Skip to content

Comprehensive Versus Traditional Lifestyle Program

THINK (Translational Health in Nutrition and Kinesiology) Junior Edition

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03182621
Enrollment
105
Registered
2017-06-09
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2017-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Physical Fitness, Cognitive Function 1, Social

Keywords

Physical Fitness, Body Composition, Executive Cognitive Function

Brief summary

Despite recommends that school-based interventions use a comprehensive approach for health promotions; most fitness programs exclusively emphasize physical activity. This study compared the comprehensive Translational Health in Nutrition and Kinesiology (THINK) program to a traditional YMCA program (The Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids (SPARK) fitness curriculum) on measures of physical fitness, body composition, and executive cognitive function outcomes among 105 ethnic minority children (9±1.03 years old) following a 10-week intervention period.

Detailed description

Despite recommendations that school-based interventions use a comprehensive approaches for health promotions; most fitness programs exclusively emphasize physical activity. This study compared the comprehensive Translational Health in Nutrition and Kinesiology (THINK) program to a traditional YMCA program (The Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids (SPARK) fitness curriculum) on measures of physical fitness, body composition, and executive cognitive function outcomes among 105 predominantly, ethnic minority children (9±1.03 years old) following a 10week intervention period.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTHINK

The THINK curriculum was based on the principles of exercise physiology and health behaviors. Sessions included educational components, concentrating on physiology, nutrition, laboratory experiences, and structured physical fitness activities.

BEHAVIORALSPARK

traditional YMCA program

Sponsors

University of Tennessee
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* To be eligible for this study, subjects had to be between the ages of eight and 12, enrolled in a YMCA program, and able to participate in physical activity. Parents were provided with information packets regarding project details, a parental consent form, and a child assent form. Once the subjects assented and parents consented, a health questionnaire regarding child's age, gender, race/ethnicity, health history and SES was completed.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with metabolic, cardiovascular, neuromuscular and psychological disorders and with medications that would interfere with testing results were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Aerobic FitnessBaseline and 10 WeeksThe National Institute of Medicine Toolbox two-minute Walk Endurance Test was used to measure aerobic fitness
Change in Grip StrengthBaseline and 10 WeeksGrip strength was measures using a Jamar plus handgrip dynamometer.
Change in Abdominal StrengthBaseline and 10 WeeksThe one-minute curl-up test was used to measure abdominal strength and endurance.
Change in Lower Body StrengthBaseline and 10 WeeksLower body strength, specifically for the quadriceps muscle group, was assessed with the wall squat test. A vertical jump test utilizing a Vertec. was used to assess lower body power . The vertical jump test data were used to estimate average power (W) according to the Lewis formula Average Power (W) = √4.9 x mass (kg) x √VJ (m) x 9.81.
Change in Percent Body FatBaseline and 10 WeeksBody composition and body fat was measured using the Inbody-520 multi-frequency bioimpedance analyzer.
Change in BMIzBaseline and 10 WeeksA CDC growth chart statistical resource was used to calculate BMIz using height, weight, age, and gender.
Change in Visceral Abdominal FatBaseline and 10 WeeksThe Saggital Abdominal Height was used as estimate of visceral abdominal fat using a portable anthropometer.
Change in Waist circumferenceBaseline and 10 WeeksWaist circumference was used to measure central adiposity with a Gulick body tape measure.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026