Skip to content

Do You Arthroscopic Repair for Subscapularis Tendon Tear, Which Accounts for More Than Half of the 1st Facet? Or do You Perform Debridement?

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Arthroscopic Repair Versus Debridement for Subscapularis Tendon Tear More Than 1/2 to Entire 1st Facet (Representing 1/3 to More Than 1/3 Tear of Subscapularis Entire Footprint)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03183466
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-06-12
Start date
2011-12-01
Completion date
2017-07-01
Last updated
2017-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroscopic Debridement, Arthroscopic Repair, Subscapularis Tendon Tear

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to randomly classify the upper third of the subscapularis in 1/2 of the rupture patients as preoperative group (arthroscopic and arthroscopic debridement group) and the difference between clinical and clinical scores.

Detailed description

The degree of rupture that is an adaptation of arthroscopic surgery is now known to be about one-third to one-half of a rupture. However, the most controversial case is the one-third to one-half of the upper tear attached to the tendinous portion of the subscapularis. Currently, debridement or repair is under way. But evidence-based studies are lacking and no clear treatment guidelines are available.

Interventions

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subscapularis tendon tear from more than 1/2 to entire of 1st facet found during routine arthroscopy with 70 degree scope * Isolated or combined with Supraspinatus and/or Infraspinatus tear (SS/IS tear less than 3 cm) * Combined biceps lesion * Combined acromial clavicle (AC) arthritis

Exclusion criteria

* Revision case or previous surgical history of the index shoulder * Any open surgery, including open repair of the subscapularis tendon * Compensation case * Combined severe arthritis of the glenohumeral joint * Patient who selects one's own surgical method, i.e. not randomized * Infection, tumor, etc

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Range of Motion (ROM)2 year postoperatively
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (PVAS)2 year postoperatively
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score2 year postoperatively
Constant score2 year postoperatively
Korean Shoulder Score (KSS) score2 year postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
repair integrity analysis using postoperative MRI6 months

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026