk of developing major psychological overlay, and those that are distressed. |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | 2 Years | The pain catastrophizing scale quantifies an individual's pain experience, their tendency to magnify the threat value of pain, and their ability to prevent pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. |
| Outcome Expectation question (OEQ) | 2 Years | The OEQ will be a single item question: I strongly believe that I will recover quickly from my surgery. Responses are score on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Outcome expectations have been shown to be one of the strongest psychological predictors affecting recovery from musculoskeletal injuries. |
Countries
United States