Skip to content

AeroVanc in the Treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of AeroVanc for the Treatment of Persistent Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Lung Infection in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03181932
Enrollment
188
Registered
2017-06-09
Start date
2017-09-20
Completion date
2021-01-15
Last updated
2022-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis, MRSA

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, randomized phase III study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of AeroVanc in persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

Detailed description

This is a phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to examine the safety and efficacy of AeroVanc in the treatment of persistent MRSA lung infection in patients diagnosed with CF. After the Screening period to confirm study eligibility, participants are randomly assigned in a blinded fashion to receive either AeroVanc 30 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo BID (1:1 active to placebo) by inhalation for 24 weeks or 3 dosing cycles (Period 1). Upon completion of Period 1, participants receive open-label AeroVanc 30 mg BID for an additional 24 weeks or 3 dosing cycles (Period 2), to evaluate long-term safety of AeroVanc. A dosing cycle is defined as 28 days of treatment followed by 28 days of observation. Participants on a 28-day cyclical on/off anti-Pseudomonal antibiotic regimen enter the Screening period at a time such that the Baseline visit coincide with the end of their anti-Pseudomonas antibiotic cycle. Study drug is thereby administered during the off-cycle, and participants can then resume anti-Pseudomonal therapy during the 28-day observation period. Participants continuing alternating anti-Pseudomonal therapy can continue their treatment during the study drug administration, and observation period. The primary and secondary analyses are conducted in participants ≤21 years old. Subjects \>21 years old are analyzed separately as supportive analyses.

Interventions

DRUGVancomycin inhalation powder

100 participants are to be treated with double-blind vancomycin inhalation powder (75 subjects ≤21 years old, 25 subjects \>21 years old) for 24 weeks during Period 1.

100 participants are to be treated with double-blind placebo (75 subjects ≤21 years old, 25 subjects \>21 years old) for 24 weeks during Period 1.

