Skip to content

Physical Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease

Physical Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03181282
Acronym
PTDBS
Enrollment
31
Registered
2017-06-08
Start date
2017-08-03
Completion date
2019-08-02
Last updated
2023-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation, Balance, Gait, Physical Therapy, Parkinson disease

Brief summary

While deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is commonly used to reduce tremor, muscle stiffness, and bradykinesia in people with Parkinson disease (PD), preliminary studies suggest balance may worsen and falls may increase after STN-DBS. Walking speed, known to be reduced in PD, typically improves after surgery; however, other important gait qualities may not improve. Given the potential for worsening balance and gait and increasing falls after surgery, it is imperative that researchers explore interventions that complement the positive effects of STN-DBS and delay worsening of balance and gait. Physical therapy (PT) is reported to be effective in improving balance and walking in people with PD. However, there have been no studies to investigate how individuals with STN-DBS respond to PT. As such, it is unclear if exercise in the post-DBS population is safe, feasible, and effective. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of PT in people with PD with STN-DBS. The investigators hypothesize that PT will be safe and feasible for people with PD with STN-DBS. Further, the investigators hypothesize that those assigned to PT group will demonstrate improvements in balance and gait while those assigned to the control group will demonstrate no change or a decline in balance and gait.

Detailed description

Deficits in balance and gait may lead to falls, fall-related complications, and physical inactivity in people with PD. These negative effects are thought to lead to a 'malignant' form of PD in which there is reduced quality of life and increased risk for mortality. While people who have had STN-DBS often experience reductions in tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia, surgical management of PD may not be effective in ameliorating impairments in balance and gait. In fact, investigators have reported that DBS may worsen balance, which may accelerate an individual's decline toward 'malignant' PD. To this end, recent studies indicate physical activity levels did not increase after STN-DBS. This finding should not go unnoticed as physical activity may have a disease modifying effect, slowing the progression of motor disability. As of 2011, approximately 70,000 people with PD have undergone DBS, with the annual number of DBS procedures for PD totaling between 8,000-10,000. In addition, investigators are now studying the effects of STN-DBS in people with early PD. The procedure appears to be safe and effective in this population, which will increase the number of surgical candidates. With the number of people with PD expected to double to more than 8 million by 2030, the number of those receiving DBS is expected to substantially increase. Given the expected rise in STN-DBS procedures and potential for worsening of postural instability and gait deficits, there is a clear need for interventions that prevent these negative complications of STN-DBS. Physical therapy, delivered using various treatment approaches (e.g. treadmill training, balance training), is effective in reducing postural instability and improving spatiotemporal gait characteristics among individuals with PD who do not have DBS. To our knowledge, there are no studies to date that assessed the impact of PT for those with PD who have DBS. In fact, the current standard of care following STN-DBS does not include PT. Current care post-DBS includes pharmacologic management and monitoring of DBS settings, which are optimized based on Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subsection (UPDRS III) scores. Despite the introduction of substantial changes to neural activity in areas of the brain governing movement with DBS, formal movement training or assessment of functional mobility and safety are not provided after surgery. As such, patients may not experience significant improvements in postural stability and gait following surgery, and may be at increased risk for falls, fall-related complications, and development of a sedentary lifestyle. Physical therapy is a personalized intervention that can be used to address specific movement impairments that remain even when patients are on optimal regimens of medication and DBS. There is an urgent need to determine if PT is effective in improving postural stability and gait performance over time following STN-DBS. If the intervention is safe and feasible, future studies could evaluate the efficacy of PT for gait and balance deficits in this population before and/or immediately post-surgery, increasing the potential impact of this research. In this pilot randomized controlled trial, participants will be randomly assigned to either the physical therapy group or control group. Those in the physical therapy group will attend 1-hour sessions of PT twice weekly with a treatment plan designed to improve balance and gait. Those in the control group will not be prescribed an exercise intervention. Each participant will undergo the same battery of balance and gait tests. Although STN-DBS settings are typically stable at 12 months post-surgery, participants will be allowed to follow up with their neurologists as needed for programming and medication adjustments. All changes in programming settings and medication dosages will be noted. A rater, blinded to group assignment, will collect all outcomes at each time point. Participants will be tested in the following conditions: 1) OFF stimulation and OFF medication and 2) ON stimulation and ON medication. Testing participants OFF stimulation/OFF medication will allow us to determine if the addition of PT after STN-DBS affects balance and gait independent of other treatments. OFF medication is defined as greater than or equal to 12 hours since the last intake of anti-PD medication. For OFF stimulation/OFF medication testing, participants will arrive to the laboratory OFF medication but with stimulators on. The stimulators will be turned OFF upon arrival at the laboratory and testing will commence 45 minutes after the stimulators are turned OFF. Stimulators will be turned back on upon completion of this testing session. The investigators anticipate the total time for this laboratory visit to be 2 hours. Testing ON stimulation/ON medication will provide insight into how participants perform on an everyday basis. ON medication is defined as 1-1.5 hours after medication intake. For ON stimulation/ON medication assessments, participants will arrive to the laboratory 1-1.5 hours after taking their normal anti-PD medication dose with stimulators on and stimulators will remain on throughout the session. Assessments will occur at baseline and at 8 (i.e. post-test) and 12 weeks (i.e. follow up). Assessments will take place on two separate days and the order of testing condition (OFF medication/OFF stimulation vs. ON medication/ON stimulation) will be randomized. The Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale III (MDS-UPDRS III) will be administered in each condition.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPhysical Therapy

