Skip to content

Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Back Pain Using Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)

A Post-Market Study of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) for the Treatment of Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03179202
Enrollment
166
Registered
2017-06-07
Start date
2017-06-23
Completion date
2021-05-11
Last updated
2022-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Low Back Pain

Keywords

Electrical Stimulation, Neurostimulation, Neuromodulation, Back Pain, Low Back Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of electrical stimulation (low levels of electricity) on low back pain. This study involves the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) system. The System delivers mild electrical stimulation to the nerves in the low back. The System includes up to four small wires (called Leads) that are placed through the skin into the muscles in the low back. The wires attach to device(s) worn on the body that deliver stimulation (called Stimulators).

Interventions

The SPRINT PNS System is a device which delivers mild electrical stimulation to the muscles in the low back. The System includes up to four small wires (called Leads) that are placed through the skin into the muscles in the low back. The wires attach to device(s) worn on the body that deliver stimulation (called Stimulators). The PNS System was approved by the FDA for up to 60 days of use for the management of acute and chronic pain, including back pain.

Sponsors

SPR Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * At least 21 years of age * Chronic low back pain Key

Exclusion criteria

* Infection on or around the low back * Conditions with increased risk of infection (e.g., valvular heart disease, compromised immune system, history of recurrent skin infections) * Implanted electronic device * Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 * Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects That Experienced ≥30% Reduction in Average Low Back Pain IntensityBaseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 5 (BPI-5). The BPI-5 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents No Pain and 10 represents Pain as bad as you can imagine. For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated and percent reduction was determined. Subjects that achieved ≥30% reduction in pain, were considered successful.
Number of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse EventUp to 15 months for each subject from baseline to the last study visitAt each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition has occurred since their previous visit. If the subject experienced a change that was an adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site. The number of subjects that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifeBaseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey is a widely accepted form used to quantify quality of life. The survey consists of 8 categories with a total of 36 questions regarding the subject's general health and activities. The survey assesses physical and emotional problems associated with pain during the past 4 weeks. Each category is scored on a 0-100 scale, where a higher score indicates a more favorable health state. The score for each category was calculated at baseline and End of Treatment (EOT) for each subject. The change in each category score from Baseline to EOT was then calculated for each subject (with a positive change indicating an increase in health-related quality of life). The mean and standard deviation of the subjects' changes in each category are presented below.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a validated, 21-question survey used to measure depression severity. Questions are rated on a scale from 0 to 3, and the scores from each question are totaled to provide an overall score ranging between 0 to 63. Scores from 0-13 indicate minimal depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, and 29-63 indicates severe depression. The average total scores across subjects were calculated at baseline and end of treatment (EOT).
Worst Pain IntensityBaseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their worst pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 3 (BPI-3). The BPI-3 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents No Pain and 10 represents Pain as bad as you can imagine. For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated. The mean score across all subjects for each time point is reported.
Pain InterferenceBaseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)Question 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-9) is a 7-part question that assesses the level of interference that subjects experience in their daily lives due to pain. The 7 categories are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Subjects were asked to rate how much their low back pain interferes with each aspect on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents Does Not Interfere and 10 represents Completely Interferes. The average of these 7 scores was calculated for each subject. The mean was taken across subjects for each time point.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey8-weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) asks subjects to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale where 1 represents very much worse and 7 represents very much improved as compared to before stimulation treatment. The subjects combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. The number of participants with each rating after 8 weeks of treatment is reported here.
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a widely used assessment designed to measure the degree of disability in people with low back pain. This validated questionnaire includes topics concerning the intensity of pain, the subject's ability to perform normal daily activities such as personal care, walking, sitting, or standing, and how pain affects the subject's sex life, social life, and travel. The scale ranges from 0-100 and higher scores indicate greater disability due to low back pain. The mean score across all subjects at baseline and end of treatment (EOT) is reported here.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment began in June 2017 and was concluded in December 2019. Subjects were screened from the available pool of candidates who presented with chronic low back pain.

Pre-assignment details

After obtaining informed consent, subjects were evaluated for eligibility.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enrolled/Received Leads
Subjects who were consented, met eligibility criteria, and underwent Lead placement. Also includes subjects participating in sub-studies with modified eligibility criteria allowing a history of prior radiofrequency ablation or prior lumbar surgery.
99
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyOther Reason: Incarceration after Enrollment1
Overall StudyScreen Failure67
Overall StudySubject Lost to Follow Up12
Overall StudyUnrelated Death Reported in All-Cause Mortality1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnrolled/Received Leads
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
35 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
64 Participants
Age, Continuous57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Duration of Low Back Pain17.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
Employment Status
Currently Working
44 Participants
Employment Status
Disabled and/or Retired Because of Low Back Pain
8 Participants
Employment Status
Homemaker
4 Participants
Employment Status
On Leave of Absence
1 Participants
Employment Status
Other
3 Participants
Employment Status
Retired (not due to health)
30 Participants
Employment Status
Student
2 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
97 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
84 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
99 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 99
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects That Experienced ≥30% Reduction in Average Low Back Pain Intensity

All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 5 (BPI-5). The BPI-5 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents No Pain and 10 represents Pain as bad as you can imagine. For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated and percent reduction was determined. Subjects that achieved ≥30% reduction in pain, were considered successful.

Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

Population: Protocol Population presented. EOT data were not available for eight subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Protocol PopulationNumber of Subjects That Experienced ≥30% Reduction in Average Low Back Pain Intensity58 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse Event

At each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition has occurred since their previous visit. If the subject experienced a change that was an adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site. The number of subjects that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here.

Time frame: Up to 15 months for each subject from baseline to the last study visit

Population: All enrolled subjects that received leads are presented.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Protocol PopulationNumber of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse Event49 Participants
Secondary

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a validated, 21-question survey used to measure depression severity. Questions are rated on a scale from 0 to 3, and the scores from each question are totaled to provide an overall score ranging between 0 to 63. Scores from 0-13 indicate minimal depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, and 29-63 indicates severe depression. The average total scores across subjects were calculated at baseline and end of treatment (EOT).

Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

Population: Protocol Population presented. EOT data were not available for nine subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol PopulationBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)Baseline8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Protocol PopulationBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)EOT5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Mean Change in Health-Related Quality of Life

The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey is a widely accepted form used to quantify quality of life. The survey consists of 8 categories with a total of 36 questions regarding the subject's general health and activities. The survey assesses physical and emotional problems associated with pain during the past 4 weeks. Each category is scored on a 0-100 scale, where a higher score indicates a more favorable health state. The score for each category was calculated at baseline and End of Treatment (EOT) for each subject. The change in each category score from Baseline to EOT was then calculated for each subject (with a positive change indicating an increase in health-related quality of life). The mean and standard deviation of the subjects' changes in each category are presented below.

Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

Population: Protocol Population presented. Data were not available for three subjects at baseline and five subjects at end of treatment (EOT).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifeEnergy/Fatigue12.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifeEmotional well-being7.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifeSocial Functioning18.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifePain21.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifeGeneral Health5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifePhysical Functioning13.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifeRole Limitations due to Physical Health26.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.9
Protocol PopulationMean Change in Health-Related Quality of LifeRole Limitations due to Emotional Problems12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.5
Secondary

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a widely used assessment designed to measure the degree of disability in people with low back pain. This validated questionnaire includes topics concerning the intensity of pain, the subject's ability to perform normal daily activities such as personal care, walking, sitting, or standing, and how pain affects the subject's sex life, social life, and travel. The scale ranges from 0-100 and higher scores indicate greater disability due to low back pain. The mean score across all subjects at baseline and end of treatment (EOT) is reported here.

Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

Population: Protocol Population presented. Data were not available for one subject at baseline and for eight subjects at EOT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol PopulationOswestry Disability Index (ODI)Baseline39.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Protocol PopulationOswestry Disability Index (ODI)EOT23.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Secondary

Pain Interference

Question 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-9) is a 7-part question that assesses the level of interference that subjects experience in their daily lives due to pain. The 7 categories are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Subjects were asked to rate how much their low back pain interferes with each aspect on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents Does Not Interfere and 10 represents Completely Interferes. The average of these 7 scores was calculated for each subject. The mean was taken across subjects for each time point.

Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

Population: Protocol Population presented. Data were not available for nine subjects at end of treatment (EOT).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol PopulationPain InterferenceBaseline5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Protocol PopulationPain InterferenceEOT2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) asks subjects to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale where 1 represents very much worse and 7 represents very much improved as compared to before stimulation treatment. The subjects combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. The number of participants with each rating after 8 weeks of treatment is reported here.

Time frame: 8-weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)

Population: Protocol Population presented. EOT data were not available for eight subjects.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Protocol PopulationPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveyVery Much Improved12 Participants
Protocol PopulationPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveyMuch Improved39 Participants
Protocol PopulationPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveyMinimally Improved23 Participants
Protocol PopulationPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveyNo Change8 Participants
Protocol PopulationPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveyMinimally Worse0 Participants
Protocol PopulationPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveyMuch Worse1 Participants
Protocol PopulationPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveyVery Much Worse0 Participants
Secondary

Worst Pain Intensity

All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their worst pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 3 (BPI-3). The BPI-3 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents No Pain and 10 represents Pain as bad as you can imagine. For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated. The mean score across all subjects for each time point is reported.

Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

Population: Protocol Population presented. EOT data were not available for eight subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol PopulationWorst Pain IntensityBaseline7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Protocol PopulationWorst Pain IntensityEOT4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026