Skip to content

Fit and Strong! Plus Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Comparative Effectiveness of Customary Fit and Strong! vs. Fit and Strong Plus!

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03180008
Enrollment
413
Registered
2017-06-07
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Overweight and Obesity

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial is comparing outcomes of customary Fit and Strong!, to Fit and Strong! Plus, an enhanced version of the program that incorporates weight management. We hypothesize that Fit and Strong! Plus participants will show improved diet behaviors at 2, 6, 12, and 18 months that will be accompanied by a significant 5% weight loss at 6 months and maintained to 18 months, compared to participants in customary Fit and Strong!.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFit and Strong!

Fit and Strong! is a group exercise and self-management program that meets for 90 minutes, 3 days per week, for 8 weeks. Each 90 minute session consists of 60 minutes of multi-component physical activity (stretching/flexibility exercises, low-impact aerobics, and strength/resistance exercise) and 30 minutes of health education delivered from a structured curriculum. The health education topics build self-efficacy for managing arthritis through physical activity.

BEHAVIORALFit and Strong! Plus

The intervention consists of the traditional Fit and Strong! intervention (see previous description), but the health education component has been revised to focus on diet and weight management in addition to physical activity and arthritis.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Illinois at Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of symptoms of lower extremity osteoarthritis * Age 60 or older * Not currently participating in a regular physical activity program * BMI 25-50 * Able to attend Fit and Strong! classes

Exclusion criteria

* Score of 3 or greater on Mental Status Questionnaire * Recent hip or knee surgery * Recent steroid injection into hip or knee * Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis * Uncontrolled diabetes * Unspecified health conditions that may interfere with exercise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dietary Intake2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsThe Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) measures diet quality based on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. HEI-2010 total scores range from 0 to 100 points, with a higher score signifying superior diet quality.
Body Weight2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsA change in body weight (kilograms) measured using a calibrated digital scale (Tanita).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lower Extremity Muscle StrengthBaseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsA change in Lower Extremity Muscle Strength was measured by a Sit-Stand test that measures the number of full stands from a seated position a participant can complete in 30 s with arms folded across the chest. A higher score reflects better performance.
Physical EnduranceBaseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsA change in Physical Endurance was measured by the 6-minute Distance Walk, which is a self-paced timed test of the total distance a person can walk in six minutes. A higher score reflects better performance.
Lower Extremity StiffnessBaseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsA change in Osteoarthritis lower extremity stiffness symptoms were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The WOMAC is a self-report instrument that has been well-validated and used widely with individuals with osteoarthritis. Stiffness (2 items) was rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to four. Higher scores indicate more severe osteoarthritis symptoms, scores range from 0 to 8.
Lower Extremity PainBaseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsA change in Osteoarthritis lower extremity pain symptoms were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The WOMAC is a self-report instrument that has been well-validated and used widely with individuals with osteoarthritis. Pain (5 items) was rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to four. Higher scores indicate more severe osteoarthritis symptoms, scores range from 0-20.
Physical Activity Engagement2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsA change in Physical activity was assessed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Scored on a scale of 0 - 400, a higher score indicates greater PA.
Lower Extremity Physical FunctionBaseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 monthsA change in Osteoarthritis lower extremity physical function symptoms were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The WOMAC is a self-report instrument that has been well-validated and used widely with individuals with osteoarthritis. Lower extremity physical function (17 items) was rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to four. Higher scores indicate more severe osteoarthritis symptoms, scores range from 0 to 68.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fit and Strong!
Fit & Strong! is evidence-based group exercise and self-management program. Classes meet for 90 minutes and include 60 minutes of physical activity (stretching/flexibility, low impact aerobics, and lower-extremity strength training) and 30 minutes of health education that follows a structured, scripted curriculum that centers on physical activity and osteoarthritis and incorporates self-efficacy, social support, and self-regulation. Classes are held 3 days per week for 8 weeks (24 sessions total). Fit and Strong!: Fit and Strong! is a group exercise and self-management program that meets for 90 minutes, 3 days per week, for 8 weeks. Each 90 minute session consists of 60 minutes of multi-component physical activity (stretching/flexibility exercises, low-impact aerobics, and strength/resistance exercise) and 30 minutes of health education delivered from a structured curriculum. The health education topics build self-efficacy for managing arthritis through physical activity.
210
Fit and Strong! Plus
Fit & Strong! Plus differs from Fit & Strong! only in that the 30 minutes of health education, while retaining the core physical activity and osteoarthritis components, has weight and diet-related topics added to the curriculum. Fit and Strong! Plus: The intervention consists of the traditional Fit and Strong! intervention (see previous description), but the health education component has been revised to focus on diet and weight management in addition to physical activity and arthritis.
203
Total413

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFit and Strong!TotalFit and Strong! Plus
Age, Continuous68 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
68 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
68 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
202 Participants397 Participants195 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
193 Participants380 Participants187 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants22 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
210 participants413 participants203 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
178 Participants355 Participants177 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants58 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 2104 / 203
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 2104 / 203
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 2100 / 203

Outcome results

Primary

Body Weight

A change in body weight (kilograms) measured using a calibrated digital scale (Tanita).