Sponsors

Savara Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants ≥6 years of age at time of informed consent form or assent form signing. 2. Confirmed diagnosis of CF, determined by having clinical features consistent with the CF phenotype, plus one of the following: 1. Positive sweat chloride test (value ≥60 milliequivalent/L), 2. Genotype with 2 mutations consistent with CF (i.e., a mutation in each of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator genes). 3. Positive sputum culture or a throat swab culture for MRSA at Screening. 4. In addition to the Screening sample, have at least 2 prior sputum or throat swab cultures positive for MRSA, of which at least 1 sample is \>6 months prior to Screening. At least 50% of all MRSA cultures (sputum or throat swab culture) collected from the time of the first positive culture (in the previous 1 year) must have tested positive for MRSA. (Note: Screening sample may count towards 50% positive count) 5. FEV1 ≥30% and ≤90% of predicted that is normal for age, gender, race, and height, using the Global Lung Function Initiative equation. 6. At least 1 episode of acute pulmonary infection treated with non-maintenance antibiotics within 12 months prior to the Baseline visit (initiation of treatment with intermittent inhaled anti-Pseudomonal therapy will not qualify as treatment with non-maintenance antibiotics). 7. If female of childbearing potential, an acceptable method of contraception must be used during the study and must be combined with a negative pregnancy test obtained during Screening; sexually active male subjects of reproductive potential who are non-sterile (i.e., male who has not been sterilized by vasectomy for at least 6 months, and were not diagnosed with infertility through demonstration of azoospermia in a semen sample and/or absence of vas deferens through ultrasound) must be willing to use a barrier method of contraception, or their female partner must use an acceptable method of contraception, during the study. For purposes of this study, the Sponsor defines acceptable methods of contraception as: 1. Oral birth control pills administered for at least 1 monthly cycle prior to administration of the study drug. 2. A synthetic progestin implanted rod (eg, Implanon®) for at least 1 monthly cycle prior to the study drug administration but not beyond the 4th successive year following insertion. 3. Intrauterine devices, inserted by a qualified clinician for at least 1 monthly cycle prior to study drug administration. 4. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (eg, Depo-Provera®) administered for a minimum of 1 monthly cycle prior to administration of the study drug and continuing through 1 month following study completion. 5. Hysterectomy or surgical sterilization. 6. Abstinence. 7. Double barrier method (diaphragm with spermicidal gel or condoms with contraceptive foam). Note: For subjects prescribed Orkambi: Orkambi may substantially decrease hormonal contraceptive exposure, reducing the effectiveness and increasing the incidence of menstruation-associated adverse reactions. Hormonal contraceptives, including oral, injectable, transdermal, and implantable, should not be relied upon as an effective method of contraception when co-administered with Orkambi. 8. Able and willing to comply with the protocol, including availability for all scheduled study visits and able to perform all techniques necessary to use the AeroVanc inhaler and measure lung function. 9. Agree not to smoke during any part of the clinical trial (Screening visit through end of study). 10. Participants with a Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-infection must either be stable on a regular suppression regimen of inhaled antibiotics or must be, in the opinion of the Investigator, stable despite the lack of such treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Use of anti-MRSA treatments prescribed as maintenance therapy (intravenous \[IV\] or inhaled treatment within 28 days; oral treatment within 14 days) prior to the Baseline visit. 2. Use of non-maintenance antibiotic for pulmonary infection or extrapulmonary MRSA infection (IV or inhaled antibiotic within 28 days; oral antibiotic within 14 days) prior to the Baseline visit. 3. History of previous allergies or sensitivity to vancomycin, or other component(s) of the study drug or placebo except for a history of red-man syndrome. 4. Inability to tolerate inhaled products. 5. First time sputum culture or throat swab culture yielding Burkholderia cepacia, or nontuberculous Mycobacteria in the previous 6 months to Screening. 6. History of lung or other solid organ transplantation or currently on the list to receive lung or other solid organ transplantation. 7. Resistance to vancomycin at Screening (vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or vancomycin intermediate resistant Staphylococcus aureus, with minimum inhibitory concentration ≥8 μg/mL). 8. Oral corticosteroids in doses exceeding 10 mg prednisone per day or 20 mg prednisone every other day, or equipotent doses of other corticosteroids. 9. Changes in antimicrobial, bronchodilator, anti-inflammatory or corticosteroid medications within 14 days, or changes in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance modulators within 28 days, prior to the Baseline visit. 10. Abnormal laboratory findings or other findings or medical history at Screening that, in the Investigator's opinion, would compromise the safety of the subject or the quality of the study data. 11. Inability to tolerate inhalation of a short acting beta2 agonist 12. Oxygen saturation \<90% at Screening. 13. Changes in physiotherapy technique or physiotherapy scheduled within 1 week of the Baseline visit. 14. Administration of any investigational drug or device within 4 weeks prior to the Screening visit and during the study 15. Female with positive pregnancy test result during Screening, pregnant (or intends to become pregnant), lactating or intends to breastfeed during the study. 16. Renal insufficiency, defined as creatinine clearance \<50 mL/min using the Cockcroft-Gault equation for adults or Schwartz equation for children at the Screening visit. 17. Abnormal liver function, defined as ≥4x upper limit of normal of serum aspartate aminotransferase or serum alanine aminotransferase, or known cirrhosis at Screening. 18. Diagnosed with clinically significant hearing loss. 19. History of positive result for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus. 20. Planned hospitalizations for prophylaxis antibiotic treatment within 28 days prior to Baseline visit or during the double-blind period (Period 1).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent PredictedBaseline and Week 4, 12 and 20The mean absolute change from baseline in FEV1 percent predicted was analyzed sequentially at Week 4 (end of Cycle 1), Week 12 (end of Cycle 2) and at Week 20 (end of Cycle 3).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Pulmonary ExacerbationWeek 20Time to first pulmonary exacerbation requiring use of another antibiotic medication (oral, IV, and/or inhaled). The Outcome Measure Data presented are the median percentiles and 95% confidence intervals from Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) ScoresBaseline and Week 4, 12, and 20The CFQ-R was administered every two weeks using a hand-held e-Diary. CFQ-R scores range between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate a better outcome. The CFQ-R measures functioning in a variety of domains, including Physical Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions, Respiratory Symptoms, Treatment Burden, Role Functioning, Emotional Functioning and Social Functioning. The Outcome Measure Data presented are the Respiratory Symptoms Scores.
Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) ScoresBaseline and Week 4, 12 and 20The CFRSD-CRISS was administered every two weeks using a hand-held e-Diary. Scores range between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Frequency of Pulmonary ExacerbationsWeek 20The number of pulmonary exacerbations during Period 1 adjusted for the length of follow-up.
Number of Successful Response CyclesWeek 20The number of successful response cycles a participant achieves over Period 1. A response in a cycle is defined by at least a 5 % relative improvement in FEV1 percent predicted at the end of each the respective cycle.
Area Under the FEV1-time ProfileWeek 20The mean treatment difference in FEV1 across all post-baseline visits
Relative Change in FEV1 Percent PredictedBaseline and Week 4, 12 and 20The mean relative change from Baseline in FEV1 percent predicted

