Cardiac Rehabilitation
Conditions
Keywords
WEARABLE HEART RATE MONITORS, ACCURACY
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of four heart rate monitors in cardiac rehabilitation patients during typical, supervised cardiac rehabilitation involving exercise on a treadmill and/or stationary bicycle.
Detailed description
This study will assess the accuracy of four of the best-selling optical heart rate monitors when worn by cardiac rehabilitation patients. During testing, each subject will wear: 1. Two different optical heart rate monitors (one on each wrist) 2. A Polar chest-strap based monitor 3. ECG leads The types of wrist-worn heart rate monitors assigned to each subject will be randomly assigned. The location (left or right wrist) will also be randomly assigned. Heart rate will be assessed using each of the 4 monitors with the subject on the exercise machines under each of the following conditions: 1. Pre-exercise 2. Treadmill: at 3, 5 and 7 min. 3. Stationary Cycle: at 3, 5 and 7 min.
Interventions
Fit Bit Blaze Heart Rate Monitoring Device
Garmin Forerunner 235 Heart Rate Monitoring Device
Tom Tom Spark Cardio Heart Rate Monitoring Device
Apple Watch Heart Rate Monitoring Device
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age \> 18 years * Patients enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation program at Cleveland Clinic Main Campus
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of a cardiac pacemaker * Known chronic and persistent heart rhythm disorders * Tattoos around the wrist or forearm area * Use of a radial artery graft for coronary artery bypass grafting
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate Monitor Accuracy Compared to ECG | 16 minutes | The primary outcome measure is the accuracy of each heart rate monitor compared to ECG. This will be expressed by the correlation coefficient. |
Countries
United States