Postural stability exercises will follow a framework targeting quiet stance, anticipatory and reactive postural adjustments, and dynamic postural control. Gait exercises will include treadmill walking and practice with dual-task gait. A home exercise program (HEP), to be completed twice weekly, will be provided on each participant's initial visit with the physical therapist following STN-DBS surgery. The HEP will include the following exercises: trunk rotation, standing hip flexion, standing hip abduction, standing plantarflexion, and standing squat.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcomes assessor will be blinded to group assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease * Hoehn & Yahr stages II-IV * At least 1 year post-STN-DBS * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of atypical parkinsonism * Hoehn & Yahr stages I or V * Evidence of dementia (MMSE \< 24/30) * Inability to walk 10 meters with or without assistive device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety & Tolerability]8 weeksNumber of participants with falls, orthopedic injuries, or other adverse events that are related to treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment-Related Adherence [Feasibility]8 weeksFeasibility of the treatment as measured by the number of PT sessions attended.
Balance8 weeksChange in Balance Evaluation Systems Test score. The scale is scored from 0-100% with higher scores indicating better balance. Here, the higher the change score, the greater the improvement in balance. A change score of 0.04 would correspond to a 4% improvement in the BESTest score. A change score of -0.02 would correspond to a 2% decline in BESTest score.
Gait8 weeksChange in gait velocity (cm/sec). Higher gait speeds are associated with better mobility. The greater the value for the change in gait speed, the greater the improvement in gait speed. Negative values would indicate a decline in gait speed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

31 participants provided informed consent and were enrolled in the study. 2 participants were unable to complete the baseline assessment and as such were not randomized. 29 participants were randomized to either the intervention or control group.

Pre-assignment details

The expected enrollment planned for 34 participants due to expected attrition. Due to the lack of attrition, 29 participants were randomized in the study. This corresponds to the power analysis specifying a total sample size of 28 participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Physical Therapy
Participants assigned to Physical Therapy (PT) will attend a 1-hour visit with a physical therapist twice weekly for 8 weeks. The PT intervention, which will mirror traditional PT for those with PD, will include exercises designed to improve balance and gait. Physical Therapy: Postural stability exercises will follow a framework targeting quiet stance, anticipatory and reactive postural adjustments, and dynamic postural control. Gait exercises will include treadmill walking and practice with dual-task gait. A home exercise program (HEP), to be completed twice weekly, will be provided on each participant's initial visit with the physical therapist following STN-DBS surgery. The HEP will include the following exercises: trunk rotation, standing hip flexion, standing hip abduction, standing plantarflexion, and standing squat.
15
Control
Participants in the control group will receive the current standard of care following STN-DBS. As such, STN-DBS settings and anti-PD medications will be optimized according to the determination of their neurologist in the same fashion as they will be in the experimental group. Those in the control group will not receive prescribed exercise from a physical therapist.
14
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControlPhysical Therapy
Age, Continuous65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
67.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
Mini-Mental Status Examination29 scores on a scale29 scores on a scale28 scores on a scale
Months Since STN-DBS41.1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.7
33.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.2
47.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.2
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale - Section III (OFF)49.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
46.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
52.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale - Section III (ON)33.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
30.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
36 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
28 Participants14 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants14 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants12 Participants9 Participants
Years Since PD Diagnosis11.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
11.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
12.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 159 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 152 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety & Tolerability]

