Skip to content

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Spontaneous Confabulation: a Replica Study

Replica Study of a Neuropsychological Treatment for Patients Who Show Spontaneous Confabulation After Acquired Brain Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03183453
Enrollment
57
Registered
2017-06-12
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2018-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Memory Disorders

Keywords

Confabulations, Neuropsychological rehabilitation, Memory

Brief summary

Confabulators consistently generate false memories without intention to deceive and with great feeling of rightness. However, there is currently no known effective treatment for them. In order to fill this gap, we performed a neuropsychological treatment in two groups of confabulators: experimental vs. control (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02540772). Now, we intend to replicate the treatment with a larger sample of confabulators and with other two control groups: non-confabulator patients with brain injury and healthy individuals

Detailed description

The treatment consisted of some brief material that patients had to learn and recall at both immediate and delayed moments. After both recollections, patients were given feedback about their performance (errors and correct responses). Pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements were administered. Non-confabulator patients and healthy participants performed only the pre-treatment measurement.

Interventions

Participants had to learn some brief material (words, faces, pictures, news), after which they were asked for an immediate and a delayed recall. After both recalls, participants were confronted with feedback about correct responses, non-responses and errors (i.e., confabulations and errors of attribution). This type of feedback worked on: 1) selective attention during the learning phase, training patients to focus on the relevant details of the stimuli; 2) monitoring processes during the retrieval phase, reinforcing the strategic search and training patients to inhibit traces that were irrelevant; and 3) memory control processes after the retrieval phase. The treatment consisted of 9 sessions and lasted for 3 weeks and the participants performed a baseline before and after treatment.

Sponsors

Monica Triviño Mosquera
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The presence of spontaneous confabulations after acute brain injury, for at least three months and without clinical improvement (interfering with the patient's daily life with frequent arguments and exhaustive supervision). * The presence of momentary confabulations in the Spanish adaptation of Dalla Barba provoked confabulation interview. * Prior to injury, all patients should be completely independent for daily living.

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of impairment in alertness. * Dementia. * Acute confusional state. * A history of drug abuse. * Psychiatric antecedents.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the number of ConfabulationsA first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).The confabulations recorded were 1) guessed answers, 2) confusions in time and space, 3) a mixture of two or more stimuli presented, and 4) devised or bizarre responses. Scores ranged from 0 (no confabulations) to unlimited number of them (because devised or bizarre responses were recorded) and consisted of the sum of all the confabulations produced during the 3 sessions.
Change in the number of correct responsesA first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).Scores ranged from 0 (no correct answers) to 72 (12 stimuli remembered twice in each session: firstly, in a immediate recall after learning, and secondly, in a delayed recall after 10 minutes).
Change in the number of non-responsesA first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).Scores ranged from 0 (no non-responses) to 72 (12 stimuli remembered twice in each session: firstly, in a immediate recall after learning, and secondly, in a delayed recall after 10 minutes).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the number of errors in source attributionA first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).After the recall of the material, patients were also asked to remember which modality corresponded to each recall (i.e., seen, heard or imagined), and who had presented the material during the learning session (i.e., the therapist or themselves). Scores ranged from 0 (if all answers were non-responses) to unlimited number (depending on number of confabulations produced by patients).

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026