Time frame: 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Body Weight2-Month Follow-up-0.5 KilogramsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong!Body Weight6-Month Follow-up-0.8 KilogramsStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong!Body Weight12-Month Follow-up-0.9 KilogramsStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong!Body Weight18-Month Follow-up-0.9 KilogramsStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong! PlusBody Weight18-Month Follow-up-1.3 KilogramsStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong! PlusBody Weight2-Month Follow-up-2.0 KilogramsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong! PlusBody Weight12-Month Follow-up-1.7 KilogramsStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong! PlusBody Weight6-Month Follow-up-2.0 KilogramsStandard Error 0.3
Primary

Dietary Intake

The Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) measures diet quality based on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. HEI-2010 total scores range from 0 to 100 points, with a higher score signifying superior diet quality.

Time frame: 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Dietary Intake2-Month Follow-up2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong!Dietary Intake6-Month Follow-up0.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong!Dietary Intake12-Month Follow-up1.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong!Dietary Intake18-Month Follow-up0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong! PlusDietary Intake18-Month Follow-up1.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong! PlusDietary Intake2-Month Follow-up4.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong! PlusDietary Intake12-Month Follow-up0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong! PlusDietary Intake6-Month Follow-up2.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Secondary

Lower Extremity Muscle Strength

A change in Lower Extremity Muscle Strength was measured by a Sit-Stand test that measures the number of full stands from a seated position a participant can complete in 30 s with arms folded across the chest. A higher score reflects better performance.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Muscle Strength2-Month1.3 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Muscle Strength6-Month1.1 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Muscle Strength12-Month1.0 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Muscle Strength18-Month0.7 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Muscle Strength18-Month1.4 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Muscle Strength2-Month1.8 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Muscle Strength12-Month1.6 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Muscle Strength6-Month1.7 number of chair standsStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Lower Extremity Pain

A change in Osteoarthritis lower extremity pain symptoms were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The WOMAC is a self-report instrument that has been well-validated and used widely with individuals with osteoarthritis. Pain (5 items) was rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to four. Higher scores indicate more severe osteoarthritis symptoms, scores range from 0-20.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Pain2-Month Follow-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Pain6-Month-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Pain18-Month-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Pain12-Month-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Pain18-Month-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Pain6-Month-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Pain12-Month-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Pain2-Month Follow-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Lower Extremity Physical Function

A change in Osteoarthritis lower extremity physical function symptoms were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The WOMAC is a self-report instrument that has been well-validated and used widely with individuals with osteoarthritis. Lower extremity physical function (17 items) was rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to four. Higher scores indicate more severe osteoarthritis symptoms, scores range from 0 to 68.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Physical Function2-Month-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Physical Function6-Month-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Physical Function12-Month-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Physical Function18-Month-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Physical Function18-Month-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Physical Function2-Month-5.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Physical Function12-Month-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Physical Function6-Month-4.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Lower Extremity Stiffness

A change in Osteoarthritis lower extremity stiffness symptoms were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The WOMAC is a self-report instrument that has been well-validated and used widely with individuals with osteoarthritis. Stiffness (2 items) was rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to four. Higher scores indicate more severe osteoarthritis symptoms, scores range from 0 to 8.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Stiffness2-Month-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Stiffness6-Month-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Stiffness12-Month-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fit and Strong!Lower Extremity Stiffness18-Month-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Stiffness18-Month-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Stiffness2-Month-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Stiffness12-Month-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fit and Strong! PlusLower Extremity Stiffness6-Month-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Physical Activity Engagement

A change in Physical activity was assessed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Scored on a scale of 0 - 400, a higher score indicates greater PA.

Time frame: 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Physical Activity Engagement2 months14.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.7
Fit and Strong!Physical Activity Engagement6 months15.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 5
Fit and Strong!Physical Activity Engagement12 months7.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
Fit and Strong!Physical Activity Engagement18 months5.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Activity Engagement18 months12.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.9
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Activity Engagement2 months29.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Activity Engagement12 months11.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.9
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Activity Engagement6 months17.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 5
Secondary

Physical Endurance

A change in Physical Endurance was measured by the 6-minute Distance Walk, which is a self-paced timed test of the total distance a person can walk in six minutes. A higher score reflects better performance.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months

Population: The number analyzed at each time point varies due to loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fit and Strong!Physical Endurance2-Month22.9 meters walkedStandard Error 4.4
Fit and Strong!Physical Endurance6-Month13.3 meters walkedStandard Error 5.2
Fit and Strong!Physical Endurance12-Month10.0 meters walkedStandard Error 5.3
Fit and Strong!Physical Endurance18-Month-0.6 meters walkedStandard Error 5.8
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Endurance18-Month12.8 meters walkedStandard Error 5.8
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Endurance2-Month50.5 meters walkedStandard Error 4.4
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Endurance12-Month23.2 meters walkedStandard Error 5.3
Fit and Strong! PlusPhysical Endurance6-Month29.3 meters walkedStandard Error 5.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026