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

76 sites in Canada (2 clinics) and US (74 clinics) enrolled participants in the trial. First participant was enrolled on 20 September 2017 and last subject completed the study on 15 January 2021.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 353 participants were screened, and 188 were randomized in Period 1. In total, 165 participants were screen failures and the reasons for screen failure were ineligibility (n=157), exacerbation (n=6), lost to follow-up (n=1) and other reason (n=1).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation Powder
Vancomycin inhalation powder 30 mg is administered twice daily (BID) during the 24-week double-blind period (Period 1) by inhalation during three dosing cycles, each cycle being 28 days of treatment followed by 28 days of observation. Vancomycin inhalation powder: 100 participants are to be treated with double-blind vancomycin inhalation powder (75 subjects ≤21 years old, 25 subjects \>21 years old) for 24 weeks during Period 1.
90
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation Powder
Matching placebo is administered BID during the 24-week double-blind period (Period 1) by inhalation during three dosing cycles, each cycle being 28 days of treatment followed by 28 days of observation. Placebo inhalation powder: 100 participants are to be treated with double-blind placebo (75 subjects ≤21 years old, 25 subjects \>21 years old) for 24 weeks during Period 1.
98
Total188

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1 (Double-blind Period)Adverse Event51
Period 1 (Double-blind Period)Lost to Follow-up01
Period 1 (Double-blind Period)Protocol Violation12
Period 1 (Double-blind Period)Withdrawal by Subject59
Period 2 (Open-label Period)Adverse Event16
Period 2 (Open-label Period)Lost to Follow-up01
Period 2 (Open-label Period)Protocol Violation31
Period 2 (Open-label Period)Reason missing20
Period 2 (Open-label Period)Withdrawal by Subject25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDouble-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderDouble-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderTotal
Age, Continuous20.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.52
18.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
19.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.71
Age, Customized
>21 years
26 Participants29 Participants55 Participants
Age, Customized
6-21 years
64 Participants69 Participants133 Participants
Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted65.25 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.193
66.32 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.939
65.81 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.55
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
86 Participants92 Participants178 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Pulmonary Infections in the Previous Year2.6 infections
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53
2.6 infections
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44
2.6 infections
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.48
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection Present at Screening (Yes/No?)
No
39 Participants53 Participants92 Participants
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection Present at Screening (Yes/No?)
Yes
51 Participants45 Participants96 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
85 Participants94 Participants179 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants50 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants48 Participants93 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 900 / 980 / 158
other
Total, other adverse events
85 / 9093 / 98139 / 158
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 9035 / 9850 / 158

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted

The mean absolute change from baseline in FEV1 percent predicted was analyzed sequentially at Week 4 (end of Cycle 1), Week 12 (end of Cycle 2) and at Week 20 (end of Cycle 3).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, 12 and 20

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population (defined as all randomized participants). Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment. The ITT population was also split out by age (≤21 years, \>21 years). The population of participants ≤21 years was used for all main analyses of efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent PredictedWeek 42.39 Percent predictedStandard Deviation 8.078
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent PredictedWeek 121.52 Percent predictedStandard Deviation 8.414
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent PredictedWeek 201.61 Percent predictedStandard Deviation 9.967
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent PredictedWeek 41.18 Percent predictedStandard Deviation 8.581
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent PredictedWeek 120.13 Percent predictedStandard Deviation 8.056
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent PredictedWeek 20-1.94 Percent predictedStandard Deviation 8.924
Comparison: Based on previous experience, a sample size of 45 participants per arm would provide 89% power to detect a statistically significant difference at alpha level of 0.05. To account for potential dropouts and/or smaller effect size in a 3-cycle trial, a sample size of 75 participants per arm was to be enrolled in the primary analysis population, which if all completed would provide 90% power to detect a difference of 3.4% at 20 weeks assuming the same standard deviation of 6.3%.p-value: 0.32595% CI: [-1.4, 4.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Area Under the FEV1-time Profile