Number of participants with falls, orthopedic injuries, or other adverse events that are related to treatment.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Because we are interested in potential adverse events related to the the intervention, we assessed only the PT group in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Physical TherapyNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety & Tolerability]1 Participants
Secondary

Balance

Change in Balance Evaluation Systems Test score. The scale is scored from 0-100% with higher scores indicating better balance. Here, the higher the change score, the greater the improvement in balance. A change score of 0.04 would correspond to a 4% improvement in the BESTest score. A change score of -0.02 would correspond to a 2% decline in BESTest score.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: For the Off medication / Off stimulation condition, n=13 in the PT group and n=12 in the control group were analyzed. Those not analyzed did not complete this outcome measure at the post-test visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Physical TherapyBalanceOn Medication / On Stimulation0.04 Mean Change in BESTest Percent ScoreStandard Deviation 0.04
Physical TherapyBalanceOff Medication / Off Stimulation0.03 Mean Change in BESTest Percent ScoreStandard Deviation 0.05
ControlBalanceOn Medication / On Stimulation-0.02 Mean Change in BESTest Percent ScoreStandard Deviation 0.06
ControlBalanceOff Medication / Off Stimulation-0.04 Mean Change in BESTest Percent ScoreStandard Deviation 0.07
Comparison: This analysis is for the On Medication / On Stimulation condition. Age was controlled for in the analysis given the baseline difference in age between groups.p-value: 0.019495% CI: [0.0132, 0.0925]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: This analysis is for the Off Medication / Off Stimulation Condition. Age was controlled for in the analysis given the baseline difference in age between groups.p-value: 0.00462595% CI: [0.0242, 0.1194]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Gait

Change in gait velocity (cm/sec). Higher gait speeds are associated with better mobility. The greater the value for the change in gait speed, the greater the improvement in gait speed. Negative values would indicate a decline in gait speed.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: For the Off medication / Off stimulation analysis, n=14 in the PT group and n=12 in the control group were analyzed. Those not analyzed did not complete this outcome measure at the post-test visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Physical TherapyGaitOn Medication / On Stimulation9.71 Change in Gait Velocity (Cm/Sec)Standard Deviation 15.02
Physical TherapyGaitOff Medication / Off Stimulation7.29 Change in Gait Velocity (Cm/Sec)Standard Deviation 12.84
ControlGaitOn Medication / On Stimulation-1.07 Change in Gait Velocity (Cm/Sec)Standard Deviation 10.5
ControlGaitOff Medication / Off Stimulation-1.00 Change in Gait Velocity (Cm/Sec)Standard Deviation 11.05
Comparison: This analysis is for the On Medication / On Stimulation condition. Age was controlled for in the analysis given the baseline difference in age between groups.p-value: 0.03838995% CI: [0.6038, 20.4459]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: This analysis is for the Off Medication / Off Stimulation condition. Age was controlled for in the analysis given the baseline difference in age between groups.p-value: 0.10987395% CI: [-1.8652, 17.3117]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Treatment-Related Adherence [Feasibility]

Feasibility of the treatment as measured by the number of PT sessions attended.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: This variable is analyzed only for the PT group. Because the control group did not attend intervention sessions, this variable is not analyzed for this group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Physical TherapyTreatment-Related Adherence [Feasibility]15 Number of PT Sessions Attended

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026