The mean treatment difference in FEV1 across all post-baseline visits

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population (6-21 years).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderArea Under the FEV1-time Profile609.7 percent predicted*hour/liter
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderArea Under the FEV1-time Profile583.1 percent predicted*hour/liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) Scores

The CFQ-R was administered every two weeks using a hand-held e-Diary. CFQ-R scores range between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate a better outcome. The CFQ-R measures functioning in a variety of domains, including Physical Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions, Respiratory Symptoms, Treatment Burden, Role Functioning, Emotional Functioning and Social Functioning. The Outcome Measure Data presented are the Respiratory Symptoms Scores.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, 12, and 20

Population: ITT population (6-21 years).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) ScoresWeek 48.4 score on a scale
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) ScoresWeek 126.0 score on a scale
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) ScoresWeek 204.6 score on a scale
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) ScoresWeek 206.3 score on a scale
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) ScoresWeek 43.0 score on a scale
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) ScoresWeek 124.3 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) Scores

The CFRSD-CRISS was administered every two weeks using a hand-held e-Diary. Scores range between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, 12 and 20

Population: ITT population (6-21 years).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) ScoresWeek 4-3.2 score on a scale
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) ScoresWeek 12-4.7 score on a scale
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) ScoresWeek 20-7.3 score on a scale
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) ScoresWeek 4-5.1 score on a scale
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) ScoresWeek 12-8.0 score on a scale
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderChange From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) ScoresWeek 20-5.3 score on a scale
Secondary

Frequency of Pulmonary Exacerbations

The number of pulmonary exacerbations during Period 1 adjusted for the length of follow-up.

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population (6-21 years).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderFrequency of Pulmonary Exacerbations0.9 exacerbationsStandard Deviation 1.03
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderFrequency of Pulmonary Exacerbations0.9 exacerbationsStandard Deviation 1.02
Secondary

Number of Successful Response Cycles

The number of successful response cycles a participant achieves over Period 1. A response in a cycle is defined by at least a 5 % relative improvement in FEV1 percent predicted at the end of each the respective cycle.

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population (6-21 years).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles0 successful response cycles20 Participants
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles1 successful response cycle18 Participants
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles2 successful response cycles15 Participants
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles3 successful response cycles9 Participants
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles3 successful response cycles6 Participants
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles0 successful response cycles24 Participants
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles2 successful response cycles9 Participants
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderNumber of Successful Response Cycles1 successful response cycle27 Participants
Secondary

Relative Change in FEV1 Percent Predicted

The mean relative change from Baseline in FEV1 percent predicted

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, 12 and 20

Population: ITT population (6-21 years).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderRelative Change in FEV1 Percent PredictedWeek 42.9 percent predicted
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderRelative Change in FEV1 Percent PredictedWeek 121.2 percent predicted
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderRelative Change in FEV1 Percent PredictedWeek 201.7 percent predicted
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderRelative Change in FEV1 Percent PredictedWeek 41.5 percent predicted
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderRelative Change in FEV1 Percent PredictedWeek 12-0.3 percent predicted
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderRelative Change in FEV1 Percent PredictedWeek 20-2.2 percent predicted
Secondary

Time to First Pulmonary Exacerbation

Time to first pulmonary exacerbation requiring use of another antibiotic medication (oral, IV, and/or inhaled). The Outcome Measure Data presented are the median percentiles and 95% confidence intervals from Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population (6-21 years).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Double-blind Vancomycin Inhalation PowderTime to First Pulmonary Exacerbation38 days
Double-blind Placebo Inhalation PowderTime to First Pulmonary Exacerbation48 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026